Jump to content

Tucker Carlson wants to see evidence of election fraud


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Pastafarian said:

But Trump’s lawyers got none. 
 


 

Because hundreds of sworn affidavits  are not evidence according to the left. 😆

 

What Democrats did is stuff ballots with illegal mail in ballots while destroying the envelope they were contained in that proved they were fraudulent. 
 

This is why in some counties voter participation exceeds 100% where other parts of the country where no fraud allegations are, the participation rate is only 50-70%. 
 

You guys think you’re clever but you aren’t. Statistical analysis has exposed your fraud. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carlson:

 

>So that's a long way of saying we took Sidney Powell seriously with no intention of fighting with her. We've always respected her work, we simply wanted to see the details. How could you not want to see them? So we invited Sydney Powell on the show. We would have given her the whole hour. We would have given her the entire week, actually, and listened quietly the whole time at rapt attention.
 

But she never sent us any evidence, despite a lot of polite requests. When we kept pressing, she got angry and told us to stop contacting her. When we checked with others around the Trump campaign, people in positions of authority, they also told us Powell had never given them any evidence to prove anything she claimed today at the press conference.<


 

When Faux Noise’s chief right wing conspiracy theory bullshit peddler calls you out, you’d better find another line of work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BeAChooser said:

 

Why would Sydney Powell reveal their case to someone who, because he chose to stick with Fox who we now know is in the pocket of the UNIPARTY, might be part of the UNIPARTY as well?    No, pasta for brains, I think Powell is wise to keep's Trump's cards close to the vest ... until they bring the case before the Supreme Court.   

Are you really that ignorant of how appellate courts operate, or are you just faking such ignorance for some reason?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, theLion said:

Are you really that ignorant of how appellate courts operate, or are you just faking such ignorance for some reason?

 

Who says this will be done on appeal?   You do realize that the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction for disputes to which a state is a party, which would surely be the case here, snowflake.   In fact, I think they'd be eager to hear a case of this magnitude and not leave it to lower courts which may be part of the problem (corruption) here.   Just saying ...

  • Thumb up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Pastafarian said:

But Trump’s lawyers got none. 
 

 

 

I was talking to some friends and we were saying the same thing. If you have the DAMN evidence, then show it. Don't just spread FUD. 

 

I will go a step further, if this is real, the people responsible should be tried for treason and if convicted hung. The problem is I don't believe what they are saying. There was certainly voter fraud in this election but it isn't enough to change the fact that Biden won the election. It will be certified and the electoral college will vote him into office. As I state before, we need to focus in on the senate. That is where the fight is now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Str8tEdge said:

Because hundreds of sworn affidavits  are not evidence according to the left. 😆

 

What Democrats did is stuff ballots with illegal mail in ballots while destroying the envelope they were contained in that proved they were fraudulent. 
 

This is why in some counties voter participation exceeds 100% where other parts of the country where no fraud allegations are, the participation rate is only 50-70%. 
 

You guys think you’re clever but you aren’t. Statistical analysis has exposed your fraud. 

Lol, shitty nurse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

theLion

 

Carlson:

>So that's a long way of saying we took Sidney Powell seriously with no intention of fighting with her. We've always respected her work, we simply wanted to see the details. How could you not want to see them? So we invited Sydney Powell on the show. We would have given her the whole hour. We would have given her the entire week, actually, and listened quietly the whole time at rapt attention.
 

But she never sent us any evidence, despite a lot of polite requests. When we kept pressing, she got angry and told us to stop contacting her. When we checked with others around the Trump campaign, people in positions of authority, they also told us Powell had never given them any evidence to prove anything she claimed today at the press conference.<

 

 

 

when the Clown tucker doubts the rightwing BS.....you know its BS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Pastafarian said:

But Trump’s lawyers got none. 
 

 

 

   The kid in the basement is naive about the world, Fox did not even cover the news conference = they don't really want to know anything and you cant really blame news people for that. in the 1950s superman TV show superman would fly around and kick the shit out of the gangsters who were threatening Jimmy and Lois Lane, in 2020 even the possible new vice president of the USA  has threatened to stalk USA Republican individuals who are not in total agreement with her policy's.

  • Thumb up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chongo said:

 

   The kid in the basement is naive about the world, Fox did not even cover the news conference = they don't really want to know anything and you cant really blame news people for that. in the 1950s superman TV show superman would fly around and kick the shit out of the gangsters who were threatening Jimmy and Lois Lane, in 2020 even the possible new vice president of the USA  has threatened to stalk USA Republican individuals who are not in total agreement with her policy's.

There was no evidence provided at the news conference. 
 

Stop sucking Trump’s dick and be a man, loser. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Pastafarian said:

Thrown out of court. 

😆Thrown out of court? 😆

 

Maybe what lawyers asked for as a result was thrown out but the testimony was given under the penalty of perjury. 
 

You cannot spin away this election was fraudulent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Pastafarian said:

There was no evidence provided at the news conference. 
 

Stop sucking Trump’s dick and be a man, loser. 

 

   The news conference was not covered by the MSM and was designed to create some curiosity about the court case, MSM and there pards have no interest in the story.

 

Sunshine and rainbows on the way to der nazi-commie socialist Venezuela kangaroo court style Gov 

 

Anchors at Sinclair-owned local news station parrot a script pushing Trump talking points and “the troubling trend of irresponsible, one sided news stories plaguing our country.” (not loading, they dont want you to see)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fHfgU8oMSo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Pastafarian said:

But Trump’s lawyers got none. 
 

 


Indeed. As does Ben Shapiro...because they are interested in the truth. 
 

It’s what we need. I wish someone of consequence on the left would have been interested in the truth during the Russian collusion hoax. 

  • Thumb up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, kfools said:

They said it was an opening statement. 

 

They said they are still gathering evidence.

 

Evidence provided as follow.

 

1.Sworn affidavits.

2.Overvote count irregularities

3. County vote irregularities

4. The 3AM Biden ballot dump that has not been explained

5. The signature problems for ballot verification

 

When he says that's enough by itself to overturn an election he is correct. 

 

These irregularities are real. You can explain then and neither can anybody else. That's called EVIDENCE!

 

They have a witness who is going to testify about dominion voting machine software election rigging, biggest news story in the history of the world,

 

Trump votes deleted and replaced with Biden votes via voting machine software 11-20-2020

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Dontlooknow said:

Nor is rudy. And the judges been throwing out your claims left and right. 

not MY claims.  I'm not a plaintiff.  Most of those thrown out are not Gulianos. 

 

Surprise, surprise, surprise.  Rudy is not the judge.  Man you are as sharp as a basketball.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...