Jump to content

If Joe Biden Won Election With Most Votes EVER, Why Is The Left So Uncomfortable With


Recommended Posts

America has probable cause rules re investigating crimes. 

WE don't investigate because a President known for lying decides to lie some more just because he is a sore loser and his voters are stupid enuf to believe him.    Produce the evidence - the probable cause - then you get the investigation.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 194
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Not needed Elnut. The election has been put to rest once and for all. Joe Biden will be your president tomorrow as trump takes his final ride on AF1. There will always be dead enders like you who

Having a thorough  audit  and  examination  of the  Election , so to put this all to  rest?     Clearly  the  left should  want to brag and  show off this  massive ass kicking.   

No. He should have never produced his birth certificate. He should have given Trump the finger

7 minutes ago, maineman said:

The turtle just threw the clown under the bus..... 

 

"The mob was fed lies", McConnell said.  "They were provoked by the president and other powerful people."

 

Come on everyone ...spell along with me:  C - O - N - V - I - C - T - I - O - N.

 

Provoking a murderous mob..... that sounds felonious to me.

 

 

"The mob was fed lies".....does not a a -conviction- make.

......

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, calguy said:

They weren't worthy of going to trial. PERIOD.

 

 

the biggest alleged crime in  US  history, and  not a single  one gets to go to  trial 

 

 

Scott Peterson was convicted of murder on  circumstantial evidence alone.

 

You are full of  uninformed bullshit calvin

  • Thumb up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

 

the biggest alleged crime in  US  history, and  not a single  one gets to go to  trial 

 

 

Scott Peterson was convicted of murder on  circumstantial evidence alone.

 

You are full of  uninformed bullshit calvin

 

The 2nd biggest - The Russia-Hoax

 

And BarrFaggot and DurhamFaggot did nothing.  ZILCH.

 

The SWAMP IS IN FULL CONTROL.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

If so,  that would have be proven, and  the subject of this is about proving  the election was not rigged.

 

There  has been  no transparency.

every bit as much transparency as there has been in any prior election.

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

 

the biggest alleged crime in  US  history, and  not a single  one gets to go to  trial 

 

 

Scott Peterson was convicted of murder on  circumstantial evidence alone.

 

You are full of  uninformed bullshit calvin

you have ZERO evidence of widespread fraud.  ZERO

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many states performed audits along w/ mandated recounts, on top of numerous law suits contending the validity of the election.  They lost them all.  
 

What makes anyone think that if an counsel were set up to only report no malfeasance, that trump supporters would just let it go?

 

They literally contest everything that doesn’t affirm to their predisposition that states donald won and everything else is a lie or corrupted.  
 

It won’t ever end unless they receive the result they want.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, maineman said:

you have ZERO evidence of widespread fraud.  ZERO

 

There  was  massive  illegal votes in enough precincts  GA, PA, MI, WI and AZ

 

You can shut up with  your denial of widespread fraud 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

There  was  massive  illegal votes in enough precincts  GA, PA, MI, WI and AZ

 

You can shut up with  your denial of widespread fraud 

and yet... not one scrap of actual evidence of these supposed massive illegal votes.

 

just baseless allegations that you continue to parrot.... WITH NO  PROOF!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, maineman said:

yet... not one scrap of actual evidence of these supposed massive illegal votes.

 

there was  tons of evidence 

 

For example The  entire  mail in vote in PA was illegal.   Yet was denied to be heard in court.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, EltonJohnson said:

Having a thorough  audit  and  examination  of the  Election , so to put this all to  rest?

 

 

Clearly  the  left should  want to brag and  show off this  massive ass kicking.   

 

 

Instead, we have Cancel Culture, talks of Deprogramming ,  Silencing  Questioning 

 

It is like David Copperfield ... never let them find out the truth.

 

Not so much David Blaine ... he is just an alien.

Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

there was  tons of evidence 

 

For example The  entire  mail in vote in PA was illegal.   Yet was denied to be heard in court.

 

 

not illegal. That argument was heard in court and the court rejected it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

My proof is the  PA and US Constitution 

^^^ sez the non-lawyer.  

 

Pennsylvania State Courts, a Federal District Court, and a Federal Appeals Court all say otherwise.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Toldya said:

Since everyone knows that every single person who could ever examine or audit the election is a closet librul, Never-Trumper, or person who has been bribed or blackmailed by Biden, what difference would it make?

You are correct. Joe Biden won the election, just as George W Bush won the election in 2000. .

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, maineman said:

not illegal. That argument was heard in court and the court rejected it.

 

 

you are a liar,  or dumb.

 

The PA Constitution is clear how voting  rules are changed.   They  did not follow the  Constitution, therefor e  not legal 

 

https://www.libertariannews.org/2020/11/22/pennsylvanias-no-excuse-mail-in-voting-system-violates-the-states-constitution/

 

The court was wrong and  likely corrupted.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

 

 

The court was wrong and  likely corrupted.

who gives a fuck what you think????

 

"likely corrupted"????

 

many of the judges who decided the PA case were clown appointees.

 

hahahahahahahahahahahahhaha

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

Which proves corruption  dipshit

 

 

hahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaaha

 

the sweaty stench of desperation wafts off of you.... swirls around you.  

 

you pathetic fool.

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, maineman said:

hahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaaha

 

the sweaty stench of desperation wafts off of you.... swirls around you.  

 

you pathetic fool.

 

your mental disorder is well documented  here  hellboi

Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, slideman said:

Everyone is in on it but you Elton

You're the only guy

 

 

There are  plenty of us who  understand  what happened 

 

You are  obviously a  supporter of  the  DC Ruling Class..   the question is why?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the Pennsylvania State Constitution requires in-person voting, and the only recognized exception to this requirement is the options reflected in Sec. 14, which were added to the Constitution via the accepted Amendment process in 1967.  Sec. 14 sets forth four specific bases for a qualified voter to cast an absentee vote under the Constitution:  1) the voter will be absent from their municipality because duties, occupation, or business needs require them to be elsewhere; 2) illness or physical disability; 3) observance of a religious holiday, and 4) due to status as a county worker.

 

 

Any changes to these  laws need to be  done as a Constitutional amendment.    Two  Consecutive votes by the  PA  Legislature and  then a public vote on election day.

 

The last two did not happen, so the entire mail in  drop box no excuse absentee ballots  were  thusly  illegal 

 

Its cut and dry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...