Jump to content
Guests feel free to register and post ×
WELCOME NEW MEMBERS AND GUESTS FEEL FREE TO REGISTER AND POST ×
WELCOME NEW MEMBERS AND GUESTS ×

Ivermectin proven effective against covid


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, calguy said:

If they got themselves vaccinated, they wouldn't have to worry about getting the virus in the first place. Their chances of getting infected are greatly reduced.

How do you know this since the majority of vaxxed people aren't being tested after the jab?

 

And when I say majority, I mean most... like almost all of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, calguy said:

A trip through the ICU ward of any hospital will tell you how wrong you are.

The ICU ward's are almost always full ...

Especially at this time of year....

The start of Influenza season ...

Now ...considering this and the fact that PCR tests can't differentiate between influenza A or B and covid ....

How many are in those beds suffering from complications due too influenza A or B ?

Funny how they stopped releasing data on influenza ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rippy38 said:

How do you know this since the majority of vaxxed people aren't being tested after the jab?

 

And when I say majority, I mean most... like almost all of them.

No amount of evidence can convince you of a truth you refuse to accept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, calguy said:

No amount of evidence can convince you of a truth you refuse to accept.

Are vaxxed people being tested on a regular basis... yes or no?

 

Can vaxxed people contract and spread the virus... yes or no?

 

Are infected vaxxed people likely to have mild or no symptoms at all, but are out in the general public the entire time... yes or no?

 

Did the CDC tell people that after they got the jab, they didn't need to worry about getting tested anymore, and could resume their pre-pandemic routines... yes or no?

 

Do you believe everything you are being told by the MSM, Dr Fauci, and the CDC after they have continuously been exposed for lying like hell about a ton of info about COVID... yes or no?

 

 

C;mon man!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, slideman said:

Ivermectin for Covid-19: abundance of hype, dearth of evidence

https://www.statnews.com/2021/08/25/ivermectin-for-covid-19-abundance-of-hype-dearth-of-evidence/

The page is a series of lies to promote Big Pharma. Besides absurdity like:

"The gold standard in drug development is the randomized controlled trial."

 

That gets parroted a lot by Big Pharma's bitches like Fauci and yourself. But it's a ridiculous suggestion in light of the truth of the real gold standard of having saved tens of thousands of lives in the U.S. and millions around the world since the beginning of the pandemic with evidence-based medicine multiple drug/nutraceutical therapies. Let alone immoral and unethical to the point of mass homicide of placebo victims when positive therapies are administered to the treated group. Nor was there ever any such ridiculous need for that "gold standard" to be applied to penicillin, for example.

 

As long as adding extremely important zinc and a zinc ionophore like quercetin (to the ivermectin/zinc) and azithromycin or doxycycline antibiotics, along with vitamin D, vitamin C, melatonin and more, are disallowed as "confounding factors" in trials - which they of course they would be - there can be virtually no fair trials and few fair studies of the life-saving time-tested safe, effective, generic, hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin complete protocols. Let alone that such trials of complete $20 protocols would demonstrate them to be as 99+% successful, as treating physicians have been with them since spring of 2020, so such trials would blow out Big Pharma and their less effective alternatives.

 

00c52ad0.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, calguy said:

No amount of evidence can convince you of a truth you refuse to accept.

Shut up.

You don't have any Truth on your side......just a myriad of government sponsored propaganda and fear porn.

And that is becoming quite evident ....

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, calguy said:

If they got themselves vaccinated, they wouldn't have to worry about getting the virus in the first place. Their chances of getting infected are greatly reduced.

https://www.visiontimes.com/2021/07/04/deaths-hospital-vaccinated-uk.html

 

"The report, titled “SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern and variants under investigation in England, Technical briefing 16,” examined 60,624 Delta infections between February 1 and June 14, of which 35,521 cases were observed in unvaccinated individuals and 4,087 cases were seen in fully vaccinated individuals who got infected at least 14 days after their second dose.

The death rate for fully vaccinated individuals was 0.636 percent, which was 6.6 times higher than the unvaccinated death rate of 0.0957 percent. 26 deaths were reported among the fully vaccinated individuals, compared to 34 deaths in the unvaccinated. The death rates among fully vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals were both below one percent.

Fully vaccinated individuals were also found to be more prone to hospitalization than their unvaccinated counterparts. Out of the 4,087 fully vaccinated people, 2.05 percent (84 people) ended up in a hospital. Among the 35,521 unvaccinated people, only 1.48 percent (527 people) were hospitalized.

In an interview with LifeSiteNews, Stephanie Seneff, a senior researcher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (MIT CSAIL), says that the situation is reminiscent of a phenomenon seen among other vaccines called antibody dependent enhancement (ADE)."

 

Are we witnessing the beginnings of a mass casualty event as vaccinated immunity continues to wane?

As the FDA indicated, only time will tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, rippy38 said:

So... getting covid really is an automatic death sentence?

 

I guess my test was wrong and I didn't really have it then... because I'm still alive.

 

 

Neither did mine, the wife's, nor my son's and his wife's...it's all FAKE NEWS!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, calguy said:

If they got themselves vaccinated, they wouldn't have to worry about getting the virus in the first place. Their chances of getting infected are greatly reduced.

Partly correct....

Except for the rather large pink elephant in the room you keep denying exists....

Which is that these experimental mRNA vaccines are killing and maiming people and whose numbers are being suppressed.

And that once injected these delivery systems cannot be flushed from the body ....

And the future repercussions of which are unknown...

Your healthy now....whooptie do....

Not too mention you become asymptomatic superspreader's ....

Which keeps this virus circulating ...forever.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, crazyhole said:

@rippy38

 

Can you pin this?   I'd hate to see it go away 

Why?

 

You fucking goddamned morons should be shot.

 

 

Are these studies showing CONSISTENT or VARIED outcomes?

 

How large are the samples - not in aggregate, but each study?

 

 

What compels you?

 

A burning need to see Grifty's legacy of incompetence mitigated?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, IcebergSlim said:

Why?

 

You fucking goddamned morons should be shot.

 

 

Are these studies showing CONSISTENT or VARIED outcomes?

 

How large are the samples - not in aggregate, but each study?

 

 

What compels you?

 

A burning need to see Grifty's legacy of incompetence mitigated?

Read the study and you'll find the answers to those questions.    It's the NIH, so I would assume that you find it to be factual in nature.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, crazyhole said:

Read the study and you'll find the answers to those questions.    It's the NIH, so I would assume that you find it to be factual in nature.  

I already looked at the details of the meta study..

 

You might want to do so now, rather that take Drudge's word for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, IcebergSlim said:

Why?

 

You fucking goddamned morons should be shot.

 

 

Are these studies showing CONSISTENT or VARIED outcomes?

 

How large are the samples - not in aggregate, but each study?

 

 

What compels you?

 

A burning need to see Grifty's legacy of incompetence mitigated?

LMAO.

What happen's when a government gives EXCLUSIVE rights to big Pharma ....?....as per their contract?

Use what's left of your  brain...already.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Whitemajikman said:

LMAO.

What happen's when a government gives EXCLUSIVE rights to big Pharma ....?....as per their contract?

Use what's left of your  brain...already.

 

 

There are 3 providers in the US market, as well as Sinovac..

 

Whose "exclusive"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, IcebergSlim said:

I already looked at the details of the meta study..

 

You might want to do so now, rather that take Drudge's word for it.

Drudge?    Where did anybody bring up Drudge in this thread?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, IcebergSlim said:

You fucking goddamned morons should be shot.

You're ass sounds a little more burned than usual there slim... did the old lady not give you any this morning or something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...