Jump to content

Why didn't Facebook Censor This...Proves They are Just Leftist Faggots


Recommended Posts

Facebook Allows ANTIFA-Style Group to Organize a ‘White House Siege’ on Their Platform

This is what they allow while censoring conservatives.

2D20027A-BFC3-44F1-A3B1-7AD990F4719E-48x

Published

 1 hour ago 

on

 Aug 12, 2020
pjimage-2020-08-11T000535.489-1200x630.j
take our poll - story continues below
  • RIOTS: Who do you blame for the violence on America's streets?

 

 

The tech giant Facebook is allowing an ANTIFA-style group to organize a potentially violent “White House siege” next month on their platform.

“On September 17, 2020, we will lay siege to the White House. And we will sustain it for exactly fifty days. This is the #WhiteHouseSiege,” the group Adbusters wrote to advertise their event on their Facebook page. “We need your voice of wisdom and expertise to pull off a radically democratic toneshift in our politics.”

They boast that their extremist display will bring about a New World Order, a common goal for leftists and authoritarians who want to destroy the U.S. Constitution and national sovereignty throughout the globe.

 

“#WhiteHouseSiege will electrify the U.S. election season — and it doesn’t stop there. Drawing wind from #MeToo, #BLM, #ExtinctionRebellion, and protests against Trump’s lethal bungling of coronavirus, we’ll inspire a global movement of systemic change — a Global Spring — a cultural heave towards a new world order,” Adbusters wrote.

On their official website, Adbusters talks about their plan to re-launch the Occupy Wall Street movement, which ultimately fizzled out after being pushed by the liberal media and Obama administration nine years ago. There were reports of widespread rapes, violence and degeneracy at the various encampments.

“The Occupy anniversary arrives September 17th, 2020. And it may be the perfect day to trigger another global big-bang moment — a massive collective action of the sweetest kind of disobedience,” Adbusters wrote.

They hope that their siege of the White House lasts all the way up until election day. They hope that their sustained campaign of left-wing agitation can put Democrats back into power.

“A siege only works if it is sustained. We witnessed this — the multiplying power of a strategic occupation — nine years ago. You dig in, hold your ground, and the tension accumulates, amplifies, goes global,” Adbusters wrote.

On Monday, Big League Politics reported about a terrorist assassin who allegedly tried to storm the White House to take out President Trump:

President Donald Trump was forced to abruptly postpone his press conference today after an armed gunman stormed the White House and was reportedly shot by Secret Service agents.

Trump was taken to the Oval Office until the threat could be neutralized. After the situation was deemed safe, Trump resumed his press briefing and addressed the situation.

“There was a shooting, law enforcement shot someone, seems to be someone, and the suspect is on the way to the hospital,” Trump said.

“It’s unfortunate that this is the world but the world has always been a dangerous place. It’s not something that’s unique,” he added.

Trump refused to ascribe a motive to the shooter, saying that “it might not have had anything to do with me.” He added that he “didn’t even think about not coming back” to the press conference due to fear. The president described what it was like when the secret service official notified him of the threat.

“Just told me when he came up, you pretty much saw it like I did. He said, ‘Sir, could you please come with me?’ So, you were surprised. I was surprised, also. I think it’s probably it’s pretty unusual but very, very professional people, they all do a fantastic job, as you know,” he said.

Groups like Adbusters need to be targeted under federal RICO laws or under the federal War on Terror. These domestic enemies are far more dangerous to the U.S. Republic than ISIS could ever hope to be.

 

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/facebook-allows-antifa-style-group-to-organize-a-white-house-siege-on-their-platform/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Buffalo is a poorly informed ungulate. Facebook is simply posting info about a legal demonstration.

If they misbehave, Trump will call out his goons to suppress them. I think that this is a bad idea. But announcing it is 100% legal according to the First Amendment.

I won't be attending.

Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

Buffalo is a poorly informed ungulate. Facebook is simply posting info about a legal demonstration.

If they misbehave, Trump will call out his goons to suppress them. I think that this is a bad idea. But announcing it is 100% legal according to the First Amendment.

I won't be attending.

 

47 minutes ago, Scout said:

No wonder the Republican Party is in such sorry shape.....members like Buffalo. 

2 hypocritical moonbatty faggots=nastylittleratturd and scum

Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, king of the county said:

Time to lock and load 

10-1 if they try that shit, the military will take care of them...and they won't like it...

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

If Trump's goons actually shoot and kill unarmed protesters, he will LOSE.

 

I say more business and homeonwers need to shoot the lawless blm niggers and antifa faggot motherfuckers! It wouldn't take too many getting their asses blown away to stop their senseless thuggery.

 

[1.] In all states, you can use deadly force to defend yourself against death, serious bodily injury (which can include broken bones and perhaps even lost teeth), rape, or kidnapping, so long as (a) your fear is reasonable and (b) the danger is imminent (requirements that also apply to the doctrines I discuss below). For instance, you should be able to use deadly force against someone who is trying to burn down your home, since that threatens you with death or serious bodily harm. You should be able to do the same against someone who is trying to burn down your business, though with possible limitations involving the duty to retreat in the minority of states that recognize such a duty.

 

But in nearly all states, you can't generally use deadly force merely to defend your property. (Texas appears to be an exception, allowing use of deadly force when there's no other way to protect or recapture property even in situations involving simple theft or criminal mischief, though only at night,  Tex. Penal Code § 9.42; see, e.g., McFadden v. State (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).) That's where we get the conventional formulation that you can't use deadly force just to defend property.

[2.] This conventional formulation, though, omits an important limitation: In basically all states, you can use nondeadly force to defend your property—and if the thief or vandal responds by threatening you with death or great bodily harm, you can then protect yourself with deadly force. So in practice, you can use deadly force to protect property after all, if you're willing to use nondeadly force first and expose yourself to increased risk.

And in some states, you don't even need to expose yourself to such increased risk, if you reasonably fear at the outset that nondeadly protection of property would be too dangerous. In those states, to quote the Model Penal Code formulation (which some have adopted), deadly force can be used if

the person against whom the force is used is attempting to commit or consummate arson, burglary, robbery or other felonious theft or property destruction and either:

[a] has employed or threatened deadly force against or in the presence of the actor; or

 the use of [nondeadly] force to prevent the commission or the consummation of the crime would expose the actor or another in his presence to substantial danger of serious bodily injury.

 

https://reason.com/2020/06/02/are-people-allowed-to-use-deadly-force-to-defend-property/#comments

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, king of the county said:

I was referring to American citizens 

That would produce the same results.

Pro-Trump American citizens shooting American citizen protesters in front of the White House would prove that Trump cannot  maintain order.

Trump is a divisive son of a bitch. he runs on hatred and ignorance.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

That would produce the same results.

Pro-Trump American citizens shooting American citizen protesters in front of the White House would prove that Trump cannot  maintain order.

Trump is a divisive son of a bitch. he runs on hatred and ignorance.

 

I bet you can take a cock, both balls, and lick the asshole without coming up for air.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

That would produce the same results.

Pro-Trump American citizens shooting American citizen protesters in front of the White House would prove that Trump cannot  maintain order.

Trump is a divisive son of a bitch. he runs on hatred and ignorance.

So a bunch of brainwashed lefties want to lay siege to the White House but Trump is the divisive SOB that runs on hatred and ignorance.

 

That makes sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

That would produce the same results.

Pro-Trump American citizens shooting American citizen protesters in front of the White House would prove that Trump cannot  maintain order.

Trump is a divisive son of a bitch. he runs on hatred and ignorance.

They would be standing their ground 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, SheikhYerbouti said:

 

Are you trying to suggest everything is better now? Guffaw, guffaw, guffaw. They are certainly not going to stop censoring conservatives, Christians or people who believe in the sanctity of life, or engaging in what they themselves label "deboosting conservatives" and removing popular conservative pages from Facebook "news" that worked their way up by popularity. Any more than Google/YouTube or Twitter is. And NBC and the rest of the legacy media leftist propagandists are the beneficiaries.

Just read the stupid article you linked to:

"Facebook has allowed conservative news outlets and personalities to repeatedly spread false information without facing any of the companies stated penalties, according to leaked materials reviewed by NBC news."

 

Has your personal bias so warped your mind that your capacity for critical thought has been completely removed?

Conservative on facebook: "Socialism is bad." Zuckerberg": "Ooooo there's a "false information" we have to censor.

Leftie on facebook: "Socialism is good." Zuckerberg "There's a good article we don't have to censor! Let's "boost" it to the top of our "news" page!"

 

All of the conservative sources that they list after that paragraph that I quoted are purveyors of truth. You might have learned that if you ever taken the time to read any. Those publications as directly opposed to the Godless, socialist, facist, communist, lies of the left. Democrat filthy pig's lies have gotten things into a place so bad, that now they are confiscating children from their homes to change their sex, while pursuing the parents for child abuse for not having done so themselves.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SheikhYerbouti said:

 

The man who is prolapsing your ass. :D

NTTIAWT.

Prolapsing 

 

Prolapse:  A bulging or falling out of a body part, such as the rectum or vagina, that commonly occurs because of weakened supportive tissues.
 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...