Jump to content

Military officials held back National Guard on Jan. 6 because they feared Trump would use them to seize power:


Recommended Posts

"According to a report released last month, Christopher Miller, who served as acting Secretary of the Defense on Jan. 6, told the Department’s inspector general that he feared 'if we put U.S. military personnel on the Capitol, I would have created the greatest Constitutional crisis probably since the Civil War,'" noted Ryan Goodman and Justin Hendrix. "In congressional testimony, he said he was also cognizant of 'fears that the President would invoke the Insurrection Act to politicize the military in an anti-democratic manner' and that 'factored into my decisions regarding the appropriate and limited use of our Armed Forces to support civilian law enforcement during the Electoral College certification.'"

 

"It’s now clear that such concerns were shared by General Mark Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as well as former CIA Director and at the time Secretary of State Mike Pompeo," the report continued. "Before Nov. 3, Milley and Pompeo confided in one another that they had a persistent worry Trump would try to use the military in an attempt to hold onto power if he lost the election, the Washington Post’s Carol Leonnig and Philip Rucker reported. 'This military’s not going to be used,' Milley assured Pompeo."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Imgreatagain said:

Here you go again. Your only talking point. Ugh. 

so...you agree with ducky that the Army Chief of Staff, a highly decorated war veteran with over forty years of commissioned service,  is a "fucking pussy bitch"?

 

stay classy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, benson13 said:

"According to a report released last month, Christopher Miller, who served as acting Secretary of the Defense on Jan. 6, told the Department’s inspector general that he feared 'if we put U.S. military personnel on the Capitol, I would have created the greatest Constitutional crisis probably since the Civil War,'" noted Ryan Goodman and Justin Hendrix. "In congressional testimony, he said he was also cognizant of 'fears that the President would invoke the Insurrection Act to politicize the military in an anti-democratic manner' and that 'factored into my decisions regarding the appropriate and limited use of our Armed Forces to support civilian law enforcement during the Electoral College certification.'"

 

"It’s now clear that such concerns were shared by General Mark Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as well as former CIA Director and at the time Secretary of State Mike Pompeo," the report continued. "Before Nov. 3, Milley and Pompeo confided in one another that they had a persistent worry Trump would try to use the military in an attempt to hold onto power if he lost the election, the Washington Post’s Carol Leonnig and Philip Rucker reported. 'This military’s not going to be used,' Milley assured Pompeo."

 

I call bullshit.

 

This is a chance to blame something on someone the majority of Congress detest and move the focus off themselves.  That is easier to sell to the PPC rather than the "I held back the military and didn't protect Congress because I feared a constitutional crisis" defense.  Would the National Guard forces sent in been able to overpower the entire US military that was not sent into the Capital?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because some guy thought Trump may.....

 

What a bunch of BS...

 

During this same time we thought Trump would attack NK, refuse to leave the WH and flee to Scotland.

 

It's comical..

 

I'm still waiting for that pee tape

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, maineman said:

this is the coward talking about a guy with four bronze stars and three legions of merit.

 

now THAT is some funny shit!

Who should be hung for the Biden Afghan Disaster ?

 

1.  Joe Biden.

2.  Mark Milly.

3.  Lloyd "Affirmative Active" Austin.

4.  Antony Blinken.

 

They lied..........& people died.

13 dead Marines.

1000 Americans left behind.

60,000 Allies left behind to die.

85 Billion Dollar weapons cache left behind.    I wonder if Ukraine could use those weapons today ?

The entire world is laughing at the U.S. gutless surrender to the Taliban.

 

All of this was completely unnecessary.    It was man-made.....by the Dems.

This was the worst military disaster of my lifetime.

Joe & the Dem Team have blood on their hands.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Taipan said:

Who should be hung for the Biden Afghan Disaster ?

 

1.  Joe Biden.

2.  Mark Milly.

3.  Lloyd "Affirmative Active" Austin.

4.  Antony Blinken.

 

They lied..........& people died.

13 dead Marines.

1000 Americans left behind.

60,000 Allies left behind to die.

85 Billion Dollar weapons cache left behind.    I wonder if Ukraine could use those weapons today ?

The entire world is laughing at the U.S. gutless surrender to the Taliban.

 

All of this was completely unnecessary.    It was man-made.....by the Dems.

This was the worst military disaster of my lifetime.

Joe & the Dem Team have blood on their hands.

 

 Boo fucking hoo.

Trump is  Biden's bitch.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, benson13 said:

"According to a report released last month, Christopher Miller, who served as acting Secretary of the Defense on Jan. 6, told the Department’s inspector general that he feared 'if we put U.S. military personnel on the Capitol, I would have created the greatest Constitutional crisis probably since the Civil War,'" noted Ryan Goodman and Justin Hendrix. "In congressional testimony, he said he was also cognizant of 'fears that the President would invoke the Insurrection Act to politicize the military in an anti-democratic manner' and that 'factored into my decisions regarding the appropriate and limited use of our Armed Forces to support civilian law enforcement during the Electoral College certification.'"

 

"It’s now clear that such concerns were shared by General Mark Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as well as former CIA Director and at the time Secretary of State Mike Pompeo," the report continued. "Before Nov. 3, Milley and Pompeo confided in one another that they had a persistent worry Trump would try to use the military in an attempt to hold onto power if he lost the election, the Washington Post’s Carol Leonnig and Philip Rucker reported. 'This military’s not going to be used,' Milley assured Pompeo."

Great. So Milley is responsible for Jan 6th. 

 

Looks like Trump was right again. That guy is a fucking moron. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, benson13 said:

"Before Nov. 3, Milley and Pompeo confided in one another that they had a persistent worry Trump would try to use the military in an attempt to hold onto power if he lost the election, the Washington Post’s Carol Leonnig and Philip Rucker reported.

 

 

Ben Shapiro: It resulted from their own journalistic malfeasance for years on end....followed by their aggressive repetition of even the most thinly sourced scandal regarding Trump.
 

 

I have learned from a report published by CNN concerning former President Trump that according to a unnamed retired public information officer (formerly stationed at the Pentagon) who has extensive knowledge of a Trump cover up. He is very close to the source. His opinions are said to be respected by all his colleagues and he was the go to guy at work. Contacting the New York Times...he insisted he would only speak off the record fearing for his personal safety from Trump allied White nationalist.

 

The GS-15 named as the unofficial official source of much of the information is also described as a expert in Trump Organization matters. It has been alleged they (NYT) has seen copies of the email exchanges that contain undisclosed information that had unsterile politics at its core. The political narrative was in line with Trumps train of thought he revealed.  I am not exactly certain what the circumstances are which would give him the necessary access to see them. The emails appeared to purportedly show that he was cooperating with the Trump scandal investigation and Team Trump already had gotten wind of it.  He reports he personally heard the president airing petty, largely personal grievances against .......but much bigger things than that. His comments come amid growing warnings about baseless lawsuits concerning these types of baseless claims. 

 

Also a former communications director also who worked at The Pentagon claimed on a late night talk show that he personally interviewed a CNN employee who would only give his name as Jim A.  The CNN employee said he has proof the Trump's administration was plagued with controversies well before he was even sworn in.  The latest Trump unexpected revelation in addition to a blistering report leaked by a independent reporter has got the attention of the FBI which depicted a ever-expanding laundry list of accusations that has turned up nothing of great significance. The FBI promised they will continue to search for the truth and look in every corner. A top agent said many have promoted unfounded conspiracy theories that cast doubt on the needed integrity of further investigations but the FBI agent said we do not deal in rumors or half truths. The assumption that there is a real possibility of a Trump insider supplying information was marked by the characteristics of a earlier liberal era...so we must walk softly.

 

According to filings made in Federal District Court 136...that have not yet been unsealed...the FBI wouldn't say whether they're acting at the behest of the various Senators directly involved. This is why they refrained from leveling any possible false accusation while still maximizing criticisms based on what seems to be fabricated information reportedly from the official Chinese Media Daily.  During a press conference a close relative of the newspaper's driving hand...who was raised partly in San Francisco and partly in Hong Kong and speaks both English and Chinese flawless...insisted the papers he translated show the entire Trump apparatus is both detailed and highly ambiguous. A spokesperson for U.S. State Department New York Office directly involved offered a fresh reminder that many of these arguments against Trump...so far have been proven pointless when posted by the same Paper in thier English translation on line version. Yet he still offered a different assessment on popular thinking among the vast majority directly involved.

 

Another confidential leak claim...has kept busy website fact checker and lawyers for the Department of Justice closely monitoring the Trump situation.  According to the report the muted reaction from life long Trump advisers who gave no supported counter point was notable.  However that claim does not have the complete comprehension support of the intercircle and the scope they’re willing to make to cover up a alleged cover up so far.  This is not seen as a indication of how quick some are to point out that these Trump claims have been made before and never held up.  One tweet (which was later deleted) posted by a NY Times undercover reporter who was “preparing to publish a real truth smear job” with the NY Times cited as his source of information.  He went on to claim his account is directly from verified and fact checked NY Times souses."

 

A spokesperson for a possibly implicated Trump acquaintance's denied accusation of involvement in the scandal before hand with the released of a statement by his lawyer.  It was accommodating a photo of a alleged intoxicated Trump from a 1982 golf outing allegedly attacking him. This has ignited a new round of seemingly somewhat demeaning opinions to most concerned. The effect of these side effects has sent ripples thru the Serious Crime Review Team a secret Government agency within the CIA that allegedly shadows Secret Service agents tasked with guarding the ex-President and guards his secrets from out side his office time. This has not been confirmed except by the lowest levels of law enforcement inside the Beltway and since the subject is so highly classified it is a great example of what the precise problem Congress faces with the Trump investigation. Similarly, those who were willing to speak about the subject insisted it is a win for a complex nameless structure within the Trump Organization first revealed in a Newsweek article that lacked the authors name but is said to have been written by a well known whistleblower.

 

My source and political analyst on call...a retired KGB General now living in Florida under a assumed name because he was a CIA mole...later told other political insiders in a conference call that any of these arguments against the validity of the substance could be used as a defense only in a court of opinion. All agreed the three actual witnesses (tagged John Doe 1, 2 & 3) to the quintessential event(s) have taken the unprecedented move of pleading the fifth amendment even tho they were offered immunity.  Quoting a what it turns outs to be...a made up quote...the General declared this indicates a struggle within think tanks clustered in Baltimore...tho it was not clear which party he referenced...it is clearly understood who he meant tho. It should be noted the DNC refused to acknowledge the Trump situation lies and the Republicans said no comment BUT I am are not really sure what they meant by that. General Badanov (as he is informally known in Intelligence circles) claims it to be highly unlikely that any of these scores of investigation will bare fruit since Trump has been under investigation for approximately 4 years now. 


A Journalist investigators reached at (liberal college here) said it may be impossible to find anything that will stick after 4 years.  However these hacks still hold out for something to be found in a long forgotten water stained affidavit found in a unmarked box at a former Trump NYC property he sold 25 years ago.  And even tho it's authenticity can not be guaranteed...those who maintain that Trump has committed a illegal indiscretion here...have accused several of his aides...in the very least of violating their professional code of conduct and ethics when they refused to cooperate over the newly found envelope.  

 

Also with the investigation into a confrontation that accorded in the Halls of Congress when first brought out. The ring leader who was a once titanic figure in state politics was thought to have been publicly questioned about this and quickly reminded all present he voted no...to not authorize a bill that would not pass the buck.  He had no contemptuous words for his counter Congressmember after a small pushing match according to eyewitnesses but that is questionable.  Anyone really familiar with all of these Trump controversies know it is not debatable since they have not repeated the same argument and yet oddly enough they ignored the safety net put in place. And no they think this well written, law will sabotage itself...with not even knowing it. 
 
A Congress woman known only by three initials says in a summary...Trump should have been impeached over things said in leaked call to a official from (as she called it) a finically struggling state. She later admitted that she had not listened to the entire call and things could have been taken out of literal context of which she had been told.  Despite this...the prosecutors office saying we can’t let it dominate us under the cloud of empowering a ninnyhammer (or some other word) has come into question. However it has sparked a new legal dialogue among the Democrats with regard to Trump's attempt to allegedly fundamentally transform America into a capitalist's paradise ...where the rich pay no taxes at all.  Although it may be delayed due to the pandemic a public town house meeting at a unknown location has been set for a future date that will be released later this week to discuss this. Tho the name of the monitor has not been released yet it has already being called a well planned event and great expiations are expected.

 

On another front a local RTV newscaster from Idaho said that (without naming names) he was certain many Trump critics had negative opinions on the entire debacle but kept them to themselves for business reason.  This claim is obviously false since there is no way to measure non-expressed opinions. Now the story is everywhere, and it likely won’t leave the MSM news cycle anytime soon. It seems this professional Trump hater is morally responsible for provoking a thrown them under the bus mentality.   It’s the latest development in the Trump no scandal-scandal to rock a public study group located on E St. who claims they were the first to expose that the Trump Origination  (eg) spy networks have been uncovered and that the structures were modelled directly from the Soviet Unions play book.

 

However while unctuously trying to please Joe Biden's fan base...they did not mention these are legal acts in 48 states and all American extensions.  A former FBI agent (now a Private Detective) was hired by The Atlantic Magazine to look into this and found no wrongdoing in Trumps behavior concerning the matter.   He waivered his investigation fee and thru his book publisher called it a extremely flirtatious of illegality and manipulating 2nd amendment freedom from all around it.  The primary reasons he claims can be found inside the Old School Bag of Tricks since they are characteristics from a earlier period entirely.

 

In a recent interview the head spokeswoman for a Denver secret reach center pointed out The Washington Post makes claims against President Trump but does supply any evidence to back up thier continual ambiguous headlines...which is a well known tactic of thiers, used to spread disinformation in support of the agenda. A good example of this is the on going story where they cite unspecific people who may or may not be telling the truth but than make up a story around their statements as if it was fact. These reports are often engineered to appeal to one's emotions. Mister Trump has been accused of using a distorted counter version of what are called his no-show up jobs for Democrat's donators.  According to a new book (soon to come out) written by two prize-winning reporters from the NY Times...Trump told his staff that he did not want a certain close confidants of a highly placed Democrat boss to know what he was thinking.  

 

The head spokesman when on to say to describe the Trump matter in simple terms...the informants have led us to nothing other than rumors, rambling monologues and inaudible secretly made recordings. The contents of that audiotape, with alleged time codes has never been heard except by those who have claimed to have heard it.  According to an internal report circulated by the Department of Homeland Security last week and obtained by Yahoo News (who are holding on tight to the details) repeated Trump alleged infractions.  Yahoo News did not elaborate on why they are so closed mouth about it but one can only suspect the National Council's finance committee will be taking this to the floor in the next session of the house; and it will be release than for maximum political effect.

 

A random (possibly intoxicated) passerby at the Washington Monument was asked for a comment to add to this article. I asked him how he felt about all this Trump scandal stuff...to which he replied I really don't give a Fuck and kept walking.  Later I asked a random woman how she felt Trump is effecting the Country and she responded Most Politian's immediately resort to obsequious diversion as a defense and even more for offence. She later revealed during the conversation she was a Catholic Nun but does not wear a habit for numerous reasons.  When contacted the Catholic Arch Diocese in the District...the person who answered the phone said they are not authorized to speak on this or any other Trump matter and hung up.  

 

A Russian Federation Embassy spokesperson (not yet identified) in Chicago took the same position.  However a North Korean United Nations ethics expert tho aloof pointed to a litany of Trumps failures and achievement all in one sentence specifically targeting both.  A former trash truck driver...from Iceland now living in Arlington, VA said in broken English They all much time on thier hands. Stop fussing and get the GD  putting Trump in jail done. When asked if he knew if Trump was 100% guilty he said Of course is he...he guilt all the news papers and all the TVs...so it must be true.
 
In closing I would like to mention it is being speculated that President Obama acknowledged that he has refused to admit he had never heard about any of these things. He expressed surprise...when asked why but claims that he genuinely understands things now.

 

I have reached out by email to all major mainstream media management for a comment on these Trump allegations...among others things. But despite a weeks wait they all have not respond to my request.  As of this writing I am not aware of any attempt both publicly or privately for the MSM to clarify or deny...any or all of this and I still question if the did their research.

 

A Supreme ruling is expected soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, maineman said:

so...you agree with ducky that the Army Chief of Staff, a highly decorated war veteran with over forty years of commissioned service,  is a "fucking pussy bitch"?

 

stay classy.

I do. He should be stripped of all honors and hung like the traitor he is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, maineman said:

a highly decorated war veteran with over forty years of commissioned service,  is a "fucking pussy bitch"?

 

When I was in the Army I worked with a E-6P (busted as a E-7) who had more ribbons than you could count. I said Dam...SGT Pitts...you must have been in some real action when you were in Vietnam.

 

He told me he was stationed in Saigon and never heard one shot.  When I gave him a odd look he told he legally award them all to himself and had his section chief sign off on them.  The rub was...every soldier in Vietnam was entitled to them (and thier promotion points) and that as a personal SGT he knew what to put in for.

 

Dam mainvain...I thought you said you were in the service. You oughta know after officers go up in rank and are going to stick around it becomes political and they give you awards for stuff like not getting any speeding tickets.

 

Again I say: ultraliberals despise Christians and the Military unless they suit the agenda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Old Mack said:

 

When I was in the Army I worked with a E-6P (busted as a E-7) who had more ribbons than you could count. I said Dam...SGT Pitts...you must have been in some real action when you were in Vietnam.

 

He told he was stationed in Saigon and never heard one shot.  When I gave him a odd look he told he legally award them all to himself and had his section chief sign off on them.  The rub was...every soldier in Vietnam was entitled to them (and thier promotion points) and that as a personal SGT he knew what to put in for.

@mainemanis a perfect example of how their service to this country doesn’t mean a fucking thing, the traitorous fascist pigs.

 

The military, CIA, FBI, DOJ all need a compete house cleaning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, benson13 said:

"According to a report released last month, Christopher Miller, who served as acting Secretary of the Defense on Jan. 6, told the Department’s inspector general that he feared 'if we put U.S. military personnel on the Capitol, I would have created the greatest Constitutional crisis probably since the Civil War,'" noted Ryan Goodman and Justin Hendrix. "In congressional testimony, he said he was also cognizant of 'fears that the President would invoke the Insurrection Act to politicize the military in an anti-democratic manner' and that 'factored into my decisions regarding the appropriate and limited use of our Armed Forces to support civilian law enforcement during the Electoral College certification.'"

 

"It’s now clear that such concerns were shared by General Mark Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as well as former CIA Director and at the time Secretary of State Mike Pompeo," the report continued. "Before Nov. 3, Milley and Pompeo confided in one another that they had a persistent worry Trump would try to use the military in an attempt to hold onto power if he lost the election, the Washington Post’s Carol Leonnig and Philip Rucker reported. 'This military’s not going to be used,' Milley assured Pompeo."

 

 The fact is that Trump was the commander in Chief at the time according to his four year public service contract.

 

Who the hell are these people and who were they working for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, bigmike1256 said:

The Pinkish Orange Pig Man is Gone.

 

Is he? Seems to me he haunts your nightmares.

 

13 hours ago, bigmike1256 said:

Joe Biden is your president. If you can't live with that, Off Yourself!

 

You're the one still crying about Trump winning an election five years ago, even though he who shall not be blamed is now president.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...