Jump to content

Female police officer shoots a young man, claims she thought it was her "taser" gun not her service firearm.


Recommended Posts

Anyone really buying that?   If you are you probably bought the story the other female officer claimed she thought she was entering  her apartment (although on a different floor, different surrounding, no bright red run in front of her door,) and begins to shoot an unarmed black male who she sees, "in her apartment".  Just a big mistake, right.

 

Well this female officer supposedly has been on the police force for 26 years, what other crimes and criminal negligence conduct has she committed, and apparently she was "training " a new officer at the time she committed this crime.  How many other criminals has she trained for that police department?

 

Any rookie, anyone with common sense and rational thought could have avoided such an act but not a so called "veteran officer"?

 

Again, the problem that is causing so many incompetent, irrational, poor judgement low quality people getting into important, dangerous to the public positions, including our legislative/congressional (state and federal) government bodies, not just police is the result of the brainwashing social conditioning liberals and democrats have fed the public and pushed by the liberal news media.  Yes, quotas, gender and racial preferential treatment that allows incompetent and dishonest people to get into police work and other jobs they are not qualified for.  All our institutions have gone to scum and the scum prevail.

 

This is a clear as a sunny day but we have been so conditioned that no one will speak out about this even if the crooked news media would present those fact, and they don't.  Funny how the blacks are complaining about the abuses against them by police and other corrupt and incompetent people when they were one of the most influential outspoken demanding  groups who made  that occur.  Now pay the price and just keep quiet and shut up about it. 

 

Police departments police train and  demand that if an officer pulls a fire arm to shoot someone it must be "shoot to kill", even if a wound is easily possible.  No witnesses that way.  If they are proficient with their service weapon they should be able to shot someone in the leg, arm some non vital area easily.  NO, it's shoot to kill in all cases.  I am sure they will come up with some lame reason for that.   And it's a well known fact that women, females are more apt to shot a male who doesn't cower down to her demands, particularly female cops, or will take the most extreme measure against a male because they are more threatened by a male because they know they are inferior to men no matter what Hollywood puts out on all their brainwashing macho female shows. 

 

Hollywood can make anyone the hero or criminal, just write the script to fit what they want to make it appear and take as many shoots and retakes as necessary until everyone acts the part they are given, no matter how unrealistic it is.  Only difference today the public is so ignorant they buy it all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fact.....


IF this STUPID FUCKING CRIMINAL NIGGER HAD OBEYED ORDERS, DIDN'T TRY TO RUN, AND SIMPLY COMPLIED TO WHAT HE WAS BEING TOLD TO DO....

 

He would be ALIVE RIGHT NOW to explain his side.

 

So the STUPID FUCKING NIGGER GOT HIMSELF KILLED. PERIOD.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...