Jump to content

Are you a sucker or a liar?


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, slideman said:

Tucker Carlson I think is a liar.

 

OK if you feel that way why not personally try to prove him wrong and not by using some sketchy lefty factchecker either, it is called research.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Just read U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion, leaning heavily on the arguments of Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, slideman said:

You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers

https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/917747123/you-literally-cant-believe-the-facts-tucker-carlson-tells-you-so-say-fox-s-lawye

NPR? And do you even know what the subject matter was? And yes you can believe facts, Carlson goes to great lengths to prove his points. You should watch him and see what journalism looks like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, slideman said:

A liar or a sucker? Kfools Is one that's hard to figure out.

Sometimes I can't tell when he is kidding.

Sucker. He counted the days down to 1/6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, slideman said:

"Just read U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion, leaning heavily on the arguments of Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "

How about this? Is this another 1d violation? No link?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, FredH said:

How about this? Is this another 1d violation? No link?

The link is above and there's no requirement for a link in the first place you fucking idiot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, FredH said:

NPR? And do you even know what the subject matter was? And yes you can believe facts, Carlson goes to great lengths to prove his points. You should watch him and see what journalism looks like.

You loose your evidence in the mail (Hunter Biden). That's what Fucker's journalism looks like

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, slideman said:

"Just read U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil's opinion, leaning heavily on the arguments of Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' "

So because some judge says so you think everything Carlson says is exaggeration and non literal commentary? More proof you would rather someone tell you what to think.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/09/25/hours-after-judge-describes-tucker-carlson-engaging-exaggeration-trump-highlights-his-false-claims/

 

 

U.S. District Court Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil handed Fox News a victory Thursday, dismissing a defamation lawsuit brought against the network by Karen McDougal, a former Playboy model.

McDougal, who credibly claims to have had an extended affair with Donald Trump before he entered politics, sued Fox after host Tucker Carlson accused her of trying to extort Trump during the 2016 campaign by sharing the story of their alleged relationship. McDougal was paid $150,000 by American Media Inc., publishers of the National Enquirer, for the rights to her story — money which was repaid by Trump and a story which was intentionally buried. Carlson claimed that this “sounds like a classic case of extortion.”

 

Vyskocil's opinion rejected the argument that this was defamatory because she accepted Fox's arguments about how viewers approached Carlson's program.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, slideman said:

Right she pretty much said that he doesn't state facts.

Suck on it

Hey retard this is what Carlson said “sounds like a classic case of extortion.”  Now if I were to ask you for 150K to not give out some not so good commentary about you is that extortion? Or Blackmail? Which is exactly what McDougal did. You leftards are stupid. So what if the judge thought truth was exaggeration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, slideman said:

I think McConnell is a liar

McConnell was not lying in his celebrated denunciation of Trump. He was  a hypocrite for refusing to vote to find Trump guilty and remove him. McConnell knows what Trump is, but he refuses to do anything to diminish his power.

Don't get me wrong... McConnell is utterly despicable and opportunistic. But he is not stupid. Therein lies the danger, I would say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

McConnell was not lying in his celebrated denunciation of Trump. He was  a hypocrite for refusing to vote to find Trump guilty and remove him. McConnell knows what Trump is, but he refuses to do anything to diminish his power.

Don't get me wrong... McConnell is utterly despicable and opportunistic. But he is not stupid. Therein lies the danger, I would say.

Another stupid comment, Trump did nothing to be impeached, a second farce impeachment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, slideman said:

Elected Republicans are lying with open eyes. Their excuses are disgraceful.The GOP is increasingly defined not by its shared beliefs, but by its shared delusions. To be a loyal Republican, one must be either a sucker or a liar. And because this defining falsehood is so obviously and laughably false, we can safely assume that most Republican leaders who embrace it fall into the second category. Knowingly repeating a lie — an act of immorality — is now the evidens,  rece of Republican fidelity.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/05/03/trump-republicans-big-lie/

 

 

 

 

   

 

liars. won't see the fact refuse to see the truth. liars.

 

maybe five years ago they would  have qualified for suckers, but now they are down and out liars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, jerra- said:

 

   

 

liars. won't see the fact refuse to see the truth. liars.

 

maybe five years ago they would  have qualified for suckers, but now they are down and out liars.

Maybe so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Elected Republicans are lying with open eyes. Their excuses are disgraceful.

 

The GOP is increasingly defined not by its shared beliefs, but by its shared delusions. To be a loyal Republican, one must be either a sucker or a liar. And because this defining falsehood is so obviously and laughably false, we can safely assume that most Republican leaders who embrace it fall into the second category. Knowingly repeating a lie — an act of immorality — is now the evidence of Republican fidelity.

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/05/03/trump-republicans-big-lie/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...