Jump to content

WHO ON THIS BOARD DISAGREES WITH THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT? LOOTERS DESERVE TO BE SHOT ON SIGHT.


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Lordy, bring it on, I craves excitement. Once your behavior divorces you from civilized society, you become an unprotected feral animal. And color don't enter into it. It's taken humanity too long to gain the ground we've gained. No rational thinker wishes to regress back to the Stone Age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, AnotherJim said:

Lordy, bring it on, I craves excitement. Once your behavior divorces you from civilized society, you become an unprotected feral animal. And color don't enter into it. It's taken humanity too long to gain the ground we've gained. No rational thinker wishes to regress back to the Stone Age.

Murdering looters is sinful and not what we do in a civil society.  I take great solace in the '90's cult film Boxing Helena.  Like an old arab once said - you take something from me, I take something from you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Zaro said:

Just to the 40s or 50s, eh Jimbo?

 

1 minute ago, Skans said:

Murdering looters is sinful and not what we do in a civil society.  I take great solace in the '90's cult film Boxing Helena.  Like an old arab once said - you take something from me, I take something from you. 

Ok, no shooting. Is beating to an unrecognizable bloody pulp acceptable?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AnotherJim said:

 

Ok, no shooting. Is beating to an unrecognizable bloody pulp acceptable?

Yes it is.  That's what a bunch of thugs did to a guy in the Deltona Massacre a/k/a the Xbox Murders in Deltona Florida.  Here's a photo of the crime scene.

 

cFG1777crlILZq9oBLUH-YvRaUhIz05SY81KFE0a

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

or simply arrest them and follow standard legal procedure. 

No. Many people no longer have any faith in "legal procedure" when it comes to looters.  Vigilantism is the next best response to crime when those who are elected to prosecute criminals, arrest and incarcerate criminals and protect cities from this type of crime are neglectful of their duties.

 

There is nothing wrong with coordinated vigilantism when there is a lack of coordinated effort to stop and punnish criminals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Skans said:

No. Many people no longer have any faith in "legal procedure" when it comes to looters.  Vigilantism is the next best response to crime when those who are elected to prosecute criminals, arrest and incarcerate criminals and protect cities from this type of crime are neglectful of their duties.

 

There is nothing wrong with coordinated vigilantism when there is a lack of coordinated effort to stop and punnish criminals.

Their subjective opinions... lack of faith are not the topic. Do you  not believe in the law or is it a matter of only doing so when convenient? The looter breaks the law, you arrest them, prosecute them, and so on. If you deputize someone who may or may not have self control, dignity, etc.. what is to stop them from shooting randomly and shooting/injuring/killer someone who is not looting,rioting, protesting?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Their subjective opinions... lack of faith are not the topic. Do you  not believe in the law or is it a matter of only doing so when convenient? The looter breaks the law, you arrest them, prosecute them, and so on. If you deputize someone who may or may not have self control, dignity, etc.. what is to stop them from shooting randomly and shooting/injuring/killer someone who is not looting,rioting, protesting?

You are getting off the subject.

 

It is a very simple question, with a "yes" or "no" answer.

 

That question is:  Do looters deserve to be shot on sight?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The law doesn't shoot them because it isn't a capital offense. Unfortunately the liberal court too often just turns them loose. They need some serious punishment.

 

On the other hand when private citizens are protecting themselves and their property it's best just to shoot the mother fuckers. Look at it this way...when the looters have all been shot to death there will be no more looting and the world will be a better and safer place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, impartialobserver said:

or simply arrest them and follow standard legal procedure. 

Like when the Somali cop shot & killed that white woman in Minneapolis 3 years before Floyd's death, and the human community did not riot - loot - or destroy; but instead being civilized & not tree dwellers, allowed the law to take charge & run it's course. Like that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, impartialobserver said:

or simply arrest them and follow standard legal procedure. 

 

How myopically academic of you.

 

Arrest...?

 

NEWS_150429418_AR_0_QIWTBWAZCVLL.jpg?w=1

 

You see any police around...?

 

 

la-2426812-na-0428-baltimore-09-cmc-jpg-

 

Ha!

 

"Choot'em."

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AnotherJim said:

Like when the Somali cop shot & killed that white woman in Minneapolis 3 years before Floyd's death, and the human community did not riot - loot - or destroy; but instead being civilized & not tree dwellers, allowed the law to take charge & run it's course. Like that?

By your logic, I would observe a 7 feet 8 inches tall man doing something and then assume that all human beings would do exactly the same. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, impartialobserver said:

By your logic, I would observe a 7 feet 8 inches tall man doing something and then assume that all human beings would do exactly the same. 

 

You're an idiot.

 

Stay away from firearms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

By your logic, I would observe a 7 feet 8 inches tall man doing something and then assume that all human beings would do exactly the same. 

I just don't recall any whites rioting over a white dying at the hands of a police officer. If you could, enlighten me. Would a white somehow be less dead than a black?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...