Wallco1 Posted October 13 Share Posted October 13 They get so addicted to the power and prestige they can't let it go. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
impartialobserver Posted October 13 Share Posted October 13 I would support that. Not sure about what the limit would actually be but that could be worked out. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Scout Posted October 13 Share Posted October 13 3 minutes ago, impartialobserver said: I would support that. Not sure about what the limit would actually be but that could be worked out. Absolutely. I'm thinking 75. Based on Feinstein, Leahy, and Grassley, we know their brains are fried by 80. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
XavierOnassis Posted October 13 Share Posted October 13 Start with Trump. He has not had a new idea since the 1970's. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Deadric Posted October 13 Share Posted October 13 2 hours ago, Wallco1 said: They get so addicted to the power and prestige they can't let it go. Na. Now that I know Feinstein will vote against expanding the court, she can stay. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sole result Posted October 13 Share Posted October 13 2 hours ago, XavierOnassis said: Start with Trump. He has not had a new idea since the 1970's. You have? Best ideas you have are recited and revised for thousands of years. How about problem solving absolute power of suggestion absolutely corrupts persuasion of power behind "We said so, and let on individual get in our way". Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king of the county Posted October 13 Share Posted October 13 3 hours ago, Deadric said: Na. Now that I know Feinstein will vote against expanding the court, she can stay. She said that? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LaughinAtLefty Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 7 hours ago, Scout said: Absolutely. I'm thinking 75. Based on Feinstein, Leahy, and Grassley, we know their brains are fried by 80. Term limits versus age limit, two totally different things. I’ve been saying for a couple of decades term limits would be one of the best things to happen for the country. Problem is, guess who has to bring it up, vote, and pass it? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Scout Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 1 minute ago, LaughinAtLefty said: Term limits versus age limit, two totally different things. I’ve been saying for a couple of decades term limits would be one of the best things to happen for the country. Problem is, guess who has to bring it up, vote, and pass it? Now we know the meaning of the phrase "job security" Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pmurT Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 8 hours ago, Wallco1 said: They get so addicted to the power and prestige they can't let it go. don't be so hard on Schumer, Feinstein, @ Co... its the best the Dems old guard, can do, until their radical trainees become popular on the political/election fronts of America. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Scout Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 2 minutes ago, LaughinAtLefty said: Term limits versus age limit, two totally different things. I’ve been saying for a couple of decades term limits would be one of the best things to happen for the country. Problem is, guess who has to bring it up, vote, and pass it? I am opposed to term limits. They do not have net positive results in the states that have implemented them. Greater corruption. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LaughinAtLefty Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 2 minutes ago, Scout said: I am opposed to term limits. They do not have net positive results in the states that have implemented them. Greater corruption. Can’t possibly be any worse than now. The longer they’re there, the more power, position, and corrupt they become. How do you think these asshats go in worth a million bucks, and 30 years later they’re worth 50 million, all on (current) salary of 174k? Another thing that needs to go is their ability to buy stock. They’re inside traders to the extreme. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Scout Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 Very powerful testimony from Senator Garry Powers today about how his wife was going to lose her uterus or possibly die if she didn't get an abortion but the hospital, FOR POLITICAL REASONS, said they refused to provide the procedure. See why we laugh at pro-lifers? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Deadric Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 4 hours ago, king of the county said: She said that? She is against the idea; Dems are mad at her. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king of the county Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 7 hours ago, Deadric said: She is against the idea; Dems are mad at her. She better watch her back she’ll have a hillary Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dontlooknow Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 16 minutes ago, king of the county said: She better watch her back she’ll have a hillary Like the seth rich lie that roger stone started. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king of the county Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 8 minutes ago, Dontlooknow said: Like the seth rich lie that roger stone started. No like her bf she shot in the park Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dontlooknow Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 1 minute ago, king of the county said: No like her bf she shot in the park She shot somebody I the park. Show me that link buddy. I have to have something to do this morning. I'm waiting for the auntie come up and stick a deer. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king of the county Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 2 minutes ago, Dontlooknow said: She shot somebody I the park. Show me that link buddy. I have to have something to do this morning. I'm waiting for the auntie come up and stick a deer. Moldea's research sought, among other things, to discover the origins of this line of investigation into the Clintons' credibility. In an interview for Salon.com, he suggests that "Foster had some blond hair and carpet fibers on his suit jacket, and he had semen in his underwear. So, the media got a hold of this information, and…they start making alleging that the Clintons were involved in this murder. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dontlooknow Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 3 minutes ago, king of the county said: Moldea's research sought, among other things, to discover the origins of this line of investigation into the Clintons' credibility. In an interview for Salon.com, he suggests that "Foster had some blond hair and carpet fibers on his suit jacket, and he had semen in his underwear. So, the media got a hold of this information, and…they start making alleging that the Clintons were involved in this murder. So your telling me that Trump has had the white house for four years and Hillary isn't in jail yet koc? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king of the county Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 9 minutes ago, Dontlooknow said: So your telling me that Trump has had the white house for four years and Hillary isn't in jail yet koc? I know it’s a crime Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dontlooknow Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 1 minute ago, king of the county said: I know it’s a crime Is it a crime if you can't prove it? What about the constitution son? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king of the county Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 1 minute ago, Dontlooknow said: Is it a crime if you can't prove it? What about the constitution son? She’s innocent until proven guilty but there is a ton of evidence you want me to list it again? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
AnotherJim Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 8 years is enough; if you can't steal 9 or 10 million in 8 years, it's your own fault. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dontlooknow Posted October 14 Share Posted October 14 7 minutes ago, AnotherJim said: 8 years is enough; if you can't steal 9 or 10 million in 8 years, it's your own fault. The only reason I don't agree with that is because you should be able to chose whom ever you want. There is a reason the founders didn't have term limits. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.