ScottMon Posted July 25, 2020 Share Posted July 25, 2020 21 minutes ago, ROG62 said: Strict...you mean like you can't own one strict?...huh... Sweden, Israel, Australia. Strict Gun control. very few mass shootings. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ROG62 Posted July 25, 2020 Share Posted July 25, 2020 5 minutes ago, ScottMon said: Sweden, Israel, Australia. Strict Gun control. very few mass shootings. No one in the NRA has been involved in any mass shooting.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
nuckin futz Posted July 25, 2020 Share Posted July 25, 2020 10 hours ago, NeoConvict said: Democrats are still racist. The brand needs to be retired. The LIES just keep pouring from you! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
NeoConvict Posted July 25, 2020 Author Share Posted July 25, 2020 22 minutes ago, nuckin futz said: The LIES just keep pouring from you! Conservatives aren't generally preoccupied with race. Progressives are. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ConservativeVoice Posted July 26, 2020 Share Posted July 26, 2020 On 7/24/2020 at 8:14 AM, NeoConvict said: The democrat party has a long and sordid history of supporting slavery and racism. They promoted Jim Crow and fought against the integration of society. They fought against the Civil Rights movement. They claim to have learned the errors of their ways but that is not good enough. The democrat brand is forever soiled by the actions of powerful white men oppressing and killing minorities. They should retire the democrat brand, a brand far more tied to the wholesale slaughter of minorities than Aunt Jemima or Uncle Ben or Lady Antebellum ever could be. #canceldemocrats That's RIGHT !! DEMOCRATS = RACISM = SLAVERY = JIM CROW = KKK LEARN your HISTORY !! THAT might be why the Democrats who run education these days are trying to re-WRITE American HISTORY !! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ScottMon Posted July 26, 2020 Share Posted July 26, 2020 22 hours ago, ROG62 said: No one in the NRA has been involved in any mass shooting.... That can't proven either way. BTW, You dodged the part where i showed where strict gun control did reduce mass shootings. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Duck615 Posted July 26, 2020 Share Posted July 26, 2020 3 minutes ago, ScottMon said: That can't proven either way. BTW, You dodged the part where i showed where strict gun control did reduce mass shootings. sad shilly doesn't respect the 2nd Amendment.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ROG62 Posted July 27, 2020 Share Posted July 27, 2020 4 hours ago, ScottMon said: That can't proven either way. BTW, You dodged the part where i showed where strict gun control did reduce mass shootings. You mean no guns? Thanks for being captain obvious... Chicago has strict gun laws as well, yet there are mass shootings there every weekend...go figure... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Whatever Posted July 27, 2020 Share Posted July 27, 2020 On 7/24/2020 at 11:14 AM, NeoConvict said: The democrat party has a long and sordid history of supporting slavery and racism. They promoted Jim Crow and fought against the integration of society. They fought against the Civil Rights movement. They claim to have learned the errors of their ways but that is not good enough. The democrat brand is forever soiled by the actions of powerful white men oppressing and killing minorities. They should retire the democrat brand, a brand far more tied to the wholesale slaughter of minorities than Aunt Jemima or Uncle Ben or Lady Antebellum ever could be. #canceldemocrats Wrong. More northern democrats supported civil rights then southern republicans. Civil rights fight was geographical not political. Look it up. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ScottMon Posted July 27, 2020 Share Posted July 27, 2020 15 minutes ago, ROG62 said: You mean no guns? Thanks for being captain obvious... Chicago has strict gun laws as well, yet there are mass shootings there every weekend...go figure... Not as strict as in China and Israel. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
LaughinAtLefty Posted July 27, 2020 Share Posted July 27, 2020 1 hour ago, ScottMon said: Not as strict as in China and Israel. The nignogs don't care about laws......obviously. Yet another leftist moron. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
NeoConvict Posted July 27, 2020 Author Share Posted July 27, 2020 9 hours ago, Whatever said: Wrong. More northern democrats supported civil rights then southern republicans. Civil rights fight was geographical not political. Look it up. I won't dispute that. What support the civil rights movement had in the south was Republican. Northern democrats very well could have outnumbered them. Being Republican in the south prior to 1960 was like being gay in north Korea, just didn't happen and those that were kept to the closet. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ScottMon Posted July 27, 2020 Share Posted July 27, 2020 8 hours ago, LaughinAtLefty said: The nignogs don't care about laws......obviously. Yet another leftist moron. I'm making a point. Rog tried to equate Democrats with NAMBLA so I equated NRA with mass shootings. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
NeoConvict Posted July 27, 2020 Author Share Posted July 27, 2020 On 7/25/2020 at 4:04 PM, ScottMon said: Sweden, Israel, Australia. Strict Gun control. very few mass shootings. Very few blacks. I am sure that is a coincidence. 😁 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
NeoConvict Posted July 27, 2020 Author Share Posted July 27, 2020 2 minutes ago, ScottMon said: I'm making a point. Rog tried to equate Democrats with NAMBLA so I equated NRA with mass shootings. Both comparisons are fair. NRA policies do facilitate mass shooters. Progressives fighting for sexual expression rights for children does enable groups like nambla. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ScottMon Posted July 27, 2020 Share Posted July 27, 2020 2 minutes ago, NeoConvict said: Both comparisons are fair. NRA policies do facilitate mass shooters. Progressives fighting for sexual expression rights for children does enable groups like nambla. I don't see anyone in the Main Democrat party advocating molestation of kids. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
NeoConvict Posted July 27, 2020 Author Share Posted July 27, 2020 19 minutes ago, ScottMon said: I don't see anyone in the Main Democrat party advocating molestation of kids. I see several organizations dedicated to the giving children the freedom of sexual expression. The UN council on children for one. I know of many progressive groups, predominantly gay rights organizations, that are fighting to lower the age of consent arguing that statutory rape laws disproportionately target homosexuals. You are correct, groups wanting to legalize child rape are exceedingly rare. Groups that want to change the definition of "kid" are legion. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ScottMon Posted July 27, 2020 Share Posted July 27, 2020 1 minute ago, NeoConvict said: I see several organizations dedicated to the giving children the freedom of sexual expression. The UN council on children for one. I know of many progressive groups, predominantly gay rights organizations, that are fighting to lower the age of consent arguing that statutory rape laws disproportionately target homosexuals. You are correct, groups wanting to legalize child rape are exceedingly rare. Groups that want to change the definition of "kid" are legion. Got to be honest. I'm old school and think of 18 as the age of consent. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
XavierOnassis Posted July 27, 2020 Share Posted July 27, 2020 3 hours ago, NeoConvict said: I won't dispute that. What support the civil rights movement had in the south was Republican. Northern democrats very well could have outnumbered them. Being Republican in the south prior to 1960 was like being gay in north Korea, just didn't happen and those that were kept to the closet. Before the 1980's, gays in the South either remained in the closet or left for places that were more gay friendly: the East Village of NYC. San Francisco, LA or Hawaii. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
XavierOnassis Posted July 27, 2020 Share Posted July 27, 2020 2 hours ago, ScottMon said: Got to be honest. I'm old school and think of 18 as the age of consent. I would say that 18 is better than sooner. Hormones tend to feel the urge sooner, lamentably. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.