Scout Posted January 19 Share Posted January 19 America has probable cause rules re investigating crimes. WE don't investigate because a President known for lying decides to lie some more just because he is a sore loser and his voters are stupid enuf to believe him. Produce the evidence - the probable cause - then you get the investigation. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jefftec Posted January 19 Share Posted January 19 7 minutes ago, maineman said: The turtle just threw the clown under the bus..... "The mob was fed lies", McConnell said. "They were provoked by the president and other powerful people." Come on everyone ...spell along with me: C - O - N - V - I - C - T - I - O - N. Provoking a murderous mob..... that sounds felonious to me. "The mob was fed lies".....does not a a -conviction- make. ...... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
EltonJohnson Posted January 19 Author Share Posted January 19 1 hour ago, calguy said: They weren't worthy of going to trial. PERIOD. the biggest alleged crime in US history, and not a single one gets to go to trial Scott Peterson was convicted of murder on circumstantial evidence alone. You are full of uninformed bullshit calvin 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
CrimeaRiver Posted January 19 Share Posted January 19 7 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said: the biggest alleged crime in US history, and not a single one gets to go to trial Scott Peterson was convicted of murder on circumstantial evidence alone. You are full of uninformed bullshit calvin The 2nd biggest - The Russia-Hoax And BarrFaggot and DurhamFaggot did nothing. ZILCH. The SWAMP IS IN FULL CONTROL. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
maineman Posted January 19 Share Posted January 19 21 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said: If so, that would have be proven, and the subject of this is about proving the election was not rigged. There has been no transparency. every bit as much transparency as there has been in any prior election. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
maineman Posted January 19 Share Posted January 19 21 minutes ago, jefftec said: "The mob was fed lies".....does not a a -conviction- make. ...... wanna bet that Mitch votes to convict? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
maineman Posted January 19 Share Posted January 19 19 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said: the biggest alleged crime in US history, and not a single one gets to go to trial Scott Peterson was convicted of murder on circumstantial evidence alone. You are full of uninformed bullshit calvin you have ZERO evidence of widespread fraud. ZERO Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jrock2310 Posted January 19 Share Posted January 19 Many states performed audits along w/ mandated recounts, on top of numerous law suits contending the validity of the election. They lost them all. What makes anyone think that if an counsel were set up to only report no malfeasance, that trump supporters would just let it go? They literally contest everything that doesn’t affirm to their predisposition that states donald won and everything else is a lie or corrupted. It won’t ever end unless they receive the result they want. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
EltonJohnson Posted January 19 Author Share Posted January 19 45 minutes ago, maineman said: you have ZERO evidence of widespread fraud. ZERO There was massive illegal votes in enough precincts GA, PA, MI, WI and AZ You can shut up with your denial of widespread fraud Quote Link to post Share on other sites
maineman Posted January 19 Share Posted January 19 6 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said: There was massive illegal votes in enough precincts GA, PA, MI, WI and AZ You can shut up with your denial of widespread fraud and yet... not one scrap of actual evidence of these supposed massive illegal votes. just baseless allegations that you continue to parrot.... WITH NO PROOF!!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
EltonJohnson Posted January 19 Author Share Posted January 19 3 minutes ago, maineman said: yet... not one scrap of actual evidence of these supposed massive illegal votes. there was tons of evidence For example : The entire mail in vote in PA was illegal. Yet was denied to be heard in court. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
EltonJohnson Posted January 19 Author Share Posted January 19 5 minutes ago, maineman said: just baseless allegations that you continue to parrot.... WITH NO PROOF!!!! My proof is the PA and US Constitution Quote Link to post Share on other sites
whiteboy Posted January 19 Share Posted January 19 5 hours ago, EltonJohnson said: Having a thorough audit and examination of the Election , so to put this all to rest? Clearly the left should want to brag and show off this massive ass kicking. Instead, we have Cancel Culture, talks of Deprogramming , Silencing Questioning It is like David Copperfield ... never let them find out the truth. Not so much David Blaine ... he is just an alien. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
EltonJohnson Posted January 19 Author Share Posted January 19 5 hours ago, Duck615 said: SAD LIBERALS ARE SO SCARED OF TRUMP Terrified hate for the most liberal GOP president in history, and all he did was make America great again Quote Link to post Share on other sites
maineman Posted January 19 Share Posted January 19 43 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said: there was tons of evidence For example : The entire mail in vote in PA was illegal. Yet was denied to be heard in court. not illegal. That argument was heard in court and the court rejected it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
maineman Posted January 19 Share Posted January 19 43 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said: My proof is the PA and US Constitution ^^^ sez the non-lawyer. Pennsylvania State Courts, a Federal District Court, and a Federal Appeals Court all say otherwise. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Redoctober Posted January 19 Share Posted January 19 6 hours ago, Toldya said: Since everyone knows that every single person who could ever examine or audit the election is a closet librul, Never-Trumper, or person who has been bribed or blackmailed by Biden, what difference would it make? You are correct. Joe Biden won the election, just as George W Bush won the election in 2000. . Quote Link to post Share on other sites
EltonJohnson Posted January 19 Author Share Posted January 19 1 minute ago, maineman said: not illegal. That argument was heard in court and the court rejected it. you are a liar, or dumb. The PA Constitution is clear how voting rules are changed. They did not follow the Constitution, therefor e not legal https://www.libertariannews.org/2020/11/22/pennsylvanias-no-excuse-mail-in-voting-system-violates-the-states-constitution/ The court was wrong and likely corrupted. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
EltonJohnson Posted January 19 Author Share Posted January 19 Just now, maineman said: Pennsylvania State Courts, a Federal District Court, and a Federal Appeals Court all say otherwise. Which proves corruption dipshit Quote Link to post Share on other sites
slideman Posted January 19 Share Posted January 19 2 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said: Which proves corruption dipshit Everyone is in on it but you Elton You're the only guy 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
maineman Posted January 19 Share Posted January 19 5 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said: The court was wrong and likely corrupted. who gives a fuck what you think???? "likely corrupted"???? many of the judges who decided the PA case were clown appointees. hahahahahahahahahahahahhaha Quote Link to post Share on other sites
maineman Posted January 19 Share Posted January 19 3 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said: Which proves corruption dipshit hahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaaha the sweaty stench of desperation wafts off of you.... swirls around you. you pathetic fool. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
EltonJohnson Posted January 19 Author Share Posted January 19 23 minutes ago, maineman said: hahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaaha the sweaty stench of desperation wafts off of you.... swirls around you. you pathetic fool. your mental disorder is well documented here hellboi Quote Link to post Share on other sites
EltonJohnson Posted January 19 Author Share Posted January 19 27 minutes ago, slideman said: Everyone is in on it but you Elton You're the only guy There are plenty of us who understand what happened You are obviously a supporter of the DC Ruling Class.. the question is why? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
EltonJohnson Posted January 19 Author Share Posted January 19 the Pennsylvania State Constitution requires in-person voting, and the only recognized exception to this requirement is the options reflected in Sec. 14, which were added to the Constitution via the accepted Amendment process in 1967. Sec. 14 sets forth four specific bases for a qualified voter to cast an absentee vote under the Constitution: 1) the voter will be absent from their municipality because duties, occupation, or business needs require them to be elsewhere; 2) illness or physical disability; 3) observance of a religious holiday, and 4) due to status as a county worker. Any changes to these laws need to be done as a Constitutional amendment. Two Consecutive votes by the PA Legislature and then a public vote on election day. The last two did not happen, so the entire mail in drop box no excuse absentee ballots were thusly illegal Its cut and dry Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.