Jump to content

Michelle: We Have to Think Now About ‘How Wealth Is Distributed’


Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

you can't argue that there has been and always will be someone who thinks that resources are not distributed fairly/equitably/etc. 

 

You also can't argue with the fact that people who believe that have created a hell of a lot of misery on earth the past 150 years.

 

And that now they are trying to put people with that belief in the Whitehouse.

 

And if they succeed, it will not end well for ANY of us ... even them.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 282
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

She IDLED him?  You mean like one idles an F-150?  Put him in neutral and let his engine run? Mama singlewide should sent her young peckerwood to school.methinks.

Wealth is NOT distributed, It's earned.

PLUCK PLUCK PLUCK!   XO is RUNNING!

1 minute ago, BeAChooser said:

 

You also can't argue with the fact that people who believe that have created a hell of a lot of misery on earth the past 150 years.

 

And that now they are trying to put people with that belief in the Whitehouse.

 

And if they succeed, it will not end well for ANY of us ... even them.

You read too much into my post. Its simple human nature that someone bitches/whines/complain about how they/someone else is not doing as well as they think they should be. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, impartialobserver said:

You read too much into my post. Its simple human nature that someone bitches/whines/complain about how they/someone else is not doing as well as they think they should be. 

 Having an attitude of gratitude and humility seems to take some effort. It’s EASIER to bitch.. but it’s more rewarding not to. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Imgreatagain said:

 Having an attitude of gratitude and humility seems to take some effort. It’s EASIER to bitch.. but it’s more rewarding not to. 

Americans have an obsessive love of bitching, complaining, and whining. Its the new American pastime IMO.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

You read too much into my post.

 

I didn't read anything into your post.   

 

You stated what you claim is unarguable ...

 

"you can't argue that there has been and always will be someone who thinks that resources are not distributed fairly/equitably/etc."

 

I didn't and don't disagree.

 

Now tell me you disagree with what I said in response as also unarguable and why.

 

Otherwise, I'll conclude you don't disagree with me.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, BeAChooser said:

 

And the Obamas certainly are radical leftist communists ... as proven here:

 

http://www.liberalforum.org/index.php?/topic/125708-a-challenge-to-cant-decide/?p=1059755227

 

 

 

Hey you don't have to convince me.

 

America voted for a druggie with a Muslim black father and white Mother Whore, who both abandon him and his biggest influence's in life were Marxists, Communists, a Pornographer and the likes of William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, which are former FBI fugitives and founders of the Communist terrorist Weather Underground. And a Preacher that  preached God Damn America and married him off to a Hateful Woman.

“Name just ONE person involved in nurturing and raising Obama to adulthood who loved America. Just ONE. We’re waiting,” 

This explains everything……
 
A boy Named Stanley - In Depth, Warts And All
 
IN CASE YOU WONDER WHY HE SURROUNDS HIMSELF WITH THE PEOPLE HE DOES AND WHY HE IS WHAT HE IS.
 
1926: A boy named Stanley is traumatized and abandoned. 
Eight year old Stanley Dunham discovers his mother's body 
after she has committed suicide. Stanley's father then abandons the 
traumatized boy, leaving Stanley in the care of his maternal 
grandparents in El Dorado, Kansas.
 
Stanley is psychologically devastated by suicide & abandonment!
Stanley Dunham becomes a troubled teen.
The emotionally damaged boy grows into a rebellious teenager.
Stanley punches his High School principal and becomes a drifter, 
hopping rail cars to Chicago, then California, then back again. 
At age 20, he marries Madelyn Payne on the night of her Senior Prom. 
 
The hurt little boy grows into an angry young man.
 
Stanley spends time as a rail hopping drifter.
Psycho Stanley fathers a girl- names her Stanley.

Just before leaving to fight in World War II in 1942, Stanley impregnates
Madelyn.  A girl is born on November 29, 1942.  Because Stanley wanted
a son, he names the girl after himself - Stanley Dunham (middle name 
is Ann)
 
Who would name his daughter Stanley?
Stanley Ann Dunham endures childhood trauma.
After the war, the Dunham's bounce around the country for 15 years - 
moving to California, back to Kansas, to Seattle, WA, to Mercer Island,
WA, and finally to Hawaii.  Stanley is teased about her boyish name at 
every new school she attends.The instability of constantly moving,
the teasing/bullying over her strange name, and the constant reminder 
that her father wanted a boy - will combine to turn young Stanley Ann
into a traumatized psycho like her father.
 
A girl named Stanley is teased about her boyish name.
Stanley Ann Dunham becomes a troubled teen.

At 17, Stanley Ann now goes simply by "Ann".  By this time, 
she has already embraced Marxism (as had her father),
is posing naked for a Communist named Frank Marshall Davis, 
bashing America, and having sexual relations with older black men.
 
Frank Marshall Davis had a passion for photography and pornography.
Ann is impregnated by one of two Black Communists.
 
1960: Still a 17-year-old college freshman, Ann becomes pregnant. 
She claims that a Kenyan Marxist named Barack Obama (who she
met in a Russian language class) is the father.  Obama, apparently unbeknownst to Dunham at the time, has his own wife and children back in Kenya.  Ann was having sexual relations with another black man during this time -
Frank Marshall Davis (more on him later).
  
Obama looks nothing like his Kenyan father, but resembles Frank Marshall Davis very much.
Barack Obama Jr. is abandoned by his Kenyan father.
Less than four years into the unlikely marriage, Ann divorces the Kenyan bigamist. Barack Sr. returns to Africa in 1964.  Little "Barry" 
experiences his first abandonment.  Barry will briefly see his alleged 
father again in 1968, when he is about eight years old, only to have to 
say goodbye to him.  Barack Sr. will later die in a driving accident in 1982.
 
Little Barry's fragile psyche was doomed from the start.

Ann remarries an Indonesian man and settles there.  In 1965, Ann marries Lolo Soetero. She, Lolo, and little Barry settle in Indonesia. (Ann and Lolo will divorce in 1980)
 
Stanley Ann has a baby girl with her new husband.
 
Ann hires a transvestite to be Barry's nanny.  Already a full-fledged feminist Marxist, Ann Soetero hires 'Evie", a transvestite, to care for young Barry.
In 2012, it was revealed that Nanny Evie is now a broke homosexual prostitute.
 
Desperate and destitute, old Evie survives by prostitution.  Obama won't help.
 
Young Barry is bullied by his Asian classmates.  The only Black in an Indonesian school, Barry is outcast and bullied as "the boy with big ears."  Little Barry Soetero doesn't fit in. 
 
Ann has a baby girl, then dumps Barry on her parents in Hawaii.
Little Barry is again traumatized by the pain of rejection. After having a
daughter with Lolo, psycho Ann ships 10 year old Barry off to Hawaii to
be raised by his grandfather.
 
Barry's little psyche is sent from the frying pan into the fire.
Grandpa introduces Barry to a Black Communist bi-sexual.  Grandpa Dunham is friends with the Communist bi-sexual Frank Marshall Davis.  Davis will become a mentor to young Barry.  It was Davis, an avid photographer, who took the nude photographs of young Ann Dunham. 

Davis tells of his sexual deviance in a book entitled "Sex Rebel Black", written under the pen name of Bob Green. In lurid detail, he describes 3-way sex sessions between himself, his wife, and a young girl named"Ann."
 
Davis wrote the filthy "Sex Rebel Black" in 1968.
 
The dirty old Communist will finish corrupting little Barry.
 
Teenage Barry is lazy student and a heavy drug user.  By the end of High School, generations of family dysfunction and painful rejection will have already shaped the man that Obama will become.
 
By his own adult admission, Obama wastes his High School years as a heavy pot smoker and a mediocre student.
 
A self described "lazy student", Obama has a passion for smoking marijuana. (later on cocaine)
After high school, Obama is a self-described mediocre college student at Occidental College in California.   
 
1980's: Young Obama is plugged into the Globalist-Communist Presidential Pipeline.  At some point during the 1980's, Frank Marshall Davis, and others above him, plug "Barack Obama Jr." into the subversive network of Professor 
William Ayers.  Ayers and his wife, Bernadine Dohrn, are former FBI fugitives and founders of the Communist/ terrorist Weather Underground.  Obama is to be decorated with Ivy League degrees and groomed to be the first Black President.
 
Obama began his first political campaign in the Chicago living room of Ayers and Dohrn.

Aging hippie communists Ayers and Dohrn are still very active in politics today.
 
The radical Marxist Reverend Jeremiah Wright specializes in finding women to marry the professional men who frequent his church.  The angry Michelle and Obama are believed to have been matched up by the Reverend.  There is no record of any other women in Obama's life prior to Michele.
 
Few men would marry an angry woman.  So Reverend Wright gave her to Obama.
 
Obama and the America-hating Reverend Wright go 'way back.
  
Barack Obama is the product of generations of severe psychological dysfunction.
The neurotic manifestations rooted in both sides of his family tree include - suicide,abandonment of children, multiple relocation, polygamy, rejection, bullying, drug & alcohol abuse, and communist subversion.
 
To cope with the pain and low self esteem of childhood trauma, the ego creates a false Superman. We clearly see the narcissistic personality disorder manifested in the anti social behavior of Grandpa Dunham (naming a daughter after himself, joining the Communist Party), Stanley Ann Dunham (posing for pornographic photos, having sex with older black men, dumping her child), Barack Sr. (secretly keeping two families at the same time), Nanny Evie (dressing up as a woman, engaging in homosexual prostitution) Frank Marshall Davis (joining the Communist Party, boasting of sexual perversion).
 
This is why Obama himself is so arrogant, so conceited, so callous, so sensitive to criticism, so dishonest, so immoral, so vindictive, so cold, so cruel, and so dangerous. Like the Frankenstein monster of Mary Shelley's classic novel, Obama is seething with rage at the society which he blames for the pain of his dysfunctional childhood.  
 
Apart altogether from his flawed Marxist ideology and his manifest incompetence, OBAMA IS RUTHLESS.... the perfect man to lead a nation of dumped-down, degenerate sheep, many of whom are themselves narcissistic psychopaths.
 
 
ASK A PROGRESSIVE LIBERAL FOR A REBUTTAL

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, BeAChooser said:

 

I didn't read anything into your post.   

 

You stated what you claim is unarguable ...

 

"you can't argue that there has been and always will be someone who thinks that resources are not distributed fairly/equitably/etc."

 

I didn't and don't disagree.

 

Now tell me you disagree with what I said in response as also unarguable and why.

 

Otherwise, I'll conclude you don't disagree with me.

 

 

I dont disagree. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Nighthawk said:

I did not say a damn thing about "worth."  Will you idiot libs ever learn how to read??? 

 

I very, very, very clearly said that, in my hypothetical example, these workers "based on their experience, skills, and the job they are performing, provide value to their employers of say, $7/hr."

 

So, are you saying that these workers should be paid $11/hr even though they are only providing $7/hr of value to their employer?  In other words, that employers should be giving out (ignoring taxes to keep it simple) $4/hr of charity to these workers if they want to employ them?

Bump.

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, TBHWT said:

Obama himself is so arrogant, so conceited, so callous, so sensitive to criticism, so dishonest, so immoral, so vindictive, so cold, so cruel, and so dangerous. Like the Frankenstein monster of Mary Shelley's classic novel, Obama is seething with rage at the society which he blames for the pain of his dysfunctional childhood.  

 

 

 

THIS

  • Thumb up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/9/2020 at 11:58 AM, TBHWT said:

mail?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgallery.mailchimp.com%2Fcaa6f67f1482e6214d83be62d%2Fimages%2F84db70f6-1139-46e7-8df5-aeba94735e70.jpg&t=1596991551&ymreqid=f19d0044-0ff3-64e3-1c47-9a002f011c00&sig=WdxhhM9c2toOIlPPHcZbJQ--~D
Wednesday on her new podcast, former First Lady Michelle Obama called the coronavirus pandemic an opportunity to think about “how wealth is distributed.”

 

“And that’s something that we need to, that’s a part of that reflection, that we need to do, you know. With ourselves, and, and as a community,” Michelle mused.

 

“And we have to think about that, in terms of how wealth is distributed. You know, how, how these essential people are supported. And what does that mean? A lot of these people are broke. They don’t have health insurance.” She added that “We have to think about the people who are not from this country, who are essential workers” too, and that we can’t make budget cuts or poor kids won’t get school lunches.

 

Later she stated condescendingly and self-righteously, “Always with great opposition, because you’re asking people to sacrifice, to give up, things that, that they think they deserve, that they’re entitled to for the sake of the greater good.”

 

She and her radical Marxist husband are worth an estimated $70 million. How much of that does she think they’re entitled to, and how much are they giving to illegal alien essential workers for the greater good?

 

 Lets think about how the government ran people off of their small farms, helped remove manufacturing plants and then starts saying that various service jobs are non essential in 2020 because of a cold virus. Then democrats want to eliminate gas vehicles as people are being forced to drive across Texas in order to get some peanut butter and noodles. Promises of goods and services are not goods and services, prepare to survive as a rugged individual, a few Marxist leaders will pocket whatever mandatory contract  money has not been blown and you will have pissed away your freedom of speech and right to a life etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, XavierOnassis said:

If it requires these workers to live indoors and feed themselves to do the job, then the boss must pay so they can survive.

So if the amount of value some workers provide to their employer is less than this arbitrary "survival" amount that you pick, you are saying the employers should still have to pay it, even though they would be LOSING money in the process if they hire them?  And you don't think this will result in it becoming very difficult for these low-skilled workers, especially the black ones, to obtain and/or retain employment???

 

Do you not realize that this is basically what you are telling these workers? - "You are not allowed to legally work for pay unless you can happen to find some employer that is willing to take you on as a charity case and lose money by hiring you.  And while this does mean that if you can't do this, then you will actually be making ZERO dollars/hr, and even worse, you will not be gaining any experience or skills from on-the-job training so that you can improve your lot in life, but that is just too damn bad.  Tough shit.  You should just go home, sit your ass down, and shut the hell up while you suffer, because we idiot libs are your betters, and we know what is good for you."

 

How the hell do you idiot libs live with yourselves while being so unbelievably evil and cruel to these poor people?  What, do you all just get some kind of sick pleasure in putting your foot on their necks and laughing at their plight?  I sincerely hope there is a special place in hell for you sadistic assholes...

Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Nighthawk said:

So if the amount of value some workers provide to their employer is less than this arbitrary "survival" amount that you pick, you are saying the employers should still have to pay it, even though they would be LOSING money in the process if they hire them?  And you don't think this will result in it becoming very difficult for these low-skilled workers, especially the black ones, to obtain and/or retain employment???

 

Do you not realize that this is basically what you are telling these workers? - "You are not allowed to legally work for pay unless you can happen to find some employer that is willing to take you on as a charity case and lose money by hiring you.  And while this does mean that if you can't do this, then you will actually be making ZERO dollars/hr, and even worse, you will not be gaining any experience or skills from on-the-job training so that you can improve your lot in life, but that is just too damn bad.  Tough shit.  You should just go home, sit your ass down, and shut the hell up while you suffer, because we idiot libs are your betters, and we know what is good for you."

 

How the hell do you idiot libs live with yourselves while being so unbelievably evil and cruel to these poor people?  What, do you all just get some kind of sick pleasure in putting your foot on their necks and laughing at their plight?  I sincerely hope there is a special place in hell for you sadistic assholes...

I do not pick what people need to earn to survive, mostly it is landlords and the banks on their backs that affect rents.

Fools like you are the cruel ones, Nighthawk. You were thrown off the AARP board years ago for this sort of stupid and cruel remarks.

Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

Fools like you are the cruel ones, Nighthawk.

Then it should be extremely easy for you to show how I am supposedly the one being cruel, like I very easily just did above to show your unbelievable cruelty, which you did not even attempt to try to refute because you can't.  So what the fuck are you waiting for?

 

Good luck.

 

27 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

You were thrown off the AARP board years ago for this sort of stupid and cruel remarks.

As I have told you numerous times, I have never once posted on some damn AARP board.   It is still a long, long time before I will even be eligible to be in the AARP, so why the hell would I be posting on such a site?  If I had, I would have no reason to lie about such a thing, so why do you not believe me when I tell you this?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Nighthawk said:

Then it should be extremely easy for you to show how I am supposedly the one being cruel, like I very easily just did above to show your unbelievable cruelty, which you did not even attempt to try to refute because you can't.  So what the fuck are you waiting for?

 

Good luck.

 

As I have told you numerous times, I have never once posted on some damn AARP board.   It is still a long, long time before I will even be eligible to be in the AARP, so why the hell would I be posting on such a site?  If I had, I would have no reason to lie about such a thing, so why do you not believe me when I tell you this?

THere is a duplicate cruel ass that also uses the name Nighthawk, then.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/9/2020 at 12:58 PM, TBHWT said:

mail?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgallery.mailchimp.com%2Fcaa6f67f1482e6214d83be62d%2Fimages%2F84db70f6-1139-46e7-8df5-aeba94735e70.jpg&t=1596991551&ymreqid=f19d0044-0ff3-64e3-1c47-9a002f011c00&sig=WdxhhM9c2toOIlPPHcZbJQ--~D
Wednesday on her new podcast, former First Lady Michelle Obama called the coronavirus pandemic an opportunity to think about “how wealth is distributed.”

 

“And that’s something that we need to, that’s a part of that reflection, that we need to do, you know. With ourselves, and, and as a community,” Michelle mused.

 

“And we have to think about that, in terms of how wealth is distributed. You know, how, how these essential people are supported. And what does that mean? A lot of these people are broke. They don’t have health insurance.” She added that “We have to think about the people who are not from this country, who are essential workers” too, and that we can’t make budget cuts or poor kids won’t get school lunches.

 

Later she stated condescendingly and self-righteously, “Always with great opposition, because you’re asking people to sacrifice, to give up, things that, that they think they deserve, that they’re entitled to for the sake of the greater good.”

 

She and her radical Marxist husband are worth an estimated $70 million. How much of that does she think they’re entitled to, and how much are they giving to illegal alien essential workers for the greater good?

Ok she and Barry should start giving money away or at least allow those down and out stay at their home 

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, king of the county said:

Ok she and Barry should start giving money away or at least allow those down and out stay at their home 

Yeah like that's going to happen. Like most leftist politicians and some on the right they only care about themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, XavierOnassis said:

THere is a duplicate cruel ass that also uses the name Nighthawk, then.

If you are saying I am cruel to idiot libs like yourself, then yes, I am guilty as charged.  This is because people of your ilk deserve to be treated like the evil pieces of shit that you are.  But I am not cruel to INNOCENT people, like the way you idiot libs promote and advocate for policies that cause such severe and needless suffering among the very people you lie about wanting to help.  If this description of you is incorrect, then let's see you prove me wrong.  You can be the very first idiot lib to ever do so on this forum.

 

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/17/2020 at 3:54 PM, Nighthawk said:

I did not say a damn thing about "worth."  Will you idiot libs ever learn how to read??? 

 

I very, very, very clearly said that, in my hypothetical example, these workers "based on their experience, skills, and the job they are performing, provide value to their employers of say, $7/hr."

 

So, are you saying that these workers should be paid $11/hr even though they are only providing $7/hr of value to their employer?  In other words, that employers should be giving out (ignoring taxes to keep it simple) $4/hr of charity to these workers if they want to employ them?

Where did scout go?  No matter how amazingly simple I make these questions for idiot libs, they never seem able to give rational answers to them.  Lol...

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/17/2020 at 12:19 PM, Scout said:

You are wrong. 

Funny how idiot libs routinely like to blindly proclaim that I am supposedly "wrong", but none of them ever want to actually prove how this is the case.  Instead, they always seem to just cowardly run the fuck away while I continually bump the threads to deafening silence.  Lol...

 

Bump.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/9/2020 at 12:58 PM, TBHWT said:

mail?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgallery.mailchimp.com%2Fcaa6f67f1482e6214d83be62d%2Fimages%2F84db70f6-1139-46e7-8df5-aeba94735e70.jpg&t=1596991551&ymreqid=f19d0044-0ff3-64e3-1c47-9a002f011c00&sig=WdxhhM9c2toOIlPPHcZbJQ--~D
Wednesday on her new podcast, former First Lady Michelle Obama called the coronavirus pandemic an opportunity to think about “how wealth is distributed.”

 

“And that’s something that we need to, that’s a part of that reflection, that we need to do, you know. With ourselves, and, and as a community,” Michelle mused.

 

“And we have to think about that, in terms of how wealth is distributed. You know, how, how these essential people are supported. And what does that mean? A lot of these people are broke. They don’t have health insurance.” She added that “We have to think about the people who are not from this country, who are essential workers” too, and that we can’t make budget cuts or poor kids won’t get school lunches.

 

Later she stated condescendingly and self-righteously, “Always with great opposition, because you’re asking people to sacrifice, to give up, things that, that they think they deserve, that they’re entitled to for the sake of the greater good.”

 

She and her radical Marxist husband are worth an estimated $70 million. How much of that does she think they’re entitled to, and how much are they giving to illegal alien essential workers for the greater good?

 

How much wealth did either of them create to enable them to bank $70 million? Not two nickel's worth. It's greedy parasite pigs like them, that are exactly the greatest reason, that the Marxism that the Left longs for has failed every time it has ever been tried.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/9/2020 at 1:07 PM, BeAChooser said:

If the younger generation make it possible for Biden (or more precisely, whoever is pulling his strings) to win this fall, they will deserve what happens to them and their children.

 

Just saying ...

 

Unfortunately, conservative kids like mine, will be stuck riding the ship down with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...