Jump to content

Robert e Lee should have been hung


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

 The Southern states were not any sort of democracies. With few exceptions, they were totally dominated by the slave plantation owners. Most of the White population were illiterate peasants.

Nearly all the wealth belonged to a tiny aristocracy of planters.

All you have to do is read the constitutions of the Southern states.

Slavery was the reason the South seceded. That is the reason given by every secessionist. This "States Rights" crap was what the segregationists  and other advocates of Jim Crow used to justify the myth of "The Lost Cause" after Reconstruction.

What percentage of Southern Whites owned slaves ?

I have heard 3.6%   The rest did not.

Now, blacks are demanding, from Southern Whites, Northern Whites, & Western Whites........'reparations'

for what happened 200yrs. ago.            That just don't seem right to me .

 

Suh.......what is your position on reparations ?                                                                                           🥃

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Then we should have hung everybody in Chaz/Chop.

That's what we do with traitors

Along with the other Confederate generals

3 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

That is a very, very stupid proposal.  You  are full of stupid proposals. Americans are not going to move from  one state to another over this. You are on the LOSER's side.

 

Suhh.......

as things get worse on the Dem Plantation, more & more people will cotton to the 

idea of TNM.   And then some other states might like to join the party, too.

OK, AR,LA,MS, AL, ID, MT, MO, NE, & the Dakotas.   ETC.

 

Several Texas politicians are now backing TNM.

TNM has a big rally planned at the state capital in Austin next Thurs.

Let's see if it can make the national news.                                     😊..    🥃

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Taipan said:

What percentage of Southern Whites owned slaves ?

I have heard 3.6%   The rest did not.

Now, blacks are demanding, from Southern Whites, Northern Whites, & Western Whites........'reparations'

for what happened 200yrs. ago.            That just don't seem right to me .

 

Suh.......what is your position on reparations ?                                                                                           🥃

On average, 20% of Southern  families owned slaves, and in SC this was as high as 50%.

There is little likelihood of any reparations. What we have in this country is gross inequality of wealth which is unhealthy and unsustainable. I think that is the issue that needs addressing.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

On average, 20% of Southern  families owned slaves, and in SC this was as high as 50%.

There is little likelihood of any reparations. What we have in this country is gross inequality of wealth which is unhealthy and unsustainable. I think that is the issue that needs addressing.

 

I will agree on one point.

The rich & rich corps. are paying very little in taxes.

They have tax lawyers and tax CPA's to manipulate the 75,000 page Tax Code.

Bill Gates said his secretary pays a higher percentage than he does.

That ain't right.

And Trump is a billionaire who paid $750.00 in taxes last year.   

That ain't right.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Taipan said:

I will agree on one point.

The rich & rich corps. are paying very little in taxes.

They have tax lawyers and tax CPA's to manipulate the 75,000 page Tax Code.

Bill Gates said his secretary pays a higher percentage than he does.

No, WARREN BUFFET said that.

That ain't right.

And Trump is a billionaire who paid $750.00 in taxes last year.   

That ain't right.\

Trump paid $0 taxes from 2007 through $2016. Nada, bupkiss.

He may or may niot actually be a millionaire. He lies all the time about everything.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, XavierOnassis said:

Just read the Constitution of any Confederate state.

Read the newspapers of the Southern  states on the day of secession.

It wasn't the whole cause of the war you fucking cuban POS

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Mirabeau said:

Are the negroes in the USA who are the descendants of slaves better off today than the descendants of African negroes who WEREN'T slaves and who have remained in Africa to this day?

Notice that no liberal dares to answer the question.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, benson13 said:

"Abolishing slavery became a major issue towards the end of the war ... "

 

 

 

WRONG.....it became a Political Issue in the North in 1863....but it was the underlying Issue of why the slave states declared War on the North in 1861

 

Hey, Benson the Negro:

 

Provide us with a link to the declaration of war against the USA that was passed by the Confederate States of America.

 

Mirabeau wants to read the text of that document.

 

(Watch Benson the Negro squirm, folks.)

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, slideman said:

Lee should have been hung.

Davis 2

all antifa pukes should be hung

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, slideman said:

Lee should have been hung.

Davis 2

You should have been run out of Texas with the rest of the queers.

 

Oh . . . wait.

 

You WERE run out of Texas with the rest of the queers!

 

Never mind.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

WHY CAN'T ANY OF THE LIBERALS ANSWER THIS SIMPLE QUESTION?

 

WHY IS IT SO DIFFICULT FOR THEM?

 

(Snicker.)

 

Are the negroes in the USA who are the descendants of slaves better off today than the descendants of African negroes who WEREN'T slaves and who have remained in Africa to this day?

  • Thumb up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Mirabeau said:

WHY CAN'T ANY OF THE LIBERALS ANSWER THIS SIMPLE QUESTION?

 

WHY IS IT SO DIFFICULT FOR THEM?

 

(Snicker.)

 

Are the negroes in the USA who are the descendants of slaves better off today than the descendants of African negroes who WEREN'T slaves and who have remained in Africa to this day?

Some are, some are not,

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, XavierOnassis said:

Some are, some are not,

LOOK AT THIS!

 

ms. onASSis managed to sneak down to the nurses' station and get on a computer while no one was watching her.

 

So, ms. onASSis, those who ARE better off here in the USA should BE GRATEFUL that they are descendants of slaves, and should THANK Mirabeau's ancestors for bringing THEIR ancestors to America.

 

Right?

 

(Watch this, folks!)

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

Some are, some are not,

So, ms. onASSis:

 

Is the average negro in the USA MUCH, MUCH, MUCH, MUCH better off than the average negro in . . . say . . . Ouagadougou?

 

(Watch carefully, folks!)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Mirabeau said:

You should have been run out of Texas with the rest of the queers.

 

Oh . . . wait.

 

You WERE run out of Texas with the rest of the queers!

 

Never mind.

I'll BE BACK

Stand by asshole

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Taipan said:

No, sir.

The main reason was Individual States-Rights.

The Southern states did not want to be bossed around by a bunch of Damn Yankees.

Slavery was just one subset of that fierce argument.                                                         🥃

 

 

name one other thing besides slavery the north bossed the south about.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Spartan said:

 

I won't defend slavery in any way; it was reprehensible in practice, to say nothing of hypocritical in the extreme for our nation to have been founded on personal liberty and the idea that ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL yet to allow men to be held in bondage for so long.

 

That said, your claim that "The South was trying to force slavery on the entire country" is not accurate.  The Southern states believed that any state that WANTED to have slavery as a practice should be allowed to, and they felt the Union government was actively oppressing them.  They believed that the Federal government had too much power, and that remaining in the Union was now detrimental to them; hence secession.

 

At the time, most people identified themselves as citizens of their state first, and as Americans second.  Robert E. Lee did not support slavery himself, but he felt compelled to defend his home state of Virginia.  Most people today forget that our nation is a REPUBLIC of separate and independent states - NOT a contiguous nation - and in the mid-1800's Lee would have been seen as a traitor more for abandoning Virginia than the U.S.

 

 

the south demanded runaway slaves in the north to be returned. the south bossed the north around in that respect.

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, slideman said:

That's what we do with traitors

 

Many family's had hundreds of relatives participating  on both sides of the war, neither side was fighting to become a dependent of a

>>>>strange socialist medical dictatorship<<<<<

with an old world money system that local area people would not control.

 

The north thought they were fighting for continuation of the constitutional system however the leaders were in contact-collaboration with Marx.

 

The south suspected that the north had become a neo socialist monarchical area  full of simple born loser troublemakers with stupid gang rules.

 

Page 123: The Creature
from Jekyll
Island

The top Communist leaders have never been as hostile to their counterparts in the West, as the rhetoric suggests. They are quite friendly to the world's leading financiers and have worked closely with them, when it suits their purposes. As we shall see in the following section, the Bolshevik revolution actually was financed by wealthy financiers in London and New York. Lenin and Trotsky were on the closest of terms with these moneyed interests both before and after the Revolution. Those hidden liaisons have continued to this day and occasionally pop to the surface, when we discover a David Rockefeller holding confidential meetings with a Mikhail Gorbachev in the absence of government sponsorship or diplomatic purpose.

 

Pages 263-267:

Chapter 13 - MASQUERADE IN MOSCOW

One of the greatest myths of contemporary history is that the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia was a popular uprising of the downtrodden masses against the hated ruling class of the Tsars. As we shall see, however, the planning, the leadership and especially the financing came entirely from outside Russia, mostly from financiers in Germany, Britain and the United States. Furthermore we shall see, that the Rothschild Formula played a major role in shaping these events.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, SheikhYerbouti said:

 

You had your chance last year, Cuck615....you didn't take it. 🤣

oh I took it... little one

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Duck615 said:

It wasn't the whole cause of the war you fucking cuban POS

Had slavery not existed, there would have been no Civil War.

You are ignorant of history.

 

In all Spanish colonies, slavery was abolished at the time of independence.

Slavery was illegal in Texas until Texas declared independence from Mexico.

Slavery continued in Cuba and PR until 1886.

It was abolished in Brazil in 1888.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...