Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What attracted me to this forum years ago was that a conservative owned it and, even though it was called a liberal forum, allowed conservatives to speak their mind with as little interference as possible.    It made for a good place to debate the left and explore the truth about various issues.   But the events of the past few weeks now prove that’s no longer the case.   That era is clearly over.  @kfools claims to own the site but out of the blue he made a new rule a few weeks ago that only 1 paragraph from any article could be posted.   Instead of just accepting that like the rests of you meek members, I argued against the rule, vehemently providing reasons why it was not a good rule …at least in my case


In the end, kfools offered a compromise.  He stated that I and I alone would be allowed me to post 1 article a day in it’s entirety sans 1 paragraph.  I thanked him for that privilege, foolishly assuming that it was now set in stone.    But yesterday I learned from teacher that luciferhammer hid one of the threads I started under that rule.  Ok, I thought … he just didn’t get the word.   So I showed him the post kfools made to me with the “compromise” and asked nicely that he unhide the thread.   He refused.   He said he doesn’t care what kfools said … that he’s not going to allow me to do what kfools gave me permission to do.   I notified kfools of this and he never even made an appearance or sent a PM.   


So, I can only conclude that kfools is merely a figurehead now, and that luciferhammer is in complete control of the forum’s operations.  It’s luciferhammer who has the final say on rules and their enforcement.   Some posters tell me that kfools told everyone that recently.     Maybe so, but folks, that means luciferhammer is going to selectively interpret and enforce the rules, as he has done in the past, without oversight.   Remember when he unilaterally decided to alter the interpretation of the 5 new threads in 24 hours rule?   He decided not to enforce it as it had been enforced for years and as kfools had clearly stated he wanted it enforced.   Many of you agreed at that time that luciferhammer was changing the rule … it wasn’t just me.     lh got his way.   kfools bowed to lh.  Groveled at his feet in fact.    That was my first warning that things had changed around here.


So, maybe I was a little slow on the uptake but clearly luciferhammer, a anti-Tea Party, anti-Gun, anti-Trump leftist, is now the boss of all things around here.     And what happens every time a leftist gets in control of a forum like this?   Censorship and rule changes that hurt conservatives follow.   I’ve seen it happen time and again.   And since kfools is just the joker everyone thinks he is … not the conservative he claims to be, that is the future of this forum.   And by not even having the courtesy to respond to my protests, kfools has demonstrated to me that he has no integrity, and that’s not a good thing for the owner of a forum.   If a conservative poster like me is nothing more than another target of his *jokes*, then it’s time to move on.     As luciferhammer just told me, it’s my choice.   At least I still have that freedom.   But maybe the rest of you won’t, given what coming.    Just saying …
 

  • Sad 1
  • Fuck you! 1
  • Thumb up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 129
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

If people had any real interest in reading these things, they would click on the links or simply go to your RWNJ propaganda sites and obnoxious opinion columns in the first place.   It's not

What attracted me to this forum years ago was that a conservative owned it and, even though it was called a liberal forum, allowed conservatives to speak their mind with as little interference as poss

tldr  

Pretty much  everything  you  have  posted  is  typical  Reds-under-the-bed  John Bircher   nonsense,which I first heard  in   the early 1960's but at least you were  not accusing  everyone who disagreed   with you of being  gay or sex  perverts, obsessed  with   shit  like TBHWT or shitstain Max or  ignorant   peckerwoods, so there's that.

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Zaro said:

I think the rule in question is stupid and should be sacked. A lot of links don't open due to a paywall

I  agree  it is a dumb rule.most issues cannot   be  addressed   in four   lines of text.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

I  agree  it is a dumb rule.most issues cannot   be  addressed   in four   lines of text.

but seriously, Beach Oozer's seventy-five page cut and paste rants about Ron Brown's posthumous skull Xray were a bit over the top.... doncha think?

  • Fuck you! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, maineman said:

but seriously, Beach Oozer's seventy-five page cut and paste rants about Ron Brown's posthumous skull Xray were a bit over the top.... doncha think?

I  seem to  have  missed that  one.  I  have decided not  to  regret missing  it.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, maineman said:

but seriously, Beach Oozer's seventy-five page cut and paste rants about Ron Brown's posthumous skull Xray were a bit over the top.... doncha think?

He burned up the bandwidth

  • Fuck you! 1
  • Thumb up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

I  agree  it is a dumb rule.most issues cannot   be  addressed   in four   lines of text.

I would agree with the premise of your statement but as the owner of the site,  kfools has internet copyright regulations to consider. I think those legality concerns are what lead to him imposing the new rule. As a mod it can be a pain in the ass to enforce. We have no intention to censor anyone's thread and at the same time we have to impartially follow the rules. Often we have to make judgement calls which result in rage rants by certain members, but that comes with the territory and is of no concern to the mods.

  • Fuck you! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, maineman said:

but seriously, Beach Oozer's seventy-five page cut and paste rants about Ron Brown's posthumous skull Xray were a bit over the top.... doncha think?

Over the top is the whole point of this operation

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, calguy said:

I would agree with the premise of your statement but as the owner of the site,  kfools has internet copyright regulations to consider. I think those legality concerns are what lead to him imposing the new rule. As a mod it can be a pain in the ass to enforce. We have no intention to censor anyone's thread and at the same time we have to impartially follow the rules. Often we have to make judgement calls which result in rage rants by certain members, but that comes with the territory and is of no concern to the mods.

 

 

could you repost the rule? I thought it was like the link's text  had to be together, not broken up, with the link either at top or bottom and one's own words not in the middle of the link's text.

Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, BeAChooser said:

What attracted me to this forum years ago was that a conservative owned it and, even though it was called a liberal forum, allowed conservatives to speak their mind with as little interference as possible.    It made for a good place to debate the left and explore the truth about various issues.   But the events of the past few weeks now prove that’s no longer the case.   That era is clearly over.  @kfools claims to own the site but out of the blue he made a new rule a few weeks ago that only 1 paragraph from any article could be posted.   Instead of just accepting that like the rests of you meek members, I argued against the rule, vehemently providing reasons why it was not a good rule …at least in my case


In the end, kfools offered a compromise.  He stated that I and I alone would be allowed me to post 1 article a day in it’s entirety sans 1 paragraph.  I thanked him for that privilege, foolishly assuming that it was now set in stone.    But yesterday I learned from teacher that luciferhammer hid one of the threads I started under that rule.  Ok, I thought … he just didn’t get the word.   So I showed him the post kfools made to me with the “compromise” and asked nicely that he unhide the thread.   He refused.   He said he doesn’t care what kfools said … that he’s not going to allow me to do what kfools gave me permission to do.   I notified kfools of this and he never even made an appearance or sent a PM.   


So, I can only conclude that kfools is merely a figurehead now, and that luciferhammer is in complete control of the forum’s operations.  It’s luciferhammer who has the final say on rules and their enforcement.   Some posters tell me that kfools told everyone that recently.     Maybe so, but folks, that means luciferhammer is going to selectively interpret and enforce the rules, as he has done in the past, without oversight.   Remember when he unilaterally decided to alter the interpretation of the 5 new threads in 24 hours rule?   He decided not to enforce it as it had been enforced for years and as kfools had clearly stated he wanted it enforced.   Many of you agreed at that time that luciferhammer was changing the rule … it wasn’t just me.     lh got his way.   kfools bowed to lh.  Groveled at his feet in fact.    That was my first warning that things had changed around here.


So, maybe I was a little slow on the uptake but clearly luciferhammer, a anti-Tea Party, anti-Gun, anti-Trump leftist, is now the boss of all things around here.     And what happens every time a leftist gets in control of a forum like this?   Censorship and rule changes that hurt conservatives follow.   I’ve seen it happen time and again.   And since kfools is just the joker everyone thinks he is … not the conservative he claims to be, that is the future of this forum.   And by not even having the courtesy to respond to my protests, kfools has demonstrated to me that he has no integrity, and that’s not a good thing for the owner of a forum.   If a conservative poster like me is nothing more than another target of his *jokes*, then it’s time to move on.     As luciferhammer just told me, it’s my choice.   At least I still have that freedom.   But maybe the rest of you won’t, given what coming.    Just saying …
 

 

sorry you feel you have to go.

Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, jerra- said:

 

 

could you repost the rule? I thought it was like the link's text  had to be together, not broken up, with the link either at top or bottom and one's own words not in the middle of the link's text.

The rule is listed in the rules link above the NHB topics. 

Rule 1. d. "If you want to post an article you may post the first paragraph then a link. You may do commentary before or after the the paragraph/link."

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, calguy said:

The rule is listed in the rules link above the NHB topics. 

Rule 1. d. "If you want to post an article you may post the first paragraph then a link. You may do commentary before or after the the paragraph/link."

Fuck you Fagot!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...