Jump to content

Scientific American makes first ever political endorsement in its 175 year history


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, XavierOnassis said:

Most of the money went to the fatcats at the top/ The Tax cuts were engineered by the Heritage Foundation with input from the last Koch  brother and his staff.

 

Translation:  EVERYBODY GOT A TAX CUT.

 

You REALLY don't understand that a 3% tax cut for someone with an AGI of $500Kper annum is going to be larger than a 3% tax cut for someone who makes $50K per annum, do you?

 

That's a GREAT, BIG, UNFAIR MYSTERY TO YOU, because you are economically and arithmetically ignorant.

 

But . . . wait.

 

You don't understand ANYTHING of import.

 

That's why you're a LIBERAL!

 

 

  • Thumb up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Spouting disinformation and engaging in attention-seeking behaviors is your whole bag.   You are a moronic troll.   Bill

EVERYONE got a tax break under the Trump tax cuts, ms. onASSis, and FEDERAL REVENUES INCREASED!   Get one of your nurses to research that for you.

Most of the money went to the fatcats at the top/ The Tax cuts were engineered by the Heritage Foundation with input from the last Koch  brother and his staff.

8 hours ago, BeAChooser said:

Clearly, the folks at SA believes in AGWalarmism as do all the leftists here a LF.   Yet neither SA or LF's AGWalarmists are willing to debate the actual data ... data which proves the entire premise of AGWalarmism is faulty.   Every time ... and I mean EVERY TIME the data comes out the leftists here RUN as I'm sure the staff at SA would do were we given the opportunity to actually debate them face to face or on the internet.    The whole concern about CO2 is based on a LIE promulgated by leftists whose agenda is NOT concern about the environment but a desire to transform the US into a communist state.  A state where elite democRATS will be in control ... in control of literally everything in people's lives ... Soviet style.   

Question: why do biden and obama own beautiful beach front homes?

Answer: because they don't believe in it either...

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Mirabeau said:

 

Translation:  EVERYBODY GOT A TAX CUT.

 

You REALLY don't understand that a 3% tax cut for someone with an AGI of $500Kper annum is going to be larger than a 3% tax cut for someone who makes $50K per annum, do you?

 

That's a GREAT, BIG, UNFAIR MYSTERY TO YOU, because you are economically and arithmetically ignorant.

 

But . . . wait.

 

You don't understand ANYTHING of import.

 

That's why you're a LIBERAL!

 

 

It's because math is painful for these libtawds...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, ROG62 said:

Problem being, you libruls have abandoned science for political ideologies....

 

How did we manage to convince the vast majority of science organizations, journals and magazines to become libruls when we couldn't even win the presidency against one of the worst RWNJ candidates of all time? And I don't just mean in America, I mean all around the entire world.

 

Your conspiracy theory is stupid and you should feel bad.

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

 

LOL...   in  your  liberal dreams

 

It's true Elton.

 

You don't actually make points, you don't actually provide examples or links to back up any statements you make (almost all of which are lies or misinterpretations), you don't know how to avoid fallacies or identify them in others' arguments, you think that simply repeating something over and over makes it true... and whenever points are made you ignore them completely and try to change the topic. Whenever someone gives up due to how pointless it is to keep going, you declare victory and chase them around the forum telling them how you won the Internet and they can't hope to beat you, and use all of it to 'prove' to yourself how right you are about everything.

 

You're seriously one of the most annoying posters I've ever come across on the Internet.

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Mirabeau said:

 

Translation:  EVERYBODY GOT A TAX CUT.

 

You REALLY don't understand that a 3% tax cut for someone with an AGI of $500Kper annum is going to be larger than a 3% tax cut for someone who makes $50K per annum, do you?

 

That's a GREAT, BIG, UNFAIR MYSTERY TO YOU, because you are economically and arithmetically ignorant.

 

But . . . wait.

 

You don't understand ANYTHING of import.

 

That's why you're a LIBERAL!

 

 

 

 

$1500=$15000

 

You literally believe this.

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, DemDog said:

After 175 years of staying out of the political spot light, is anyone really surprised that Scientific American would back a candidate that isn’t a science denying, climate denying, COVID denying piece of ignorant shit like Donald J Trump? 

Climate change... LOL

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Toldya said:

You don't actually make points, you don't actually provide examples or links to back up any statements you make

 

 

Thats a fucking lie.   I provide citations a lot.     

 

3 hours ago, Toldya said:

you don't know how to avoid fallacies or identify them in others' arguments, you think that simply repeating something over and over makes it true.

 

 

Another lie.   I do not engage in fallacies .   I have been doing this a long time.   You ignore the truths that you don’t like, and you accuse your opponent of what you are guilty of.   You push old lies here, liesxwe have all seen before, using fallacious debate tactics we have seen before.

 

 

3 hours ago, Toldya said:

You're seriously one of the most annoying posters I've ever come across on the Internet.

 

 

To liars, truth is annoying 

Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, 123urout said:

OMG, You are the one that Demands you came from critters.

I do not "demand" anything. It is obvious that humans are a species of animal related to great apes. It is not what I demand, it is  obvious  to anyone who understands biology all humans, including you,  share a common ancestor with great apes. The DNA evidence is irrefutable to all but simple-minded imbeciles.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Toldya said:

 

How did we manage to convince the vast majority of science organizations, journals and magazines to become libruls when we couldn't even win the presidency against one of the worst RWNJ candidates of all time? And I don't just mean in America, I mean all around the entire world.

 

Your conspiracy theory is stupid and you should feel bad.

These "organizations" are funded mostly thru private donations and govt grants...

 

you don't think those who fund have influence? Also, political ideologies choose "scientific experts" that 'fit' the narrative yet cancel those that disagree with the help of the media...

 

you are so naive it's pathetic...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, ROG62 said:

These "organizations" are funded mostly thru private donations and govt grants...

 

you don't think those who fund have influence? Also, political ideologies choose "scientific experts" that 'fit' the narrative yet cancel those that disagree with the help of the media...

 

you are so naive it's pathetic...

 

Scientists are a minority of the population of every country, including this one. Still, scientists are absolutely essential to the US economy.  The Scientific American, like the National Geographic,  which agrees with the Scientific American, are supported by subscriptions of readers who recognize the importance of science. People read these magazines to be informed of the present state of science and to update themselves of recent research.

 

Opposition to information about Global Climate change is financed by Big Oil. Big Coal. Big Gas and industries related to these. Their objective is to sell nonsustainable hydrocarbons for the greatest profit possible for at most the next five years.

 

It is YOU who are naive.

Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, ROG62 said:

These "organizations" are funded mostly thru private donations and govt grants...

 

you don't think those who fund have influence? Also, political ideologies choose "scientific experts" that 'fit' the narrative yet cancel those that disagree with the help of the media...

 

you are so naive it's pathetic...

 

Ah, so the solution to this politicization of science is to make sure that nobody who decides to become a scientist ever gets paid even a fucking dime.

 

Brilliant.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

Scientists are a minority of the population of every country, including this one. Still, scientists are absolutely essential to the US economy.  The Scientific American, like the National Geographic,  which agrees with the Scientific American, are supported by subscriptions of readers who recognize the importance of science. People read these magazines to be informed of the present state of science and to update themselves of recent research.

 

Opposition to information about Global Climate change is financed by Big Oil. Big Coal. Big Gas and industries related to these. Their objective is to sell nonsustainable hydrocarbons for the greatest profit possible for at most the next five years.

 

It is YOU who are naive.

And so, because it fits your ideaology, it's a go and I'm naive....

 

how about these 50 "renowned scientists?
 

https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions

 

You see, opinions at best...even with presumed favorable data they eat crow...

 

problem being, one person states an opinion, another agrees and then it becomes a bandwagon hair on fire event...

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, ROG62 said:

And so, because it fits your ideaology, it's a go and I'm naive....

 

how about these 50 "renowned scientists?
 

https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions

 

You see, opinions at best...even with presumed favorable data they eat crow...

 

problem being, one person states an opinion, another agrees and then it becomes a bandwagon hair on fire event...

There is no evidence to support the fact that greenhouse gases are causing climate change.

There is considerable evidence that we have the ability to reduce said gases by using better technology, but greedy oil companies are preventing it.

Your "rotten cherry-picking" of scientists that have erred is irrelevant.

You are naive and stupid as well as  just another boring rightwing troll.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, XavierOnassis said:

There is no evidence to support the fact that greenhouse gases are causing climate change.

There is considerable evidence that we have the ability to reduce said gases by using better technology, but greedy oil companies are preventing it.

Your "rotten cherry-picking" of scientists that have erred is irrelevant. Whataboutism is a stupid way of make a point.

You are naive and stupid as well as  just another boring rightwing troll.

 

Just now, XavierOnassis said:

There is no evidence to support the fact that greenhouse gases are causing climate change.

There is considerable evidence that we have the ability to reduce said gases by using better technology, but greedy oil companies are preventing it.

Your "rotten cherry-picking" of scientists that have erred is irrelevant.

You are naive and stupid as well as  just another boring rightwing troll.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

 

Its not the vast majority, and don’t even say 97%

Please don't tell Mirabeau that there are still some IGNORANT, IGNORANT FOOLS out there who think that 97% of "scientists" believe the myth of anthropogenic global warming!

 

PLEASE DON'T SAY THERE ARE STILL PEOPLE WHO ARE THAT IGNORANT!

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, XavierOnassis said:

Scientists are a minority of the population of every country, including this one. Still, scientists are absolutely essential to the US economy.  The Scientific American, like the National Geographic,  which agrees with the Scientific American, are supported by subscriptions of readers who recognize the importance of science. People read these magazines to be informed of the present state of science and to update themselves of recent research.

 

Opposition to information about Global Climate change is financed by Big Oil. Big Coal. Big Gas and industries related to these. Their objective is to sell nonsustainable hydrocarbons for the greatest profit possible for at most the next five years.

 

It is YOU who are naive.

Hey, ms. onASSis:

 

Does your nursing home have air conditioning and heat?

 

What provides the energy for the air conditioning and heat?

 

When your nursing home takes you to the hospital in the ambulance for your monthly industrial-strength enema, is that ambulance powered by solar panels?

 

Disclosure:  Mirabeau receives monthly royalties/working interest payments from the production of oil, natural gas and coal, and uses significant portions of those royalties to support many worthwhile causes, including, but not limited to, the Gun Owners of America, the Federation for American Immigration Reform, the Send Them All Back to Mexico Council, the Kill California Initiative and the Kill a Commie for Christ Foundation.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

There is no evidence to support the fact that greenhouse gases are causing climate change.

There is considerable evidence that we have the ability to reduce said gases by using better technology, but greedy oil companies are preventing it.

Your "rotten cherry-picking" of scientists that have erred is irrelevant.

You are naive and stupid as well as  just another boring rightwing troll.

Shut the hell up, ms. onASSis.

 

Your ABYSMAL IGNORANCE is on full display!

 

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A "GREEDY OIL COMPANY!"

 

Such an entity DOES NOT EXIST!

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, XavierOnassis said:

There is no evidence to support the fact that greenhouse gases are causing climate change.

There is considerable evidence that we have the ability to reduce said gases by using better technology, but greedy oil companies are preventing it.

Your "rotten cherry-picking" of scientists that have erred is irrelevant.

You are naive and stupid as well as  just another boring rightwing troll.

So now you're stating there is NO evidence to back up your claim? Cool...now that that's out of the way, I didn't'cherry pick' anything...just googled it...you should try it sometime...

 

So, in essence, I proved YOU WRONG, and your best refutation is...

 

"You are naive and stupid as well as  just another boring rightwing troll."

 

got it loser...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...