RayDonavin Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slideman Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 He didn't introduce a single fact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaro Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 9 minutes ago, RayDonavin said: Issues and irregularities. Not fraud Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayDonavin Posted November 25, 2020 Author Share Posted November 25, 2020 3 minutes ago, Zaro said: Issues and irregularities. Not fraud Issues and irregularities? Fraud could not be under one of those categories? Election fraud comes under many guises. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaro Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 2 minutes ago, RayDonavin said: Issues and irregularities? Fraud could not be under one of those categories? Election fraud comes under many guises. No. Fraud is premeditated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayDonavin Posted November 25, 2020 Author Share Posted November 25, 2020 3 minutes ago, Zaro said: No. Fraud is premeditated And issues or irregularities are not? You bet the election fraud was premeditated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaro Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 2 minutes ago, RayDonavin said: And issues or irregularities are not? You bet the election fraud was premeditated. What you wanna bet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olivaw Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 This is not a hearing. It’s a GOP event in a hotel. next Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayDonavin Posted November 25, 2020 Author Share Posted November 25, 2020 3 minutes ago, Dontlooknow said: So your saying that the challenge to the law passed by republicans before the election as unconstitutional is voter fraud correct? 3 minutes ago, Dontlooknow said: So your saying that the challenge to the law passed by republicans before the election as unconstitutional is voter fraud correct? How about some context? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayDonavin Posted November 25, 2020 Author Share Posted November 25, 2020 Just now, Olivaw said: This is not a hearing. It’s a GOP event in a hotel. Stop with the mushrooms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Olivaw Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 6 minutes ago, RayDonavin said: Stop with the mushrooms. Stop with the desperation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calguy Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 42 minutes ago, RayDonavin said: Sometimes I actually feel a bit sorry for you Ray. These right wing hucksters have you running down every dead end rabbit hole they can find. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duck615 Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 43 minutes ago, slideman said: He didn't introduce a single fact. investigations will produce the facts fucknut Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayDonavin Posted November 25, 2020 Author Share Posted November 25, 2020 59 minutes ago, slideman said: He didn't introduce a single fact. So eyewitness testimony is not fact? Retard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calguy Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 3 minutes ago, RayDonavin said: So eyewitness testimony is not fact? Retard. yawn .... zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calguy Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 10 minutes ago, RayDonavin said: So eyewitness testimony is not fact? Retard. Tweet See new Tweets Tweet Josh Shapiro @JoshShapiroPA · 7m The sitting president’s remarks today were devoid of reality. The election is over. Pennsylvania has certified results & declared Joe Biden the winner of our Commonwealth. Lying through a cell phone at a fake hearing changes nothing. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squatchman Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 1 hour ago, RayDonavin said: Oh my! You got 'em dead to rights. 🤣😂🤣😂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calguy Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 So, how do you get a former Trump administration employee off your front porch? Pay for the pizza! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayDonavin Posted November 25, 2020 Author Share Posted November 25, 2020 6 minutes ago, Squatchman said: Oh my! You got 'em dead to rights. 🤣😂🤣😂 So allowing the voting process to be compromised is ok with you? Thought so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calguy Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 Just now, RayDonavin said: So allowing the voting process to be compromised is ok with you? Thought so. You have to prove it was compromised. You can't. Cuz it wasn't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calguy Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 Trump needs to be charged with Sedition. After this atrocity of a phone call into the phony “hearing” in Pennsylvania, he should be arrested and charged with Sedition. The man is a psychopath and he is a clear and present danger to the nation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrock2310 Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 There’s a reason they’re holding these “hearings” for the public and not in a courtroom. There is no discernible punishment for lying to the public. Conversely, I bet they don’t push this same narrative in front of a judge. Why? Perjury. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayDonavin Posted November 25, 2020 Author Share Posted November 25, 2020 6 minutes ago, jrock2310 said: There’s a reason they’re holding these “hearings” for the public and not in a courtroom. There is no discernible punishment for lying to the public. Conversely, I bet they don’t push this same narrative in front of a judge. Why? Perjury. Too funny all these people have sworn under oath their statements are true. Keep squirming. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayDonavin Posted November 25, 2020 Author Share Posted November 25, 2020 11 minutes ago, calguy said: You have to prove it was compromised. You can't. Cuz it wasn't. So election officials allowing illegal votes is not compromising an election? Interesting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaro Posted November 25, 2020 Share Posted November 25, 2020 1 minute ago, RayDonavin said: So election officials allowing illegal votes is not compromising an election? Interesting. Look Ray. Everything else failed. It's time to pray Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.