Jump to content

The FAILED PseudoScience of "GloBULLSHIT Warming". Climate models fail in key test region


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, TruePatriot said:

This is irrelevant to this thread........but it certainly demonstrates how massively out of touch with reality you clueless and confused rightwingnuts really are.....

What's even more amazing is that you thought I was being serious...

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TBHWT said:

NOW GFY AH!!!

 

It's really amusing to watch how the rightwingnut retards get so pathetically butthurt when their anti-science, anti-reality bullshit gets thoroughly debunked by the facts. They have no rational response so they hurl puerile insults like cranky 2nd graders.

 

Meanwhile, in the real world.............

 

Scientists Have Been Underestimating the Pace of Climate Change

 

Scientific American

August 19, 2019

 

Recently, the U.K. Met Office announced a revision to the Hadley Center historical analysis of sea surface temperatures (SST), suggesting that the oceans have warmed about 0.1 degree Celsius more than previously thought. The need for revision arises from the long-recognized problem that in the past sea surface temperatures were measured using a variety of error-prone methods such as using open buckets, lamb’s wool–wrapped thermometers, and canvas bags. It was not until the 1990s that oceanographers developed a network of consistent and reliable measurement buoys. Then, to develop a consistent picture of long-term trends, techniques had to be developed to compensate for the errors in the older measurements and reconcile them with the newer ones. The Hadley Centre has led this effort, and the new data set—dubbed HadSST4—is a welcome advance in our understanding of global climate change. But that’s where the good news ends. Because the oceans cover three fifths of the globe, this correction implies that previous estimates of overall global warming have been too low. Moreover it was reported recently that in the one place where it was carefully measured, the underwater melting that is driving disintegration of ice sheets and glaciers is occurring far faster than predicted by theory—as much as two orders of magnitude faster—throwing current model projections of sea level rise further in doubt. These recent updates, suggesting that climate change and its impacts are emerging faster than scientists previously thought, are consistent with observations that we and other colleagues have made identifying a pattern in assessments of climate research of underestimation of certain key climate indicators, and therefore underestimation of the threat of climate disruption. When new observations of the climate system have provided more or better data, or permitted us to reevaluate old ones, the findings for ice extent, sea level rise and ocean temperature have generally been worse than earlier prevailing views.

 
  • Fuck you! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, TruePatriot said:

 

Nope! Actually what I posted are quite true scientific facts that are recognized as such by scientists around the world. Too bad your poor retarded brain got so "trashed" by the anti-science propaganda the fossil fuel industry pushes. You are a pathetic, reality challenged denier cultist and conspiracy theory wacko.

Climate Models Got It Right on Global Warming

Even models in the 1970s accurately predicted the relationship between greenhouse gas emissions and temperature rise

 

There’s a favorite argument among doubters of mainstream climate science: Climate models overestimate the rate at which the Earth is warming. That claim surfaces time and again and is frequently based on single examples of uncertainty or cherry-picked data. Various studies have gone back and closely examined individual climate models in recent years and have generally found that they’re working pretty well. A study released yesterday has taken the exercise to the next level. The research takes a comprehensive look at all the global climate models published from the 1970s to 2007, including the models used in the first three reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. It’s always a sign that you’re onto a good project when your first thought is, ‘Why hasn’t anyone done this before?’” said lead study author Zeke Hausfather, a climate scientist at the University of California, Berkeley, who worked with Massachusetts Institute of Technology scientists Henri Drake and Tristan Abbott and NASA scientist Gavin Schmidt. “No one has really gone back and gathered all of the old model predictions that were in the literature, in part because climate models have changed a lot.” Most of these models are long since obsolete, replaced by far more advanced generations. And yet, most of them were spot on in their projections of how much the Earth would warm in the years after they were published in response to greenhouse gas emissions. Fourteen out of 17 models were found to be accurate.

 

......

This is ridiculously false. None of the models have been accurate.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Str8tEdge said:

This is ridiculously false. None of the models have been accurate.

 

Nope, you are just ridiculously stupid........and you can repeat your bogus denier cult myths until you are blue in the face, Str8Jacket, but that won't change reality or the scientific facts about Anthropogenic Global Warming and its consequent Climate Disruptions. The scientific climate models that have been developed and refined over the decades have been proven to be very accurate by multiple scientific studies, as I have quoted here in this thread in articles from NASA and Scientific American. Your denial of this reality is based only on your usual evidence-free denier cult mythology, and the fact that you are basically bat-shit crazy.

 

In the real world..............

 

The successful forecasting of GMST by early climate models is impressive, as scientists, policymakers and stakeholders are all well aware. Numerical models based on scientific equations.......
  • Fuck you! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, TruePatriot said:

 

Nope, you are just ridiculously stupid........and you can repeat your bogus denier cult myths until you are blue in the face, Str8Jacket, but that won't change reality or the scientific facts about Anthropogenic Global Warming and its consequent Climate Disruptions. The scientific climate models that have been developed and refined over the decades have been proven to be very accurate by multiple scientific studies, as I have quoted here in this thread in articles from NASA and Scientific American. Your denial of this reality is based only on your usual evidence-free denier cult mythology, and the fact that you are basically bat-shit crazy.

 

In the real world..............

 

The successful forecasting of GMST by early climate models is impressive, as scientists, policymakers and stakeholders are all well aware. Numerical models based on scientific equations.......

ROFL! They didn’t predict it with any accuracy. So far, there is not one climate model that has been accurate because scientists do not understand the dynamic interaction of all the variables involved. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Str8tEdge said:

ROLF! They didn’t predict it with any accuracy. So far, there is not one climate model that has been accurate because scientists do not understand the dynamic interaction of all the variables involved. 

 

Nope! Wrong again, retard. Scientific climate models have indeed been very accurately predicting the rise in global temperatures that has resulted from human caused global warming. Repeating over and over, without any evidence, your braindead denial of that scientific fact just makes you look even more idiotic than you already look, if that is even possible.

 

You may wholehearedly believe your fraudulent denier cult myths and lies, Str8Jacket, but they are still just utter bullshit that you are too stupid to realize. Repeating them doesn't over and over convinces nobody. Too bad you are such a confused retard.

  • Fuck you! 1
  • Thumb up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, TruePatriot said:

It's really amusing to watch how the rightwingnut retards get so pathetically butthurt when their anti-science, anti-reality bullshit gets thoroughly debunked by the facts. They have no rational response so they hurl puerile insults like cranky 2nd graders.

 

TruePatriot 6/10/2021 at 4:20 AM,

False. You’re trash. Too bad your poor retarded brain got so "trashed" by the anti-science propaganda the fossil fuel industry pushes. You are a pathetic, reality challenged denier cultist and conspiracy theory wacko.

When one starts calling names and degrading people and changing one's posts to lie's there is only one thing to say, GOFUCK YOURSELF ASSHOLE!!!

 

Remember this, you can't live with out fossil fuels, 90% of Everything you touch comes from fossil fuels.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, rippy38 said:

What's even more amazing is that you thought I was being serious...

The usual line when you've been owed, "Sorry, I wasn't only joking."

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/8/2021 at 8:34 AM, MidnightMax said:


 

They can't even show you ONE SINGLE PREDICTION that has ever happened, but they keep trucking like these MODELS were a religious doctrine.

THIS WAS PREDICTED!!

The West is the driest it's been in 1,200 years -- raising questions about a livable future

Trees are dying. Riverbeds are empty. Lake Mead's water level dropped to its lowest point in history, and Utah's governor asked residents to pray for rain.

Water is increasingly scarce in the Western U.S. — where 72 percent of the region is in "severe" drought, 26 percent is in exceptional drought, and populations are booming.

Insufficient monsoon rains last summer and low snowpacks over the winter left states like Arizona, Utah and Nevada without the typical amount of water they need, and forecasts for the rainy summer season don't show promise.

This year's aridity is happening against the backdrop of a 20-year-long drought. The past two decades have been the driest or the second driest in the last 1,200 years in the West, posing existential questions about how to secure a livable future in the region.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/the-west-is-the-driest-its-been-in-1200-years-%e2%80%94-raising-questions-about-a-livable-future/ar-AAKW7ab

Link to post
Share on other sites

THIS WAS ALSO PREDICTED!!

Earth's carbon dioxide levels hasn't been this high in mankind's entire history

Carbon dioxide levels have hit an all-time high — again. In May (the month scientists use to compare year-to-year CO2 shifts), carbon dioxide in the atmosphere averaged 419 parts per million, according to data from Scripps Institution of Oceanography and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

Unfortunately, that in itself would hardly even classify as news anymore. But what really is striking is that CO2 levels haven’t been this high since before humans emerged as a species. We’d have to go to the Pliocene Epoch, between 4.1 to 4.5 million years ago, to see similar levels — a period when sea levels were nearly 80 feet higher and temperatures were about 7°F above the preindustrial era.

https://www.zmescience.com/ecology/pollution-ecology/carbon-dioxide-levels-highest-08062021/

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, TBHWT said:

When one starts posting facts that debunk my favorite rightwingnut denier cult myths and pointing out how stupid I must be to fall for that idiotic bullshit, there is only one thing to say, I NEED TO GO FUCK MYSELF IN THE ASSHOLE!!! (A little difficult but I believe it is possible when one has a very small penis like I do).

 

Remember this, you don't need fossil fuels for anything, we have many other non-polluting sources of energy and chemical feed stock to cover everything that fossil fuels do now.         

 

The only true statements ever posted under your name. Too bad you're too stupid to post them yourself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...