Jump to content
Guests feel free to register and post ×
WELCOME NEW MEMBERS AND GUESTS FEEL FREE TO REGISTER AND POST ×
WELCOME NEW MEMBERS AND GUESTS ×
guests can now post ×
welcome guests . feel free to test the waters. ×

Should a person with two perfectly good kidneys


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

11 hours ago, Golfboy said:

Murdering a baby because it's inconvenient to your immoral lifestyle is not acceptable.

If you don't want a baby, don't get pregnant.  

Women aren't animals who are slaves to their baser sexual instincts. 

 

Bullshit, panty-wadder. 
 

Does God murdering a baby after it’s born more palpable for you?

 

A woman’s body= her choice. The fetus is only along for the ride. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, crazyhole said:

Maybe a better analogy is whether we should have the right to eliminate people that leech off of the system.    If you can justify the killing of a fetus because it requires a host to keep it alive, why can't that same standard be used for welfare recipients?

 

Hashtag eugenics.  

That’s murder. 
 

A fetus’ rights do not Trump an actual fully formed human being. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Pastafarian said:

Be forced to donate a kidney to save a sick person’s life?

 

No?  I would hope. 
 

Then why should a woman be forced to have an unwanted baby instead of an abortion? Especialy within the first trimester when it is least evasive and most humane. 

 

 


pssssst. MORON.


YOUR KIDNEYS have the SAME IDENTICAL DNA.

 

A BABY in the mothers womb DOES NOT HAVE THE SAME IDENTICAL MOTHER'S DNA!!!

 

"Most Humane" is your way of saying MURDER without any consequences, huh, SHITSTAIN???

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Blue Devil said:

 

Your argument is unsound... bordering on infantile.

 

A baby - is not part of the mother... any more that a passenger is part of your car (considered castle).

 

Stopping a human heartbeat is murder.

 

Stopping a human heartbeat in your car... is still murder.

 

Get it.

 

 

^^^^

 

Expects me to support every baby momma in the hood. No thanks. You can sign up for that if you want to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pastafarian said:

Lots of women don’t know they’re pregnant at six weeks. 

well if you're fucking everything that walks then test yourself or prepare to deal with the consequences of your own retarded decisions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pastafarian said:

Bullshit, panty-wadder. 
 

Does God murdering a baby after it’s born more palpable for you?

 

A woman’s body= her choice. The fetus is only along for the ride. 

 

 

So, as long as the woman consents, I should be allowed to go in and harvest body parts from an 8-month old fetus.  Maybe, I want to keep it alive as long as possible, so I would start harvesting parts around month 7, and grab the cranial  parts and vital organs toward month 9, if I can keep it alive that long. 

 

Or, what if I feel like experimenting on the Fetus - the pregnant lady donated her live fetus for "scientific study".  Maybe I'd try to make a hybrid by replacing Fetal arms with canine legs, or give it 7 eyes, and then kill it off on month 8.9.

 

Or, maybe, a pregnant mother can pimp out her body to would-be baby-murders who get off on poking live Fetuses with knitting needles just for kicks and giggles to watch them squirm in pain using an ultrasound machine.  It's not a life; just along for the ride; so I guess, the mom can make some extra money finding sickos who get off on things like this.  Maybe even start a Fetal-Torture porn site and make tons of money. That's ok with you, because the fetus is just along for the ride - has no rights whatsoever. I just want to make sure I understand where you stand on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the teaser title I wondered if it was going to be followed by "Should a person with two perfectly good kidneys take Remdesivir."

 

"You may not be aware of this that Remdesivir, 6% of patients that took Remdesivir developed atrial fibrillation, which is a dangerous cardiac arrhythmia, 1% had cardiac arrest, 23% had liver dysfunction, 15% had kidney dysfunction."

"STUDY: Remdesivir Does Not Reduce COVID Mortality" (or shorten hospital stay)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, drvoke said:

 

 

^^^^

 

Expects me to support every baby momma in the hood. No thanks. You can sign up for that if you want to.

If you pay Federal income tax, you're already supporting every baby momma in the hood.

 

You're already signed up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, rippy38 said:

If you pay Federal income tax, you're already supporting every baby momma in the hood.

 

You're already signed up.

 

The difference being the number we have signed up for. My policies would discourage procreation, his would increase it. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pastafarian said:

The baby does not have the mental capacity to make any choices. The baby can’t even live on it’s own for the first trimester and a lot of the second. 

Neither do infants, or most toddlers. Should we just throw them in trash bags if it isn’t working out ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Skans said:

Well, if they live in Texas, they will now.

 

22 hours ago, MidnightMax said:


pssssst. MORON.


YOUR KIDNEYS have the SAME IDENTICAL DNA.

 

A BABY in the mothers womb DOES NOT HAVE THE SAME IDENTICAL MOTHER'S DNA!!!

 

"Most Humane" is your way of saying MURDER without any consequences, huh, SHITSTAIN???

 

 

Then that unwanted baby should find other residence. 
 

Sorry, clown, a woman’s choice is not murder. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Imgreatagain said:

Neither do infants, or most toddlers. Should we just throw them in trash bags if it isn’t working out ? 

No bcuz those are wanted. 
 

You seem to have trouble distinguishing between wanted children and unwanted pregnancies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pastafarian said:

No bcuz those are wanted. 
 

You seem to have trouble distinguishing between wanted children and unwanted pregnancies. 

You seem to put value on a life at a time that YOU think makes sense. 
clearly you’ve never been pregnant.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...