ScottMon Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 You shouldn't anyway but this user will use it to suse you out on the Internet and creep on you. He/she has been suspended for it before. He/she chased a user named Zaro when BAC found out that Zaro was underage. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Imgreatagain Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 13 minutes ago, ScottMon said: You shouldn't anyway but this user will use it to suse you out on the Internet and creep on you. He/she has been suspended for it before. He/she chased a user named Zaro when BAC found out that Zaro was underage. Zaro was a nasty person. Her age was irrelevant IMO Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Skans Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 2 minutes ago, Imgreatagain said: Zaro was a nasty person. Her age was irrelevant IMO So, Zaro was a child? Figures. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ScottMon Posted July 27 Author Share Posted July 27 2 minutes ago, Imgreatagain said: Zaro was a nasty person. Her age was irrelevant IMO Just don't give BAC any info. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Taipan Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 15 minutes ago, ScottMon said: You shouldn't anyway but this user will use it to suse you out on the Internet and creep on you. He/she has been suspended for it before. He/she chased a user named Zaro when BAC found out that Zaro was underage. K-Dog doxed himself last year. I was drunk and followed suite. I doxed myself.............because I love a good fight. It was a bold, brash........in your face............fighting stance. This is why I like myself. I am a real son-of-a-bitch. 🤠 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Taipan Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 5 minutes ago, Skans said: So, Zaro was a child? Figures. What is your favorite handgun? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Imgreatagain Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 5 minutes ago, Skans said: So, Zaro was a child? Figures. I think someone caught onto it . She had a mouth like an old sailor. She will surely grow into a nasty liberal woman . Quote Link to post Share on other sites
AnotherJim Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 2 minutes ago, Taipan said: What is your favorite handgun? Tough call; depends on the situation. My favorite ATM handgun is my hammerless Bulldog DA .44. One hand on the ATM card, the other in my pocket holding the Bulldog. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Taipan Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 Just now, AnotherJim said: Tough call; depends on the situation. My favorite ATM handgun is my hammerless Bulldog DA .44. One hand on the ATM card, the other in my pocket holding the Bulldog. You old wise bastard !! Hell,....I thought I was smart !! Until I met you!! You put punks like me...........face down into the dust !! Damn...........you are fast. Day after day. Unrelenting. Yes, this is how Texans give a complement. 🤠...🍺 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
AnotherJim Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 7 minutes ago, Taipan said: You old wise bastard !! Hell,....I thought I was smart !! Until I met you!! You put punks like me...........face down into the dust !! Damn...........you are fast. Day after day. Unrelenting. Yes, this is how Texans give a complement. 🤠...🍺 No exposed hammer to catch on anything; plus, you can just shoot through the pocket. I always wear a cheap jacket. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Skans Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 22 minutes ago, Taipan said: What is your favorite handgun? Sig X-Five Level 1 9mm. I love the X-Fives because I can beat the pants off of Glock fanboys and 1911 fanboys with it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blue Devil Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 2 hours ago, ScottMon said: You shouldn't anyway but this user will use it to suse you out on the Internet and creep on you. He/she has been suspended for it before. He/she chased a user named Zaro when BAC found out that Zaro was underage. Zaro - OD's on Victimhood and Cat-Nip. The little one was very disturbed. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
RebelGator Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 1 hour ago, ScottMon said: Just don't give BAC any info. Too late, Christopher Steele has already sent him your dossier. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blue Devil Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 1 hour ago, Skans said: Sig X-Five Level 1 9mm. I love the X-Fives because I can beat the pants off of Glock fanboys and 1911 fanboys with it. Oh, please... For SD...? .45 ACP. Use a round that begins w/ "4"... or go home. 8>) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blue Devil Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 1 hour ago, AnotherJim said: No exposed hammer to catch on anything; plus, you can just shoot through the pocket. I always wear a cheap jacket. Really thinkin' on a CA Pitbull in .40 S&W. How do you like the Bulldog in general, how's the DA trigger, and how is it holding up? @AnotherJim Quote Link to post Share on other sites
impartialobserver Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 Its a matter of engaging or not engaging. If you fully engage in a conversation with BAC, one knows what they are getting themselves into. If one does not info about you to come out... then do not post it. Its quite simple. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
AnotherJim Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 2 minutes ago, Blue Devil said: Really thinkin' on a CA Pitbull in .40 S&W. How do you like the Bulldog in general, how's the DA trigger, and how is it holding up? @AnotherJim Never a hiccup; and it makes a very big hole. Just my ATM revolver; cause it's a bit heavy. My everyday revolver is a Ruger .327 Magnum. Lighter & about the same punch as a .357. I retired the Firestar .45; too heavy even for the padded shoulder holster; but a great nightstand pistol.You don't stay 20 forever. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Taipan Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 2 hours ago, Skans said: Sig X-Five Level 1 9mm. I love the X-Fives because I can beat the pants off of Glock fanboys and 1911 fanboys with it. OK. Good one !! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Wallco1 Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 I just bought a Spingfield xd Hellcat Micro 9mm, Has 14 round cap. Great carry gun. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blue Devil Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 9 minutes ago, Wallco1 said: I just bought a Spingfield xd Hellcat Micro 9mm, Has 14 round cap. Great carry gun. Really like'em. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Skans Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 1 hour ago, Blue Devil said: Oh, please... For SD...? .45 ACP. Use a round that begins w/ "4"... or go home. 8>) LOL! For Black Ops Ninja fighting. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Wallco1 Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 1 minute ago, Skans said: LOL! For Black Ops Ninja fighting. A lot can be said for capacity, And new 9mm +p are no joke. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blue Devil Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 3 minutes ago, Skans said: LOL! For Black Ops Ninja fighting. 9mm - the more the merrier... Ha! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
king of the county Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 3 hours ago, AnotherJim said: Tough call; depends on the situation. My favorite ATM handgun is my hammerless Bulldog DA .44. One hand on the ATM card, the other in my pocket holding the Bulldog. Hammerless guns are for females Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BeAChooser Posted July 27 Share Posted July 27 3 hours ago, ScottMon said: You shouldn't anyway but this user will use it to suse you out on the Internet and creep on you. He/she has been suspended for it before. He/she chased a user named Zaro when BAC found out that Zaro was underage. I love tribute threads to me because they invariably backfire on the poster. What you claim is an OUTRIGHT LIE, SM. I was NOT suspended for doing what you claim AND YOU DAMN WELL KNOW IT. I'll repeat a portion of what I posted to you yesterday (and last December when you pulled this same crap) so readers can see what a UTTER CREEP you are, ScottMon. https://www.liberalforum.org/topic/324218-richard-nixon-was-a-total-idiot-he-opened-china-started-the-epa-and-the-vietnam-war/page/2/?tab=comments#comment-1062062843 Quote Zaro made a post that indicated she was under seventeen ( http://www.liberalforum.org/index.php?/topic/199146-lib-moderator-run-forum-is-disaster/page-3 ), so I ask if she was really 16 and I expressed concern to the forum that we have a minor on the site ( http://www.liberalforum.org/index.php?/topic/199146-lib-moderator-run-forum-is-disaster/?p=1059618312 ). Zaro didn't deny being a minor, so I again questioned whether this is a good idea ... expressing the opinion that it might open the site to liability should anything happen to said minor as a result of being on it. Moderator Isabel (later DemoMan) then joined the discussion and immediately attacked me (with vile language, unsuitable for children I might add: http://www.liberalforum.org/index.php?/topic/199146-lib-moderator-run-forum-is-disaster/?p=105961836 ). So I asked her sarcastically if the plan was to make this site friendly to pedophiles in order to increase forum visits ( http://www.liberalforum.org/index.php?/topic/199146-lib-moderator-run-forum-is-disaster/?p=1059618371 ). I did not say there were already pedophiles on the site and I'll point out that Isabel herself regularly accused posters of being pedophiles. Isabel's response ( http://www.liberalforum.org/index.php?/topic/199146-lib-moderator-run-forum-is-disaster/?p=1059618412 ) was to accuse me of being a pedophile (thus proving my point). I think given that sort of behavior, BY ONE OF THE TOP MODERATORS on the forum at the time, perhaps an ADMITTED sixteen year old (or younger) poster did not belong on this forum. So I pinged Chuck (top dog at the time) to that effect. And note that I did not accuse Chuck or the site of harboring pedophiles. I only warned him that allowing 16 year olds (or younger) on the forum MIGHT attract them, and that his own top moderator, The Empress ... Isabel, suggested the forum was ALREADY harboring pedophiles. You remember that, don't you SM? Next, other liberals joined the thread in question and piled on me as well. shintao (ANOTHER long gone leftist MODERATOR, by the way) accused me of being a "child molester" "in favor of brutally raping 13 year olds" ( http://www.liberalforum.org/index.php?/topic/199146-lib-moderator-run-forum-is-disaster/?p=1059618430 ). Again, I pinged Chuck about this behavior and the assertion by his own moderators that there were pedophiles on the forum, and suggested that GIVEN THAT, perhaps admitted children don't belong on the website. And when Chuck finally showed up ( http://www.liberalforum.org/index.php?/topic/199146-lib-moderator-run-forum-is-disaster/?p=1059618587 ), I posted the following to him: http://www.liberalforum.org/index.php?/topic/199146-lib-moderator-run-forum-is-disaster/?p=1059618624 . I'll stand behind everything I said in that. When he posted back, acting clueless and asking exactly what I was referring to that made this site unfit for teenagers, I wrote ( http://www.liberalforum.org/index.php?/topic/199146-lib-moderator-run-forum-is-disaster/?p=1059618768 ) "You don't spend much time here, do you, Chuck. You do realize that your moderators are going around accusing people of being pedophiles. If they believe that, then that by itself makes this site unfit for minors." Chuck's response was to admit that he didn't spend much time on the site, demand a link to one of his moderators making the pedophile accusation, and then basically ignore the rest of my concern. I then supplied him ( http://www.liberalforum.org/index.php?/topic/199146-lib-moderator-run-forum-is-disaster/?p=1059618834 ) with links from the thread to where moderators were accusing *me* of being a pedophile and told him that if moderators "are convinced that members are pedophiles and then encourage someone who says she is a minor to remain on this forum, that's a problem". My last post before I was then suspended by Chuck (he told me to respond with the threat of suspension or banning hanging over my head) was this: http://www.liberalforum.org/index.php?/topic/199146-lib-moderator-run-forum-is-disaster/?p=1059618874 Quote Chuck, I am TRYING to help you. I'm not threatening to take you to court or rat on you. I'm giving you my honest opinion on how a court would see things should a minor end up in the hands of a pedophile as a result of posting on this forum. Allowing minors to post on this site is NOT a good idea. Surely you recognize that. This IS an adult forum, regardless of your spin. ANY court would see it that way. And it's filled with vile posts ... by the hundreds ... many of them by the people you have made moderators. And your own moderators have indicated the belief that many of the folks on this forum are pedophiles. They do it constantly. Now I don't know if you've noticed, but courts and public opinion seem to have very little tolerance now days when it comes to anything that seems to have aided pedophiles. The family of such a child could end up sueing the owner and it just wouldn't look very good if the forum's moderators had to admit that the poster had indicated she was a minor, that the moderators and forum owner were aware of it, and the moderators seemed to know there were pedophiles on the forum ... and then the owner did nothing. What you do at this point is up to you. Just saying ... I'll STILL stand by that opinion as well. Now what does all that mean? First, you lied, ScottMon. The above proves that I was NOT suspended for "chasing Zaro around" or "Pestering her about her age". Second, I predicted that your answer would prove you're a SLIMY, DISHONEST debater, and it did.  Third, *I* didn't say there were pedophiles on the forum. I said to Chuck "your own moderators have indicated the belief that many of the folks on this forum are pedophiles." True. So, Chuck was outright wrong in suspending me for (in his words) claiming that I said he was harboring pedophiles. I did no such thing. His moderators did. Fourth, Zaro, who started out acting like a sweet innocent female poster, ended up claiming she ruled the roost and using sexually explicit language only appropriate to gutter.In other words, she apparently was corrupted, just as I feared would happen, by the forum. And finally, Fifth. I'm still here. Zaro, Isabel, shintao and maybe even Chuck are all gone. Will you be next?  Here is also a link proving that I told you the same material back in December: https://www.liberalforum.org/topic/324218-richard-nixon-was-a-total-idiot-he-opened-china-started-the-epa-and-the-vietnam-war/page/3/?tab=comments#comment-1062062884 . More evidence that you're a LYING CREEP. Now I warned you that if you persisted in this smear I might start *recalling* additional posts showing even more of your dishonesty on topic after topic after topic. Like the death of Vince Foster and Ron Brown, the Fabian Society, Iraq, the bogus rape allegations against Trump, AGW, FDR being socialist, you claiming you're a Republican, the rape allegations against Clinton, McCarthy and HUAC, the number of people who died of starvation in the Great Depression, Mark Clemmons, the Clinton Foundation, Chinagate, the ACLU, the 2000 election, you claiming Teddy Roosevelt wasn't a socialist, and I could go on and on. Shall I do that, CREEP? Shall I turn this thread in to a ScottMon THE CREEP tribute thread? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.