Jump to content

If Joe Biden Won Election With Most Votes EVER, Why Is The Left So Uncomfortable With


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

the Pennsylvania State Constitution requires in-person voting, and the only recognized exception to this requirement is the options reflected in Sec. 14, which were added to the Constitution via the accepted Amendment process in 1967.  Sec. 14 sets forth four specific bases for a qualified voter to cast an absentee vote under the Constitution:  1) the voter will be absent from their municipality because duties, occupation, or business needs require them to be elsewhere; 2) illness or physical disability; 3) observance of a religious holiday, and 4) due to status as a county worker.

 

 

Any changes to these  laws need to be  done as a Constitutional amendment.    Two  Consecutive votes by the  PA  Legislature and  then a public vote on election day.

 

The last two did not happen, so the entire mail in  drop box no excuse absentee ballots  were  thusly  illegal 

 

Its cut and dry

in the first place the objection should have been made before the election and in the second place the remedy can't be to throw all the votes out You're f*****

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 194
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Not needed Elnut. The election has been put to rest once and for all. Joe Biden will be your president tomorrow as trump takes his final ride on AF1. There will always be dead enders like you who

Having a thorough  audit  and  examination  of the  Election , so to put this all to  rest?     Clearly  the  left should  want to brag and  show off this  massive ass kicking.   

No. He should have never produced his birth certificate. He should have given Trump the finger

Just now, slideman said:

in the first place the objection should have been made before the election and in the second place the remedy can't be to throw all the votes out You're f*****

 

You moron, they did challenge it before and were told they ahd no injury, then they challenged it after  and they  were told it was to late

 

The entire process was illegal done  by the  executive branch of  PA, who has no authority in  election  regs.

 

And yes you can throw out  illegal votes

  • Thumb up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

You moron, they did challenge it before and were told they ahd no injury, then they challenged it after  and they  were told it was to late

 

The entire process was illegal done  by the  executive branch of  PA, who has no authority in  election  regs.

 

And yes you can throw out  illegal votes

which votes, specifically, do you think were illegal in PA?  

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

 

And yes you can throw out  illegal votes

no court in the land would EVER disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of voters who cast their ballots in good faith according to the rules.  Are you crazy?

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.npr.org/sections/biden-transition-updates/2020/11/29/939859062/pennsylvania-supreme-court-rejects-republican-suit-to-throw-out-ballots

 

The justices contended that if the plaintiffs had constitutional concerns over the mail-in voting law, their suit would have been filed earlier and not after millions of mail-in ballots were cast in the 2020 primary and general election. The justices further noted that the plaintiffs waited until after the votes had been tallied and their preferred presidential candidate lost the state.

"Unsatisfied with the results of that wager, they would now flip over the table, scattering to the shadows the votes of millions of Pennsylvanians," Justice David Wecht wrote in a statement concurring with the three-page order. "It is not our role to lend legitimacy to such transparent and untimely efforts to subvert the will of Pennsylvania voters."

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, slideman said:

in the first place the objection should have been made before the election and in the second place the remedy can't be to throw all the votes out You're f*****

 

 

There is a great explanation addressed to Hawley by one of his previous instructors as to why all is legal and constitutional and Hawley was in error.  You all should read it as soon as you learn to read (not aimed at you, Slideman :) ) .  

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, maineman said:

no court in the land would EVER disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of voters who cast their ballots in good faith according to the rules.  Are you crazy?

 

 

the  rules  were  unconstitutional  and therefore  illegal

 

the  whole thing is illegal 

  • Haha 1
  • Thumb up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

 

the  rules  were  unconstitutional  and therefore  illegal

 

the  whole thing is illegal 

Are going to have "trump was robbed" etched on your gravestone? You're obviously planning on taking this failed argument to your grave.

  • MORON! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, maineman said:

which votes, specifically, do you think were illegal in PA?  

Yes, tell us the names of the voters who committed fraud.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now, isn't all PA did was change the date the last ballot could be counted because the President said the post office needed extra time.  

 

How is that unconstitutional --- to accommodate situational voting problems caused by COVID?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pennsylvania modified its absentee/mail-in voting procedures for the November 3, 2020, general election as follows:

  • Absentee/mail-in voting: The mail-in ballot receipt deadline for the general election was extended to November 6, 2020. Drop boxes were made available to return ballots. The state provided prepaid return postage for all mail-in and absentee ballots.
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

 

the  rules  were  unconstitutional  and therefore  illegal

 

the  whole thing is illegal 

the courts disagreed.  And even IF there was a hint of impropriety, the remedy the republicans sought was inappropriately draconian.  Disenfranchising millions was grotesquely unfair.   The judges also said that, if the republicans had a problem with the procedure, they should have filed their suit before - or soon after - the springtime primary when it was first used, and not wait to see who WON (and lost)  the November election before deciding to object to the procedure.

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, EltonJohnson said:

Having a thorough  audit  and  examination  of the  Election , so to put this all to  rest?

 

 

Clearly  the  left should  want to brag and  show off this  massive ass kicking.   

 

 

Instead, we have Cancel Culture, talks of Deprogramming ,  Silencing  Questioning 

The left knows what we’ll find upon examination of those mail in ballots. Massive fraud. 

  • Thumb up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, maineman said:

the courts disagreed.  And even IF there was a hint of impropriety, the remedy the republicans sought was inappropriately draconian.  Disenfranchising millions was grotesquely unfair.   The judges also said that, if the republicans had a problem with the procedure, they should have filed their suit before - or soon after - the springtime primary when it was first used, and not wait to see who WON (and lost)  the November election before deciding to object to the procedure.

No. The courts did not disagree. Why do you keep parroting this same lie?  Virtually none of the evidence was presented in front of judges except for the 22 Dominion voting machines that were proven to affect the election results.

  • Thumb up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Str8tEdge said:

The left knows what we’ll find upon examination of those mail in ballots. Massive fraud. 

 

 

“But there is no evidence of widespread fraud ...  the courts said so”

 

rinse repeat

 

its 3rd world 1984 and Fahrenheit 451 all at the same  time

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, EltonJohnson said:

Having a thorough  audit  and  examination  of the  Election , so to put this all to  rest?

 

 

Clearly  the  left should  want to brag and  show off this  massive ass kicking.   

 

 

Instead, we have Cancel Culture, talks of Deprogramming ,  Silencing  Questioning 

Full Video: Georgia Senate Subcommittee Holds Hearing on Election Issues (ntd.com)

 

The ballots have yet to be released, and I predict they never will be.

 

 

  • Thumb up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, maineman said:

Disenfranchising millions was grotesquely unfair.

 

 

Disenfranchising legal voters was unfair assface.  The massive unverified swell of printed ballots coming from all over out of state was insane.   

 

The Draconians are the Democrats who engaged in grotesque unconstitutional acts to shut down society and take over the election.  

 

You are the enemy of the Constitution  

  • Thumb up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, FivebyFive said:

Amazing that the biggest story in the history of the US has no legs..

 

The only fraudulent votes Trump discovered were for him.  Three dead mothers voted for Trump in PA.

 

 

The place gets dumber when you post.  

  • Thumb up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

 

“But there is no evidence of widespread fraud ...  the courts said so”

 

rinse repeat

 

its 3rd world 1984 and Fahrenheit 451 all at the same  time

Yup. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Str8tEdge said:

No. The courts did not disagree. Why do you keep parroting this same lie?  Virtually none of the evidence was presented in front of judges except for the 22 Dominion voting machines that were proven to affect the election results.

cool story, bro.  Not factual, but, if it makes that scrotum easier to suckle, keep on believin'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...