Jump to content

Democrat Adam Schiff doctored text messages between Mark Meadows and Jim Jordan during Monday's Jan. 6 hearings...


ROG62
 Share

Recommended Posts

Oops, he did it again. After leaking fake Donald Trump, Jr. emails, fabricating the transcript of a 2019 phone call between former President Donald Trump and Ukraine’s president, and lying about his interactions with the so-called whistleblower behind House Democrats’ first impeachment of Trump, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., is now running the same con against a fellow lawmaker. During a hearing Monday night on the riot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, Adam Schiff claimed to have proof that a member of Congress texted former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows to instruct former Vice President Mike Pence to overturn the 2020 presidential election results.

Not only did Schiff misrepresent the substance of the text message and its source, he even doctored original text messages, which were obtained and reviewed by The Federalist in their entirety.

 

https://thefederalist.com/2021/12/15/during-january-6-hearing-schiff-doctored-text-messages-between-mark-meadows-and-rep-jim-jordan/

 

SHITHEAD schiff doing what he does best....LIE, CHEAT, RINSE, REPEAT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ROG62 said:

Oops, he did it again. After leaking fake Donald Trump, Jr. emails, fabricating the transcript of a 2019 phone call between former President Donald Trump and Ukraine’s president, and lying about his interactions with the so-called whistleblower behind House Democrats’ first impeachment of Trump, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., is now running the same con against a fellow lawmaker. During a hearing Monday night on the riot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, Adam Schiff claimed to have proof that a member of Congress texted former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows to instruct former Vice President Mike Pence to overturn the 2020 presidential election results.

Not only did Schiff misrepresent the substance of the text message and its source, he even doctored original text messages, which were obtained and reviewed by The Federalist in their entirety.

 

https://thefederalist.com/2021/12/15/during-january-6-hearing-schiff-doctored-text-messages-between-mark-meadows-and-rep-jim-jordan/

 

SHITHEAD schiff doing what he does best....LIE, CHEAT, RINSE, REPEAT

 

 

https://www.good.is/articles/donald-trump-jr-russia-other-shoe-drops

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ROG62 said:

Oops, he did it again. After leaking fake Donald Trump, Jr. emails, fabricating the transcript of a 2019 phone call between former President Donald Trump and Ukraine’s president, and lying about his interactions with the so-called whistleblower behind House Democrats’ first impeachment of Trump, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., is now running the same con against a fellow lawmaker. During a hearing Monday night on the riot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, Adam Schiff claimed to have proof that a member of Congress texted former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows to instruct former Vice President Mike Pence to overturn the 2020 presidential election results.

Not only did Schiff misrepresent the substance of the text message and its source, he even doctored original text messages, which were obtained and reviewed by The Federalist in their entirety.

 

https://thefederalist.com/2021/12/15/during-january-6-hearing-schiff-doctored-text-messages-between-mark-meadows-and-rep-jim-jordan/

 

SHITHEAD schiff doing what he does best....LIE, CHEAT, RINSE, REPEAT

CNN 

Follow

Jim Jordan sent one of the texts revealed by January 6 committee
 

 

https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/15/politics/jim-jordan-mark-meadows-text/index.html

 

Not even a mention of the doctored and taken out of context messages lol…

 

The left calls this garbage REAL journalism. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, drvoke said:

I think he was just editing for clarity.

 

 

the text. 

 

-------

 

On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all the electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all — in accordance with guidance from founding father Alexander Hamilton and judicial precedence,” Schmitz's original text read. “‘No legislative act,’ wrote Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 78, ‘contrary to the Constitution, can be valid.’ The court in Hubbard v. Lowe reinforced this truth: ‘That an unconstitutional statute is not a law at all is a proposition no longer open to discussion.’ 226 F. 135, 137 (SDNY 1915), appeal dismissed, 242 U.S. 654 (1916).”

“Following this rationale, an unconstitutionally appointed elector, like an unconstitutionally enacted statute, is no elector at all,” Schmitz's text continued.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, ROG62 said:

Oops, he did it again. After leaking fake Donald Trump, Jr. emails, fabricating the transcript of a 2019 phone call between former President Donald Trump and Ukraine’s president, and lying about his interactions with the so-called whistleblower behind House Democrats’ first impeachment of Trump, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., is now running the same con against a fellow lawmaker. During a hearing Monday night on the riot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, Adam Schiff claimed to have proof that a member of Congress texted former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows to instruct former Vice President Mike Pence to overturn the 2020 presidential election results.

Not only did Schiff misrepresent the substance of the text message and its source, he even doctored original text messages, which were obtained and reviewed by The Federalist in their entirety.

 

https://thefederalist.com/2021/12/15/during-january-6-hearing-schiff-doctored-text-messages-between-mark-meadows-and-rep-jim-jordan/

 

SHITHEAD schiff doing what he does best....LIE, CHEAT, RINSE, REPEAT

That little pencil-neck prick really needs to get what he has coming to him.  I have faith that someday he will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, drvoke said:

I think he was just editing for clarity.

 

 

hubbard vs lowe was about cotton prices, nothing about elections.

 

 

----------------

 

https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrUjdPoRrthYhEAWAAPxQt.;_ylu=Y29sbwNncTEEcG9zAzEEdnRpZAMEc2VjA3Ny/RV=2/RE=1639692137/RO=10/RU=https%3a%2f%2fwww.conservapedia.com%2fHubbard_v._Lowe/RK=2/RS=vbFSC0jifD_vne7LF8XPuGalIiM-

 

 

The decision in Hubbard v. Lowe, 226 F. 135 (S.D.N.Y. 1915), appeal dismissed, 242 U.S. 654 (1916), is the leading precedent for striking down a federal statute as unconstitutional under the Origination Clause.

The trial Judge Charles Merrill Hough was presented with a challenge to the constitutionality of the Cotton Futures Act of 1914, which was major federal legislation attempting to reduce speculative trading in cotton futures, by regulating color, quality and other attributes of cotton. Judge Hough observed that:

[E]very one who has studied the investigations, reports, and discussions preceding and producing that passage of the act knows that nothing was further from the intent or desire of the lawmakers than the production of revenue, nevertheless the result of their efforts is a revenue bill within the constitutional meaning.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jerra- said:

 

 

hubbard vs lowe was about cotton prices, nothing about elections.

 

 

----------------

The decision in Hubbard v. Lowe, 226 F. 135 (S.D.N.Y. 1915), appeal dismissed, 242 U.S. 654 (1916), is the leading precedent for striking down a federal statute as unconstitutional under the Origination Clause.

The trial Judge Charles Merrill Hough was presented with a challenge to the constitutionality of the Cotton Futures Act of 1914, which was major federal legislation attempting to reduce speculative trading in cotton futures, by regulating color, quality and other attributes of cotton. Judge Hough observed that:

[E]very one who has studied the investigations, reports, and discussions preceding and producing that passage of the act knows that nothing was further from the intent or desire of the lawmakers than the production of revenue, nevertheless the result of their efforts is a revenue bill within the constitutional meaning.

Cotton is white.....you racist, privileged bitch.

  • Haha 1
  • MORON! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ROG62 said:

Oops, he did it again. After leaking fake Donald Trump, Jr. emails, fabricating the transcript of a 2019 phone call between former President Donald Trump and Ukraine’s president, and lying about his interactions with the so-called whistleblower behind House Democrats’ first impeachment of Trump, Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., is now running the same con against a fellow lawmaker. During a hearing Monday night on the riot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, Adam Schiff claimed to have proof that a member of Congress texted former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows to instruct former Vice President Mike Pence to overturn the 2020 presidential election results.

Not only did Schiff misrepresent the substance of the text message and its source, he even doctored original text messages, which were obtained and reviewed by The Federalist in their entirety.

 

https://thefederalist.com/2021/12/15/during-january-6-hearing-schiff-doctored-text-messages-between-mark-meadows-and-rep-jim-jordan/

 

SHITHEAD schiff doing what he does best....LIE, CHEAT, RINSE, REPEAT

What this latest crime by Schiff implies is that The Dems and RINO'S like Cheney have become so emboldened by their grip on all 3 branches that they no longer need to worry about any consequences for their actions.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Whitemajikman said:

What this latest crime by Schiff implies is that The Dems and RINO'S like Cheney have become so emboldened by their grip on all 3 branches that they no longer need to worry about any consequences for their actions.

 

To them, it's business as usual...no ethics necessary...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ROG62 said:

They may know something we don't...

They have been exhibiting this behaviour since 2015.

When their Party created the Russia hoax out of thin air in conjunction with their partisan beaurecratic operatives, their partisan media and their partisan big tech partnerships.

At that point they already had  absolute control of our government.

Trump disrupted their agenda for 4 years because they miscalculated his popularity ......

 

 

 

  • Thumb up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Whitemajikman said:

What this latest crime by Schiff implies is that The Dems and RINO'S like Cheney have become so emboldened by their grip on all 3 branches that they no longer need to worry about any consequences for their actions.

 

 

 

----------

 

Indeed, as the Washington Post noted on Tuesday, “The emails between President Trump’s oldest son and an intermediary for the Russians provide the clearest indication to date that Trump campaign officials and family members were at least prepared to do business with a foreign adversary in the mutual goal of taking down Hillary Clinton.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ROG62 said:

To them, it's business as usual...no ethics necessary...

 

 

to what extent does this clear anyone?

 

---------------------------------------------

 

the TEXT

 

On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all the electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all — in accordance with guidance from founding father Alexander Hamilton and judicial precedence,” Schmitz's original text read. “‘No legislative act,’ wrote Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 78, ‘contrary to the Constitution, can be valid.’ The court in Hubbard v. Lowe reinforced this truth: ‘That an unconstitutional statute is not a law at all is a proposition no longer open to discussion.’ 226 F. 135, 137 (SDNY 1915), appeal dismissed, 242 U.S. 654 (1916).”

“Following this rationale, an unconstitutionally appointed elector, like an unconstitutionally enacted statute, is no elector at all,” Schmitz's text continued.

 

----------------

 

@slideman    @drvoke

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...