Jump to content

Michelle: We Have to Think Now About ‘How Wealth Is Distributed’


Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, Nighthawk said:

Funny how idiot libs routinely like to blindly proclaim that I am supposedly "wrong", but none of them ever want to actually prove how this is the case.  Instead, they always seem to just cowardly run the fuck away while I continually bump the threads to deafening silence.  Lol...

 

Bump.

 

We like to talk about how you make statement but never back them up with evidence and facts.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 282
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

She IDLED him?  You mean like one idles an F-150?  Put him in neutral and let his engine run? Mama singlewide should sent her young peckerwood to school.methinks.

Wealth is NOT distributed, It's earned.

PLUCK PLUCK PLUCK!   XO is RUNNING!

22 minutes ago, freeman said:

 

How much wealth did either of them create to enable them to bank $70 million? Not two nickel's worth. It's greedy parasite pigs like them, that are exactly the greatest reason, that the Marxism that the Left longs for has failed every time it has ever been tried.

 

I should have said it's greedy parasite pigs like them that make socialism/Marxism fail faster than it otherwise might. It's guaranteed to fail every time, no matter how hard a society tries to keep that ship afloat, always resulting in equally shared misery for all.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, freeman said:

 

How much wealth did either of them create to enable them to bank $70 million? Not two nickel's worth. It's greedy parasite pigs like them, that are exactly the greatest reason, that the Marxism that the Left longs for has failed every time it has ever been tried.

Hey give them a break, their black, they privileged! And F everyone else. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/9/2020 at 12:58 PM, TBHWT said:

mail?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgallery.mailchimp.com%2Fcaa6f67f1482e6214d83be62d%2Fimages%2F84db70f6-1139-46e7-8df5-aeba94735e70.jpg&t=1596991551&ymreqid=f19d0044-0ff3-64e3-1c47-9a002f011c00&sig=WdxhhM9c2toOIlPPHcZbJQ--~D
Wednesday on her new podcast, former First Lady Michelle Obama called the coronavirus pandemic an opportunity to think about “how wealth is distributed.”

 

“And that’s something that we need to, that’s a part of that reflection, that we need to do, you know. With ourselves, and, and as a community,” Michelle mused.

 

“And we have to think about that, in terms of how wealth is distributed. You know, how, how these essential people are supported. And what does that mean? A lot of these people are broke. They don’t have health insurance.” She added that “We have to think about the people who are not from this country, who are essential workers” too, and that we can’t make budget cuts or poor kids won’t get school lunches.

 

Later she stated condescendingly and self-righteously, “Always with great opposition, because you’re asking people to sacrifice, to give up, things that, that they think they deserve, that they’re entitled to for the sake of the greater good.”

 

She and her radical Marxist husband are worth an estimated $70 million. How much of that does she think they’re entitled to, and how much are they giving to illegal alien essential workers for the greater good?

Ok distribute your wealth to those less fortunate.   You can start in Chicago 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Scout said:

 

We like to talk about how you make statement but never back them up with evidence and facts.  

What the fuck are you talking about, dimwit?  I routinely back up my claims with logic, reason, evidence, and facts, which is why no idiot lib has ever come remotely close to proving me wrong.

 

Exactly what statement of mine do you want me to back up, moron?

 

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Nighthawk said:

What the fuck are you talking about, dimwit?  I routinely back up my claims with logic, reason, evidence, and facts, which is why no idiot lib has ever come remotely close to proving me wrong.

 

Nah, you don't. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know where you all got the idea that man's responsibility to his fellow man is to pay him a 

wage that won't support him so the employer can have another Mercedes.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Scout said:

 

Nah, you don't. 

Oh really?  Then who wrote this post- Link1?  Or this one- Link2?  Seems to be a lot of links and backup information in those posts, which were just 2 quick examples out of hundreds and hundreds I could have posted.  What, are you claiming that someone stole my password and wrote those posts under my username, retard?  Lol...

 

Since you cowardly dodged my simple request above, here it is again for you-

 

Exactly what statement of mine do you want me to back up, moron?

 

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Scout said:

I don't know where you all got the idea that man's responsibility to his fellow man is to pay him a 

wage that won't support him

And I don't know where you get the idiotic idea that employers should be transformed into some kind of charity or welfare dispenser.  An employer is simply someone that makes an economic transaction of trading wages and other compensation with someone for their labor.  That's it.  They are not fucking ADOPTING them, dumbass.   So why the hell do you idiot libs want to arbitrarily assign employers the responsibility of providing some kind of charity/welfare to people with whom they just happen to be making a transaction???  If society thinks that some people should be gifted with extra aid above what they can earn fairly based on their current productivity, when why shouldn't SOCIETY AS A WHOLE be responsible for giving them that aid in the most efficient, fairest, and least harmful method possible?

 

I have asked this question of you idiot libs over and over and over and over and over ad nauseam, and for some strange reason, none of you twits ever want to give a rational answer.  Let's see if you can be the very first.

 

Good luck.

 

5 minutes ago, Scout said:

so the employer can have another Mercedes.  

Again, why are you picking on employers, even if your dumb little scenario was true?  Why not claim that ANYONE that buys a Mercedes should have to give that money to poor people instead?

 

And if there was some moronic living wage law passed, exactly where do you think any extra money that ends up in the pockets of unskilled workers lucky enough to stay employed will come from in the long term?  What, you think the evil, greedy, selfish business owner or CEO will just take that money out of their own pockets, dunce?  Lol...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Scout said:

I don't know where you all got the idea that man's responsibility to his fellow man is to pay him a 

wage that won't support him so the employer can have another Mercedes.  

 

That's the great thing about freedom. If an employee is working for a wage that is less than he believes he should be earning, then he can just move on and get a different job that will pay him what he is worth. Or work hard at the job he is at to become valuable enough to get raises that take him up to the pay he thinks is commensurate with his skills and intelligence. The same guy that is complaining about low wages, is enjoying inexpensive fast food hamburgers, because of wages being paid to entry level workers that live in their mother's basement (ie a 16-year old or the typical Antifa type with an IQ of about 60).

The only responsibility the owner has is to keep his business afloat. Period. That is for his own benefit as well as his employees. If he thinks he can do so by running a stable of unhappy employees, he may well find out that he can't, and will keep loosing his best employees to his competitor. Your comment suggests that you are a lousy, perpetually disgruntled employee type, that wouldn't be worth a flip to any employer.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, freeman said:

 

That's the great thing about freedom. If an employee is working for a wage that is less than he believes he should be earning, then he can just move on and get a different job that will pay him what he is worth. Or work hard at the job he is at to become valuable enough to get raises that take him up to the pay he thinks is commensurate with his skills and intelligence. The same guy that is complaining about low wages, is enjoying inexpensive fast food hamburgers, because of wages being paid to entry level workers that live in their mother's basement (ie a 16-year old or the typical Antifa type with an IQ of about 60).

The only responsibility the owner has is to keep his business afloat. Period. That is for his own benefit as well as his employees. If he thinks he can do so by running a stable of unhappy employees, he may well find out that he can't, and will keep loosing his best employees to his competitor. Your comment suggests that you are a lousy, perpetually disgruntled employee type, that wouldn't be worth a flip to any employer.

 

This is some kind of fantasy posting.

Has nothing to do with reality. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Scout said:

I don't know where you all got the idea that man's responsibility to his fellow man is to pay him a 

wage that won't support him so the employer can have another Mercedes.  

 

If the man's Mercedes was obtained legally, and he met all of his legal obligations to his fellow man, what FURTHER would you require of him at the point of a gun? You communist.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, SixShooter said:

 

If the man's Mercedes was obtained legally, and he met all of his legal obligations to his fellow man, what FURTHER would you require of him at the point of a gun? You communist.

 

He has not met any obligations to man.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/9/2020 at 12:58 PM, TBHWT said:

mail?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgallery.mailchimp.com%2Fcaa6f67f1482e6214d83be62d%2Fimages%2F84db70f6-1139-46e7-8df5-aeba94735e70.jpg&t=1596991551&ymreqid=f19d0044-0ff3-64e3-1c47-9a002f011c00&sig=WdxhhM9c2toOIlPPHcZbJQ--~D
Wednesday on her new podcast, former First Lady Michelle Obama called the coronavirus pandemic an opportunity to think about “how wealth is distributed.”

 

“And that’s something that we need to, that’s a part of that reflection, that we need to do, you know. With ourselves, and, and as a community,” Michelle mused.

 

“And we have to think about that, in terms of how wealth is distributed. You know, how, how these essential people are supported. And what does that mean? A lot of these people are broke. They don’t have health insurance.” She added that “We have to think about the people who are not from this country, who are essential workers” too, and that we can’t make budget cuts or poor kids won’t get school lunches.

 

Later she stated condescendingly and self-righteously, “Always with great opposition, because you’re asking people to sacrifice, to give up, things that, that they think they deserve, that they’re entitled to for the sake of the greater good.”

 

She and her radical Marxist husband are worth an estimated $70 million. How much of that does she think they’re entitled to, and how much are they giving to illegal alien essential workers for the greater good?

And how did they get that much money in the first place? They stole it, thats how!

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, freeman said:

 

That's the great thing about freedom. If an employee is working for a wage that is less than he believes he should be earning, then he can just move on and get a different job that will pay him what he is worth. Or work hard at the job he is at to become valuable enough to get raises that take him up to the pay he thinks is commensurate with his skills and intelligence. The same guy that is complaining about low wages, is enjoying inexpensive fast food hamburgers, because of wages being paid to entry level workers that live in their mother's basement (ie a 16-year old or the typical Antifa type with an IQ of about 60).

The only responsibility the owner has is to keep his business afloat. Period. That is for his own benefit as well as his employees. If he thinks he can do so by running a stable of unhappy employees, he may well find out that he can't, and will keep loosing his best employees to his competitor. Your comment suggests that you are a lousy, perpetually disgruntled employee type, that wouldn't be worth a flip to any employer.

No, you clearly must be mistaken.  According to most idiot libs, employers all have some kind of magical power that allows them to pay their workers whatever the fuck they feel like paying them, without having to ever worry about a competitor stealing them for higher wages if what they are paying is too low.  The only reason any non-union worker in the US gets paid more than the amount the government requires by law is because of the sheer generosity of their employer who is just graciously bestowing higher pay upon them out of the goodness of their heart.

 

Now, don't forget this!  🙂

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Nighthawk said:

And I don't know where you get the idiotic idea that employers should be transformed into some kind of charity or welfare dispenser.  An employer is simply someone that makes an economic transaction of trading wages and other compensation with someone for their labor.  That's it.  They are not fucking ADOPTING them, dumbass.   So why the hell do you idiot libs want to arbitrarily assign employers the responsibility of providing some kind of charity/welfare to people with whom they just happen to be making a transaction???  If society thinks that some people should be gifted with extra aid above what they can earn fairly based on their current productivity, when why shouldn't SOCIETY AS A WHOLE be responsible for giving them that aid in the most efficient, fairest, and least harmful method possible?

 

I have asked this question of you idiot libs over and over and over and over and over ad nauseam, and for some strange reason, none of you twits ever want to give a rational answer.  Let's see if you can be the very first.

 

Good luck.

 

Again, why are you picking on employers, even if your dumb little scenario was true?  Why not claim that ANYONE that buys a Mercedes should have to give that money to poor people instead?

 

And if there was some moronic living wage law passed, exactly where do you think any extra money that ends up in the pockets of unskilled workers lucky enough to stay employed will come from in the long term?  What, you think the evil, greedy, selfish business owner or CEO will just take that money out of their own pockets, dunce?  Lol...

 

 

Bump.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Scout said:

 

This is some kind of fantasy posting.

Has nothing to do with reality. 

Are you really that dumb???

 

LMFAO

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, 123urout said:

And how did they get that much money in the first place? They stole it, thats how!

That's why one becomes a politician's. "Money for nothing Chicks for free"!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Scout said:

No.  Just responding to  a silly post.  

 

Then your post didn't make any sense. Did you want to discuss the topic, or just ramble on with gibberish?

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/21/2020 at 11:06 AM, Nighthawk said:

Oh really?  Then who wrote this post- Link1?  Or this one- Link2?  Seems to be a lot of links and backup information in those posts, which were just 2 quick examples out of hundreds and hundreds I could have posted.  What, are you claiming that someone stole my password and wrote those posts under my username, retard?  Lol...

 

Since you cowardly dodged my simple request above, here it is again for you-

 

Exactly what statement of mine do you want me to back up, moron?

 

Good luck.

 

Time for Scout to run like she usually does.

 

She's probably going to put you on ignore, like she has me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...