Jump to content

This is the first of many nails in the coffin of the Biden/Harris campaign I’m going to say


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Toldya said:

They're promoting bail for protest-related charges.

He didn't molest a child to protest police brutality.

 

Right-wing dishonesty knows no bounds.

You're excusing Kamala and Joe paying a pedophiles bail? 🤣

 

The left sinks lower by the minute. How low can you go? Got any more fake stories about Trump? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

So you are saying that Kamaltoe doesn't support the MMF, that bailed this creep out?   She is actively supporting a group that bails criminals out of jail, and you support her.   T

I HAVE AN ISSUE WITH POLITICIANS MAKING BAIL FOR PEDOPHILES WHO SEXUALLY ASSAULTED 8 YEARS YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE. HAVE ANY KIDS? HOW WOULD YOU FEEL IF JOE AND KAMALA BAILED OUT A GUY WHO JUST DIDDLED YO

20 minutes ago, Str8tEdge said:

You're excusing Kamala and Joe paying a pedophiles bail? 🤣

 

The left sinks lower by the minute. How low can you go? Got any more fake stories about Trump? 

 

This is one of those typical sensationalist RWNJ articles (pedophilia OMG!) that trains morons like you to make snap judgments based on tribal allegiances and then disappears before it can really be scrutinized.

 

It's not like he isn't going to have a trial or be thrown in prison for 30 years if he is found guilty.

 

If Trump had molested an 8 year old (not saying he hasn't), you would be demanding he pardon himself and avoid all prison time before going after the 8 year old who accused him, throwing her in jail without a trial, and then executing her for crimes against the state.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Toldya said:

 

This is one of those typical sensationalist RWNJ articles (pedophilia OMG!) that trains morons like you to make snap judgments based on tribal allegiances and then disappears before it can really be scrutinized.

 

It's not like he isn't going to have a trial or be thrown in prison for 30 years if he is found guilty.

 

If Trump had molested an 8 year old (not saying he hasn't), you would be demanding he pardon himself and avoid all prison time before going after the 8 year old who accused him, throwing her in jail without a trial, and then executing her for crimes against the state.

1. They SHOULDN'T BE BAILING ANY CRIMINALS OUT you stupid FUCK.

 

Protestors don't get arrested for protesting. They get arrested for ASSAULT, ARSON, TRESPASSING, PROPERTY DAMAGE, MURDER. 

 

Democrats are ENABLING CRIMINALS and the destruction of our cities to the tune of BILLIONS, not to mention the dozens that have been murdered due to these fucking domestic terrorists. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Str8tEdge said:

They SHOULDN'T BE BAILING ANY CRIMINALS OUT you stupid FUCK.

 

It's still guilty until proven innocent, and if you have an issue with the accused being granted bail why don't you take it up with the judge who seemed to think it was ok to do so?

 

3 minutes ago, Str8tEdge said:

Protestors don't get arrested for protesting. They get arrested for ASSAULT, ARSON, TRESPASSING, PROPERTY DAMAGE, MURDER. 

 

Not true. They're also using gang laws to criminalize behavior such as holding a water bottle in a 'menacing fashion'. People are facing five years in prison for smashing windows and daubing red paint on the street because of these laws. On top of this Trump is trying to get them labelled domestic terrorists for simple acts of vandalism. This is purely about squashing the right to protest, which you as a fascist support... but others do not.

 

10 minutes ago, Str8tEdge said:

Democrats are ENABLING CRIMINALS and the destruction of our cities to the tune of BILLIONS, not to mention the dozens that have been murdered due to these fucking domestic terrorists. 

 

And yet when this shit happened in Hong Kong, everyone was totally for it.

 

The Democrats are trying to protect the right to protest, a right that Trump is trying to destroy. They ARE NOT defending criminals, no matter how much you want to lie to yourself about it. You're obviously one of those 'trade freedom for security' types who thinks that simply because you want to do that, it means everyone else should simply agree with you and have neither in the end as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Toldya said:

 

It's still guilty until proven innocent, and if you have an issue with the accused being granted bail why don't you take it up with the judge who seemed to think it was ok to do so?

I HAVE AN ISSUE WITH POLITICIANS MAKING BAIL FOR PEDOPHILES WHO SEXUALLY ASSAULTED 8 YEARS YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE. HAVE ANY KIDS? HOW WOULD YOU FEEL IF JOE AND KAMALA BAILED OUT A GUY WHO JUST DIDDLED YOUR 8 YEAR OLD? 

54 minutes ago, Toldya said:

 

Not true. They're also using gang laws to criminalize behavior such as holding a water bottle in a 'menacing fashion'. People are facing five years in prison for smashing windows and daubing red paint on the street because of these laws. On top of this Trump is trying to get them labelled domestic terrorists for simple acts of vandalism. This is purely about squashing the right to protest, which you as a fascist support... but others do not.

IT IS TRUE YOU STUPID FUCK. NO ONE IS GETTING ARRESTED WHILE PEACEFULLY PROTESTING. GOD DAMN YOU ARE A FUCKING MORON. BREAKING WINDOWS IS ILLEGAL!!!!!! DEFACING PROPERTY IS ILLEGAL!!!!

 

GOD DAMNIT YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LAW BREAKING RIOTS AND PEACEFUL PROTESTS. 

 

54 minutes ago, Toldya said:

 

 

And yet when this shit happened in Hong Kong, everyone was totally for it.

 

The Democrats are trying to protect the right to protest, a right that Trump is trying to destroy. They ARE NOT defending criminals, no matter how much you want to lie to yourself about it. You're obviously one of those 'trade freedom for security' types who thinks that simply because you want to do that, it means everyone else should simply agree with you and have neither in the end as well.

ABOLUTE FUCKING BULLSHIT. YOU JUST CITED TWO CRIMES AND TRIED TO CLAIM THEY WERE PEACEFUL PROTESTING. 

 

THE FIRST AMENDMENT DOES NOT GIVE YOU THE RIGHT TO STEP ONTO MY PRIVATE PROPERTY, DESTROY PROPERTY, DEFACE PROPERTY, BANG ON CARS, BURN DOWN PROPERTY, THROW OBJECTS AT OTHERS, POLICE, BUILDINGS, LOOT AND STEAL PROPERTY, ASSAULT CITIZENS, THREATEN CITIZENS, EXTORT CITIZENS, STAB CITIZENS, MURDER CITIZENS. 

 

THAT IS NOT FUCKING PROTESTING YOU FUCKING MORON. THERE'S ENTIRE BLOCKS OF CITIES BURNED TO THE GROUND, DOZENS OF MURDERS AND HUNDREDS OF ASSAULTS. BILLIONS IN PROPERTY DAMAGE AND STOLEN GOODS. 

 

THAT IS NOT FUCKING PEACEFUL YOU FUCKING BRAIN DEAD MORON. 

 

 

  • Thumb up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Toldya said:

They're promoting bail for protest-related charges.

He didn't molest a child to protest police brutality.

 

Right-wing dishonesty knows no bounds.

Uh the facts are did a group of Harris Biden employees contribute to a fund that bailed out a child molester, yes or no.   It’s a show of poor judgement and    one reason of many why harris Biden should not be voted to run our country.

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, calguy said:

Your side promotes a russian take over of our government.

Nice.

 

You still on this Russia, Russia, Russia BULLSHIT that you claimed that MUELLER would prove Trump colluded with??


Fact is, YOUR SIDE are the ones PROMOTING LEFT WING COMMUNISM/SOCIALISM, which is RUSSIAN ALL THE WAY!!!!

 

So PERHAPS, Mueller needs to look to YOUR SIDE for the REAL RUSSIAN COLLUSION there SHITSTAIN!!!
 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Toldya said:

They're promoting bail for protest-related charges.

He didn't molest a child to protest police brutality.

 

Right-wing dishonesty knows no bounds.

Uh their contributions went to pay bail for a child molester poor judgement poor decision wtf 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Str8tEdge said:

I HAVE AN ISSUE WITH POLITICIANS MAKING BAIL FOR PEDOPHILES WHO SEXUALLY ASSAULTED 8 YEARS YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE. HAVE ANY KIDS? HOW WOULD YOU FEEL IF JOE AND KAMALA BAILED OUT A GUY WHO JUST DIDDLED YOUR 8 YEAR OLD? 

IT IS TRUE YOU STUPID FUCK. NO ONE IS GETTING ARRESTED WHILE PEACEFULLY PROTESTING. GOD DAMN YOU ARE A FUCKING MORON. BREAKING WINDOWS IS ILLEGAL!!!!!! DEFACING PROPERTY IS ILLEGAL!!!!

 

GOD DAMNIT YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LAW BREAKING RIOTS AND PEACEFUL PROTESTS. 

 

ABOLUTE FUCKING BULLSHIT. YOU JUST CITED TWO CRIMES AND TRIED TO CLAIM THEY WERE PEACEFUL PROTESTING. 

 

THE FIRST AMENDMENT DOES NOT GIVE YOU THE RIGHT TO STEP ONTO MY PRIVATE PROPERTY, DESTROY PROPERTY, DEFACE PROPERTY, BANG ON CARS, BURN DOWN PROPERTY, THROW OBJECTS AT OTHERS, POLICE, BUILDINGS, LOOT AND STEAL PROPERTY, ASSAULT CITIZENS, THREATEN CITIZENS, EXTORT CITIZENS, STAB CITIZENS, MURDER CITIZENS. 

 

THAT IS NOT FUCKING PROTESTING YOU FUCKING MORON. THERE'S ENTIRE BLOCKS OF CITIES BURNED TO THE GROUND, DOZENS OF MURDERS AND HUNDREDS OF ASSAULTS. BILLIONS IN PROPERTY DAMAGE AND STOLEN GOODS. 

 

THAT IS NOT FUCKING PEACEFUL YOU FUCKING BRAIN DEAD MORON. 

 

 

Man, that was an ass whippin. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, king of the county said:

Uh the facts are did a group of Harris Biden employees contribute to a fund that bailed out a child molester, yes or no.

 

No.

 

He was accused, not convicted. And it's bail, not a pardon-- if a rich asshole had been accused of exactly the same crime, he wouldn't spend a single day in jail.

 

Quote

It’s a show of poor judgement and    one reason of many why harris Biden should not be voted to run our country.

 

It doesn't even come close to intentionally letting covid spread as revenge for not voting for Trump.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, Toldya ... who will you REALLY be voting for when you cast your vote for Biden?   Because you have to know that Biden is so diminished already from dementia and/or Alzheimers that he will not be able to carry out the duties of President.   Is it radical Harris, who will become President in that event?  Or are you voting for Biden because you think even Harris will be a Potemkin president for someone in the shadows ... perhaps Obama ... or George Soros.   So try to be honest for a moment and tell us who will you REALLY be voting for when you cast your vote for Biden?  Hmmmmm?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Toldya said:

 

Trump and Pence are far more radical than Harris.

Harris is basically Obama redux.

Radical comes from the Latin word for "roots" and means change from the roots.

Trump wants to return to the days when Black people knew their place and the penalties for being uppity. He wants to return to the days when slavery was never mentioned in any detail in school, and women knew better than to contradict a man, when a guy like Trump ditched two models  who got pregnant and blimped up on him, and he chose a dim introverted woman who agreed in her prenup that she could not, ever,  look fat. While Trump himself has become quite blimpish.

 

Harris favors change at the basic assumptions in the other direction: more equality of rights for women and minorities and a recognition of the true history of this country, warts and all.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Toldya said:

 

No.

 

He was accused, not convicted. And it's bail, not a pardon-- if a rich asshole had been accused of exactly the same crime, he wouldn't spend a single day in jail.

 

 

It doesn't even come close to intentionally letting covid spread as revenge for not voting for Trump.

What?   

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, rippy38 said:

Biden phonecall to the Ukraine setting up a back channel in the wake of Trump's 2016 victory is being whispered about in DC.

 

Seems they might not have to kill Coma Joe to get him outta they way after all... they'll just impeach his ass as soon as he is sworn in.

Impeachments don't work anymore, dip wad! Trump saw to that!

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Toldya said:

Trump and Pence are far more radical than Harris.

Harris is basically Obama redux.

 

Is that an admission that you're really voting for Harris (who was demolished in the primaries in her home state, by the way)?

 

And isn't that and admission that you see Harris as a Potemkin candidate ... for Obama who might actually be pulling her strings?


So ... aren't you admitting that you're really voting for Obama for President, not Biden, or Harris?

 

If so, aren't you then trying to circumvent what the Constitution clearly states ... that no one can be elected more than twice to the office of President?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, BeAChooser said:

 

Is that an admission that you're really voting for Harris (who was demolished in the primaries in her home state, by the way)?

 

And isn't that and admission that you see Harris as a Potemkin candidate ... for Obama who might actually be pulling her strings?


So ... aren't you admitting that you're really voting for Obama for President, not Biden, or Harris?

 

If so, aren't you then trying to circumvent what the Constitution clearly states ... that no one can be elected more than twice to the office of President?

 

Potemkin?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, king of the county said:

Potemkin?

 

Prince Potemkin was the governor-general of Russia's southern provinces in the days of Catherine the Great.  He's known for creating villages made of structures with painted façades to fool visiting officials into thinking there were well maintained and full of happy, well-fed people ... when they were not.  For example ...

 

Castle_and_brewery_in_Kol%C3%ADn_2.jpg

 

So a Potemkin candidate is one who uses a fake external façade to hide who he really is and what he will do as president, in order to be a more viable candidate.  It's a candidate who is just the opposite of Trump, who told us 4 years ago EXACTLY who he is and what he was going to do.  

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, BeAChooser said:

 

Prince Potemkin was the governor-general of Russia's southern provinces in the days of Catherine the Great.  He's known for creating villages made of structures with painted façades to fool visiting officials into thinking there were well maintained and full of happy, well-fed people ... when they were not.  For example ...

 

Castle_and_brewery_in_Kol%C3%ADn_2.jpg

 

So a Potemkin candidate is one who uses a fake external façade to hide who he really is and what he will do as president, in order to be a more viable candidate.  It's a candidate who is just the opposite of Trump, who told us 4 years ago EXACTLY who he is and what he was going to do.  

 

Oh i like it 

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, king of the county said:

What?   

 

It was bail, not a pardon.

He isn't free-- he still has to appear at his trial.

Not doing so would mean further charges.

 

This happens literally every single fucking day, and anyone who had committed the same crime and was able to afford the bail would also be 'out on the streets'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...