rippy38 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 6 minutes ago, maineman said: it was a succinct answer to all of the posts in question.... you fucking pansy ass hall monitor. go fuck yourself. You can't talk to management that way! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jerra- Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 2 hours ago, Duck615 said: there can be no trial in the senate once Trump leaves office ---------------------------- --------------------------------- This time, the Senate could go a few different ways: — A traditional trial with similar lengths of argument that would extend a couple of weeks and consume the Senate's focus during the early days of the Biden administration. — A truncated trial that includes significantly briefer presentations, an acknowledgment of the more public nature of the evidence against Trump. — A lengthier half-day-at-a-time trial that permits the Senate to focus on its other business for large parts of the day. Biden has suggested this approach as a compromise that will allow him to govern with Congress in his early tenure even as the Senate considers the charge against Trump. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
maineman Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 1 minute ago, rippy38 said: You can't talk to management that way! I can piss on you. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
rippy38 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 6 minutes ago, maineman said: I can piss on you. You should be thanking me... I just saved you from a spam charge. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Duck615 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 13 minutes ago, jerra- said: ---------------------------- --------------------------------- This time, the Senate could go a few different ways: — A traditional trial with similar lengths of argument that would extend a couple of weeks and consume the Senate's focus during the early days of the Biden administration. — A truncated trial that includes significantly briefer presentations, an acknowledgment of the more public nature of the evidence against Trump. — A lengthier half-day-at-a-time trial that permits the Senate to focus on its other business for large parts of the day. Biden has suggested this approach as a compromise that will allow him to govern with Congress in his early tenure even as the Senate considers the charge against Trump. there is no solid evidence you fucking liberal POS faggot Quote Link to post Share on other sites
maineman Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 9 minutes ago, rippy38 said: You should be thanking me... I just saved you from a spam charge. yawn Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MidnightMax Posted January 14 Author Share Posted January 14 1 hour ago, Str8tEdge said: You mean his media made up the story and LIED to @maineman like they lied about EVERYTHING? Uh, you think?? 52 minutes ago, SpyCar said: He can be tried and convicted after his term ends, as removal from office is not the only remedy the Senate has to punish an unfaithful president. Bill Really?? So where in the CONSTITUTION is that little ditty you just pulled out of your ASS??? Kinda like maineBITCH of mine that pulled HIS SHIT out of HIS or his HANDLERS ASS!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MidnightMax Posted January 14 Author Share Posted January 14 Hey @SpyCarwho is no longer about to PLAY LITTLE GOD..... HERE is where your fucking SHIT YOU PULLED OUT OF YOUR ASS FAILS!!! CONSTITUTION SAYS.... Judgement in Cases of Impreachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office.... So if it SHALL NOT EXTEND more than REMOVING him, and he is NO LONGER IN OFFICE, what are you going to "remove"?? There is NO CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISION for CONVICTION OR TRIAL OF A PERSON NO LONGER IN OFFICE YOU DUMB AS A FUCKING ROCK MORON!!! Just like you can't take a dead person to court and convict him/her, you have NO LEGAL FOUNDATION TO TRY A NON-SITTING PRESIDENT!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ROG62 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 2 hours ago, Duck615 said: Guess these asshole democrats don't want the country to come together..... there is no constitution in the democratic mindset... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Str8tEdge Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 24 minutes ago, MidnightMax said: Uh, you think?? Really?? So where in the CONSTITUTION is that little ditty you just pulled out of your ASS??? Kinda like maineBITCH of mine that pulled HIS SHIT out of HIS or his HANDLERS ASS!!! McConnell turned down an emergency session to hear the impeachment articles. Welcome to impeachment failure part 2. Democrats have cheapened impeachment and racism to be meaningless at this point. What a failure they are. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jerra- Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 1 hour ago, rippy38 said: Why would he be in the primaries in 2024? Presidents can only serve two terms. they can't serve 3 consecutive terms. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jerra- Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 55 minutes ago, Duck615 said: there is no solid evidence you fucking liberal POS faggot lol-- it is all on video. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king of the county Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 10 hours ago, maineman said: who cares? Convicting him prevents him from ever running again. Doncha think that Cruz and Hawley would LOVE to not have to worry about the clown in the primaries for the next election? Anybody can beat kameltoe Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king of the county Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 The senate isn’t even in session Quote Link to post Share on other sites
rippy38 Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 3 minutes ago, king of the county said: The senate isn’t even in session Nope... and the Turtle said he wasn't calling them back until after the inauguration either. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MidnightMax Posted January 14 Author Share Posted January 14 8 hours ago, jerra- said: they can't serve 3 consecutive terms. No, MORON, they can't serve more than 2 terms no matter how they do it- consecutive or otherwise. Are you SHITSTAINS incapable of actually READING the Constitution?? Yes, the AMENDMENTS are part of that document. It's even written in PLAIN ENGLISH too. OH WAIT, you MORONS went to a PUBLIC INDOCTRINATION CENTER, so I guess they no longer TEACH THE CONSTITUTION since doing so would mean you have actual CIVIC EDUCATED PEOPLE and when you have that, you can't MANIPULATE YOU FUCKING IMBECILES so easy. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king of the county Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 4 minutes ago, rippy38 said: Nope... and the Turtle said he wasn't calling them back until after the inauguration either. Case closed Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SixShooter Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 11 hours ago, maineman said: they can impeach him solely for the purpose of preventing him from ever running again. 11 hours ago, SixShooter said: He's already impeached, dumbfuck. 10 hours ago, maineman said: that's wrong. Bump to show mainemoron's stupidity. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MidnightMax Posted January 14 Author Share Posted January 14 9 hours ago, jerra- said: ---------------------------- --------------------------------- This time, the Senate could go a few different ways: — A traditional trial with similar lengths of argument that would extend a couple of weeks and consume the Senate's focus during the early days of the Biden administration. — A truncated trial that includes significantly briefer presentations, an acknowledgment of the more public nature of the evidence against Trump. — A lengthier half-day-at-a-time trial that permits the Senate to focus on its other business for large parts of the day. Biden has suggested this approach as a compromise that will allow him to govern with Congress in his early tenure even as the Senate considers the charge against Trump. ANOTHER goddamn IDIOT!!! So, SHITSTAIN, the REMEDY (sentence) for a conviction of IMPEACHMENT is removal from office. PERIOD, And in order to REMOVE SOMEONE, they must HOLD that office. Just like you can't take a DEAD MAN to court and get a CONVICTION, you can't try a NON SITTING PERSON to remove them from office they no longer hold. ADD TO IT, you are bringing charges against a SITTING PRESIDENT. AND he has the RIGHT TO BE AT THE "Trial" you SHITSTAINS think you have a right to to hold AFTER he leaves office. Well, guess what, you CANNOT COMPEL HIM TO APPEAR nor can you COMPEL him to offer ANY defense since a NO LONGER SITTING PRESIDENT DOES NOT HAVE TO APPEAR OR PROVIDE COUNCIL TO APPEAR IN HIS BEHALF EITHER. AND THAT, my friend, IS TOTALLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL to have ANY "trial" WITHOUT THE DEFENDANT OR HIS COUNCIL PRESENT !!! So you LOSE moron, on BOTH COUNTS!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MidnightMax Posted January 14 Author Share Posted January 14 Just now, SixShooter said: Bump to show mainemoron's stupidity. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA maineMYBITCH thinks you can try DEAD PEOPLE for their crimes too!!! Yeah, she is THAT goddamn STUPID. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
maineman Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 2 hours ago, SixShooter said: Bump to show mainemoron's stupidity. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA the senate can convict after he has left office for the sole purpose of preventing him from ever holding high office again. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SixShooter Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 2 minutes ago, maineman said: the senate can convict after he has left office for the sole purpose of preventing him from ever holding high office again. Stop running from the POINT of the post you replied to, loser. LMAO Quote Link to post Share on other sites
maineman Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 7 minutes ago, SixShooter said: Stop running from the POINT of the post you replied to, loser. LMAO that IS the point. that is why the house impeached even though the clown will be gone in six days anyway...so that the senate can have the opportunity to irrevocably bury him. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SixShooter Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 22 minutes ago, maineman said: that IS the point. No, the point is you thought the Senate impeaches the president. Dumbass. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
maineman Posted January 14 Share Posted January 14 16 minutes ago, SixShooter said: No, the point is you thought the Senate impeaches the president. Dumbass. I have never thought that. fool. Address the point I made or move on. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.