Jump to content

Why is capitalism a threat to communism?


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Str8tEdge said:

Command economies fail.  No private property and no incentive to create. No efficient means of production and distribution. 
 

Any economics course will clear up your stupidity for you. 

Not innovate at the level that elevates the standards of living for 7 billion people. You’re an uneducated twit. Just accept it. 

False. You don’t know what the fuck you’re babbling about to begi with. 
 

Takes an economics course and get the basics down. 

=================================================

I do not think that the Chinese normally have the problems with distribution that the Soviets had. The Russians' problem was  that jobs were assigned by favoritism rather than competence or merit.

He makes vastly more sense than you do.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 188
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

We on the left are frequently accused of being communists but I don't know any communists. I do believe there is a role for government in healthcare education and the welfare of the people. That is no

There is a rise in the number of people that espouse Marxism lately.   Mostly poor people that are jealous of others and want to get something for just existing but it is definitely a growing movement

So you agree that capitalism is superior to communism and socialism.  Weird how that works, isn't it?   Capitalism knows exactly how many hotdogs to produce, and communism just makes hotdogs until the

1 minute ago, XavierOnassis said:

The far right in Spain is the Partido VOX.  There is no part of the VOX coalition that bears the name Falange or Falangista. VOX has 52 of 350 seats in the Cortes.

Spain was a Falange fascist government into the 1970s. And yes, it was very good for the spanish economy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why, then does not even a vestige of the Falange Party fremaon

1 minute ago, PhilipIV said:

Spain was a Falange fascist government into the 1970s. And yes, it was very good for the spanish economy.

Why, then, does not even a vestige of the Falange remain?

I was in Spain in 1900 and asked about Franco and the consensus was "ya acabamos con esos pendejos",

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

Why, then does not even a vestige of the Falange Party fremaon

Why, then, does not even a vestige of the Falange remain?

I was in Spain in 1900 and asked about Franco and the consensus was "ya acabamos con esos pendejos",

 

 

Because jews gained global domination by the 70s and hated fascism?

 

Just a hunch

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

Why, then does not even a vestige of the Falange Party fremaon

Why, then, does not even a vestige of the Falange remain?

I was in Spain in 1900 and asked about Franco and the consensus was "ya acabamos con esos pendejos",

 

 

Well props on being in Spain 121 years ago, I guess.  

 

The simple answer to why no vestige of the Falange party exists today is the same as why we don't have whigs anymore:   the party was disbanded 45 years ago.   

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, crazyhole said:

Well props on being in Spain 121 years ago, I guess.  

 

The simple answer to why no vestige of the Falange party exists today is the same as why we don't have whigs anymore:   the party was disbanded 45 years ago.   

Also props on using a language barrier to further obfuscate your position.     Last time I checked there weren't a lot of Spanish speaking people on this board.   

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, PhilipIV said:

Because jews gained global domination by the 70s and hated fascism?

 

Just a hunch

Yeah, of course, the Spanish people take all their political advice from Jews.

You are fucking nuts!

People everywhere vote for those who they think will make their lives less difficult.

Fascism is tyrannical and has been corrupt in all its forms.

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

Yeah, of course, the Spanish people take all their political advice from Jews.

You are fucking nuts!

People everywhere vote for those who they think will make their lives less difficult.

Fascism is tyrannical and has been corrupt in all its forms.

When you control international finance, you don't give 'advice'.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

Tell us how Jews cause Spaniards to vote the way they do.

Your propaganda was not true in Germany in the 1930's and it is not true today, either,

Lol...it is so obviously true today that only idiots don't see it.

 

AIPAC is our most powerful lobby. 

 

The ADL is our most powerful political pressure group. 

 

Jews are the biggest donors to both parties. 

 

And blackrock has literally been given power over the feds private investments. 

 

With power like that, you don't need to advise anyone. Just threaten them 

 

And it was also true in 1930s germany. Don't be absurd...thinking the vast majority of german people just decided to hate Jews because hitler hypnotized them. That is dumb and unrealistic. There were very clear reasons.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, PhilipIV said:

Lol...it is so obviously true today that only idiots don't see it.

 

AIPAC is our most powerful lobby. 

 

The ADL is our most powerful political pressure group. 

 

Jews are the biggest donors to both parties. 

 

And blackrock has literally been given power over the feds private investments. 

 

With power like that, you don't need to advise anyone. Just threaten them 

 

And it was also true in 1930s germany. Don't be absurd...thinking the vast majority of german people just decided to hate Jews because hitler hypnotized them. That is dumb and unrealistic. There were very clear reasons.

They were told that they were winning the war... and then they lost it, and the economy collapsed because all the money had been spent. To survive, they pawned their possessions, and many pawnshops were run by Jews.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, XavierOnassis said:

They were told that they were winning the war... and then they lost it, and the economy collapsed because all the money had been spent. To survive, they pawned their possessions, and many pawnshops were run by Jews.

 

Lol dude. This is so fake and gay lol. Don't even try. I know the real history.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Str8tEdge said:

Command economies fail.  No private property and no incentive to create. No efficient means of production and distribution. 
 

Any economics course will clear up your stupidity for you. 

 

So your argument is that the reason the USSR collapsed is because in 69 years of history, most of which it spent as a global superpower and rival to the US, it didn't create a single fucking thing and everyone just laid around being lazy because there was no incentive to do anything?

 

THINK about what you're saying.

Or better yet, get an adult to explain to you how dumb it is.

 

5 hours ago, Str8tEdge said:

Not innovate at the level that elevates the standards of living for 7 billion people. You’re an uneducated twit. Just accept it. 

 

This is just ridiculous. The USSR did not collapse because of lack of innovation... it collapsed because innovations were not being brought to market effectively as the government was too heavy-handed and probably extremely corrupt.

 

It has nothing to do with welfare parasites and people not being educated. That is your own delusion and ugly cynicism about human nature, probably because you yourself are a shitty, ugly human being.

  • Thumb up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Toldya said:

 

So your argument is that the reason the USSR collapsed is because in 69 years of history, most of which it spent as a global superpower and rival to the US, it didn't create a single fucking thing and everyone just laid around being lazy because there was no incentive to do anything?

 

THINK about what you're saying.

Or better yet, get an adult to explain to you how dumb it is.

 

 

This is just ridiculous. The USSR did not collapse because of lack of innovation... it collapsed because innovations were not being brought to market effectively as the government was too heavy-handed and probably extremely corrupt.

 

It has nothing to do with welfare parasites and people not being educated. That is your own delusion and ugly cynicism about human nature, probably because you yourself are a shitty, ugly human being.

I love it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Toldya said:

 

So your argument is that the reason the USSR collapsed is because in 69 years of history, most of which it spent as a global superpower and rival to the US, it didn't create a single fucking thing and everyone just laid around being lazy because there was no incentive to do anything?

 

THINK about what you're saying.

Or better yet, get an adult to explain to you how dumb it is.

What’s stupid is you trying to change my argument into something it clearly wasn’t. You’re a dishonest piece of shit along with being uneducated and stupid. 

Quote

 

 

This is just ridiculous. The USSR did not collapse because of lack of innovation... it collapsed because innovations were not being brought to market effectively as the government was too heavy-handed and probably extremely corrupt.

You mean command economics are very inefficient compared to profit motive driven capitalism? Thanks for agreeing with me, dumb fuck. 

 

Quote

 

It has nothing to do with welfare parasites and people not being educated. That is your own delusion and ugly cynicism about human nature, probably because you yourself are a shitty, ugly human being.

Says the uneducated low IQ moron who’s sucking on that welfare tit. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, crazyhole said:

Fascist Germany would have taken out communist Russia if capitalist USA hadn't rescued them.    Communist China was failing until they gave way to capitalism and free market investment.  Even Japan, being a tiny nation that essentially lived under a monarchy beat the living hell out of Communist China.  A bunch of goat herders in Afghanistan living under a religious theocracy beat the living shit out of the "powerful" USSR.

 

Wow, so much wrong.

 

A lot of European countries were invaded by the Nazis, FFS. The USA had a huge geographical advantage with the whole Atlantic and Pacific Oceans thing. The USSR DID manage to repel the Nazis, FFS... they didn't end up in control of East Germany or hold so much influence over so much of Eastern Europe because the US gave it to them.

 

And Japan didn't beat Communist China... they beat a crumbling former monarchy that had succumbed to its own corruption and arrogance and had devolved into a sort of feudalism with warlords running various unofficial states within the country... the CCP actually REUNITED the badly divided country in 1949, long after the Japanese had left.

 

And LOL at you for saying that losing to Afghanistan is proof of inferiority. The US lost in Vietnam AND Iraq AND Afghanistan AND Korea. It hasn't actually won a war since WWII... despite all of its superior technology and firepower and money.

 

And is anyone even a little doubtful that the US is currently collapsing? So if it does collapse (and it could probably be argued that it already has, to some extent), does that mean capitalism doesn't work?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, crazyhole said:

"it collapsed because innovations were not being brought to market effectively as the government was too heavy-handed and probably extremely corrupt."

 

Wait, wut?   

 

My point is that command economies don't 'train' people to stop innovating like Str8tjacket is claiming.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Toldya said:

 

Wow, so much wrong.

 

A lot of European countries were invaded by the Nazis, FFS. The USA had a huge geographical advantage with the whole Atlantic and Pacific Oceans thing. The USSR DID manage to repel the Nazis, FFS... they didn't end up in control of East Germany because the US gave it to them.

 

And Japan didn't beat Communist China... they beat a crumbling former monarchy that had succumbed to its own corruption and arrogance and had devolved into a sort of feudalism with warlords running various unofficial states within the country... the CCP actually REUNITED the badly divided country in 1949, long after the Japanese had left.

 

And LOL at you for saying that losing to Afghanistan is proof of inferiority. The US lost in Vietnam AND Iraq AND Afghanistan AND Korea. It hasn't actually won a war since WWII... despite all of its superior technology and firepower and money.

 

And is anyone even a little doubtful that the US is currently collapsing? So if it does collapse (and it could probably be argued that it already has, to some extent), does that mean capitalism doesn't work?

So this whole time, being told that fascist Germany would have taken over the world if the mighty capitalist USA hadn't gotten involved was just a lie? 

 

This completely destroys my entire concept of reality.   I had no idea that the communists of Russia didn't really need our help to defeat the evil fascists.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, crazyhole said:

So this whole time, being told that fascist Germany would have taken over the world if the mighty capitalist USA hadn't gotten involved was just a lie? 

 

This completely destroys my entire concept of reality.   I had no idea that the communists of Russia didn't really need our help to defeat the evil fascists.  

I'm just glad hitler was on drugs and attacked Russia. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, crazyhole said:

So this whole time, being told that fascist Germany would have taken over the world if the mighty capitalist USA hadn't gotten involved was just a lie? 

 

This completely destroys my entire concept of reality.   I had no idea that the communists of Russia didn't really need our help to defeat the evil fascists.  

 

Saying that the US didn't singlehandedly win the war isn't the same thing as saying that the US wasn't needed. But everyone knows that invading the USSR was Hitler's biggest mistake and the Soviets were also integral to the Allied victory. The Russians DID repel the Nazis... that's simply a fact. 

 

READ.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...