Jump to content
Guests feel free to register and post ×
WELCOME NEW MEMBERS AND GUESTS FEEL FREE TO REGISTER AND POST ×
WELCOME NEW MEMBERS AND GUESTS ×
guests can now post ×
welcome guests . feel free to test the waters. ×

Chauvin’s Attorney Files Motion for New Trial


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Taipan said:

How about "excessive use of force"?

Time served, loss of job, loss of retirement, and then he goes

and gets a job a  security guard to support himself.?

Could you live w/ that ?                                                                   

I could live with that. As long as he serves his twenty years first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Taipan said:

How about "excessive use of force"?

Time served, loss of job, loss of retirement, and then he goes

and gets a job a  security guard to support himself.?

Could you live w/ that ?                                                                   

Ain't it a bit early to be slushed?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, king of the county said:

Not very fair when a jurist wears racist shirt 

A jurist is a citizen and has the right to wear any goddamn shirt he wishes.

A jury of peers does not mean a jury of ignorant dummies.

It is not racist to express the idea that cops do not have the right to put their knees on the necks of citizens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Old Mack said:

I can't understand how that could convict on three different charges that were all the same in nature.

 

They do that so if one or two are overturned on appeal, the remaining still stick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

His trial was as fair as fair could be

 

Bullshit. One of the jurors flat-out lied to get seated, which is unfair, unethical, and illegal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

A jurist is a citizen and has the right to wear any goddamn shirt he wishes.

A jury of peers does not mean a jury of ignorant dummies.

It is not racist to express the idea that cops do not have the right to put their knees on the necks of citizens.

 

It's illegal to lie under oath when being examined for jury duty

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SixShooter said:

 

It's illegal to lie under oath when being examined for jury duty

 

 

Lying to a lawyer is a crime? 

Let's see if anyone arrests him, then.

I daresay this is bloody unlikely.

I will say that is was unwise for this juror to announce his views publicly.

Then all he would have to do us say that he was not they guy in the shirt.

No one is obliged to believe in stuff printed on their shirt.

I myself have  falsely worn a shirt proclaiming myself to be a "Pepper" when in reality I prefer sweetened tea and ginger ale.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

A jurist is a citizen and has the right to wear any goddamn shirt he wishes.

A jury of peers does not mean a jury of ignorant dummies.

It is not racist to express the idea that cops do not have the right to put their knees on the necks of citizens.

Sooooo..............a Ku Klux Klansman can sit on a jury judging a black man

who is charged w/ raping a White woman ?

Did I understand you correctly ?

Is that your position ??                                       🙄

 

(same principle in the Floyd case)

  • Thumb up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Taipan said:

Sooooo..............a Ku Klux Klansman can sit on a jury judging a black man

who is charged w/ raping a White woman ?

Did I understand you correctly ?

Is that your position ??                                       🙄

 

(same principle in the Floyd case)

The defense lawyers allowed this man to sit on the jury. You have a problem with that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Taipan said:

 

 

🖕.    ..........And good day.

Oh man....you hurt my feelings. Now I'm going to have to get drunk tonight. Wanna come over?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Taipan said:

Sooooo..............a Ku Klux Klansman can sit on a jury judging a black man

who is charged w/ raping a White woman ?

Did I understand you correctly ?

Is that your position ??                                       🙄

 

(same principle in the Floyd case)

The defense lawyer has many opportunities to exclude jurors.

I was once excluded because I  stated that I had an Amnesty International AND a Geico bumper sticker on my car.

 

We do not know whether this juror had decided the case when the trial started.

Obviously, this juror craves publicity.   I think this juror is a nitwit.

But lawyers LOVE impressionable nitwits whose minds they can sway.

Eleven other jurors agreed with this juror.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, calguy said:

The defense lawyers allowed this man to sit on the jury. You have a problem with that?

Yes.

That is grounds for appeal.

"Incompetent defense representation".    

 

Just try that w/ Trey Gowdy, Ted Cruz, Jim Jordan, or John Ratcliffe.

Those guys will go into a court of law and eat your goddamn lunch.......for breakfast.            

They will filet the meat off the bone.......and make you LIKE IT !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Taipan said:

Yes.

That is grounds for appeal.

"Incompetent defense representation".    

 

Just try that w/ Trey Gowdy, Ted Cruz, Jim Jordan, or John Ratcliffe.

Those guys will go into a court of law and eat your goddamn lunch.......for breakfast.            

They will filet the meat off the bone.......and make you LIKE IT !!

Tell us another good joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Taipan said:

Yes.

That is grounds for appeal.

"Incompetent defense representation".    

 

Just try that w/ Trey Gowdy, Ted Cruz, Jim Jordan, or John Ratcliffe.

Those guys will go into a court of law and eat your goddamn lunch.......for breakfast.            

They will filet the meat off the bone.......and make you LIKE IT !!

Taipan we never did establish yesterday

Are you a sucker or a liar?

  • Fuck you! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Str8tEdge said:

Sounds about right. 
 

Having a known BLM protestor on the jury is enough alone. 
 

You hear the crazed ridiculously partisan response by the head of the CIA?????

 

The entire federal government has been taken over by the enemy of free people. 

Proof?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, XavierOnassis said:

The defense lawyer has many opportunities to exclude jurors.

I was once excluded because I  stated that I had an Amnesty International AND a Geico bumper sticker on my car.

 

We do not know whether this juror had decided the case when the trial started.

Obviously, this juror craves publicity.   I think this juror is a nitwit.

But lawyers LOVE impressionable nitwits whose minds they can sway.

Eleven other jurors agreed with this juror.

 

 

 

The other 11 were intimidated.

It is the nature of man.......to fear.

 

I wish I had been there.

I don't get ulsers.................I give them.                       😎..🍺(my 1st)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Taipan said:

 

The other 11 were intimidated.

It is the nature of man.......to fear.

 

I wish I had been there.

I don't get ulsers.................I give them.                       😎..🍺(my 1st)

Keep drinking they will come

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, slideman said:

Taipan we never did establish yesterday

Are you a sucker or a liar?

Will you confess to your homosexuality ?

You can tell us.

It won't go no further than right here.                                  😊..🍺

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Taipan said:

Will you confess to your homosexuality ?

You can tell us.

It won't go no further than right here.                                  😊..🍺

I am cis.

Do you believe the election was stolen?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lie about Chaz was told by a police chief Carmen best who claimed that the protesters were extorting local businesses which turned out to be a complete fabrication.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...