Pastafarian Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 But Trump’s lawyers got none. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Str8tEdge Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 7 minutes ago, Pastafarian said: But Trump’s lawyers got none. Because hundreds of sworn affidavits are not evidence according to the left. 😆 What Democrats did is stuff ballots with illegal mail in ballots while destroying the envelope they were contained in that proved they were fraudulent. This is why in some counties voter participation exceeds 100% where other parts of the country where no fraud allegations are, the participation rate is only 50-70%. You guys think you’re clever but you aren’t. Statistical analysis has exposed your fraud. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theLion Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 Carlson: >So that's a long way of saying we took Sidney Powell seriously with no intention of fighting with her. We've always respected her work, we simply wanted to see the details. How could you not want to see them? So we invited Sydney Powell on the show. We would have given her the whole hour. We would have given her the entire week, actually, and listened quietly the whole time at rapt attention. But she never sent us any evidence, despite a lot of polite requests. When we kept pressing, she got angry and told us to stop contacting her. When we checked with others around the Trump campaign, people in positions of authority, they also told us Powell had never given them any evidence to prove anything she claimed today at the press conference.< When Faux Noise’s chief right wing conspiracy theory bullshit peddler calls you out, you’d better find another line of work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post BeAChooser Posted November 20, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted November 20, 2020 Quote Tucker Carlson wants to see evidence of election fraud Why would Sydney Powell reveal their case to someone who, because he chose to stick with Fox who we now know is in the pocket of the UNIPARTY, might be part of the UNIPARTY as well? No, pasta for brains, I think Powell is wise to keep's Trump's cards close to the vest ... until they bring the case before the Supreme Court. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theLion Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 4 minutes ago, BeAChooser said: Why would Sydney Powell reveal their case to someone who, because he chose to stick with Fox who we now know is in the pocket of the UNIPARTY, might be part of the UNIPARTY as well? No, pasta for brains, I think Powell is wise to keep's Trump's cards close to the vest ... until they bring the case before the Supreme Court. Are you really that ignorant of how appellate courts operate, or are you just faking such ignorance for some reason? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeAChooser Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 1 hour ago, theLion said: Are you really that ignorant of how appellate courts operate, or are you just faking such ignorance for some reason? Who says this will be done on appeal? You do realize that the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction for disputes to which a state is a party, which would surely be the case here, snowflake. In fact, I think they'd be eager to hear a case of this magnitude and not leave it to lower courts which may be part of the problem (corruption) here. Just saying ... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redoctober Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 3 hours ago, Pastafarian said: But Trump’s lawyers got none. I was talking to some friends and we were saying the same thing. If you have the DAMN evidence, then show it. Don't just spread FUD. I will go a step further, if this is real, the people responsible should be tried for treason and if convicted hung. The problem is I don't believe what they are saying. There was certainly voter fraud in this election but it isn't enough to change the fact that Biden won the election. It will be certified and the electoral college will vote him into office. As I state before, we need to focus in on the senate. That is where the fight is now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pastafarian Posted November 20, 2020 Author Share Posted November 20, 2020 5 hours ago, Str8tEdge said: Because hundreds of sworn affidavits are not evidence according to the left. 😆 What Democrats did is stuff ballots with illegal mail in ballots while destroying the envelope they were contained in that proved they were fraudulent. This is why in some counties voter participation exceeds 100% where other parts of the country where no fraud allegations are, the participation rate is only 50-70%. You guys think you’re clever but you aren’t. Statistical analysis has exposed your fraud. Lol, shitty nurse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Str8tEdge Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 1 hour ago, Pastafarian said: Lol, shitty nurse. Well? Sworn testimony under the penalty of perjury is usually considered evidence unless it’s about Democrat fraud. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benson13 Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 theLion Carlson: >So that's a long way of saying we took Sidney Powell seriously with no intention of fighting with her. We've always respected her work, we simply wanted to see the details. How could you not want to see them? So we invited Sydney Powell on the show. We would have given her the whole hour. We would have given her the entire week, actually, and listened quietly the whole time at rapt attention. But she never sent us any evidence, despite a lot of polite requests. When we kept pressing, she got angry and told us to stop contacting her. When we checked with others around the Trump campaign, people in positions of authority, they also told us Powell had never given them any evidence to prove anything she claimed today at the press conference.< when the Clown tucker doubts the rightwing BS.....you know its BS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pastafarian Posted November 20, 2020 Author Share Posted November 20, 2020 30 minutes ago, Str8tEdge said: Well? Sworn testimony under the penalty of perjury is usually considered evidence unless it’s about Democrat fraud. Thrown out of court. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benson13 Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 28 of the Lying ConMans BOGUS FRAUD CASES have now been thrown out....but his Idiot Brigade still believes them all Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chongo Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 7 hours ago, Pastafarian said: But Trump’s lawyers got none. The kid in the basement is naive about the world, Fox did not even cover the news conference = they don't really want to know anything and you cant really blame news people for that. in the 1950s superman TV show superman would fly around and kick the shit out of the gangsters who were threatening Jimmy and Lois Lane, in 2020 even the possible new vice president of the USA has threatened to stalk USA Republican individuals who are not in total agreement with her policy's. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pastafarian Posted November 20, 2020 Author Share Posted November 20, 2020 1 minute ago, Chongo said: The kid in the basement is naive about the world, Fox did not even cover the news conference = they don't really want to know anything and you cant really blame news people for that. in the 1950s superman TV show superman would fly around and kick the shit out of the gangsters who were threatening Jimmy and Lois Lane, in 2020 even the possible new vice president of the USA has threatened to stalk USA Republican individuals who are not in total agreement with her policy's. There was no evidence provided at the news conference. Stop sucking Trump’s dick and be a man, loser. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whiteboy Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 1 minute ago, Pastafarian said: There was no evidence provided at the news conference. Well shit ... I thought in this country, we hold every trial at news conferences ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Str8tEdge Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 59 minutes ago, Pastafarian said: Thrown out of court. 😆Thrown out of court? 😆 Maybe what lawyers asked for as a result was thrown out but the testimony was given under the penalty of perjury. You cannot spin away this election was fraudulent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chongo Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 6 minutes ago, Pastafarian said: There was no evidence provided at the news conference. Stop sucking Trump’s dick and be a man, loser. The news conference was not covered by the MSM and was designed to create some curiosity about the court case, MSM and there pards have no interest in the story. Sunshine and rainbows on the way to der nazi-commie socialist Venezuela kangaroo court style Gov Anchors at Sinclair-owned local news station parrot a script pushing Trump talking points and “the troubling trend of irresponsible, one sided news stories plaguing our country.” (not loading, they dont want you to see) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fHfgU8oMSo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neue regel Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 9 hours ago, Pastafarian said: But Trump’s lawyers got none. Indeed. As does Ben Shapiro...because they are interested in the truth. It’s what we need. I wish someone of consequence on the left would have been interested in the truth during the Russian collusion hoax. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duck615 Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 SORRY YOU DIDN'T UNDERSTAND A WORD THEY SAID YESTERDAY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pastafarian Posted November 20, 2020 Author Share Posted November 20, 2020 32 minutes ago, Str8tEdge said: 😆Thrown out of court? 😆 Maybe what lawyers asked for as a result was thrown out but the testimony was given under the penalty of perjury. You cannot spin away this election was fraudulent. And recanted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duck615 Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 IT IS A RIOT WATCHING THESE LIBTARDS GOING APESHIT.... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chongo Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 12 minutes ago, kfools said: They said it was an opening statement. They said they are still gathering evidence. Evidence provided as follow. 1.Sworn affidavits. 2.Overvote count irregularities 3. County vote irregularities 4. The 3AM Biden ballot dump that has not been explained 5. The signature problems for ballot verification When he says that's enough by itself to overturn an election he is correct. These irregularities are real. You can explain then and neither can anybody else. That's called EVIDENCE! They have a witness who is going to testify about dominion voting machine software election rigging, biggest news story in the history of the world, Trump votes deleted and replaced with Biden votes via voting machine software 11-20-2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
solarcell Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 9 hours ago, Pastafarian said: But Trump’s lawyers got none. he's not the judge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chongo Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 1 minute ago, Dontlooknow said: Nor is rudy. And the judges been throwing out your claims left and right. News around the world Trump votes deleted and replaced with Biden votes via voting machine software 11-20-2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
solarcell Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 1 minute ago, Dontlooknow said: Nor is rudy. And the judges been throwing out your claims left and right. not MY claims. I'm not a plaintiff. Most of those thrown out are not Gulianos. Surprise, surprise, surprise. Rudy is not the judge. Man you are as sharp as a basketball. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.