kfools Posted February 21 Share Posted February 21 Topics are Guns And also equity and equality. 8pm est https://youtu.be/RmpszlHb4sg 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Popular Post EltonJohnson Posted February 22 Popular Post Share Posted February 22 Debate lost by the left when he said "mandatory volunteer" 2 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king of the county Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 Is it over 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king of the county Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 That’s commurslayingirl in the lower left? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king of the county Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 Who is the guys voice that keeps jumpin in? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JinnMartini Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 34 minutes ago, king of the county said: Is it over You're pretty slow, ain't ya ? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JinnMartini Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 17 minutes ago, king of the county said: That’s commurslayingirl in the lower left? Top left is Brittany, lower right is a guy . . . soooo 1+1 ought to be . . . YOU tell me, fatso ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dontlooknow Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 Sorry the second amendment says shall not be infringed. No age limits no criminal conviction in the second amendment. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dontlooknow Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 Sorry rachel you lost girl. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king of the county Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 1 hour ago, JinnMartini said: Top left is Brittany, lower right is a guy . . . soooo 1+1 ought to be . . . YOU tell me, fatso ! Why the name callin? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dontlooknow Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 Commie slayer got her ass handed to her. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
crazyhole Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 Really good debate tonight. Both Rachel and Alex made great points and it was amicable. 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dontlooknow Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 Just now, crazyhole said: Really good debate tonight. Both Rachel and Alex made great points and it was amicable. Rachel got wrecked. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dontlooknow Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 You can't say the shall not infringe part then talk about all the thing you want to infringe upon. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
crazyhole Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 Just now, Worstposteronforum said: Rachel got wrecked. Nobody got wrecked. That was exactly what a debate should be. There were points of agreement and points of disagreement and nobody had to go smoke pot in the middle of it. 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dontlooknow Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 1 minute ago, crazyhole said: Nobody got wrecked. That was exactly what a debate should be. There were points of agreement and points of disagreement and nobody had to go smoke pot in the middle of it. She was moving the goal post and was off topic most of the time. All over the place. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
crazyhole Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 1 minute ago, Worstposteronforum said: She was moving the goal post and was off topic most of the time. All over the place. Lol. Man, you are like a fart bouncing around in a skillet on this board most of the time and you're gonna say she was all over the place? That was an evenly matched debate. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dontlooknow Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 Just now, crazyhole said: Lol. Man, you are like a fart bouncing around in a skillet on this board most of the time and you're gonna say she was all over the place? That was an evenly matched debate. I'm one topic in every thread I post in. What's your point? Lol lmao. She talked about abortion and other topics when talking about gun rights. Then used the shall not infringe argument then talked about what she would allow to be infringed. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
CommieSlayinGirl Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 I was really disappointed in this debate. The guy basically showed up to a cage match and rolled over and exposed his belly. What was I supposed to do? Kick a guy in the nuts when he’s just conceding to pretty much everything I say? He wouldn’t take a position. He just said “it depends” or “it’s on a case by case basis.” Or he agreed! Ok, then why are you here motherfucker?? Ugh. My bloodlust is only stronger. I want a fight. Don’t concede. BATTLE! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
CommieSlayinGirl Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 It’s called Politically PROVOKED, not Politically AGREEABLE. 😒 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
CommieSlayinGirl Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 12 minutes ago, Worstposteronforum said: I'm one topic in every thread I post in. What's your point? Lol lmao. She talked about abortion and other topics when talking about gun rights. Then used the shall not infringe argument then talked about what she would allow to be infringed. I did not talk about abortion, LOL. I was Trying my best to get Alex to take a position on anything ever. All that bastard did was agree with everything I said Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dontlooknow Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 3 minutes ago, CommieSlayinGirl said: I did not talk about abortion, LOL. I was Trying my best to get Alex to take a position on anything ever. All that bastard did was agree with everything I said You used the shall not infringe argument then talked about age limits and criminals getting their guns taken away and back ground checks. That's not what the second amendment says. Is it. Yes or no. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kfools Posted February 22 Author Share Posted February 22 13 minutes ago, Worstposteronforum said: You used the shall not infringe argument then talked about age limits and criminals getting their guns taken away and back ground checks. That's not what the second amendment says. Is it. Yes or no. No. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
CommieSlayinGirl Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 13 minutes ago, Worstposteronforum said: You used the shall not infringe argument then talked about age limits and criminals getting their guns taken away and back ground checks. That's not what the second amendment says. Is it. Yes or no. Rights are ascribed to adults, not children. I do not agree with background checks I just said we already have them. There was nothing much to say to a guy who just kept conceding my points or refusing to argue them Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dontlooknow Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 2 minutes ago, CommieSlayinGirl said: Rights are ascribed to adults, not children. I do not agree with background checks I just said we already have them. There was nothing much to say to a guy who just kept conceding my points or refusing to argue them No they are given to citizens. You are a citizen at birth. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.