Jump to content

These are the morals of Trump supporters. Please read.


Recommended Posts

How Trump Steered Supporters Into Unwitting Donations  (to the tune of $120 million)

Online donors were guided into weekly recurring contributions. Demands for refunds spiked. Complaints to banks and credit card companies soared. But the money helped keep Donald Trump’s struggling campaign afloat.

 

Stacy Blatt was in hospice care last September listening to Rush Limbaugh’s dire warnings about how badly Donald J. Trump’s campaign needed money when he went online and chipped in everything he could: $500.

 

It was a big sum for a 63-year-old battling cancer and living in Kansas City on less than $1,000 per month. But that single contribution — federal records show it was his first ever — quickly multiplied. Another $500 was withdrawn the next day, then $500 the next week and every week through mid-October, without his knowledge — until Mr. Blatt’s bank account had been depleted and frozen. When his utility and rent payments bounced, he called his brother, Russell, for help.

 

What the Blatts soon discovered was $3,000 in withdrawals by the Trump campaign in less than 30 days. They called their bank and said they thought they were victims of fraud.

“It felt,” Russell said, “like it was a scam.”

 

But what the Blatts believed was duplicity was actually an intentional scheme to boost revenues by the Trump campaign and the for-profit company that processed its online donations, WinRed. Facing a cash crunch and getting badly outspent by the Democrats, the campaign had begun last September to set up recurring donations by default for online donors, for every week until the election.

 

Contributors had to wade through a fine-print disclaimer and manually uncheck a box to opt out.

 

As the election neared, the Trump team made that disclaimer increasingly opaque, an investigation by The New York Times showed. It introduced a second prechecked box, known internally as a “money bomb,” that doubled a person’s contribution. Eventually its solicitations featured lines of text in bold and capital letters that overwhelmed the opt-out language.

How Trump Steered Supporters Into Unwitting Donations - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

 

ADVERTISEMENT

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Scout said:

How Trump Steered Supporters Into Unwitting Donations  (to the tune of $120 million)

Online donors were guided into weekly recurring contributions. Demands for refunds spiked. Complaints to banks and credit card companies soared. But the money helped keep Donald Trump’s struggling campaign afloat.

 

Stacy Blatt was in hospice care last September listening to Rush Limbaugh’s dire warnings about how badly Donald J. Trump’s campaign needed money when he went online and chipped in everything he could: $500.

 

It was a big sum for a 63-year-old battling cancer and living in Kansas City on less than $1,000 per month. But that single contribution — federal records show it was his first ever — quickly multiplied. Another $500 was withdrawn the next day, then $500 the next week and every week through mid-October, without his knowledge — until Mr. Blatt’s bank account had been depleted and frozen. When his utility and rent payments bounced, he called his brother, Russell, for help.

 

What the Blatts soon discovered was $3,000 in withdrawals by the Trump campaign in less than 30 days. They called their bank and said they thought they were victims of fraud.

“It felt,” Russell said, “like it was a scam.”

 

But what the Blatts believed was duplicity was actually an intentional scheme to boost revenues by the Trump campaign and the for-profit company that processed its online donations, WinRed. Facing a cash crunch and getting badly outspent by the Democrats, the campaign had begun last September to set up recurring donations by default for online donors, for every week until the election.

 

Contributors had to wade through a fine-print disclaimer and manually uncheck a box to opt out.

 

As the election neared, the Trump team made that disclaimer increasingly opaque, an investigation by The New York Times showed. It introduced a second prechecked box, known internally as a “money bomb,” that doubled a person’s contribution. Eventually its solicitations featured lines of text in bold and capital letters that overwhelmed the opt-out language.

How Trump Steered Supporters Into Unwitting Donations - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

ADVERTISEMENT

 

Do you wanna fight ??

Really ??

Now, let's get real.

You want................. what I want..................😎...........

Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Scout said:

Stacy Blatt was in hospice care last September listening to Rush Limbaugh’s dire warnings about how badly Donald J. Trump’s campaign needed money when he went online and chipped in everything he could: $500.

 

He will still vote for Trump if he runs in 2024, assuming he's still alive.

 

This isn't even a fool me twice thing... he has been fooled over and over and it hasn't shamed him at all.

 

These people are in a cult.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Toldya said:

 

He will still vote for Trump if he runs in 2024, assuming he's still alive.

 

This isn't even a fool me twice thing... he has been fooled over and over and it hasn't shamed him at all.

 

These people are in a cult.

stfu you pos liberal asswipe shill

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Toldya said:

 

He will still vote for Trump if he runs in 2024, assuming he's still alive.

 

This isn't even a fool me twice thing... he has been fooled over and over and it hasn't shamed him at all.

 

These people are in a cult.

 

I just think they lack critical thinking skills.  They are like the ones that send their last penny to a wealthy TV evangelist.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

These are the morals of WOKE LIBERALS

 

1. Vote and cheer a 50 year war criminal

 

2.  Jail Govt corruption exposing whistleblowers...or chase them to Russia😆

 

3.  Assassinate American children....DRONE BAMMY!!

 

4. Vote for the Best Niggar Jailer Ever....and cheer him.  BIDEN CRIME BILL

 

5. BARBED WIRE CAPITAL

 

6. Bomb and destroy countries for oil

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

No. he is not: this is factual.

 

These guys always claim I never provide a link (I nearly always provide a link to a news article or online posting).

I just feel sorry for them that they don't like to read or do research, which I usually enjoy. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Scout said:

 

These guys always claim I never provide a link (I nearly always provide a link to a news article or online posting).

I just feel sorry for them that they don't like to read or do research, which I usually enjoy. 

 

you always provide left leaning links bitch

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...