Jump to content

PENNSYLVANIA JUDGE: 2020 ELECTION LIKELY UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND TRUMP LIKELY TO PREVAIL


Recommended Posts

Just now, Zaro said:

The only difference is that this one is even more ridiculous than the others

Not really.    Its like if congress passed a law that said citizens are required to board soldiers in a time of peace.   It isn't legal because it's unconstitutional, and there is a proper remedy for them to change the constitution if they feel its necessary.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Butthead said:

Not really.    Its like if congress passed a law that said citizens are required to board soldiers in a time of peace.   It isn't legal because it's unconstitutional, and there is a proper remedy for them to change the constitution if they feel its necessary.  

Not really. This doozy asks not to certify the winner of an election

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Zaro said:

Not really. This doozy asks not to certify the winner of an election

It references the SCOTUS deadline of December 8th as a point of reference, basically saying they don't have to do it until then regardless.   The judge feels that the case has merit and there is no reason to finalize things until then, pending a further ruling.   Its not an unreasonable move on his part.   

  • Thumb up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...