Jump to content

Guns, Black Votes and the NFL Will Ensure a Trump Victory in November


Recommended Posts

The Trump Formula for Victory: Guns, Black Voters and the NFL

Wayne Allyn Root
|
Posted: Aug 09, 2020 12:01 AM
 
The Trump Formula for Victory: Guns, Black Voters and the NFL

Source: @xshularx

  

Well, I'm sure I've got your attention now, with that provocative title! But I'm not kidding. I think President Donald Trump will win by an electoral landslide on Nov. 3 because of guns, black voters and the NFL. Let me explain this winning formula.

 

First, guns. It's hard to believe Democrats are this clueless, blind, deaf and dumb. And I stress dumb. They've made the 2020 election about guns. What a huge mistake in a country dominated by gun owners.

First, a Soros-funded St Louis circuit attorney made the PR mistake of a lifetime: indicting Mark and Patricia McCloskey for defending their own lives and home with their legal guns. This was a PR disaster for Democrats.

For decades, conservatives like me have argued Democrats want to take all our guns away. Democrats have said, "Of course not. That's ridiculous." Now it's clear to everyone that's exactly what they want to do, not only take our guns away but also prosecute law-abiding citizens for defending our own lives, on our own property.

If this is what you want, America, please stand up. Anyone standing? I thought not.

Then, as if to scream, "You're right. We are coming for your guns," New York's radical, extreme, Trump-obsessed attorney general, Letitia James, announced a lawsuit to drive the National Rifle Association out of business. She called the NRA "a terrorist organization." Talk about negative reinforcement. These radical Marxists aren't hiding it anymore. They're coming for our guns -- all of them. They want us defenseless as crime, robberies, murder and rioting skyrocket across the country.

 

You think Americans are buying that? I guess not, because in three of the past four months, record numbers of Americans tried to buy guns.

Today's Democrats put the "d" in dumb." At least former President Barack Obama knew enough to hide his radical intentions. Today's Democratic Party is out of the closet. It showcases its radical Marxist agenda. It's scaring middle-class Americans to death.

Then we come to black voters. I believe there is a black "silent minority" that strongly supports law and order. It not only doesn't want to disband or defund police; it wants more police on their streets. 

Who makes up this black silent minority? Black business owners, black homeowners, black gun owners, black churchgoers and black families with children attending charter or religious schools. Many are Trump voters.

I also don't believe black homeowners in the suburbs support Joe Biden's goal of filling the suburbs with high-density, low-income housing. No one wants to buy a $500,000 home and then see its value ruined as the government builds low-income housing next door.

Anyone want to live next door to a drug den? Anyone want drug needles on the street in front of their home? This is not "racism." It's common sense and human nature. Black families who left dangerous, crime-ridden cities for the suburbs don't want their home value ruined any more than you or me. Many of them will vote for Trump.

 

Biden's comments on Thursday won't help bring out the black vote either. Biden basically said he thinks the black community, with notable exceptions, has no diversity of thought. Now that's the definition of "racism."

The latest polls prove my gut instincts right. A new Gallop poll shows over 80 percent of black Americans do not support disbanding or defunding police. Nineteen percent want more police.

 

And a new Rasmussen poll finds that 83 percent of voters agree with President Trump's decision to kill an Obama-era regulation that brings "diversity" to suburbs by building low-income housing.

I guarantee you these 80 percent and 83 percent totals include the black silent minority. You think they'll be voting Democratic -- against their own self-interest? I don't.

If Trump merely doubles his share of the black vote from 8 percent in 2016 to 16 percent in 2020, that clinches a landslide electoral victory. Democrats will not find a path to victory if Trump gets 16 percent. A recent poll showed Trump with nearly 20 percent of the black vote.

That brings me to the NFL. The NFL just announced NFL Votes, a program to encourage NFL fans to vote. Thank you, NFL. Your players may be liberals who kneel for the national anthem, but I guarantee NFL fans are over 60 percent Trump Republicans. Your typical NFL fan is middle-aged, middle-class, macho and testosterone-driven. That's "Trump country." So, great job, NFL. Let's get them out to vote!

There you have it, the Trump formula for victory: guns, black voters and the NFL.

 

Political Cartoons by Michael Ramirez

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

 

Political Cartoons by Tom Stiglich

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

antifa and blm are!!!! they will lose badly soon

Confiscate guns, remove police and stop prosecuting crime, a government for brain damaged people by brain damaged people?

Beto was just campaigning... he didn't really mean that.   C'mon Man!

This election is not about gun ownership. The NFL has nothing to do with who the president is. Trump is running a racist campaign and that is offensive to Black people. They will be motivated to vote the corrupt turkey out of office.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

This election is not about gun ownership.

 

Not so fast there skippy.

 

To many, who don't really care for either candidate, it is ONLY about gun ownership.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, whiteboy said:

 

Not so fast there skippy.

 

To many, who don't really care for either candidate, it is ONLY about gun ownership.

They voted for Trump once and will probably vote for him again, but their numbers are not increasing. That makes this an unimportant matter.

 

THis is a bogus issue, In eight years, Obama did not prevent anyone from owning a gun. Biden will do the same.

There are many issues far more important: health care, the environment, the disgusting race war that Trump has provoked, police brutality, foreign policy, the mishandling of  relations with China, ignoring Russian interference in our elections and other affairs, and ending this pandemic.

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

This election is not about gun ownership. The NFL has nothing to do with who the president is. Trump is running a racist campaign and that is offensive to Black people. They will be motivated to vote the corrupt turkey out of office.

 

Confiscate guns, remove police and stop prosecuting crime, a government for brain damaged people by brain damaged people?

  • Thumb up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Chongo said:

 

Confiscate guns, remove police and stop prosecuting crime, a government for brain damaged people by brain damaged people?

No one is advocating that, you paranoid jerk.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

No one is advocating that, you paranoid jerk.

antifa and blm are!!!! they will lose badly soon

  • Thumb up 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

No one is advocating that, you paranoid jerk.

 

Democrats do not seem to be having a promotion for these things they are just implementing various socialist kangaroo court rules on a sick drugged up population, Christian Church closed, gambling house open with 6 inches of space between gamblers, excessive fines for not wearing mask outside in the fresh air but then violent rioters are never prosecuted and a homeless person can camp out by your front door, that's why they can keep rioting.

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

No one is advocating that, you paranoid jerk.

Braindead biden goddamn sure has and is. Why do you repeat lies of the left? Oh, that's right...You are a brainfucked Anti-Trump moonbat piece of shit!

When dim-0-craps such as braindead biden talk about a government buyback program, that is just a euphemism for gun confiscation.

These are Biden’s exact words from the first dim-0-crap debate:

"Folks, look, and I would buy back assault weapons. We already started talking about that. We tried to get it done. I think it can be done. And it should be demanded that we do it. And that’s a good expenditure of money." 

Why do people who don't know a goddamn thing about guns insist on creating new laws to regulate your ability to defend yourself?

Braindead biden focused on gun control efforts like a government buy back of “assault weapons”, which is a word madeup by people who don’t understand firearms.

Braindead biden, in a CNN interview, said that, "a Biden administration would push for a “national buyback program” to get such firearms “off the street.”

Asked what he’d say to gun owners worried that braindead biden would be coming for their guns, he quickly answered: “Bingo! You’re right, if you have an assault weapon.“

There it is. He admitted what we have been saying the whole time. They are coming for your guns and will take them by force.

But the craziest moment of his anti-Constitution bullshit came when the braindead idiot declared he supported regulation for the “number of clips in a gun“.

Braindead biden said, "such an “assault weapons” buyback is possible and has already been a topic of conversation." He added, "that such a buyback ought to be “demanded” because “it’s a good expenditure of money.”

 

Brainddead also boasted about securing the 1994 “assault weapons” ban and said he also banned “the number of clips in a gun.”

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Buffalo said:

Braindead biden goddamn sure has and is. Why do you repeat lies of the left? Oh, that's right...You are a brainfucked Anti-Trump moonbat piece of shit!

When dim-0-craps such as braindead biden talk about a government buyback program, that is just a euphemism for gun confiscation.

These are Biden’s exact words from the first dim-0-crap debate:

"Folks, look, and I would buy back assault weapons. We already started talking about that. We tried to get it done. I think it can be done. And it should be demanded that we do it. And that’s a good expenditure of money." 

Why do people who don't know a goddamn thing about guns insist on creating new laws to regulate your ability to defend yourself?

Braindead biden focused on gun control efforts like a government buy back of “assault weapons”, which is a word madeup by people who don’t understand firearms.

Braindead biden, in a CNN interview, said that, "a Biden administration would push for a “national buyback program” to get such firearms “off the street.”

Asked what he’d say to gun owners worried that braindead biden would be coming for their guns, he quickly answered: “Bingo! You’re right, if you have an assault weapon.“

There it is. He admitted what we have been saying the whole time. They are coming for your guns and will take them by force.

But the craziest moment of his anti-Constitution bullshit came when the braindead idiot declared he supported regulation for the “number of clips in a gun“.

Braindead biden said, "such an “assault weapons” buyback is possible and has already been a topic of conversation." He added, "that such a buyback ought to be “demanded” because “it’s a good expenditure of money.”

 

Brainddead also boasted about securing the 1994 “assault weapons” ban and said he also banned “the number of clips in a gun.”

  This is old, but it STILL applies today.

 

DAILY KOS

 

Fri Dec 21, 2012 at 03:20 AM PST

How to Ban Guns: A step by step, long term process

by sporksFollow It's nice that we're finally talking about gun control. It's very sad that it took such a terrible tragedy to talk about it, but I'm glad the conversation is happening. I hear a lot about assault weapon and large magazine bans, and whilst I'm supportive of that, it won't solve the problem. The vast majority of firearm deaths occur with handguns. Only about 5% of people killed by guns are killed by guns which would be banned in any foreseeable AWB.

Furthermore, there seems to be no talk about high powered rifles. What gun nuts don't want you to know is many target and hunting rifles are chambered in the same round (.223/5.56mm) that Lanza's assault weapon was. Even more guns are chambered for more powerful rounds, like the .30-06 or (my personal "favorite") 7.62x54R. Even a .22, the smallest round manufactured on a large scale, can kill easily. In fact, some say the .22 kills more people than any other round out there.

Again, I like that we're talking about assault weapons, machine guns, and high capacity clips. But it only takes one bullet out of one gun to kill a person. Remember the beltway sniper back in 2002? The one who killed a dozen odd people? Even though he used a bushmaster assault rifle, he only fired one round at a time before moving. He could have used literally any rifle sold in the US for his attacks.

The only way we can truly be safe and prevent further gun violence is to ban civilian ownership of all guns. That means everything. No pistols, no revolvers, no semiautomatic or automatic rifles. No bolt action. No breaking actions or falling blocks. Nothing. This is the only thing that we can possibly do to keep our children safe from both mass murder and common street violence.

Unfortunately, right now we can't. The political will is there, but the institutions are not. Honestly, this is a good thing. If we passed a law tomorrow banning all firearms, we would have massive noncompliance. What we need to do is establish the regulatory and informational institutions first. This is how we do it:

 

The very first thing we need is national registry. We need to know where the guns are, and who has them. Canada has a national firearms registry. We need to copy their model. We need a law demanding all firearms be registered to a national database. We need to know who has them and where they are. We need to make this as easy as possible for gun owners. The federal government provides the money and technical expertise, and the State police carry it out. Like a funded mandate. Most firearms already have a serial number on them, so it would really be a matter of taking the information already on the ATF form 4473 and putting it in a national database. I think about 6 months should be enough time.

Along with this, make private sales illegal. When a firearm is transferred, make it law that the registration must be updated. Again, make it super easy to do. Perhaps over, the internet. Dealers can log in by their FFLs and update the registration. Additionally, new guns are to be registered by the manufacturer. The object here is to create a clear paper trail from factory to distributor to dealer to owner. We want to encourage as much voluntary compliance as possible.

Now we get down to it. The registration period has passed. Now we have criminals without registered guns running around. Probably kooky types that "lost" them on a boat or something. So remember those ATF form 4473s? Those record every firearm sale, going back twenty years. And those have to be surrendered to the ATF on demand. So, we get those logbooks, and cross reference the names and addresses with the new national registry. Since most NRA types own two or (many) more guns, we can get an idea of who properly registered their guns and who didn't. For example, if we have a guy who purchased 6 guns over the course of 10 years, but only registered two of them, that raises a red flag.

Now, maybe he sold them or they got lost or something. But it gives us a good target for investigation. A nice visit by the ATF or state police to find out if he really does still have those guns would be certainly warranted. It's certainly not perfect. People may have gotten guns from parents or family, and not registered them. Perfect is the enemy of pretty darn good, as they say. This exercise isn't so much to track down every gun ever sold; the main idea would be to profile and investigate people that may not have registered their guns. As an example, I'm not so concerned with the guy who bought that bolt action Mauser a decade ago and doesn't have anything registered to his name. It's a pretty good possibility that he sold it, gave it away, or got rid of it somehow. And even if he didn't, that guy is not who I'm concerned with. I'm concerned that other guy who bought a half dozen assault weapons, registered two hunting rifles, and belongs to the NRA/GOA. He's the guy who warrants a raid.

So registration is the first step. Now that the vast majority are registered, we can do what we will. One good first step would be to close the registry to new registrations. This would, in effect, prevent new guns from being made or imported. This would put the murder machine corporations out of business for good, and cut the money supply to the NRA/GOA. As money dries up, the political capital needed for new controls will be greatly reduced.

There are a few other things I would suggest. I would suggest an immediate, national ban on concealed carry. A ban on internet sales of guns and ammunition is a no brainer. Microstamping would also be a very good thing. Even if the only thing it does is drive up costs, it could still lead to crimes being solved. I'm willing to try every advantage we can get.

A national Firearms Owner Identification Card might be good, but I'm not sure if it's necessary if we have a national database. We should also insist on comprehensive insurance and mandatory gun safes, subject to random, spot checks by local and federal law enforcement.

We must make guns expensive and unpopular, just like cigarettes. A nationwide, antigun campaign paid for by a per gun yearly tax paid by owners, dealers, and manufacturers would work well in this regard. We should also segway into an anti-hunting campaign, like those in the UK. By making hunting expensive and unpopular, we can make the transition to a gun free society much less of a headache for us.

I know this seems harsh, but this is the only way we can be truly safe. I don't want my kids being shot at by a deranged NRA member. I'm sure you don't either. So lets stop looking for short term solutions and start looking long term. Registration is the first step.

Tell Pres. Obama and democrats in congress to demand mandatory, comprehensive gun registration. It's the only way we can ban guns with any effectiveness.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, bgr39 said:

  This is old, but it STILL applies today.

 

DAILY KOS

 

Fri Dec 21, 2012 at 03:20 AM PST

How to Ban Guns: A step by step, long term process

by sporksFollow It's nice that we're finally talking about gun control. It's very sad that it took such a terrible tragedy to talk about it, but I'm glad the conversation is happening. I hear a lot about assault weapon and large magazine bans, and whilst I'm supportive of that, it won't solve the problem. The vast majority of firearm deaths occur with handguns. Only about 5% of people killed by guns are killed by guns which would be banned in any foreseeable AWB.

Furthermore, there seems to be no talk about high powered rifles. What gun nuts don't want you to know is many target and hunting rifles are chambered in the same round (.223/5.56mm) that Lanza's assault weapon was. Even more guns are chambered for more powerful rounds, like the .30-06 or (my personal "favorite") 7.62x54R. Even a .22, the smallest round manufactured on a large scale, can kill easily. In fact, some say the .22 kills more people than any other round out there.

Again, I like that we're talking about assault weapons, machine guns, and high capacity clips. But it only takes one bullet out of one gun to kill a person. Remember the beltway sniper back in 2002? The one who killed a dozen odd people? Even though he used a bushmaster assault rifle, he only fired one round at a time before moving. He could have used literally any rifle sold in the US for his attacks.

The only way we can truly be safe and prevent further gun violence is to ban civilian ownership of all guns. That means everything. No pistols, no revolvers, no semiautomatic or automatic rifles. No bolt action. No breaking actions or falling blocks. Nothing. This is the only thing that we can possibly do to keep our children safe from both mass murder and common street violence.

Unfortunately, right now we can't. The political will is there, but the institutions are not. Honestly, this is a good thing. If we passed a law tomorrow banning all firearms, we would have massive noncompliance. What we need to do is establish the regulatory and informational institutions first. This is how we do it:

 

The very first thing we need is national registry. We need to know where the guns are, and who has them. Canada has a national firearms registry. We need to copy their model. We need a law demanding all firearms be registered to a national database. We need to know who has them and where they are. We need to make this as easy as possible for gun owners. The federal government provides the money and technical expertise, and the State police carry it out. Like a funded mandate. Most firearms already have a serial number on them, so it would really be a matter of taking the information already on the ATF form 4473 and putting it in a national database. I think about 6 months should be enough time.

Along with this, make private sales illegal. When a firearm is transferred, make it law that the registration must be updated. Again, make it super easy to do. Perhaps over, the internet. Dealers can log in by their FFLs and update the registration. Additionally, new guns are to be registered by the manufacturer. The object here is to create a clear paper trail from factory to distributor to dealer to owner. We want to encourage as much voluntary compliance as possible.

Now we get down to it. The registration period has passed. Now we have criminals without registered guns running around. Probably kooky types that "lost" them on a boat or something. So remember those ATF form 4473s? Those record every firearm sale, going back twenty years. And those have to be surrendered to the ATF on demand. So, we get those logbooks, and cross reference the names and addresses with the new national registry. Since most NRA types own two or (many) more guns, we can get an idea of who properly registered their guns and who didn't. For example, if we have a guy who purchased 6 guns over the course of 10 years, but only registered two of them, that raises a red flag.

Now, maybe he sold them or they got lost or something. But it gives us a good target for investigation. A nice visit by the ATF or state police to find out if he really does still have those guns would be certainly warranted. It's certainly not perfect. People may have gotten guns from parents or family, and not registered them. Perfect is the enemy of pretty darn good, as they say. This exercise isn't so much to track down every gun ever sold; the main idea would be to profile and investigate people that may not have registered their guns. As an example, I'm not so concerned with the guy who bought that bolt action Mauser a decade ago and doesn't have anything registered to his name. It's a pretty good possibility that he sold it, gave it away, or got rid of it somehow. And even if he didn't, that guy is not who I'm concerned with. I'm concerned that other guy who bought a half dozen assault weapons, registered two hunting rifles, and belongs to the NRA/GOA. He's the guy who warrants a raid.

So registration is the first step. Now that the vast majority are registered, we can do what we will. One good first step would be to close the registry to new registrations. This would, in effect, prevent new guns from being made or imported. This would put the murder machine corporations out of business for good, and cut the money supply to the NRA/GOA. As money dries up, the political capital needed for new controls will be greatly reduced.

There are a few other things I would suggest. I would suggest an immediate, national ban on concealed carry. A ban on internet sales of guns and ammunition is a no brainer. Microstamping would also be a very good thing. Even if the only thing it does is drive up costs, it could still lead to crimes being solved. I'm willing to try every advantage we can get.

A national Firearms Owner Identification Card might be good, but I'm not sure if it's necessary if we have a national database. We should also insist on comprehensive insurance and mandatory gun safes, subject to random, spot checks by local and federal law enforcement.

We must make guns expensive and unpopular, just like cigarettes. A nationwide, antigun campaign paid for by a per gun yearly tax paid by owners, dealers, and manufacturers would work well in this regard. We should also segway into an anti-hunting campaign, like those in the UK. By making hunting expensive and unpopular, we can make the transition to a gun free society much less of a headache for us.

I know this seems harsh, but this is the only way we can be truly safe. I don't want my kids being shot at by a deranged NRA member. I'm sure you don't either. So lets stop looking for short term solutions and start looking long term. Registration is the first step.

Tell Pres. Obama and democrats in congress to demand mandatory, comprehensive gun registration. It's the only way we can ban guns with any effectiveness.

 

A lot of people would die trying to enforce any of that.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, whiteboy said:

 

A lot of people would die trying to enforce any of that.

 

 

  It IS a playbook that liberals/communist continue to use.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, XavierOnassis said:

This election is not about gun ownership. The NFL has nothing to do with who the president is. Trump is running a racist campaign and that is offensive to Black people. They will be motivated to vote the corrupt turkey out of office.

What part of the President's campaign is racist?  Please be specific.

 

Why is this campaign offensive to Black people?  Why not simply all people without regard to race?  Please stop being a racist and segregating my beloved countryman into racial groups!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump is the divisive one here. His entire campaign began with birtherism and calling claiming that Mexico was sending rapists and thieves. Black people I know find the sumbitch offensive and so do I. He is also incompetent, corrupt and aggressively ignorant.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

Trump is the divisive one here. His entire campaign began with birtherism and calling claiming that Mexico was sending rapists and thieves. Black people I know find the sumbitch offensive and so do I. He is also incompetent, corrupt and aggressively ignorant.

What does any of that have to do with his 2020 campaign?

 

"And some, I assume, are good people." from that same speech about Mexico sending criminals and rapists.  Mexico is not a race, it is a country, it might be possible to be a bigot against Mexicans, but not a racist, just like it is possible for people to be bigots against law enforcement, but not racists.

 

"Black people I know find the sumbitch offensive and so do I."  It seams to me that a lot of racists have a habit of talking about the "I have black friends" to excuse their racism.  Are the opinions of Black people somehow better then the opinions of people?  Why are you such a racist?  Does pigmentation dictate opinion?

 

Trump is the divisive one?  "He [President Trump] is also incompetent, corrupt and aggressively ignorant."  Sounds a lot like the pot calling the kettle black.

 

You just spout your hateful propaganda over and over again, but that will not change reality.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, bgr39 said:

  It IS a playbook that liberals/communist continue to use.

The ole turn up the heat on a frog in a pot of water. Not noticeable until it is to late.  All responsible, law abiding gun owners should do their due diligence to stop the gun grabbers!!! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...