RayDonavin Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 If Trump is not re elected this in itself makes his presidency a success. If you leftards and you scum leaders try to manipulate the Supreme court that is reason for revolution. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whiteboy Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 2 hours ago, Dontlooknow said: I love it. Now we can call the courts crooked and get out the vote on their decisions. Yippy. You go girl. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Devil Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 4 hours ago, RayDonavin said: If Trump is not re elected this in itself makes his presidency a success. If you leftards and you scum leaders try to manipulate the Supreme court that is reason for revolution. Lots of work to do. RECONSTRUCTION II - Begins 04NOV20 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zaro Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 4 hours ago, RayDonavin said: If Trump is not re elected this in itself makes his presidency a success. What? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayDonavin Posted October 27, 2020 Author Share Posted October 27, 2020 43 minutes ago, Dontlooknow said: Well it will be good for the democrats to have a conservative court. Gives us something to get the vote out for. I find the total ignorance of you leftards amusing. You do know the Supreme court is what protects you from government right? The more textualist or originalist the court is the stronger your rights are, your freedom if you can't understand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayDonavin Posted October 27, 2020 Author Share Posted October 27, 2020 5 hours ago, Dontlooknow said: I love it. Now we can call the courts crooked and get out the vote on their decisions. Yippy. You go girl. Well the courts have been crooked, Ginsberg was a perfect example along with Kagan, Roberts, Sotomeyer and Kennedy. Finally the court turns back to what it is supposed to be, what defines our rights not what laws it can create. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayDonavin Posted October 27, 2020 Author Share Posted October 27, 2020 2 minutes ago, Dontlooknow said: I'm excited to see what rights they take away. You are just not that smart are you? Abortion for instance, it could have been you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpyCar Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 She sullied her position by participating in a campaign op at the White House for her swearing in. Not kosher. Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rippy38 Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 5 minutes ago, RayDonavin said: Well the courts have been crooked, Ginsberg was a perfect example along with Kagan, Roberts, Sotomeyer and Kennedy. Finally the court turns back to what it is supposed to be, what defines our rights not what laws it can create. Yes... the left has been seating legislators on the SCOTUS for decades... which is why they are thoroughly pissed that now the Court has a majority of actual judges that will follow the law instead of doing their bidding. To the leftists, the SCOTUS is only "fair" when it's stacked in their favor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RayDonavin Posted October 27, 2020 Author Share Posted October 27, 2020 2 minutes ago, SpyCar said: She sullied her position by participating in a campaign op at the White House for her swearing in. Not kosher. Bill Weasel, so Biden selling his office to the Chinese Communist Party for more than a billion dollars is Kosher to you? Campaign op? Fathead. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpyCar Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 2 minutes ago, RayDonavin said: Weasel, so Biden selling his office to the Chinese Communist Party for more than a billion dollars is Kosher to you? Campaign op? Fathead. The only one selling anything to the Chinese is Trump. Almost 6 million for an office in Trump Tower that the CCP never even used. As always, Trumpists blame others for the crimes they are guilty of themselves. The usual MO. Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redoctober Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 1 hour ago, SpyCar said: She sullied her position by participating in a campaign op at the White House for her swearing in. Not kosher. Bill No, no she didn't. You guys are just poor losers. Nothing was wrong with the whole process. You just didn't like that you were not in control. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpyCar Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 1 minute ago, Redoctober said: No, no she didn't. You guys are just poor losers. Nothing was wrong with the whole process. You just didn't like that you were not in control. No. It was a partisan action. Total disgrace to her position. Especially on the eve of an election. Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duck615 Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 2 minutes ago, SpyCar said: No. It was a partisan action. Total disgrace to her position. Especially on the eve of an election. Bill if the roles were reversed you dems would have done the same thing... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rippy38 Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 Just now, SpyCar said: No. It was a partisan action. Total disgrace to her position. Especially on the eve of an election. Bill So... Trump being present when his nominee was sworn in is a disgrace? Clinton was there when Ginsberg was sworn in... was that a "disgrace"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpyCar Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 9 minutes ago, Duck615 said: if the roles were reversed you dems would have done the same thing... LOL. No. No Democratic president in history has use the White House as a campaign prop the way Donald J Trump has. It is illegal. Violates the Hatch Act. Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duck615 Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 1 minute ago, SpyCar said: LOL. No. No Democratic president in history has use the White House as a campaign prop the way Donald J Trump has. It is illegal. Violates the Hatch Act. Bill not what I was talking about, but nice deflection Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rippy38 Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 2 minutes ago, SpyCar said: LOL. No. No Democratic president in history has use the White House as a campaign prop the way Donald J Trump has. It is illegal. Violates the Hatch Act. Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redoctober Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 19 minutes ago, SpyCar said: No. It was a partisan action. Total disgrace to her position. Especially on the eve of an election. Bill She had the deal she wanted and said no. That is exactly what happened. CNN even went after her for doing that. She directly lied to CNN and the American people and that damn fake smile. Even CNN isn't buying it, especially after she says CNN are apologists for the Republicans. LOL! What a fucking CUNT this bitch is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rippy38 Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 Just now, Redoctober said: She had the deal she wanted and said no. That is exactly what happened. CNN even went after her for doing that. She was so pissed at Wolf... that shit was hilarious! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpyCar Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 2 minutes ago, rippy38 said: Not a campaign use, dumb-dumb. Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duck615 Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 Just now, SpyCar said: Not a campaign use, dumb-dumb. Bill keep deflecting... it's all you got little fella Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rippy38 Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 1 minute ago, SpyCar said: Not a campaign use, dumb-dumb. Bill Oh no? You don't think that wasn't a message to the LGBQTXYZ community? Who paid for the light upgrade? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpyCar Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 2 minutes ago, Duck615 said: keep deflecting... it's all you got little fella Not a deflection. What Trump's doing is illegal. Multiple Hatch Act violations. Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpyCar Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 Just now, rippy38 said: Oh no? You don't think that wasn't a message to the LGBQTXYZ community? Who paid for the light upgrade? Not a campaign use, not a partisan purpose. Not illegal. Trump--in contrast--keeps violating the Hatch Act. Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.