Jump to content

Bio-ethics and mRNA technology


Recommended Posts

This technology is new, regardless of what some may try to make you believe.   Up until a year ago, it had never been approved for the treatment of anything because all clinical trials had failed.    

 

Fast forward 12 months, and we are technically still in the clinical trial phase of the Covid vaccine.   While I have no problem whatsoever with using this technology on people who are at risk and have been educated about any potential dangers, the approach our government has taken seems to have significantly stepped over the line of what is ethical.   Even the hint of making something like this mandatory is a huge breach as far as I'm concerned.   And then we have this:

 

 

 

Do they even consider whether or not these kids benefit at all from the shot?   Apparently not, because 2 did jack crap.   So why continue to pump more and more doses with no evidence that it can work, and no long term studies on potential side effects?    

 

 

  • MORON! 1
  • Thumb up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, crazyhole said:

This technology is new, regardless of what some may try to make you believe.   Up until a year ago, it had never been approved for the treatment of anything because all clinical trials had failed.    

 

Fast forward 12 months, and we are technically still in the clinical trial phase of the Covid vaccine.   While I have no problem whatsoever with using this technology on people who are at risk and have been educated about any potential dangers, the approach our government has taken seems to have significantly stepped over the line of what is ethical.   Even the hint of making something like this mandatory is a huge breach as far as I'm concerned.   And then we have this:

 

 

 

Do they even consider whether or not these kids benefit at all from the shot?   Apparently not, because 2 did jack crap.   So why continue to pump more and more doses with no evidence that it can work, and no long term studies on potential side effects?    

 

 

You’re exactly right. As RN’s we HAVE to have informed consent on ALL vaccines because every vaccine poses risks.

 

We cannot ethically get informed consent on covid vaccines because we don’t have the informed part yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, crazyhole said:

This technology is new, regardless of what some may try to make you believe.   Up until a year ago, it had never been approved for the treatment of anything because all clinical trials had failed.    

 

Fast forward 12 months, and we are technically still in the clinical trial phase of the Covid vaccine.   While I have no problem whatsoever with using this technology on people who are at risk and have been educated about any potential dangers, the approach our government has taken seems to have significantly stepped over the line of what is ethical.   Even the hint of making something like this mandatory is a huge breach as far as I'm concerned.   And then we have this:

 

 

 

Do they even consider whether or not these kids benefit at all from the shot?   Apparently not, because 2 did jack crap.   So why continue to pump more and more doses with no evidence that it can work, and no long term studies on potential side effects?    

 

 

Just follow the narrative by the left...you'd be braindead to know it's not scripted...their Fearporn has risen to hyperbolic levels again reaching code hysterical...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, crazyhole said:

This technology is new, regardless of what some may try to make you believe.   Up until a year ago, it had never been approved for the treatment of anything because all clinical trials had failed.    

 

Fast forward 12 months, and we are technically still in the clinical trial phase of the Covid vaccine.   While I have no problem whatsoever with using this technology on people who are at risk and have been educated about any potential dangers, the approach our government has taken seems to have significantly stepped over the line of what is ethical.   Even the hint of making something like this mandatory is a huge breach as far as I'm concerned.   And then we have this:

 

 

 

Do they even consider whether or not these kids benefit at all from the shot?   Apparently not, because 2 did jack crap.   So why continue to pump more and more doses with no evidence that it can work, and no long term studies on potential side effects?    

 

 

FROM THE RELEASE OF THE VACCINE, PEOPLE HAVE BEEN USED AS TEST SUBJECTS. 

NORMAL TRIAL PERIODS RANGE FROM 5-10 YEARS.Making Vaccines: Process of Vaccine Development | Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (chop.edu)

THEN WHEN THEY ANNOUNCED FDA APPROVAL, IT ONLY APPLIED TO A PRODUCT NAMED COMIRNATY  WHICH THE U.S. DID NOT HAVE. 

NOW THEY ARE USING CHILDREN AS TEST SUBJECTS  Why has Pfizer changed the formulation of its Covid-19 Vaccine for Children to include an ingredient that stabilises people suffering a Heart Attack? – The Expose (dailyexpose.uk)

 

THERE WILL BE LONG TERM DAMAGE TO ALL THAT HAVE TAKEN THE VACCINE.

RESEARCH HAS SHOWN RISKS OF PRION DISEASE COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease (scivisionpub.com)

 AUTO-IMMUNE DISEASE AND ORGAN FAILURE The Dangers of The Covid-19 “Vaccine” UPDATED (Video) | SOTN: Alternative News, Analysis & Commentary (stateofthenation.co)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, crazyhole said:

This technology is new, regardless of what some may try to make you believe.   Up until a year ago, it had never been approved for the treatment of anything because all clinical trials had failed.    

 

Fast forward 12 months, and we are technically still in the clinical trial phase of the Covid vaccine.   While I have no problem whatsoever with using this technology on people who are at risk and have been educated about any potential dangers, the approach our government has taken seems to have significantly stepped over the line of what is ethical.   Even the hint of making something like this mandatory is a huge breach as far as I'm concerned.   And then we have this:

 

 

 

Do they even consider whether or not these kids benefit at all from the shot?   Apparently not, because 2 did jack crap.   So why continue to pump more and more doses with no evidence that it can work, and no long term studies on potential side effects?    

 

 

Kennedy dredges up this dark, forgotten history of NIAID experiments in which, in New York state alone, at least 523 infants and children who tested positive for HIV were given potently toxic AIDS drugs like AZT and Nevirapine. Hundreds of children died and were buried in plain wooden coffins stacked in a mass grave — all under the oversight of “America’s Doctor.” It’s a chapter of Fauci’s history that, as chief marketing agent of Pfizer and other drug companies currently promoting experimental COVID injections to healthy children, is suddenly relevant again.

In 2004, journalist Liam Scheff published his shocking investigative report on HIV drug experiments inside a four-story brick institute called the Incarnation Children’s Center, run by Columbia University’s Presbyterian Hospital in affiliation with the Catholic Archdiocese of New York.

Brain damage and bone marrow death

Scheff had discovered that children at this orphanage were being used as guinea pigs. “The drugs being given to the children are toxic — they’re known to cause genetic mutation, organ failure, bone marrow death, bodily deformations, brain damage, and fatal skin disorders,” he wrote.

“If the children refuse the drugs, they’re held down and force-fed. If the children continue to resist, they’re taken to Columbia Presbyterian hospital, where a surgeon puts a plastic tube through their abdominal wall into their stomachs. From then on, the drugs are injected directly into their intestines.”

 

Mass grave of children

For the children under Fauci’s HIV regime, it was a nightmare. Scheff interviewed staff and child care workers at ICC who recounted their suffering:

One girl, a six-year-old, Shyanne — she came in for adherence. She was the most delicate little flower — beautiful, polite, full of life. Her family never gave her meds. So, Administration for Children’s Services brought her into ICC … she came in and started the meds. And it was three months, maybe three months. And she had a stroke. She could not see. She was this normal girl, singing, jumping, playing. Then, poof, stroked out. Blind. We were freaked out. Then in a few months, she was gone — dead.

 

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/fauci-approved-aids-drugs-toxic-for-adults-to-be-tested-on-orphans-foster-kids-rfk-jr-says-in-new-book/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...