Imgreatagain Posted Saturday at 03:11 PM Share Posted Saturday at 03:11 PM Are You Kidding Me? Is it possible for someone to be dumber than AOC??? In Texas, State Representative Terry Meza (D-Irving) has introduced HB196. Her bill would repeal the state's "Castle Doctrine." This doctrine allows a homeowner to use deadly force against an armed intruder who breaks into his home. Now listen to what she has to say... "I'm not saying that stealing is okay," Meza explained. "All I'm saying is that it doesn't warrant a death penalty. Thieves only carry weapons for self-protection and to provide the householder an incentive to cooperate. They just want to get their loot and get away. When the resident tries to resist is when people get hurt. If only one side is armed fewer people will be killed." Meza was quick to reassure that her bill would not totally prevent homeowners from defending themselves. Under her new law, “… the homeowner's obligation is to flee the home at the first sign of intrusion. If fleeing is not possible, he must cooperate with the intruder. But if violence breaks out it is the homeowner's responsibility to make sure no one gets hurt. The best way to achieve this is to use the minimum non-lethal force possible because intruders will be able to sue for any injuries they receive at the hands of the homeowner. "In most instances the thief needs the money more than the homeowner does," Meza reasoned. "The homeowner's insurance reimburse his losses. On balance, the transfer of property is likely to lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth. If my bill can help make this transfer a peaceful one so much the better. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Zaro Posted Saturday at 03:14 PM Share Posted Saturday at 03:14 PM 2 minutes ago, Imgreatagain said: Are You Kidding Me? Is it possible for someone to be dumber than AOC??? In Texas, State Representative Terry Meza (D-Irving) has introduced HB196. Her bill would repeal the state's "Castle Doctrine." This doctrine allows a homeowner to use deadly force against an armed intruder who breaks into his home. Now listen to what she has to say... "I'm not saying that stealing is okay," Meza explained. "All I'm saying is that it doesn't warrant a death penalty. Thieves only carry weapons for self-protection and to provide the householder an incentive to cooperate. They just want to get their loot and get away. When the resident tries to resist is when people get hurt. If only one side is armed fewer people will be killed." Meza was quick to reassure that her bill would not totally prevent homeowners from defending themselves. Under her new law, “… the homeowner's obligation is to flee the home at the first sign of intrusion. If fleeing is not possible, he must cooperate with the intruder. But if violence breaks out it is the homeowner's responsibility to make sure no one gets hurt. The best way to achieve this is to use the minimum non-lethal force possible because intruders will be able to sue for any injuries they receive at the hands of the homeowner. "In most instances the thief needs the money more than the homeowner does," Meza reasoned. "The homeowner's insurance reimburse his losses. On balance, the transfer of property is likely to lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth. If my bill can help make this transfer a peaceful one so much the better. Fake news Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SixShooter Posted Saturday at 03:18 PM Share Posted Saturday at 03:18 PM 4 minutes ago, Imgreatagain said: Thieves only carry weapons for self-protection and to provide the householder an incentive to cooperate. LMFAO liberals are fucked in the head 5 minutes ago, Imgreatagain said: the transfer of property is likely to lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth LMFAO liberals are fucked in the head Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Imgreatagain Posted Saturday at 03:19 PM Author Share Posted Saturday at 03:19 PM Just now, SixShooter said: LMFAO liberals are fucked in the head LMFAO liberals are fucked in the head Yeah. And not in the good way Quote Link to post Share on other sites
CrimeaRiver Posted Saturday at 03:25 PM Share Posted Saturday at 03:25 PM fake progressive aoc just being a dc establishment opportunist whore. 🤣 hey qunt. What about that medicare for all? ohhh Pelosi told you to drop it and you obeyed😂 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Imgreatagain Posted Saturday at 03:26 PM Author Share Posted Saturday at 03:26 PM Just now, CrimeaRiver said: fake progressive aoc just being a dc establishment opportunist whore. 🤣 hey qunt. What about that medicare for all? ohhh Pelosi told you to drop it and you obeyed😂 Every time I want a woman to succeed in politics. They don’t. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
CrimeaRiver Posted Saturday at 03:31 PM Share Posted Saturday at 03:31 PM 4 minutes ago, Imgreatagain said: Every time I want a woman to succeed in politics. They don’t. Im still holding out hope for Tulsi. After that fails. its paca paca and no regrets 😀 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Taipan Posted Saturday at 03:34 PM Share Posted Saturday at 03:34 PM 19 minutes ago, Imgreatagain said: Are You Kidding Me? Is it possible for someone to be dumber than AOC??? In Texas, State Representative Terry Meza (D-Irving) has introduced HB196. Her bill would repeal the state's "Castle Doctrine." This doctrine allows a homeowner to use deadly force against an armed intruder who breaks into his home. Now listen to what she has to say... "I'm not saying that stealing is okay," Meza explained. "All I'm saying is that it doesn't warrant a death penalty. Thieves only carry weapons for self-protection and to provide the householder an incentive to cooperate. They just want to get their loot and get away. When the resident tries to resist is when people get hurt. If only one side is armed fewer people will be killed." Meza was quick to reassure that her bill would not totally prevent homeowners from defending themselves. Under her new law, “… the homeowner's obligation is to flee the home at the first sign of intrusion. If fleeing is not possible, he must cooperate with the intruder. But if violence breaks out it is the homeowner's responsibility to make sure no one gets hurt. The best way to achieve this is to use the minimum non-lethal force possible because intruders will be able to sue for any injuries they receive at the hands of the homeowner. "In most instances the thief needs the money more than the homeowner does," Meza reasoned. "The homeowner's insurance reimburse his losses. On balance, the transfer of property is likely to lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth. If my bill can help make this transfer a peaceful one so much the better. Texas.....loves you because of your strength & wisdom. Peace, cowgirl. 😔..🍺 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Taipan Posted Saturday at 03:35 PM Share Posted Saturday at 03:35 PM 3 minutes ago, CrimeaRiver said: Im still holding out hope for Tulsi. After that fails. its paca paca and no regrets 😀 What is paca , paca. ?? Explain, please. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Taipan Posted Saturday at 03:45 PM Share Posted Saturday at 03:45 PM 11 minutes ago, Imgreatagain said: Every time I want a woman to succeed in politics. They don’t. I am going to back a woman/woman ticket in 2024. Maybe I shouldn't play identity politics. Maybe I am mad about the last election. I wouldn't be mad.......if more good souls, like yours........would stand up and run. I would vote for you.............if you ran for office. Have a nice day, Mam. 🙂 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Imgreatagain Posted Saturday at 03:46 PM Author Share Posted Saturday at 03:46 PM Just now, Taipan said: I would vote for you.............if you ran for office. Have a nice day, Mam. 🙂 I can barely run a vacuum . Lol 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
slideman Posted Saturday at 04:04 PM Share Posted Saturday at 04:04 PM Fake news No link Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Duck615 Posted Saturday at 04:07 PM Share Posted Saturday at 04:07 PM 2 minutes ago, slideman said: Fake news No link the skinflutist is fake Quote Link to post Share on other sites
slideman Posted Saturday at 04:07 PM Share Posted Saturday at 04:07 PM https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-terry-meza-castle-doctrine/factcheckdemocratictexas-rep-terry-meza-wants-to-amend-castle-doctrine-not-repeal-it-posts-feature-satirical-quotes-idUSKBN28L1ZB Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Duck615 Posted Saturday at 04:08 PM Share Posted Saturday at 04:08 PM the skinflutist using a uk link again Quote Link to post Share on other sites
slideman Posted Saturday at 04:08 PM Share Posted Saturday at 04:08 PM 56 minutes ago, Imgreatagain said: Are You Kidding Me? Is it possible for someone to be dumber than AOC??? In Texas, State Representative Terry Meza (D-Irving) has introduced HB196. Her bill would repeal the state's "Castle Doctrine." This doctrine allows a homeowner to use deadly force against an armed intruder who breaks into his home. Now listen to what she has to say... "I'm not saying that stealing is okay," Meza explained. "All I'm saying is that it doesn't warrant a death penalty. Thieves only carry weapons for self-protection and to provide the householder an incentive to cooperate. They just want to get their loot and get away. When the resident tries to resist is when people get hurt. If only one side is armed fewer people will be killed." Meza was quick to reassure that her bill would not totally prevent homeowners from defending themselves. Under her new law, “… the homeowner's obligation is to flee the home at the first sign of intrusion. If fleeing is not possible, he must cooperate with the intruder. But if violence breaks out it is the homeowner's responsibility to make sure no one gets hurt. The best way to achieve this is to use the minimum non-lethal force possible because intruders will be able to sue for any injuries they receive at the hands of the homeowner. "In most instances the thief needs the money more than the homeowner does," Meza reasoned. "The homeowner's insurance reimburse his losses. On balance, the transfer of property is likely to lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth. If my bill can help make this transfer a peaceful one so much the better. Your quotes are a satire You are an idiot 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Imgreatagain Posted Saturday at 04:09 PM Author Share Posted Saturday at 04:09 PM 1 minute ago, slideman said: https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-terry-meza-castle-doctrine/factcheckdemocratictexas-rep-terry-meza-wants-to-amend-castle-doctrine-not-repeal-it-posts-feature-satirical-quotes-idUSKBN28L1ZB The bill would add a requirement to try to safely retreat before using deadly force against an intruder, WHAT IF YOU CANT? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
slideman Posted Saturday at 04:10 PM Share Posted Saturday at 04:10 PM Just now, Imgreatagain said: The bill would add a requirement to try to safely retreat before using deadly force against an intruder, WHAT IF YOU CANT? Your OP is a f****** lie Quote Link to post Share on other sites
crazyhole Posted Saturday at 04:14 PM Share Posted Saturday at 04:14 PM 3 minutes ago, Imgreatagain said: The bill would add a requirement to try to safely retreat before using deadly force against an intruder, WHAT IF YOU CANT? It's a silly amendment because it's impossible to prove that someone tried to safely retreat. Regardless, why should any law protect a lawbreaker? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king of the county Posted Saturday at 04:14 PM Share Posted Saturday at 04:14 PM 1 hour ago, Imgreatagain said: Are You Kidding Me? Is it possible for someone to be dumber than AOC??? In Texas, State Representative Terry Meza (D-Irving) has introduced HB196. Her bill would repeal the state's "Castle Doctrine." This doctrine allows a homeowner to use deadly force against an armed intruder who breaks into his home. Now listen to what she has to say... "I'm not saying that stealing is okay," Meza explained. "All I'm saying is that it doesn't warrant a death penalty. Thieves only carry weapons for self-protection and to provide the householder an incentive to cooperate. They just want to get their loot and get away. When the resident tries to resist is when people get hurt. If only one side is armed fewer people will be killed." Meza was quick to reassure that her bill would not totally prevent homeowners from defending themselves. Under her new law, “… the homeowner's obligation is to flee the home at the first sign of intrusion. If fleeing is not possible, he must cooperate with the intruder. But if violence breaks out it is the homeowner's responsibility to make sure no one gets hurt. The best way to achieve this is to use the minimum non-lethal force possible because intruders will be able to sue for any injuries they receive at the hands of the homeowner. "In most instances the thief needs the money more than the homeowner does," Meza reasoned. "The homeowner's insurance reimburse his losses. On balance, the transfer of property is likely to lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth. If my bill can help make this transfer a peaceful one so much the better. Stupid and yes she is dumb as a box of rocks 🪨 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Imgreatagain Posted Saturday at 04:16 PM Author Share Posted Saturday at 04:16 PM 1 minute ago, crazyhole said: It's a silly amendment because it's impossible to prove that someone tried to safely retreat. Regardless, why should any law protect a lawbreaker? There are too many interpretations of retreating. my daughter used to cover her own eyes and say “mommy I’m hiding” Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Taipan Posted Saturday at 04:57 PM Share Posted Saturday at 04:57 PM 1 hour ago, Imgreatagain said: I can barely run a vacuum . Lol I think you are cool. I am always on your side. Peace. 🙂 https://youtu.be/TNFSED77-GM Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king of the county Posted Saturday at 05:00 PM Share Posted Saturday at 05:00 PM 52 minutes ago, slideman said: https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-terry-meza-castle-doctrine/factcheckdemocratictexas-rep-terry-meza-wants-to-amend-castle-doctrine-not-repeal-it-posts-feature-satirical-quotes-idUSKBN28L1ZB Fuck retreating this is America! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king of the county Posted Saturday at 05:01 PM Share Posted Saturday at 05:01 PM 1 hour ago, Imgreatagain said: I can barely run a vacuum . Lol I’ll be your maid 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ROG62 Posted Saturday at 09:17 PM Share Posted Saturday at 09:17 PM 6 hours ago, Imgreatagain said: Are You Kidding Me? Is it possible for someone to be dumber than AOC??? In Texas, State Representative Terry Meza (D-Irving) has introduced HB196. Her bill would repeal the state's "Castle Doctrine." This doctrine allows a homeowner to use deadly force against an armed intruder who breaks into his home. Now listen to what she has to say... "I'm not saying that stealing is okay," Meza explained. "All I'm saying is that it doesn't warrant a death penalty. Thieves only carry weapons for self-protection and to provide the householder an incentive to cooperate. They just want to get their loot and get away. When the resident tries to resist is when people get hurt. If only one side is armed fewer people will be killed." Meza was quick to reassure that her bill would not totally prevent homeowners from defending themselves. Under her new law, “… the homeowner's obligation is to flee the home at the first sign of intrusion. If fleeing is not possible, he must cooperate with the intruder. But if violence breaks out it is the homeowner's responsibility to make sure no one gets hurt. The best way to achieve this is to use the minimum non-lethal force possible because intruders will be able to sue for any injuries they receive at the hands of the homeowner. "In most instances the thief needs the money more than the homeowner does," Meza reasoned. "The homeowner's insurance reimburse his losses. On balance, the transfer of property is likely to lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth. If my bill can help make this transfer a peaceful one so much the better. Check the date...seems to be an old article.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.