Jump to content

No Apologies: Sorry, But It's Okay to Celebrate the 75th Anniversary of Us Nuking Japan.


Recommended Posts

This month on August 6 and 9, it will be the 75th anniversary of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. For some people, and you know who these people are, it is a controversial subject. It is one that I'm surprised hasn't bubbled up with the renewed push by the Left to either erase or historically misinterpret our history. I'm actually a bit shocked we haven't had a meltdown from the Left regarding this action.
 

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, TBHWT said:

This month on August 6 and 9, it will be the 75th anniversary of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. For some people, and you know who these people are, it is a controversial subject. It is one that I'm surprised hasn't bubbled up with the renewed push by the Left to either erase or historically misinterpret our history. I'm actually a bit shocked we haven't had a meltdown from the Left regarding this action.
 

Demorats can only handle about 3-4 weeks of prior history.They really are as educated as Neanderthals.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, 123urout said:

Demorats can only handle about 3-4 weeks of prior history.They really are as educated as Neanderthals.

I blame the Democratic Party for celebrating the abnormal. 
The mentally, morally, and spiritually deficient Liberal Democrats are suffering from the insanity of satanity whose only expertise is bullshitology, masked under the cloak of self righteousness.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, AnotherJim said:

Sad, but the Japanese shouldn't have started the shit storm. Leave us be & we will not vaporizes your cities.

Yeah, they did ask for it... and even after it was clear that they were defeated, they still wouldn't give up.

 

What's so ironic is that the fire bombing campaign over Tokyo killed more than either atomic bomb did, yet the atom bombs get the press.

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, rippy38 said:

Yeah, they did ask for it... and even after it was clear that they were defeated, they still wouldn't give up.

 

What's so ironic is that the fire bombing campaign over Tokyo killed more than either atomic bomb did, yet the atom bombs get the press.

Makes sense though because it was an unprecedented event.    That was the moment that the entire world realized that they better not fuck with the US unless you want to experience our wrath.   The message we sent was more powerful than the explosion.    Kind of like the Soleimani deal, or when we dropped a bomb down Gaddafi's chimney.   Kill 2 or 3 people, and you can put a hell of a lot more in check.    

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Butthead said:

Makes sense though because it was an unprecedented event.    That was the moment that the entire world realized that they better not fuck with the US unless you want to experience our wrath.   The message we sent was more powerful than the explosion.    Kind of like the Soleimani deal, or when we dropped a bomb down Gaddafi's chimney.   Kill 2 or 3 people, and you can put a hell of a lot more in check.    

 

Problem is we stopped there.

 

If we had responded that way more often the world would be a better place.

 

In fact, we should lob a couple of those bad boys over to South & Central America, and destroy all the coca and poppy fields.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Butthead said:

Kind of like the Soleimani deal, or when we dropped a bomb down Gaddafi's chimney.   Kill 2 or 3 people, and you can put a hell of a lot more in check.    

I remember the Gaddafi deal... an F-111 put that firecracker in Momar's bed.

 

Too bad he wasn't in it, but yeah, it let him know that there is no such thing as hiding from the U.S.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Now for the aspects of "genetics."

 

It took the Japanese and the Germans approximately fifteen years following their near-total destruction at the hands of the Allies to become among the top ten wealthiest nations of the world.

 

Here, in the USA, we have poured OVER FIVE TIMES the amount of money, adjusted for inflation, into the American negro population via welfare and all other forms of government assistance, compared with Marshall Plan funding, and, STILL, the negro cannot rise above his lamentable economic status.

 

FIVE TIMES MORE FUNDING FOR A MUCH LOWER POPULATION that the populations of Germany and Japan!

 

WHY HAS THIS MASSIVE AMOUNT OF FUNDING NOT BEEN AS SUCCESSFUL AS THE MARSHALL PLAN?

 

Can you say, "genetics?"

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Mirabeau said:

Now for the aspects of "genetics."

 

It took the Japanese and the Germans approximately fifteen years following their near-total destruction at the hands of the Allies to become among the top ten wealthiest nations of the world.

 

Here, in the USA, we have poured OVER FIVE TIMES the amount of money, adjusted for inflation, into the American negro population via welfare and all other forms of government assistance, compared with Marshall Plan funding, and, STILL, the negro cannot rise above his lamentable economic status.

 

FIVE TIMES MORE FUNDING FOR A MUCH LOWER POPULATION that the populations of Germany and Japan!

 

WHY HAS THIS MASSIVE AMOUNT OF FUNDING NOT BEEN AS SUCCESSFUL AS THE MARSHALL PLAN?

 

Can you say, "genetics?"

 

 

Sad but true.

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Mirabeau said:

Can you say, "genetics?"

 

Genetics is Not the reason, Mirabeau.   It's democRATS.   blacks in this country were making great progress, socially, educationally, and economically ... until Fabian Socialist democRATS turned them into victims, destroyed their family structure, made sure to poorly educate them, and made them dependent on the government.    Your genetics argument is counter productive to fixing things.  It's racist.  I suggest you instead focus on democRATS and what their $25 trillion (plus) war on poverty and 24/7 brainwashing of the black community has done to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, BeAChooser said:

 

Genetics is Not the reason, Mirabeau.   It's democRATS.   blacks in this country were making great progress, socially, educationally, and economically ... until Fabian Socialist democRATS turned them into victims, destroyed their family structure, made sure to poorly educate them, and made them dependent on the government.    Your genetics argument is counter productive to fixing things.  It's racist.  I suggest you instead focus on democRATS and what their $25 trillion (plus) war on poverty and 24/7 brainwashing of the black community has done to them.

When the Dems lost the Civil War, they regrouped, and introduced shackleless slavery. It's as obvious as being struck by lightening. Democrats would rather see our country shredded, than admit they're wrong. They are truly psychotic. No rhyme or reason in their lust for power & control. They could care less about the nightmares they leave in their wake.

Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, BeAChooser said:

 

Genetics is Not the reason, Mirabeau.   It's democRATS.   blacks in this country were making great progress, socially, educationally, and economically ... until Fabian Socialist democRATS turned them into victims, destroyed their family structure, made sure to poorly educate them, and made them dependent on the government.    Your genetics argument is counter productive to fixing things.  It's racist.  I suggest you instead focus on democRATS and what their $25 trillion (plus) war on poverty and 24/7 brainwashing of the black community has done to them.

Sorry, to disagree, somewhat, but . . .

 

While the welfare state certainly has caused massive damage to the negro community, that does not alter the fact that genetics have a profound effect on intelligence (between 65% & 70%) contrasted with environment.  In other words, in "nurture vs. nature," it is "nature" that is overwhelmingly responsible for one's level of intelligence.  And intelligence is overwhelmingly correlated with financial success and social well-being. 

 

Consider sub-Saharan Africa, where the average IQ is below 70, which is considered RETARDED in the USA and Western Europe.  That below-70 IQ is the sole and only reason the nations of sub-Saharan Africa are . . . shall we say . . . $&!#hole nations.  Democrats aren't responsible for the states of affairs in sub-Saharan Africa.

Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, AnotherJim said:

When the Dems lost the Civil War, they regrouped, and introduced shackleless slavery. It's as obvious as being struck by lightening. Democrats would rather see our country shredded, than admit they're wrong. They are truly psychotic. No rhyme or reason in their lust for power & control. They could care less about the nightmares they leave in their wake.

Liberals destroy everything they touch.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/8/2020 at 1:18 PM, Butthead said:

What's so ironic is that the fire bombing campaign over Tokyo killed more than either atomic bomb did, yet the atom bombs get the press.

You do not understand the meaning of the word "ironic".

The atom bombs were  serious game changers, bombing Tokyo was not.

 

Celebrating victory is fine with me.

Celebrating killing 200,000 innocent Japanese civilians who did not have any vote in Japan building an empire is just sick.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, AnotherJim said:
1 hour ago, AnotherJim said:

blacks in this country were making great progress, socially, educationally, and economically

No one, Black or White seriously makes this claim. Blacks were given only until 1876, when the Republicans sold them out in return for making Rutherford B. Hayes president. rather than Samuel Tilden, who actually got more votes. The Republicans withdrew the Freedmen's Bureau from the South and the few days of Black entreprenueurship was dead. And the Fabians had not one goddamned thing to do with it.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

You do not understand the meaning of the word "ironic".

The atom bombs were  serious game changers, bombing Tokyo was not.

 

Celebrating victory is fine with me.

Celebrating killing 200,000 innocent Japanese civilians who did not have any vote in Japan building an empire is just sick.

The irony is that the destruction and death was worse in Tokyo during the firebombing raids than either bomb, but Tokyo is rarely mentioned.

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

You do not understand the meaning of the word "ironic".

The atom bombs were  serious game changers, bombing Tokyo was not.

 

Celebrating victory is fine with me.

Celebrating killing 200,000 innocent Japanese civilians who did not have any vote in Japan building an empire is just sick.

Why tag me in your response?   That wasn't my post.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, rippy38 said:

The irony is that the destruction and death was worse in Tokyo during the firebombing raids than either bomb, but Tokyo is rarely mentioned.

There is nothing ironic in this. You don't understand "irony" as I understand the word.It was entirely NORMAL for the Atomic Bomb to have been the bigger story.

 

The Atom Bombs ended the war. Bombing Tokyo did not and would not have done so

The big news story was that one single bomb, perhaps two, ended the war as the firebombing did not.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...