Jump to content

What you want to know about the Bilderberg Group and New World Order


Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, pmurT said:

 

@SpyCar won't appreciate it much either

I'm not here to please and tell what one wants to hear. Getting the truth out and opening the eyes of the brain dead zombies is my purpose. Making them understand what's happening in the Country, the direction we are heading in, and who is responsible. They can take it or leave it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

LOL

 

truth is  boring 

 

can't accept  your side is  the  world cancer can you?  that you are  useful pawn to them.

I just can't accept your twisted partisan view of this world where you think that America can thrive while the rest of the world suffers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a not so shocking fact about the Bilderbergers, antifakiller.

 

They are not only UNIPARTY, they are Fabian Socialists (which means stealth communists).

 

Joseph Retinger ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Józef_Retinger ), one of the Bilderberger Group’s founders, collaborated with the Fabian Society.  This is acknowledged on the Bilderberger’s own website which notes that "he enrolled at the London School of Economics and Political Science (the LSE), where he studied for a year. During this time he came into contact with reformist ideas promoted by the Fabian Society; it was three members of the Fabian Society (Sidney Webb, Beatrice Webb and George Bernard Shaw) who in 1895 had created the LSE, in order to shape minds in favor of a political model which would be a synthesis between communism and capitalism, between the planned economy and the market economy."  


The Fabian society itself admits it’s connection to the Bilderbergers ….
 
https://fabiansociety.wordpress.com/2012/11/15/hello-world/
 

Quote

 

The truth of the matter is that the Bilderberg Group has been a Socialist operation from inception: by all accounts, Bilderberg was the brainchild of Polish Socialist Joseph Retinger who was a close collaborator of the Fabian Society.
 
Based in London, Retinger had been in charge of co-ordinating the foreign ministers of various European governments-in-exile during the war. After the war, he was appointed secretary-general of several organisations promoting Socialist projects like the Independent League for European Co-operation (ILEC) and the European League for Economic Co-operation (ELEC). These organisations were bankrolled by David Astor and associated interests and became the driving force behind the movement for a united Europe (Ratiu, 2012).

 

The involvement of leading figures from the financial world shows that Bilderberg was indeed the creation of financial interests. Only that these interests were not “capitalist” but Socialist. David Astor, who became a member, was a leader of the pro-Socialist Milner Group. Other leading financiers who attended Bilderberg meetings from the first conference (1954) were long-standing Fabian Socialists David and Nelson Rockefeller; Joseph E. Johnson, chairman of the Rockefellers’ Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and president of the Rockefeller-controlled Carnegie Endowment for International Peace; and Dean Rusk, CFR director, director of the Rockefeller Foundation, Bilderberg co-chairman and (from 1961) Democrat Secretary of State. The only capitalist of sorts was the Group’s chairman, Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands. However, he was controlled by Retinger who, as a former member of the intelligence services, held information about Bernhard’s private life (de Villemarest, p. 15) and had clearly chosen him to cover the Socialist trail.


On the political side, too, the Group was dominated by Socialists like Denis Healey and Hugh Gaitskell of the Fabian Society executive committee. Healey was also member and later chairman of the Fabian International Bureau Advisory Committee as well as Chatham House (RIIA) councillor. Their “Conservative” colleague on the Bilderberg steering committee was Reginald (“Reggie”) Maudling, Churchill’s Economic Secretary to the Treasury, who had been a key supporter of Labour’s nationalisation programme. French members included Guy Mollet, Vice-President of the Fabian-controlled Socialist International, leader of the French Section of the Workers’ International (later Socialist) Party (SFIO) who later became Prime Minister of France, and his assistant Jacques Piette of the SFIO executive committee.
 
… snip …
 
The Bilderberg Group’s role in the drive for world government has been confirmed by leading Fabian Healey himself, co-founder of both the Socialist International and Bilderberg, who admitted that the group aimed to achieve a “united global governance” (Birrell, 2013).
 
In light of the above facts, the identity of the objectives of the Fabian Society represented by the Socialist International and parties like Labour, on one hand, and the objectives of international financial interests represented by the UN and Bilderberg, on the other hand, becomes indisputable (Ratiu, 2012).
 

 


And do you know that lowly Arkansas governor Bill Clinton (who had hardly a dime to his name) attended the Bilderberger meeting in June of 1991.   That was FOUR MONTHS before he announced he was a candidate for the US Presidency.    Do you know that Daniel Estulin who has researched the Bilderberg Group for decades says that at that meeting David Rockefeller (a Bilderberger who attended the Fabian's London School of Economics (LSE) and has had nothing but nice things to say about Fabians) told Clinton why the North American Free Trade Agreement (which Bill had probably even heard of at that point) was a Bilderberg priority and that the group needed him to support it.   The very next year, Bill Clinton was elected president, perhaps with Fabian support, and on January 1 of 1994 (just 1 year after Bill taking office) NAFTA took effect.  I don't believe in so many coincidences?

Just look at the attendees ...

 

Bill Clinton
Hillary Clinton
Sandy Berger
Timothy Geithner
Dick Gephardt
Henry Kissinger
Richard Perle
Colin Powell
Condolezza Rice
George Schultz
Paul Volcker
George Bush
Gerald Ford
Tom Daschle
John Edwards
John Kerry
Sam Nunn
Lindsey Graham
Kathleen Sebelius
David Rockefeller (who studied economics at the Fabian Society’s London School of Economics, and then helped found the Bildergergers)
Jeff Bezos
Bill Gates
Chris Hughes (co-founder of Facebook)
Eric Schmidt (CEO and Chairman of Google)
William F Buckley, Jr
George Stephanopoulos
Bill Kristol
RIchard Perle
George Soros
Dianne Feinstein
Vernon Jordan
Ben Bernanke
Bill Richardson
 
It's all the usual suspects of the GOPe and the DemocRATS.    The UNIPARTY.   All are people desperately trying to stop against Trump.   And many have direct ties to the Fabian Society or the organizations they created to further their agenda ... like the LSE.   George Soros (whose likely behind the unrest being fomented by BLM) attended LSE.   Ben Bernanke has lectured numerous times at the LSE.  Bill Kristol's father, Irving Kristol, wrote glowing articles about prominent Fabian Socialists and their society.     The Rockefellers had strong connections to Fabian Socialists.   William Buckley's National Review which he founded in 1954 was staffed by *ex*-Fabians.   When are we going to realize that the Fabian society is behind much of what's been going on to oppose Trump and his agenda?

 

  • Thumb up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, maineman said:

I just can't accept your twisted partisan view of this world where you think that America can thrive while the rest of the world suffers.

 

... and there you have it.

 

Why can't we all suffer evenly?

 

jimacostaborderwall-998x702.jpg

                                         "This is where Trump hid all the mailboxes."

 

 

kj

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, antifakiller said:

I'm not here to please and tell what one wants to hear. Getting the truth out and opening the eyes of the brain dead zombies is my purpose. Making them understand what's happening in the Country, the direction we are heading in, and who is responsible. They can take it or leave it.

 

Work on your English language skills, Russian troll.

 

Bill

Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, maineman said:

I just can't accept your twisted partisan view of this world where you think that America can thrive while the rest of the world suffers.

 

 

Get over your blindness and arrogance.   America is not responsible for world suffering ,  nor are  we required to  give our wealth away to try to fix it, only to  have it pilfered  by corruptocrats  like  the   EU and   American   elites 

 

wake the fuck  up...   you are fucking clueless

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

 

Get over your blindness and arrogance.   America is not responsible for world suffering ,  nor are  we required to  give our wealth away to try to fix it, only to  have it pilfered  by corruptocrats  like  the   EU and   American   elites 

 

wake the fuck  up...   you are fucking clueless

yawn  more of the same partisan bullshit.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, antifakiller said:

I'm not here to please and tell what one wants to hear. Getting the truth out and opening the eyes of the brain dead zombies is my purpose. Making them understand what's happening in the Country, the direction we are heading in, and who is responsible. They can take it or leave it.

 

Welcome Home!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

Because of  Ross Perot, who was  against NAFTA

 

It's certainly possible that the powers that be didn't expect Clinton to win ... that he wasn't supposed to win.  

 

After all, they already had a Deep State socialist candidate in the election ... George Bush.  A sitting President.   A sure thing.

 

Perhaps Perot just screwed their plans up.

 

And look who Perot supported in later elections ... Bush and Romney ... both Deep State and arguably socialists.

 

But then he probably just got fooled like most of the rest of us conservatives.

Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, BeAChooser said:

 

It's certainly possible that the powers that be didn't expect Clinton to win ... that he wasn't supposed to win.  

 

After all, they already had a Deep State socialist candidate in the election ... George Bush.  A sitting President.   A sure thing.

 

Perhaps Perot just screwed their plans up.

 

And look who Perot supported in later elections ... Bush and Romney ... both Deep State and arguably socialists.

 

But then he probably just got fooled like most of the rest of us conservatives.

 

 

OK that makes sense.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...