Jump to content

Pastafarian thinks the government should get 60% of YOUR money when you die....Do you agree...?


Recommended Posts

So picture this...

 

Your parents die and leave you a house worth $500,000

However the government wants over $250,000 from the house...

 

So instead of keeping the house or maybe renting it out the government forces you to sell the house because they want their "cut"..

 

Do you agree with this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Z09 said:

So picture this...

 

Your parents die and leave you a house worth $500,000

However the government wants over $250,000 from the house...

 

So instead of keeping the house or maybe renting it out the government forces you to sell the house because they want their "cut"..

 

Do you agree with this?

Another homage. 
 

Thanks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pastafarian said:

Another homage. 
 

Thanks. 

It's a legitimate question ..

 

You think the government should get most of your money when you die

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Z09 said:

It's a legitimate question ..

 

You think the government should get most of your money when you die

FLASH!  Here is what you own when you are dead:

N O T H I N G!

No political party will even change that.

 

Taxes will never seem fair.  But they are less unfair when they are levied on those who have no need of money.

 

  • Thumb up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

FLASH!  Here is what you own when you are dead:

N O T H I N G!

No political party will even change that.

 

Taxes will never seem fair.  But they are less unfair when they are levied on those who have no need of money.

 

Do you think the government should have 60% of your estate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Z09 said:

So picture this...

 

Your parents die and leave you a house worth $500,000

However the government wants over $250,000 from the house...

 

So instead of keeping the house or maybe renting it out the government forces you to sell the house because they want their "cut"..

 

Do you agree with this?

Hell no. That money was already taxed when they earned it. That money belongs to your posterity. 
 

@Pastafariandoesn‘t have any money and/or children. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Str8tEdge said:

Hell no. That money was already taxed when they earned it. That money belongs to your posterity. 
 

@Pastafariandoesn‘t have any money and/or children. 

And he doesn't have any clue either

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

FLASH!  Here is what you own when you are dead:

N O T H I N G!

No political party will even change that.

 

Taxes will never seem fair.  But they are less unfair when they are levied on those who have no need of money.

 

You obviously have never had children, bitch. Fuck off.  You don’t deserve a fucking dime of what anyone else has earned. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Z09 said:

So picture this...

 

Your parents die and leave you a house worth $500,000

However the government wants over $250,000 from the house...

 

So instead of keeping the house or maybe renting it out the government forces you to sell the house because they want their "cut"..

 

Do you agree with this?

No, I do not agree. That would be my business. It's not the government's business what every single dollar flows through my lineage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Str8tEdge said:

You obviously have never had children, bitch. Fuck off.  You don’t deserve a fucking dime of what anyone else has earned. 

Isn't that your position?  You cannot  prevent me from expressing my opinion, and trying to do so as you do here it plumb stupid.

 

"Deserve"  is a loaded word and should never be confused with equity.  What people "deserve" should not be legislated.

 

I have children.

The fact remains that you can't take it with you, and no political party will ever change that.

 

I am not going to feel sorry if Ivanka, Don Jr. Eric, Barron and, yes, even Tiffany only get half of Trump's money.

The same is true for Biden's kids.

 

I would say that the inheritance tax be dealt with on the same sliding scale that is used for income taxes.

The first $1,000,000 is tax free.   $ 1 to $10,000,000, the tax is 10%, and so on, up to a billion being taxed at 50%

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

FLASH!  Here is what you own when you are dead:

N O T H I N G!

No political party will even change that.

 

Taxes will never seem fair.  But they are less unfair when they are levied on those who have no need of money.

 

....Did you ever consider that people will amass funds and assets for people or causes that they choose, according to their will?  What work or sacrifices does the government do?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

Isn't that your position?  You cannot  prevent me from expressing my opinion, and trying to do so as you do here it plumb stupid.

 

"Deserve"  is a loaded word and should never be confused with equity.  What people "deserve" should not be legislated.

 

I have children.

The fact remains that you can't take it with you, and no political party will ever change that.

 

I am not going to feel sorry if Ivanka, Don Jr. Eric, Barron and, yes, even Tiffany only get half of Trump's money.

The same is true for Biden's kids.

 

I would say that the inheritance tax be dealt with on the same sliding scale that is used for income taxes.

The first $1,000,000 is tax free.   $ 1 to $10,000,000, the tax is 10%, and so on, up to a billion being taxed at 50%

 

 

So you don't have shit to leave your children so fuck everyone else. Gotya. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Str8tEdge said:

So you don't have shit to leave your children so fuck everyone else. Gotya. 

You know nothing about me.

And you still will never take it with you.

An intelligent parent should contribute the max to a Roth IRA yearly  for his kids, and manage it wisely.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

You know nothing about me.

And you still will never take it with you.

An intelligent parent should contribute the max to a Roth IRA yearly  for his kids, and manage it wisely.

 

 

That's not the point as there's plenty of legal ways to skirt death taxes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Z09 said:

So picture this...

 

Your parents die and leave you a house worth $500,000

However the government wants over $250,000 from the house...

 

So instead of keeping the house or maybe renting it out the government forces you to sell the house because they want their "cut"..

 

Do you agree with this?

No.

 

@Pastafarian also thinks the feds should take 60% while alive. He said so yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

I would say that the inheritance tax be dealt with on the same sliding scale that is used for income taxes.

 

The idea the government  should  get moeny  at that level is insane.

 

The logic behind  what  you think the graduated steps should be is insane on  multple levels .  As if  anyone can decide  what the  amounts   should be,  or  how  much anyone nees or that governetn  needs infinite money from all sources  is nuts .

 

 

Libs love governmenet and hate individuals,  it is a  mental disorder 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

You know nothing about me.

And you still will never take it with you.

An intelligent parent should contribute the max to a Roth IRA yearly  for his kids, and manage it wisely.

 

 

And still pay 60%?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Z09 said:

So picture this...

 

Your parents die and leave you a house worth $500,000

However the government wants over $250,000 from the house...

 

So instead of keeping the house or maybe renting it out the government forces you to sell the house because they want their "cut"..

 

Do you agree with this?

 

The Government - is an Unconstitutional Parasite.

 

Wealth, is Liberty already Taxed.

 

liberalism.jpg

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you noticed that Democrats, liberals, socialists or what ever they call themselves spend all day trying to get YOUR money even when you die?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Z09 said:

Have you noticed that Democrats, liberals, socialists or what ever they call themselves spend all day trying to get YOUR money even when you die?

 

Like Cockroaches.

 

They have no sense of American Liberty and self-reliance.

 

They are simply adult infants.

 

Sialia_mexicana_adult_feeding_chicks_in_

  • Thumb up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Z09 said:

So picture this...

 

Your parents die and leave you a house worth $500,000

However the government wants over $250,000 from the house...

 

So instead of keeping the house or maybe renting it out the government forces you to sell the house because they want their "cut"..

 

Do you agree with this?

I do not agree with this 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...