Jump to content

Fox hosts' public spin vs. private pleas


calguy
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yes, nut jobs, I know this is CNN, but they're using the hypocrites' at FuxNews own words. What Fux viewer can say he isn't being duped?

CNN rolls tape on Fox hosts' public spin vs. private pleas (CNN)

As Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham and Brian Kilmeade were frantically texting Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows on the day of the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection, CNN's John Berman shows how the Fox News anchors were reporting the event publicly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, RebelGator said:

No one gives a shit about that protest......just like you fuckwads didn't give a shit about the nigger protests during the summer.

The Fux news propagandists were very concerned indeed. You apparently didn't view the viseo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, calguy said:

The Fux news propagandists were very concerned indeed. You apparently didn't view the viseo.

Trump 137-140 politicians he has endorsed has won. 

 

Americans really don't give a fuck about your hyper-partisan witch hunt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Str8tEdge said:

Trump 137-140 politicians he has endorsed has won. 

 

Americans really don't give a fuck about your hyper-partisan witch hunt. 

Is your magic link going to be your go to response now for everything you want to deflect attention from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The difference between Fox News pundits and CNN: Fox has always been, since day one, deliberately deceitful and a cabal of shameless hypocrites. They are lying scum who would sell their mothers out for a nickel. The pundits at CNN are idealistic and deluded morons. TDS-afflicted dopes who see the world through orange-tinted glasses. Their utopia would be a nightmare even if it was practical. Fox's would be worse. They would be merciless slavers in every aspect of society. And this country would be awash with blood. I detest all of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, calguy said:

Take out your lies first and there will be no fraudulent ballots.

If they were lies, you’d prove those hundreds of credible allegations of fraud false. 
 

You haven’t. Every forensic investigation done has found fraud. 
 

 

  • great post 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, crazyhole said:

Are these texts the worst thing they found on Meadows phone?   

I think the committee is only releasing what they have to release. Odds are they have tons of damning testimony we don't yet know about.

Remember, toadies like Bannon and Meadows are getting all the press because they refuse to cooperate. 

What's not being widely reported is the three hundred or so government officials who HAVE given testimony. Those are the folks trump needs to worry about.

I don't think the committee is showing their full hand just yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Str8tEdge said:

If they were lies, you’d prove those hundreds of credible allegations of fraud false. 
 

You haven’t. Every forensic investigation done has found fraud. 
 

 

It's your responsibility to prove your false claims in a court of law. You haven't and you can't. 

Just because gatewaypundit says it happened, doesn't mean it did. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, calguy said:

It's your responsibility to prove your false claims in a court of law. You haven't and you can't. 

Just because gatewaypundit says it happened, doesn't mean it did. 

That would involve actual forensic investigations the left has done everything possible to keep from happening. 😄

 

Why is that? 
 

Everyone an actual investigation is done fraud has been found.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Str8tEdge said:

That would involve actual forensic investigations the left has done everything possible to keep from happening. 😄

 

Why is that? 
 

Everyone an actual investigation is done fraud has been found.  

Sorry asshole. Your shit was old a year ago, but yet you still use it. Pathetic at best.

  • Thumb up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, calguy said:

I think the committee is only releasing what they have to release. Odds are they have tons of damning testimony we don't yet know about.

Remember, toadies like Bannon and Meadows are getting all the press because they refuse to cooperate. 

What's not being widely reported is the three hundred or so government officials who HAVE given testimony. Those are the folks trump needs to worry about.

I don't think the committee is showing their full hand just yet.

Seems odd that if they have some kind of Bombshell that this would be worth making an issue out of, because it really doesn't even seem newsworthy.   

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, calguy said:

Sorry asshole. Your shit was old a year ago, but yet you still use it. Pathetic at best.

Sorry, motherfucker. When you call it a lie it’s YOUR fucking claim to prove. 
 

You have ZERO evidence it’s a lie and there’s mounds of evidence it’s true so fuck off, bitch. 

  • great post 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, crazyhole said:

Seems odd that if they have some kind of Bombshell that this would be worth making an issue out of, because it really doesn't even seem newsworthy.   

Lol…. It’s not newsworthy, at all. 
 

The lefts desperation is starting to stink up the entire country. 

  • great post 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Str8tEdge said:

Sorry, motherfucker. When you call it a lie it’s YOUR fucking claim to prove. 
 

You have ZERO evidence it’s a lie and there’s mounds of evidence it’s true so fuck off, bitch. 

The lies you believe were used to cover up trump's lies which you also believed.

It's easy to lie to someone who wants to believe. You dumbfucks wanted trump to stay in office so bad you want to believe anything anyone tells you that Biden didn't win, even though he did.

It was so easy for you to believe trump's lies. You and your ilk are easy marks for a con man like trump.

 

  • great post 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, crazyhole said:

Seems odd that if they have some kind of Bombshell that this would be worth making an issue out of, because it really doesn't even seem newsworthy.   

They used it to argue as to why Meadows refuses to be questioned about the very material he gave the committee. They're playing chess and you only know how to play checkers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...