Jump to content

More proof, for us to demand that the DHS/USDOJ deem The Democratic Party, as a terrorist organization. Join me in a petition to Bill Barr. Please? lol


Recommended Posts

On 10/28/2020 at 9:10 PM, pmurT said:

the satanic, demonic souls on msnbc and some here too @Pastafarian @XavierOnassis @FivebyFive etc have stooped so, low, to whereas they now deceitfully blame President Trump because when he visited Nebraska yesterday... some local buses doing business within a Nebraska town, had problems when trying to travel along crowded, turbulent local roads to transport local residents back to their private vehicles where they came out to support President Trump.

 

Yes.

 

Every business in the USA is responsible for their own logistics in terms of agreements that they enter into with clients. Yes the clients are not responsible for planning how to navigate the roads and traffics, as that is solely a responsible of company providing the transport services ---supposedly experts in the conditions of the local area they operate in--- unless, the client is Donald Trump. 

Then, and only then, do lunatics come along and pretend that President Trump runs the local bus company and Trump failed to navigate local traffic and local road's turbulence. Yes, lunatics listed above, have psyched themselves into blaming Trump.  And undecided voters are watching this horrid treachery.

 

This is how desperate and forlorn President Trump has made these satanc, demonic humans who embody why The Dem Party must be banned in the USA as soon as possible.

 

 

pmuT, the democrats nave no choice but to lie. And they're not even hiding it anymore. It's one lie after another any little incident turns into a lie blaming Trump for anything and everything. Pathetic creatures those Dem's. 

 

There are many among us who refuse to acknowledge that radical Dems have declared war on America and our way of life.  This Demi brigade' is only too eager to sympathize with our socialist enemies and swallow whatever damning accusations that are leveled against us, no matter how tenuous. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

the satanic, demonic souls on msnbc and some here too @Pastafarian @XavierOnassis @FivebyFive etc have stooped so, low, to whereas they now deceitfully blame President Trump because when he visited Ne

This is Fascistic and idiotic and anyone who supports this is a fool. Excessive traffic is not terrorism, that is lunacy. No one was killed or wounded, perhaps a few people spent longer in traffic tha

Demorat party is a terrorist organization, there is no doubt about it.

35 minutes ago, TBHWT said:

pmuT, the democrats nave no choice but to lie. And they're not even hiding it anymore. It's one lie after another any little incident turns into a lie blaming Trump for anything and everything. Pathetic creatures those Dem's. 

 

There are many among us who refuse to acknowledge that radical Dems have declared war on America and our way of life.  This Demi brigade' is only too eager to sympathize with our socialist enemies and swallow whatever damning accusations that are leveled against us, no matter how tenuous. 

 

you made a strrrrong case here, for why The Democrats deserve to banned from operating in the USA.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, pmurT said:

 

you made a strrrrong case here, for why The Democrats deserve to banned from operating in the USA.

just like you shouldnt  have firearms

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, FivebyFive said:

you shouldnt  have firearms

 

Wrong answer.

The 2nd Amendment was created, exclusively, to guard against the eternal threat of you Homegrown Radicalized terrorists. That is what you Dems have now become, so it is illogical and unreasonable to give up our guns.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, pmurT said:

 

Wrong answer.

The 2nd Amendment was created, exclusively, to guard against the eternal threat of you Homegrown Radicalized terrorists. That is what you Dems have now become, so it is illogical and unreasonable to give up our guns.

against godzilla

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, FivebyFive said:

against godzilla

 

uhhh, No pal, against The Dem Party and you Patriotism-adulterers who hath cheated on, America, with Globalists' Socialism Frontier lol

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

Backwards Trump is an Anti-American idiot.

His hero is doomed.

As usual you would be 100% wrong, at least you are consistent.

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, shetluck said:

Soooooo........ you're a commie

 

We not be asking for any new goods, services, TV programing or non voluntary classing and grouping etc., just be getting on back into your own areas and try be calm down.

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Dontlooknow said:

Barr has to follow the law. 

 

Exactly.

 

And here is the legal litmus test, which easily verifies The Dem Party has divulged into a terrorist organization:

 

THE SOCIOLOGY AND PSYCHOLOGY OF TERRORISM:

 

WHO BECOMES A TERRORIST AND WHY?

 

 

 https://fas.org/irp/threat/frd.html

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, pmurT said:

 

"...GENERAL HYPOTHESES OF TERRORISM

 

If one accepts the proposition that political terrorists are made, not born, then the question is what makes a terrorist. Although the scholarly literature on the psychology of terrorism is lacking in full-scale, quantitative studies from which to ascertain trends and develop general theories of terrorism, it does appear to focus on several theories. One, the Olson hypothesis, suggests that participants in revolutionary violence predicate their behavior on a rational cost-benefit calculus and the conclusion that violence is the best available course of action given the social conditions. The notion that a group rationally chooses a terrorism strategy is questionable, however. Indeed, a group's decision to resort to terrorism is often divisive, sometimes resulting in factionalization of the group..."

 

...

 

"

Narcissistic Rage Hypothesis

 

The advocates of the narcissism-aggression hypothesis include psychologists Jerrold M. Post, John W. Crayton, and Richard M. Pearlstein. Taking (Nancy Pelosi/Adam Schiff) the-terrorists-as-mentally-ill approach, this hypothesis concerns the early development of the terrorist. Basically, if primary narcissism in the form of the "grandiose self" is not neutralized by reality testing, the grandiose self produces individuals who are sociopathic, arrogant, and lacking in regard for others. Similarly, if the psychological form of the "idealized parental ego" is not neutralized by reality testing, it can produce a condition of helpless defeatism, and narcissistic defeat can lead to reactions of rage and a wish to destroy the source of narcissistic injury. "As a specific manifestation of narcissistic rage, terrorism occurs in the context of narcissistic injury," writes Crayton (1983:37-8). For Crayton, terrorism is an attempt to acquire or maintain power or control by intimidation. He suggests that the "meaningful high ideals" of the political terrorist group "protect the group members from experiencing shame.

 

In Post's view, a particularly striking personality trait of people who are drawn to terrorism "is the reliance placed on the psychological mechanisms of "externalization" and 'splitting'."

 

These are psychological mechanisms, he explains, that are found in "individuals with narcissistic and borderline personality disturbances." "Splitting," he explains, is a mechanism characteristic of people whose personality development is shaped by a particular type of psychological damage (narcissistic injury) during childhood.

 

Those individuals with a damaged self-concept have failed to integrate the good and bad parts of the self, which are instead split into the "me" and the "not me." These individuals, who have included Hitler, need an outside enemy to blame for their own inadequacies and weaknesses.

 

The data examined by Post, including a 1982 West German study, indicate that many terrorists have not been successful in their personal, educational, and vocational lives. Thus, they are drawn to terrorist groups, which have an us-versus-them outlook. This hypothesis, however, appears to be contradicted by the increasing number of terrorists who are well-educated professionals, such as chemists, engineers, and physicists."

 

...

 

 

"

The Process of Joining a Terrorist Group

 

Individuals who become terrorists often are unemployed, socially alienated individuals who have dropped out of society. Those with little education, such as youths in Algerian ghettos or the Gaza Strip, may try to join a terrorist group out of boredom and a desire to have an action-packed adventure in pursuit of a cause they regard as just. Some individuals may be motivated mainly by a desire to use their special skills, such as bomb-making.

 

The more educated youths may be motivated more by genuine political or religious convictions. The person who becomes a terrorist in Western countries is generally both intellectual and idealistic. Usually, these disenchanted youths, both educated or uneducated, engage in occasional protest and dissidence. Potential terrorist group members often start out as sympathizers of the group. Recruits often come from support organizations, such as prisoner support groups or student activist groups.

 

From sympathizer, one moves to passive supporter. Often, violent encounters with police or other security forces motivate an already socially alienated individual to join a terrorist group. Although the circumstances vary, the end result of this gradual process is that the individual, often with the help of a family member or friend with terrorist contacts, turns to terrorism. Membership in a terrorist group, however, is highly selective. Over a period as long as a year or more, a recruit generally moves in a slow, gradual fashion toward full membership in a terrorist group.

 

An individual who drops out of society can just as well become a monk or a hermit instead of a terrorist. For an individual to choose to become a terrorist, he or she would have to be motivated to do so. Having the proper motivation, however, is still not enough. The would-be terrorist would need to have the opportunity to join a terrorist group. And like most job seekers, he or she would have to be acceptable to the terrorist group, which is a highly exclusive group. Thus, recruits would not only need to have a personality that would allow them to fit into the group, but ideally a certain skill needed by the group, such as weapons or communications skills.

 

The psychology of joining a terrorist group differs depending on the typology of the group. Someone joining an anarchistic or a Marxist-Leninist terrorist group would not likely be able to count on any social support, only social opprobrium, whereas someone joining an ethnic separatist group like ETA or the IRA would enjoy considerable social support and even respect within ethnic enclaves.

 

Psychologist Eric D. Shaw (1986:365) provides a strong case for what he calls "The Personal Pathway Model," by which terrorists enter their new profession. The components of this pathway include early socialization processes; narcissistic injuries; escalatory events, particularly confrontation with police; and personal connections to terrorist group members, as follows:

 

The personal pathway model suggests that terrorists came from a selected, at risk population, who have suffered from early damage to their self-esteem. Their subsequent political activities may be consistent with the liberal social philosophies of their families, but go beyond their perception of the contradiction in their family's beliefs and lack of social action. Family political philosophies may also serve to sensitize these persons to the economic and political tensions inherent throughout modern society. As a group, they appear to have been unsuccessful in obtaining a desired traditional place in society, which has contributed to their frustration. The underlying need to belong to a terrorist group is symptomatic of an incomplete or fragmented psychosocial identity. (In Kohut's terms--a defective or fragmented "group self"). Interestingly, the acts of security forces or police are cited as provoking more violent political activity by these individuals and it is often a personal connection to other terrorists which leads to membership in a violent group (shared external targets?)."

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Chongo said:

 

We not be asking for any new goods, services, TV programing or non voluntary classing and grouping etc., just be getting on back into your own areas and try be calm down.

Stuff your bullshit up your ass.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, pmurT said:

 

"...GENERAL HYPOTHESES OF TERRORISM

 

If one accepts the proposition that political terrorists are made, not born, then the question is what makes a terrorist. Although the scholarly literature on the psychology of terrorism is lacking in full-scale, quantitative studies from which to ascertain trends and develop general theories of terrorism, it does appear to focus on several theories. One, the Olson hypothesis, suggests that participants in revolutionary violence predicate their behavior on a rational cost-benefit calculus and the conclusion that violence is the best available course of action given the social conditions. The notion that a group rationally chooses a terrorism strategy is questionable, however. Indeed, a group's decision to resort to terrorism is often divisive, sometimes resulting in factionalization of the group..."

 

...

 

"

Narcissistic Rage Hypothesis

 

The advocates of the narcissism-aggression hypothesis include psychologists Jerrold M. Post, John W. Crayton, and Richard M. Pearlstein. Taking (Nancy Pelosi/Adam Schiff) the-terrorists-as-mentally-ill approach, this hypothesis concerns the early development of the terrorist. Basically, if primary narcissism in the form of the "grandiose self" is not neutralized by reality testing, the grandiose self produces individuals who are sociopathic, arrogant, and lacking in regard for others. Similarly, if the psychological form of the "idealized parental ego" is not neutralized by reality testing, it can produce a condition of helpless defeatism, and narcissistic defeat can lead to reactions of rage and a wish to destroy the source of narcissistic injury. "As a specific manifestation of narcissistic rage, terrorism occurs in the context of narcissistic injury," writes Crayton (1983:37-8). For Crayton, terrorism is an attempt to acquire or maintain power or control by intimidation. He suggests that the "meaningful high ideals" of the political terrorist group "protect the group members from experiencing shame.

 

In Post's view, a particularly striking personality trait of people who are drawn to terrorism "is the reliance placed on the psychological mechanisms of "externalization" and 'splitting'."

 

These are psychological mechanisms, he explains, that are found in "individuals with narcissistic and borderline personality disturbances." "Splitting," he explains, is a mechanism characteristic of people whose personality development is shaped by a particular type of psychological damage (narcissistic injury) during childhood.

 

Those individuals with a damaged self-concept have failed to integrate the good and bad parts of the self, which are instead split into the "me" and the "not me." These individuals, who have included Hitler, need an outside enemy to blame for their own inadequacies and weaknesses.

 

The data examined by Post, including a 1982 West German study, indicate that many terrorists have not been successful in their personal, educational, and vocational lives. Thus, they are drawn to terrorist groups, which have an us-versus-them outlook. This hypothesis, however, appears to be contradicted by the increasing number of terrorists who are well-educated professionals, such as chemists, engineers, and physicists."

 

...

 

 

"

The Process of Joining a Terrorist Group

 

Individuals who become terrorists often are unemployed, socially alienated individuals who have dropped out of society. Those with little education, such as youths in Algerian ghettos or the Gaza Strip, may try to join a terrorist group out of boredom and a desire to have an action-packed adventure in pursuit of a cause they regard as just. Some individuals may be motivated mainly by a desire to use their special skills, such as bomb-making.

 

The more educated youths may be motivated more by genuine political or religious convictions. The person who becomes a terrorist in Western countries is generally both intellectual and idealistic. Usually, these disenchanted youths, both educated or uneducated, engage in occasional protest and dissidence. Potential terrorist group members often start out as sympathizers of the group. Recruits often come from support organizations, such as prisoner support groups or student activist groups.

 

From sympathizer, one moves to passive supporter. Often, violent encounters with police or other security forces motivate an already socially alienated individual to join a terrorist group. Although the circumstances vary, the end result of this gradual process is that the individual, often with the help of a family member or friend with terrorist contacts, turns to terrorism. Membership in a terrorist group, however, is highly selective. Over a period as long as a year or more, a recruit generally moves in a slow, gradual fashion toward full membership in a terrorist group.

 

An individual who drops out of society can just as well become a monk or a hermit instead of a terrorist. For an individual to choose to become a terrorist, he or she would have to be motivated to do so. Having the proper motivation, however, is still not enough. The would-be terrorist would need to have the opportunity to join a terrorist group. And like most job seekers, he or she would have to be acceptable to the terrorist group, which is a highly exclusive group. Thus, recruits would not only need to have a personality that would allow them to fit into the group, but ideally a certain skill needed by the group, such as weapons or communications skills.

 

The psychology of joining a terrorist group differs depending on the typology of the group. Someone joining an anarchistic or a Marxist-Leninist terrorist group would not likely be able to count on any social support, only social opprobrium, whereas someone joining an ethnic separatist group like ETA or the IRA would enjoy considerable social support and even respect within ethnic enclaves.

 

Psychologist Eric D. Shaw (1986:365) provides a strong case for what he calls "The Personal Pathway Model," by which terrorists enter their new profession. The components of this pathway include early socialization processes; narcissistic injuries; escalatory events, particularly confrontation with police; and personal connections to terrorist group members, as follows:

 

The personal pathway model suggests that terrorists came from a selected, at risk population, who have suffered from early damage to their self-esteem. Their subsequent political activities may be consistent with the liberal social philosophies of their families, but go beyond their perception of the contradiction in their family's beliefs and lack of social action. Family political philosophies may also serve to sensitize these persons to the economic and political tensions inherent throughout modern society. As a group, they appear to have been unsuccessful in obtaining a desired traditional place in society, which has contributed to their frustration. The underlying need to belong to a terrorist group is symptomatic of an incomplete or fragmented psychosocial identity. (In Kohut's terms--a defective or fragmented "group self"). Interestingly, the acts of security forces or police are cited as provoking more violent political activity by these individuals and it is often a personal connection to other terrorists which leads to membership in a violent group (shared external targets?)."

It's called conditioning...

And the Dems and their Swamp critters have been in engaged in this process against "We the people" for over 4 years now....

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Toldya said:

'Plz let Trump turn America into a fascist one-party dictatorship becuz I am mad'- every RWNJ on this forum.

Bizarre exactly what the left is trying to do, once they stack the Supreme court the way is paved for dictatorship.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Toldya said:

I am a Dem voter, so I am a horrid liar. Yes I need to play pretend here: "see Trump turn America into a fascist one-party dictatorship becuz I am mad'- every RWNJ on this forum." even though this thread says nothing about seeking a one-party society.

 

...fixed

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, pmurT said:

 

...fixed

 

They're talking about labelling one of the two big parties in a two-party state a terrorist organization.

So yes, dumbass, they are talking about implementing a one-party dictatorship by force.

 

Also, can you please get a new gimmick?

This post-changing shit is really childish.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, RayDonavin said:

Bizarre exactly what the left is trying to do, once they stack the Supreme court the way is paved for dictatorship.

 

Even if the Dems DID pack the court, how would it be any different from having a 6-3 con majority??

NONE of those judges were elected by the people, and their views don't reflect those of the majority either.

The same goes for all of the RWNJs appointed by Trump simply because they were staunch right-wingers and young enough to not die any time soon.

 

It's TRUMP that is trying to bypass the popular vote in swing states by trying to appoint electors who will defy the will of the people and re-elect him.

 

https://news.yahoo.com/trump-campaign-discussing-plans-appoint-090001571.html

 

If Biden doesn't win big, Trump will say it's because of voter fraud or whatever and try to get the electors in GOP-controlled swing states to toss out the election results. And when the inevitable shitstorm hits, he will go after all dissenters while you cheer on the end of all elections and beat off as Trump's political opponents and journalists are imprisoned one by one.

Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, Toldya said:

They're talking about labelling one of the two big parties in a two-party state a terrorist organization.

 

This is a nonsensical remark considering you 1)lack the wherewithal and intestinal fortitude, that is needed, to deem any 3rd party as a non-factor on the USA political frontier and 2)foolishly desire to punish one party (Repubs) because the other party (Dems) has decided to practice Sedition which earned their banishment from the USA.

 

 

Quote

Also, can you please get a new gimmick?...This post-changing shit is really childish.

 

Your posts are childish, your lies you tell on President Trump are even more childish, so if you do not complain when you post propagandized-hyperbole about Trump...then shut up now/stay silent while I treat you like you get to treat Trump.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Despite Barr being a boot-licker of the worst sort, and a guy who is willing to bend the DOJ to outrageous partisan purposes, Barr still has Trumpist death-cultists outside his home making threats against him for not doing more to abuse his authority and do more to go after Biden.

 

You all are cray-cray.

 

Bill

 

Elr5eGiXUAAHo0u?format=jpg&name=small

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, SpyCar said:

You all are cray-cray.

 

And you all are ...Seditionists, for supporting an anti-USA organization which did the following:

 

  • Biden: corruption with his son in China, Ukraine, and with the spouse of Moscow Russia's mayor when raping the USA political system
  • Hillary: intentionally purchased a fake dossier, coerced FBI and other House Dems to file false docx with the FISA Court
  • Schiff: is the House Intel chief, and currently is spreading false information even as according to the FBI and Intel community feeling a need to come out and expose him the other day
  • Pelosi, Schumer, Nadler:  impeached Trump for exercising his civil right to report corruption
  • Obama, Biden, Brennan, FBI: illegally spied on Trump's Administration in Nov 2016 and illegally entrapped General Flynn and imprisoned Trump associates for not assisting with a coup against Trump
  • Kamala Harris: locked up 2nd-most, non-violent negros after Joe Biden's Crime Bill, plus she has lied to Black America when now claiming she is Black altho in 2016 when she won the Senate seat she said she was West Indian.
  • DNC: approving of its state of MI chapter to strip state Senator Karen Whitsett of her Democrat membership/can no longer run for office as a Democrat. Why?
  • Twitter, Facebook, Google: illegal campaign financing for Democrat candidates and raped the spirit of Section 230 in the U.S. Code
  • CNN, CBS, WaPo, NYT, NBC, ABC:  4 straight years of journalistic irresponsibility and partiality and defamation/slander onto a sitting President
  • Several members of The Dem Party's celebs in Hollywood: wishing death onto President Trump because they disagree with his politics.

 

I will try hard to get you and your ilk on the terrorism watch list

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...