Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 144
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

White racists today are politically homeless. There is no party pushing for white power. Plenty of black and brown racists welcome in the Democrat party. 

The Democrat party is the  worst party  in US  history 

The democrat party has a long and sordid history of supporting slavery and racism. They promoted Jim Crow and fought against the integration of society. They fought against the Civil Rights movement.

2 hours ago, Vegas said:

You dont really believe he did that put of moral conviction, do you? It was a political strategy. He needed the black vote, so he gave them something, and in return, the blacks voted democrats. It had nothing to do with principle. 

Sure he referred to them as Niggers, but everyone in Texas did back then. I know, I grew up in SanAntone! It was not a negative term back then. LBJ also taught school to poor Mexican kids, so i don't think he was very racist. Many considered him to be the best Senate Majority leader ever. He did hate JFK tho, as he thought he deserved to be Prez, but he wasn't behind the shooting. Asshole Roger Stone said he was in a book he wrote, but Stone is a LIAR!

I read a lot, that's how I know these things!

Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, nuckin futz said:

I read a lot, that's how I know these things!

 

 

Have you ever read a book called

 

”nuckin  futz :  the a-hole”?

 

its pretty short but concise,  well sourced,  you should get it on Amazon .   

Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, nuckin futz said:

Sure he referred to them as Niggers, but everyone in Texas did back then. I know, I grew up in SanAntone! It was not a negative term back then. LBJ also taught school to poor Mexican kids, so i don't think he was very racist. Many considered him to be the best Senate Majority leader ever. He did hate JFK tho, as he thought he deserved to be Prez, but he wasn't behind the shooting. Asshole Roger Stone said he was in a book he wrote, but Stone is a LIAR!

I read a lot, that's how I know these things!

He was a racist pig. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, NeoConvict said:

The democrat party has a long and sordid history of supporting slavery and racism. They promoted Jim Crow and fought against the integration of society. They fought against the Civil Rights movement. They claim to have learned the errors of their ways but that is not good enough. The democrat brand is forever soiled by the actions of powerful white men oppressing and killing minorities. They should retire the democrat brand, a brand far more tied to the wholesale slaughter of minorities than Aunt Jemima or Uncle Ben or Lady Antebellum ever could be. #canceldemocrats

Some congressman have started this very idea!

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, ScottMon said:

So false I can't even begin to say.  Try the phrase consenting adults.

Ever hear of NAMBLA? Brace yourself...

 

Editor, Manteca Bulletin,
NAMBLA, the North American Man-Boy Love Association, is a homosexual organization for older men to follow their fiendish desires to be with young boys sexually. This organization is criminal and should be dismantled with its members and organizers thrown in jail. Yet, NAMBLA has a working relationship with the Democrat party.  President Obama appointed Kevin Jennings as the Safe School Czar. Jennings expressed his admiration and praise for Harry Hay, who is a long time advocate for NAMBLA and the legalization of sexual abuse of young boys by older men.

As an educator, Jennings was approached by a 15-year-old boy who sought his advice about a relationship he was having with an older man.  Instead of reporting this felonious act to police or encouraging the boy to talk to his family or seek counseling, Jennings told the boy to “use a condom” with the man.  This is our Safe School Czar?  Jennings also wrote the forward to a book called “Queering Elementary Education,” which promotes homosexual doctrine to be taught in elementary school, even to children in first grade.  Jennings has already stated he will promote his “homosexual agenda” into our public school curriculum.

NAMBLA made headlines when a 10-year-old boy from Massachusetts named Jeffery Curry was abducted by two men who tried to force the boy to have sex with them.  When the boy refused to consent to sex with the men, they murdered the boy forcing him to choke on a gasoline soaked rag. Then the men sexually assaulted the dead boy’s body.  Curry’s parents sued NAMBLA since one of the killers said he was discouraged from following his fiendish desires until NAMBLA encouraged him.  Curry’s lawyer explained how NAMBLA instructed perverts on how to lure children into sex, citing NAMBLA’s publication “The Rape-and Escape manual.” Its actual title is “The Survival Manual: The Man’s Guide to Staying Alive in a Man-Boy Sexual Relationships”.  The American Civil Liberties Union, which receives a bulk of support from Democrats, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, defended NAMBLA against the parents of the murdered boy.  Not one Democrat came out in opposition to the ACLU defense of NAMBLA.  

In the 2001 San Francisco “Gay Pride” parade, Nancy Pelosi walked along side of the NAMBLA advocate, Harry Hay, who has stated “ If the parents and friends of gays are truly friends of gays, they would know from their gay kids that the relationship with an older man is precisely what 13-, 14-, and 15- year-old kids need more than anything else in the world.”

NAMBLA is a criminal organization of pedophiles preying on young boys. How can an organization like NAMBLA even exist?  Why aren’t these men in jail?  Who is protecting these boys or even girls from these pedophiles?  Where is the national media?  How safe are our school children with the hidden agenda of our Safe School Czar?  Should the Democratic Party and its leaders walk with or praise and admire the leaders of NAMBLA?  Should the Democratic Party give money to an organization that defends NAMBLA? These are just some of the disturbing questions that should be answered.

 

https://www.mantecabulletin.com/opinion/letters/democrats-cozy-dealings-with-nambla/

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, ScottMon said:

So false I can't even begin to say.  Try the phrase consenting adults.

After a few days of engaging post, I have come to the realization that you are very naive...agree?

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, ROG62 said:

Ever hear of NAMBLA? Brace yourself...

 

Editor, Manteca Bulletin,
NAMBLA, the North American Man-Boy Love Association, is a homosexual organization for older men to follow their fiendish desires to be with young boys sexually. This organization is criminal and should be dismantled with its members and organizers thrown in jail. Yet, NAMBLA has a working relationship with the Democrat party.  President Obama appointed Kevin Jennings as the Safe School Czar. Jennings expressed his admiration and praise for Harry Hay, who is a long time advocate for NAMBLA and the legalization of sexual abuse of young boys by older men.

As an educator, Jennings was approached by a 15-year-old boy who sought his advice about a relationship he was having with an older man.  Instead of reporting this felonious act to police or encouraging the boy to talk to his family or seek counseling, Jennings told the boy to “use a condom” with the man.  This is our Safe School Czar?  Jennings also wrote the forward to a book called “Queering Elementary Education,” which promotes homosexual doctrine to be taught in elementary school, even to children in first grade.  Jennings has already stated he will promote his “homosexual agenda” into our public school curriculum.

NAMBLA made headlines when a 10-year-old boy from Massachusetts named Jeffery Curry was abducted by two men who tried to force the boy to have sex with them.  When the boy refused to consent to sex with the men, they murdered the boy forcing him to choke on a gasoline soaked rag. Then the men sexually assaulted the dead boy’s body.  Curry’s parents sued NAMBLA since one of the killers said he was discouraged from following his fiendish desires until NAMBLA encouraged him.  Curry’s lawyer explained how NAMBLA instructed perverts on how to lure children into sex, citing NAMBLA’s publication “The Rape-and Escape manual.” Its actual title is “The Survival Manual: The Man’s Guide to Staying Alive in a Man-Boy Sexual Relationships”.  The American Civil Liberties Union, which receives a bulk of support from Democrats, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, defended NAMBLA against the parents of the murdered boy.  Not one Democrat came out in opposition to the ACLU defense of NAMBLA.  

In the 2001 San Francisco “Gay Pride” parade, Nancy Pelosi walked along side of the NAMBLA advocate, Harry Hay, who has stated “ If the parents and friends of gays are truly friends of gays, they would know from their gay kids that the relationship with an older man is precisely what 13-, 14-, and 15- year-old kids need more than anything else in the world.”

NAMBLA is a criminal organization of pedophiles preying on young boys. How can an organization like NAMBLA even exist?  Why aren’t these men in jail?  Who is protecting these boys or even girls from these pedophiles?  Where is the national media?  How safe are our school children with the hidden agenda of our Safe School Czar?  Should the Democratic Party and its leaders walk with or praise and admire the leaders of NAMBLA?  Should the Democratic Party give money to an organization that defends NAMBLA? These are just some of the disturbing questions that should be answered.

 

https://www.mantecabulletin.com/opinion/letters/democrats-cozy-dealings-with-nambla/

Yeah, That's a work of fiction.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, ScottMon said:

I've never seen any modern racist sign up as a Democrat.  Plenty are proud Republicans.  

 

 

 

 

Anyone who supports BLM and Affirmative Action is prejudiced against White People.

It is racist to be prejudiced against the White People.

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, ROG62 said:

Ever hear of NAMBLA? Brace yourself...

 

Editor, Manteca Bulletin,
NAMBLA, the North American Man-Boy Love Association, is a homosexual organization for older men to follow their fiendish desires to be with young boys sexually. This organization is criminal and should be dismantled with its members and organizers thrown in jail. Yet, NAMBLA has a working relationship with the Democrat party.  President Obama appointed Kevin Jennings as the Safe School Czar. Jennings expressed his admiration and praise for Harry Hay, who is a long time advocate for NAMBLA and the legalization of sexual abuse of young boys by older men.

As an educator, Jennings was approached by a 15-year-old boy who sought his advice about a relationship he was having with an older man.  Instead of reporting this felonious act to police or encouraging the boy to talk to his family or seek counseling, Jennings told the boy to “use a condom” with the man.  This is our Safe School Czar?  Jennings also wrote the forward to a book called “Queering Elementary Education,” which promotes homosexual doctrine to be taught in elementary school, even to children in first grade.  Jennings has already stated he will promote his “homosexual agenda” into our public school curriculum.

NAMBLA made headlines when a 10-year-old boy from Massachusetts named Jeffery Curry was abducted by two men who tried to force the boy to have sex with them.  When the boy refused to consent to sex with the men, they murdered the boy forcing him to choke on a gasoline soaked rag. Then the men sexually assaulted the dead boy’s body.  Curry’s parents sued NAMBLA since one of the killers said he was discouraged from following his fiendish desires until NAMBLA encouraged him.  Curry’s lawyer explained how NAMBLA instructed perverts on how to lure children into sex, citing NAMBLA’s publication “The Rape-and Escape manual.” Its actual title is “The Survival Manual: The Man’s Guide to Staying Alive in a Man-Boy Sexual Relationships”.  The American Civil Liberties Union, which receives a bulk of support from Democrats, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, defended NAMBLA against the parents of the murdered boy.  Not one Democrat came out in opposition to the ACLU defense of NAMBLA.  

In the 2001 San Francisco “Gay Pride” parade, Nancy Pelosi walked along side of the NAMBLA advocate, Harry Hay, who has stated “ If the parents and friends of gays are truly friends of gays, they would know from their gay kids that the relationship with an older man is precisely what 13-, 14-, and 15- year-old kids need more than anything else in the world.”

NAMBLA is a criminal organization of pedophiles preying on young boys. How can an organization like NAMBLA even exist?  Why aren’t these men in jail?  Who is protecting these boys or even girls from these pedophiles?  Where is the national media?  How safe are our school children with the hidden agenda of our Safe School Czar?  Should the Democratic Party and its leaders walk with or praise and admire the leaders of NAMBLA?  Should the Democratic Party give money to an organization that defends NAMBLA? These are just some of the disturbing questions that should be answered.

 

https://www.mantecabulletin.com/opinion/letters/democrats-cozy-dealings-with-nambla/

Faggots make up a sizable percentage of the democrat base, as well as the left side of this forum.

  • Thumb up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, RebelGator said:

Faggots make up a sizable percentage of the democrat base, as well as the left side of this forum.

That problem would be limited to a single generation but we are letting them adopt. Strangely kids raised in gay households are far more likely to have been "born that way". Guess it's just amazing luck on the part of gay adoptive parents. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, ScottMon said:

Images are fungible.  

My bad...I went back to get clarification of post and saw it was referencing sharpton...

 

Sorry I blew up!

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

 

Have you ever read a book called

 

”nuckin  futz :  the a-hole”?

 

its pretty short but concise,  well sourced,  you should get it on Amazon .   

Yes! I am the bastard your Mommy warned you about! LOL!

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, NeoConvict said:

The democrat party has a long and sordid history of supporting slavery and racism. They promoted Jim Crow and fought against the integration of society. They fought against the Civil Rights movement. They claim to have learned the errors of their ways but that is not good enough. The democrat brand is forever soiled by the actions of powerful white men oppressing and killing minorities. They should retire the democrat brand, a brand far more tied to the wholesale slaughter of minorities than Aunt Jemima or Uncle Ben or Lady Antebellum ever could be. #canceldemocrats

https://www.liberalforum.org/topic/323896-exposing-democratic-hypocrosy/

A privileged resolution requires the House to either immediately table the motion, which then becomes a vote for or against it, or bring it to the floor for a vote within two days of its introduction. If the resolution survives a vote to table, each side has an hour to debate it before it comes up for a vote on the floor.

Gohmert’s resolution provides a long list of instances in which the Democratic Party supported slavery, the Confederacy, and racist policies, including:

    The Democratic Party platforms of 1840, 1844, 1848, 1852, and 1856 stated “that all efforts of the abolitionists, or others, made to induce Congress to interfere with questions of slavery . . . are calculated to lead to the most alarming and dangerous consequences; and that all such efforts have an inevitable tendency to diminish the happiness of the people and endanger the stability and permanency of the Union, and ought not to be countenanced by any friend of our political institutions.”

    The Democratic Party platform of 1856 declared that “new states” to the Union should be admitted “with or without domestic slavery, as [the state] may elect.”

    The Democratic Party platform of 1856 declared that “we recognize the right of the people of all the Territories . . .  to form a Constitution, with or without domestic slavery.”

    The Democratic Party platform of 1860, in seeking to uphold the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 that required law enforcement officials to arrest any individual suspected of being a runaway slave, stated that “the enactments of the State Legislatures to defeat the faithful execution of the Fugitive Slave Law are hostile in character, subversive of the Constitution, and revolutionary in their effect.”

    No Democrat in Congress supported the 14th Amendment, which gave full citizenship to freed slaves. It passed in 1868 with 94 percent Republican support and zero support from Democrats.

    No Democrat in Congress supported the 15th Amendment, which gave freed slaves the right to vote. It passed in 1870 with 100 percent Republican support and zero support from Democrats.

    Various state Democratic Party officials enacted policies to disenfranchise and “systematically suppress” the right of African Americans to vote. The resolution specifically cites the 1902 Constitution of the State of Virginia that disenfranchised about 90 percent of the African American voters at the time, forcibly reducing the number of eligible African American voters from about 147,000 in 1901 to about 10,000 by 1905. The resolution notes that this measure was “supported almost exclusively by Virginia Democrats.”

    The administration of President Woodrow Wilson, a Democrat, “began a racial segregation policy for U.S. government employees and, by 1914, the Wilson administration’s Civil Service instituted the requirement that a photograph be submitted with each employment application.”

    When the Democratic Party held its national convention in 1924 in New York City at Madison Square Garden, the event was commonly referred to as the “Klan-Bake” due to the influence of the Ku Klux Klan in the party.

    Senate Democrats held a 75-calendar day filibuster against the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

    Former Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV), a known recruiter for the KKK, led the Democrats to oppose civil rights for African Americans.

    Democrats “enacted and enforced Jim Crow laws and civil codes that forced segregation and restricted freedoms” for African Americans.

    In June, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) ordered the removal of the portraits of four previous Speakers of the House  who served in the Confederacy, stating that these portraits “set back our nation’s work to confront and combat bigotry.” However, Gohmert’s resolution notes that the Speakers that Pelosi removed (Robert M.T. Hunter, Howell Cobb, James L. Orr, and Charles F. Crisp) were all Democrats.

Gohmert’s resolution also calls for Pelosi to remove from the House wing of the Capitol of any House office building any item that “names, symbolizes or mentions any political organization or party that has ever held a public position that supported slavery or the Confederacy.”

Gohmert told Breitbart News in an exclusive statement on Thursday that this resolution outlines that a “great portion” of the Democratic Party is “filled with racism and hatred.”

Therefore, Gohmert argued, that because leftists now demand that the country must eliminate “entities symbols, and reminders” of America’s past, then the Democratic Party must change to recognize its “loathsome and bigoted past.”

He explained, “As outlined in the resolution, a great portion of the history of the Democratic Party is filled with racism and hatred. Since people are demanding we rid ourselves of the entities, symbols, and reminders of the repugnant aspects of our past, then the time has come for Democrats to acknowledge their party’s loathsome and bigoted past, and consider changing their party name to something that isn’t so blatantly and offensively tied to slavery, Jim Crow, discrimination, and the Ku Klux Klan.”

“As the country watches violent leftists burn our cities, tear down our statues and call upon every school, military base and city street to be renamed, it is important to note that past atrocities these radicals claim to be so violently offensive were largely committed by members in good standing of the Democratic Party,” Gohmert continued, “Whether it be supporting the most vile forms of racism or actively working against Civil Rights legislation, Democrats in this country perpetuated these abhorrent forms of discrimination and violence practically since their party’s inception.”

“To avoid triggering innocent bystanders by the racist past of the Democratic Party, I would suggest they change their name. That is the standard to which they are holding everyone else, so the name change needs to occur,” Gohmert concluded.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/07/cancel-culture-democrat-belongs-in-dustbin-history/

 

Cancel-culture logic demands that "Democrat" go into the dustbin of history.

American society is in the middle of a destructive hysteria of self-flagellation and denial. The symbols and exemplars of American society are now the objects of an unprecedented iconoclastic purge. What started as another iteration of perennial and often reasonable calls to dismantle statues of Confederate leaders has metastasized into loud denunciations of American icons such as Washington, Jefferson, and Lincoln. The Lincoln Memorial has been defaced in Washington, while statues of Columbus are routinely toppled, and even statues of abolitionists and the great Union general Ulysses S. Grant himself were not exempt from the depredations of the vandals. As we write this, we hear calls for the musical Hamilton to be canceled because progressives are no longer happy with some of the positions taken by the historical Hamilton.

Nor have names been spared from the epidemic of destruction. Throughout the country, protesters are demanding to change the name of any institution associated with historical persons deemed imperfect by current standards. Princeton University has renamed its Woodrow Wilson School, and some are now urging Yale University to shed its onomastic association with slave trader Elihu Yale. What about Columbia University? Perhaps both “Washington” and the “District of Columbia” will need to be expunged from the name of our capital?

How far will all this go? Shall we also change the names of months? We might start with July, which honors Julius Caesar, who by common standards committed genocide against the Gauls, and August, named after the man who put the last nail in the coffin of the Roman Republic and declared himself emperor — both were also slave owners themselves as well as leaders of vast slave empires. We understand that the names “Messidor” and “Thermidore” are available. And how exemplary a person, according to present sensitivities, was Amerigo Vespucci? Was he really better than Columbus? Perhaps we should also change the name of America?

In all this frenzy of name changes, one culprit is conspicuously missing. Up to the 1960s the Democratic Party was the party of slavery, Jim Crow, segregation, the Ku Klux Klan, lynching, poll taxes, and literacy tests for voting. The first Confederate Congress was dominated by former Democrats. While one might argue that these Democrats left their party when they left their country, their party certainly continued to stand by them: In the contested presidential election of 1876, the Democrats allowed the Republican Rutherford Hayes to assume office despite the stronger claims of their own candidate, Samuel Tilden, in exchange for the withdrawal of federal troops from the South.

This bargain ended Reconstruction and ushered in almost a century during which the Democratic Party dominated Southern politics, implementing a cruel regime of segregation in state after state of the former Confederacy. Nor were the Democrats in any great hurry to change their racist ways. When Woodrow Wilson became the first Democrat in 16 years to occupy the White House in March 1913, he lost no time resegregating the civil service; in the following year, his administration introduced the requirement that employment applications include a photograph of the job candidate, thereby greatly facilitating employment discrimination.

During the early months of World War II, the Democratic Party showed its remarkable versatility at racist oppression when Democratic president Franklin Delano Roosevelt — against the recommendation of his FBI chief, J. Edgar Hoover — ordered that Americans of Japanese ancestry be rounded up and deported to concentration camps, where they were lent out to farmers as slave labor. Many shops and farms owned by Japanese Americans were auctioned off for next to nothing to their neighbors. When Fred Korematsu, who was arrested in San Francisco and deported to Topaz, Utah, appealed his detention all the way to the Supreme Court, all six justices voting to uphold Roosevelt’s racist order were themselves Roosevelt appointees. Democrat Hugo Black, a notorious anti-Catholic bigot and former member of the Ku Klux Klan, wrote the opinion. The lone Republican appointee on the court, Owen Roberts, strenuously dissented, noting that Korematsu was imprisoned in “a concentration camp, based on his ancestry, and solely because of his ancestry.”

The Democrats’ defense of racial discrimination persisted right into the Space Age: On June 11, 1963, Governor George Wallace, a Democrat, stood in the doorway of the University of Alabama’s Foster Auditorium to block the entrance of Vivian Malone and James Hood because they were African American. On March 26, 1964, 18 of the 19 senators who voted against the Civil Rights Act were Democrats. In each of these situations, the Democrats were not simply “creatures of their time.” Time and again, they actively strove to impede or reverse progress on civil rights. Yet the party continues to do business under the name its history has made infamous. If we were to apply the standards routinely invoked by the cancel culture to “dename” other institutions, then the Democratic Party’s reluctant policy change after the 1960s should not provide absolution.

The Democratic Party has been able to redefine itself over the past half-century as the champion of minorities, yet all too often, when Democrats have held power, they have substituted identity politics for sound and effective policies. Their divide-and-conquer approach concerning race, ethnicity, sex, and sexual preferences has advanced their political ambitions to the detriment of our unifying motto E pluribus unum. Paradoxically, Democrats’ obsession over identity politics has brought their party back to where it started, with a vision of American society irredeemably divided by race: In the cities they govern, Democrats’ efforts at expanding educational opportunities and reducing poverty for minority communities have produced disappointing results at best. All too predictably, race-based identity politics have stoked division and resentment while turning on its head Martin Luther King’s call to judge people by the content of their character and not the color of their skin.

It is particularly galling to see that almost all of the recent police abuses have taken place in cities that Democrats have run for many decades. Nonetheless, incompetent and irresponsible incumbent politicians, helped along by the mainstream media, have deflected blame for their own failures by impugning their political opponents as endemically racist. What makes systemic racism such an appealing theme for social-justice warriors and demagogues is that they are able to define it not in terms of specific discriminatory actions by people and institutions (which can be identified, measured, and cured) but rather as any manifestation of disparate or unequal outcomes. Differences of any kind — whether in income, education, or life expectancy — are all defined as manifestations of systemic racial animus.

Represented this way, racism takes the place of the old and historically disastrous Communist definition of class: It’s an immutable characteristic that can be cured only by collectivism, including massive “reeducation,” widespread censorship of opposing views, and punishment for dissent. This narrative provides a convenient excuse for elected officials; when they fail to deliver public services, as they so often do, they simply place the blame on a racist system beyond their control. Of course, all of this is entirely at odds with the traditional American values of personal responsibility, freedom of speech, and tolerance.

We all know how the Communist experiment turned out in Eastern Europe. The Communists thought they could achieve their professed goals of eliminating inequality by means of a vast, indeed unprecedented, array of education and “reeducation” tools that were deployed in schools, universities, workplaces, and just about everywhere in society. Those who resisted were sent to prisons or labor camps or simply killed. But none of this produced the New Man the Communists envisaged. Instead it led to widespread apathy, resentment, dissimulation, cynicism, and hypocrisy. Under pressure to go along, people chose instead to pretend to conform while allowing themselves the freedom to think whatever they pleased, in total opposition to the monolithic viewpoint they publicly professed. Die Gedanken sind frei — thoughts are free. The abject failure of these policies became painfully obvious when, after the fall of Communism in Eastern Europe, the region experienced an ugly spasm of ethnic and racial violence. Let’s spare the next three generations of Americans another such experiment.

We do not, in any way, believe that denaming historical institutions is the way to go. We simply want to shed light on the hypocrisy of cancel-culture advocates who fail to apply their own twisted logic to the institutions and causes they embrace. We hope and pray that people will reflect on the existential dangers of cancel culture — the course advocated by extreme social-justice warriors and their demagogic allies is bringing our nation to the brink of a chasm. But if the frenzy persists, then let the Democratic Party be the next to have its name swept into the dustbin of history.

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

Michelle Obama

Eric Holder 

Al Sharpton

 

you need more?

 

Joe Biden. "Slight Indian Accent if you go into a 7-11" and his ANTI BUSING stance is notorious.

 

Seems these SHITSTAINS love to "forget away" all these DEMOSHIT RACISTS that are still around.

 

Bill Clinton, Jimha Cahta, are just a few still living that made their living race hustling.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, MidnightMax said:

 

Joe Biden. "Slight Indian Accent if you go into a 7-11" and his ANTI BUSING stance is notorious.

 

Seems these SHITSTAINS love to "forget away" all these DEMOSHIT RACISTS that are still around.

 

Bill Clinton, Jimha Cahta, are just a few still living that made their living race hustling.

 

 

Democrats are still racist. The brand needs to be retired. 

  • MORON! 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...