Dontlooknow Posted November 28, 2020 Author Share Posted November 28, 2020 Just now, RayDonavin said: PA will not have to go to the SC. No the supreme court already ruled the faithless electors can't vote other than the state has voted. So its illegal. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RayDonavin Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 Just now, Dontlooknow said: The supreme court already ruled that it's unlawful for an elector to vote against it's state. So the senators can't make law to elect their own doctors to the electoral college. So with the majority of the legal vote going to Trump how are the electors voting against it's state? Are you trying to say those who cheated at our presidential election should face no charges? That you think it OK? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RayDonavin Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 1 minute ago, Dontlooknow said: No the supreme court already ruled the faithless electors can't vote other than the state has voted. So its illegal. You seem to have a brain fart going. Without the illegal votes Trump wins in a landslide. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
crazyhole Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 3 minutes ago, Dontlooknow said: The supreme court already ruled that it's unlawful for an elector to vote against it's state. So the senators can't make law to elect their own doctors to the electoral college. Thats not what it says. It says that electors are bound to vote for the candidate they are pledged to vote for. It says nothing about how electors must be chosen. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dontlooknow Posted November 28, 2020 Author Share Posted November 28, 2020 12 minutes ago, RayDonavin said: Get another source. A legitimate source. The supreme court has rules that any electors to the electoral college has to vote with the state. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
crazyhole Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 2 minutes ago, Dontlooknow said: The supreme court has rules that any electors to the electoral college has to vote with the state. Are you 15 or just mentally retarded? Thats what what the ruling said. Once selected by the state legislature, based on whatever laws they use to appoint them, the electors are required to vote as they pledged to do. Its not that complicated. In the case of PA, and apparently Wisconsin, there are laws that have been passed that are unconstitutional based on their own state constitutions and are therefore illegal. That being the case, it reverts back to the original law. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dontlooknow Posted November 28, 2020 Author Share Posted November 28, 2020 1 minute ago, Butthead said: Are you 15 or just mentally retarded? Thats what what the ruling said. Once selected by the state legislature, based on whatever laws they use to appoint them, the electors are required to vote as they pledged to do. Its not that complicated. In the case of PA, and apparently Wisconsin, there are laws that have been passed that are unconstitutional based on their own state constitutions and are therefore illegal. That being the case, it reverts back to the original law. So the election doesn't matter the legislators can pick whomever wins the electors. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dontlooknow Posted November 28, 2020 Author Share Posted November 28, 2020 3 minutes ago, Butthead said: Are you 15 or just mentally retarded? Thats what what the ruling said. Once selected by the state legislature, based on whatever laws they use to appoint them, the electors are required to vote as they pledged to do. Its not that complicated. In the case of PA, and apparently Wisconsin, there are laws that have been passed that are unconstitutional based on their own state constitutions and are therefore illegal. That being the case, it reverts back to the original law. So why have an election? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Olivaw Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 1 hour ago, Dontlooknow said: https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/experts-scorch-pennsylvania-senators-nakedly-indefensibly-anti-democratic-attempt-to-replace-states-electoral-college-voters/ This forum is turning into a joke and an embarrassment. There was one pinned thread about the election and one pin thread for the cult deny Trump’s landslide loss through false allegations of fraud. The election thread was unpinned. The excuses thread remained pinned. The cult creates at least a dozen additional wet dream threads daily to pretend that dear loser did not lose. President and grifter in chief Donald Trump’s term will automatically expire at noon on Jan 20th, 2021. President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. will be sworn in at noon on Jan 20th, 2021. Expect weeping and gnashing of teeth from the right. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
crazyhole Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 1 minute ago, Dontlooknow said: So the election doesn't matter the legislators can pick whomever wins the electors. Just depends on each states constitution. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dontlooknow Posted November 28, 2020 Author Share Posted November 28, 2020 Just now, Olivaw said: This forum is turning into a joke and an embarrassment. There was one pinned thread about the election and one pin thread for the cult deny Trump’s landslide loss through false allegations of fraud. The election thread was unpinned. The excuses thread remained pinned. The cult creates at least a dozen additional wet dream threads daily to pretend that dear loser did not lose. President and grifter in chief Donald Trump’s term will automatically expire at noon on Jan 20th, 2021. President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. will be sworn in at noon on Jan 20th, 2021. Expect weeping and gnashing of teeth from the right. But trump can still steal this. You just gotta have the legislators of the state say who won. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dontlooknow Posted November 28, 2020 Author Share Posted November 28, 2020 Just now, Butthead said: Just depends on each states constitution. So why have elections? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dontlooknow Posted November 28, 2020 Author Share Posted November 28, 2020 1 minute ago, Butthead said: Just depends on each states constitution. Show me where the state constutition says it can overturn the election. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
crazyhole Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 Just now, Dontlooknow said: So why have elections? At this point, most states have legally bound their selection of electors to the states popular votes. That is essentially a formality because fraud is rarely an issue of concern but the legislatures still hold the authority to override it based on the US constitution. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dontlooknow Posted November 28, 2020 Author Share Posted November 28, 2020 https://www.npr.org/2020/07/06/885168480/supreme-court-rules-state-faithless-elector-laws-constitutional According to this it's not legal. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
crazyhole Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 3 minutes ago, Dontlooknow said: Show me where the state constutition says it can overturn the election. You'd have to look at each individual states constitution. In PA, the laws that were passed to give authority to the secretary of state to appoint electors on their behalf was an unconstitutional act. On top of that they have the issue of changing voting laws that are spelled out in their constitution. Due to that, it reverts back to both their constitution and to the US constitution based on the supremacy clause. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Olivaw Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 3 minutes ago, Dontlooknow said: But trump can still steal this. You just gotta have the legislators of the state say who won. They have 26 of 203 legislators on board with the steal in PA. The Republican speaker is NOT on board. It is almost certainly a dog and pony show for the rubes. They waited until the last minute when the odds of passage is somewhere between minuscule and none. It would be vetoed. It would never survive a court challenge. That’s good enough for @EltonJohnson. It lets him exist in a state of denial for another day or two. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
benson13 Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 ""the fraud in PA is rampant"" claims trump, as he tells his Idiots ""SEND ME $$$$$$$$$...I'M GOING TO KEEP UP THE FIGHT WITH YOUR HELP'" Suckers 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
solarcell Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 49 minutes ago, Zaro said: The SC ruled on faithless electors back in July. "No ground for reversing statewide popular vote" well, if the legislature picks Democratic electors, they vote Demonrat. If the legislature chooses Republican electors, they vote Republican. No faithless electors there. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
benson13 Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 hillbillys....just sent your ConMan..Prez INSANE $$$$$ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Zaro Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 2 minutes ago, solarcell said: well, if the legislature picks Democratic electors, they vote Demonrat. If the legislature chooses Republican electors, they vote Republican. No faithless electors there. Still hopeful? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
solarcell Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 1 minute ago, Zaro said: If the states popular vote goes for the Dem candidate, the Dems pick the electors the Legislature has the power. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
crazyhole Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 Just now, solarcell said: well, if the legislature picks Democratic electors, they vote Demonrat. If the legislature chooses Republican electors, they vote Republican. No faithless electors there. Why is this faithless elector issue even a thing? Whoever gets appointed as an elector has already stated how they will vote. Its a weird obsession for people to worry about. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
solarcell Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 1 minute ago, Butthead said: Why is this faithless elector issue even a thing? Whoever gets appointed as an elector has already stated how they will vote. Its a weird obsession for people to worry about. yep, it's only a matter of which electors get picked. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Olivaw Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 27 minutes ago, solarcell said: yep, it's only a matter of which electors get picked. Talk is cheap. The grifter needs $$$$$$$. Send them now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.