Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
tunafish

Why is it that only BLM?

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, tunafish said:

Don't all lives matter?

 

 

Thats just it, all lives do matter ---except Black lives. It is why the slogan was created, therefore we cannot reasonably pretend TODAY that the phrase came before the crisis.

 

The crisis came first, where Black lives do not matter to USA cops. Once it reached a boiling point, the phrase was created. Then three (3) peaceful Black women turned the phrase into an organization once they realized Obama was not going to protect the civil rights of Trayvon Martin.

 

...

 

For example, do you see how this group of Americans featured here might be the main engine fueling the reason why BLM needed to be created: 

 

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/fbi-white-supremacists-in-law-enforcement

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump, 

I kind of get what you are saying. BLM was created to highlight the fact that police might not be treating blacks properly or may even be racist. 

 

With that in mind why is in not acceptable to say All Lives Matter. Just the other day a college official (I think) in the same statement said BLM and ALM and was fired because of saying ALM.

 

 

 

With all of this BLM going on, should I be blaming police for the removing of the word cracker, Aunt Jemima, etc. Be from products and the tearing down of statues. Is BLM related to these activities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, tunafish said:

...With that in mind why is in not acceptable to say All Lives Matter.

 

Because way back in 2012 on the day before the phrase "BLM" was ever spoken ---all 320-million of us Americans knew that supposedly ALL LIVES MATTER. Correct? Then when Trayvon was killed, coming home from buying Iced Tea & Skittles? As the 1st Black President patted Zimmerman on the head??  Well negros had to then, accept, all lives do matter except their's 

 

But those 3 Black women said hey, wait a minute, we need to remind America that "Black lives, matter!" when that sorryASS first-ever negro U.S. President refused to make Black lives matter.

 

Fortunately President Trump has done far, far more than Obama did after 3.5 years, if you go check both of their records re: improving the lives of our great negro citizenry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, pmurT said:

 

Because way back in 2012 on the day before the phrase "BLM" was ever spoken ---all 320-million of us Americans knew that supposedly ALL LIVES MATTER. Correct? Then when Trayvon was killed, coming home from buying Iced Tea & Skittles? As the 1st Black President patted Zimmerman on the head??  Well negros had to then, accept, all lives do matter except their's 

 

But those 3 Black women said hey, wait a minute, we need to remind America that "Black lives, matter!" when that sorryASS first-ever negro U.S. President refused to make Black lives matter.

 

Fortunately President Trump has done far, far more than Obama did after 3.5 years, if you go check both of their records re: improving the lives of our great negro citizenry.

Wow. Sounds like President Trump really cares about the black community. That's amazing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, tunafish said:

Wow. Sounds like President Trump really cares about the black community. That's amazing.

 

True indeed.

 

 

 

   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/3/2020 at 7:13 AM, pmurT said:

 

Because way back in 2012 on the day before the phrase "BLM" was ever spoken ---all 320-million of us Americans knew that supposedly ALL LIVES MATTER. Correct? Then when Trayvon was killed, coming home from buying Iced Tea & Skittles? As the 1st Black President patted Zimmerman on the head??  Well negros had to then, accept, all lives do matter except their's 

 

But those 3 Black women said hey, wait a minute, we need to remind America that "Black lives, matter!" when that sorryASS first-ever negro U.S. President refused to make Black lives matter.

 

Fortunately President Trump has done far, far more than Obama did after 3.5 years, if you go check both of their records re: improving the lives of our great negro citizenry.

  Trayvon Martin was killed because he doubled back and assaulted George Zimmerman who was heading back to his vehicle.  Martin knocked Zimmerman to the ground and commenced to beat Zimmerman to a pulp.  Zimmerman yelled for help for several minutes.  When no one came to help him, Zimmerman drew his legal 9MM and fired once into Martin's chest.

  Zimmerman had every right to defend himself against Martin's vicious attack. It was self-defense, pure and simple.  The jury found it self defense after they heard all the real evidence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, bgr39 said:

  Trayvon Martin was killed because he doubled back and assaulted George Zimmerman who was heading back to his vehicle.  Martin knocked Zimmerman to the ground and commenced to beat Zimmerman to a pulp.  Zimmerman yelled for help for several minutes.  When no one came to help him, Zimmerman drew his legal 9MM and fired once into Martin's chest.

  Zimmerman had every right to defend himself against Martin's vicious attack. It was self-defense, pure and simple.  The jury found it self defense after they heard all the real evidence.

 

No, you are incorrect here.

 

Police dispatch advised Zimmerman to NOT go after Trayvon.  That alone, should have landed Zimmerman in prison over the killing.

 

But, Zimmerman was allowed to exercise his White Privilege and was then rewarded for lynching a darkskin negro.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, pmurT said:

 

No, you are incorrect here.

 

Police dispatch advised Zimmerman to NOT go after Trayvon.  That alone, should have landed Zimmerman in prison over the killing.

 

But, Zimmerman was allowed to exercise his White Privilege and was then rewarded for lynching a darkskin negro.

  The police dispatch asked Zimmerman IF he knew which way Martin had gone.  Zimmerman said that he would check.  The dispatch asked IF Zimmerman was following Martin and Zimmerman replied that he was looking to see which way Martin had gone.  The police dispatch said that we don't need you to do that.  Zimmerman replied "OK" and turned around and headed back to his pick-up.  Martin doubled back and confronted Zimmerman.  Martin asked Zimmerman Have you got a problem to witch Zimmerman replied "NO".  Martin then said "you do now" and punched Zimmerman and knocked Zimmerman to the ground and Martin sat on Zimmerman's chest and started swinging hard and fast at Zimmerman face.  Zimmerman yelled for help for several minutes. When no one came to Zimmerman's aid, Zimmerman drew his legal 9MM and shot Martin ONCE.  It was pure self defense and THAT is what the jury said too.

  Zimmerman had every right to defend himself just like every other law-abiding American citizen does, including law-abiding black people that are assaulted.  

  You just need to get your fact correct before you post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, bgr39 said:

  ...The police dispatch said that we don't need you to do that. 

 

Thank you. If Zimmerman was a, negro, this is the point where he goes to prison.

 

You need to get your facts straight first LOL once you decided that you're going to protect and preserve White racism.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, pmurT said:

 

Thank you. If Zimmerman was a, negro, this is the point where he goes to prison.

 

You need to get your facts straight first LOL once you decided that you're going to protect and preserve White racism.

  WRONG!!  When the dispatcher told Zimmerman that we don't need you to do THAT, Zimmerman headed back to his auto, just like he was told to do, WHITE OR BLACK, he did like he was told to do by the police dispatch. 

  How do you figure "racism" fits into this picture?

  I am baffled by your "racism" accusation because other that that, you sound reasonable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/3/2020 at 5:17 AM, pmurT said:

 

 

Thats just it, all lives do matter ---except Black lives. It is why the slogan was created, therefore we cannot reasonably pretend TODAY that the phrase came before the crisis.

 

The crisis came first, where Black lives do not matter to USA cops. Once it reached a boiling point, the phrase was created. Then three (3) peaceful Black women turned the phrase into an organization once they realized Obama was not going to protect the civil rights of Trayvon Martin.

 

...

 

For example, do you see how this group of Americans featured here might be the main engine fueling the reason why BLM needed to be created: 

 

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/fbi-white-supremacists-in-law-enforcement

That’s stupid. When you use ratios to account for the disparity in population, blacks are not killed or targeted by police. 
 

You need to stop being so easily indoctrinated. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Str8tEdge said:

That’s stupid. When you use ratios to account for the disparity in population, blacks are not killed or targeted by police. 
 

You need to stop being so easily indoctrinated. 

 

You need to stop being so, dismissive, of factual realities:

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, pmurT said:

 

You need to stop being so, dismissive, of factual realities:

 

 

You haven't presented ONE policy or law that's systemic racism, because it doesn't fucking exist. 

 

When you going to actually PROVE your case, dumb fuck?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Str8tEdge said:

You haven't presented ONE policy or law that's systemic racism, because it doesn't fucking exist. 

 

Stop getting mad at, me, because you somehow duped yourself into thinking the USA has laws which guarantee systematic racism will be present.

You failed to accept tha, racism is immoral and unethical, so it is present only to break the law. And to oppose the law known as Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Which means, that Your obtuse questions here are the equivalent of you asking people are there now new laws that allow citizens to now brutalize or murder cops. LOL. No! It is illegal for citizens to hurt cops, so there won't be any laws allowing citizens to hurt cops LOL it is illegal to have systematic racism, so there won't be any laws that allow systematic racism each time it rears its ugly for 400yrs and counting now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lol Do we now wake up each morning and see Dem mayors letting violent looters riot and throw rocks and bottles at police officers? Yes! Does that mean there are now laws, which allow violent citizens to hurt and kill cops? No.

Do we wake up each morning and see systematic racism toward Blacks? Yes! Does that mean there are now laws, which allow for systematic racism against Blacks? No.

 

You see how logic works, in America?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, pmurT said:

 

Stop getting mad at, me, because you somehow duped yourself into thinking the USA has laws which guarantee systematic racism will be present.

You failed to accept tha, racism is immoral and unethical, so it is present only to break the law. And to oppose the law known as Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Which means, that Your obtuse questions here are the equivalent of you asking people are there now new laws that allow citizens to now brutalize or murder cops. LOL. No! It is illegal for citizens to hurt cops, so there won't be any laws allowing citizens to hurt cops LOL it is illegal to have systematic racism, so there won't be any laws that allow systematic racism each time it rears its ugly for 400yrs and counting now. 

I asked YOU for PROOF of systemic racism and you provided NONE. 

 

Yes. IT IS ILLEGAL to have any kind of systemic racism so why are you trying to claim it still exists, DUMB FUCK???????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Str8tEdge said:

I asked YOU for PROOF of systemic racism and you provided NONE. 

 

Yes. IT IS ILLEGAL to have any kind of systemic racism so why are you trying to claim it still exists, DUMB FUCK???????

 

You were provided factual proof that systematic racism exists, and you could only whine and cry and scream that it doesn't exist. But, your sissified emotions in here are meaningless to systematic racism. lol.

You were even stupid enough to think that systematic racism can somehow be a, law, therefore it only exists if there is a legal policy allowing us White people to be racist.  ROFL

 

Systematic racism is not a policy nor a law, but it is an attitude and an emotion which then creates a culture.

 

iow 

 

Do we now wake up each morning and see Dem governors/Dem mayors letting violent looters riot and throw rocks or bottles at police officers? Yes! Does that mean there are now laws, which allow violent citizens to hurt and kill police officers? No.

Do we wake up each morning and see systematic racism toward Blacks? Yes! Does that mean there are now laws, which allow Whites to be systematically racist against Blacks? No.

 

Have you learned now how logic works, in America?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, pmurT said:

 

Stop getting mad at, me, because you somehow duped yourself into thinking the USA has laws which guarantee systematic racism will be present.

You failed to accept tha, racism is immoral and unethical, so it is present only to break the law. And to oppose the law known as Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Which means, that Your obtuse questions here are the equivalent of you asking people are there now new laws that allow citizens to now brutalize or murder cops. LOL. No! It is illegal for citizens to hurt cops, so there won't be any laws allowing citizens to hurt cops LOL it is illegal to have systematic racism, so there won't be any laws that allow systematic racism each time it rears its ugly for 400yrs and counting now. 

  You need to drop the word "systematic".  Of course there is racism/ racist in America.  There is individual racism/racist on all sides.  Some whites don't like blacks and some blacks don't like whites.

  Not much you can do about a persons thinking except try to change their way of thinking,  Other than that, you can only arrest them when they break the law, THAT includes police, WHEN they break the law.

  Just because someone SAYS someone is a "racist", and THEN makes up some kind of "bullshit evidence" Doesn't mean that person IS a racist. you need to look at ALL the factual evidence, NOT the made-up evidence, or the assumed evidence. but ALL the legit evidence.

  When Martin-Zimmerman happened, I waited until all the real evidence came out before I made up my mind what really happened, not the bullshit evidence ("Zimmerman hunted Martin down like an animal" - " IF I had a son, he would be just like Trayvon", ETC.).

  The same with Ferguson, I listen to ALL the evidence NOT the "bullshit evidence" from Brown's buddies that were standing there

, The neighbors that lived there and witnessed what happened.  You do know that those witnesses were black, I gather AND that THOSE witnesses back-up the police officer's version of what happened.  THAT is why the officer is NOT in jail, because the officer was within the law to use deadly force.  ACTUALLY, even IF he was't a police officer it would STILL been "SELF-DEFENSE"!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, bgr39 said:

  ...Of course there is racism/ racist in America.  There is individual racism 

 

Exactly. And when many individuals come together with their same, exact hatred for negros, then act out that hatred in the USA workplace or other areas of society where they unfairly affect negro stakeholders...then it is called systematic, if that's been the racists' practice for many decades.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, pmurT said:

 

Exactly. And when many individuals come together with their same, exact hatred for negros, then act out that hatred in the USA workplace or other areas of society where they unfairly affect negro stakeholders...then it is called systematic, if that's been the racists' practice for many decades.   

  There are lots of negros that hate white people too.  I can't help them either.

  IF you want to get black and white people together You need to talk about things that we can BOTH affect.

  My opinion is that we need to  stop the blacks from killing each other in the inner city, so the black people can live in safe, crime-free, drug-free neighborhood and feel safe walking the streets with their little kids.

  Too many black people, little kids too (as young as less than 1 year old.) are being gunned down and it is a terrible shame.

  Can we agree on THAT?

  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, bgr39 said:

  There are lots of negros that hate white people too...

 

I know. But that is hatred, so it is not systematic racism.

 

Racism can only exist where it has, public/colossal power, which is used to illegally/immorally exclude other groups according to their Race. White people can do that, because we control all resources within America yes so we can perfect racism. 

Black people cannot do that, because Blacks own no Industry Blacks control no Markets and Blacks dictate no Cultures. So it is not possible for Blacks to be racist in the USA, but they certainly can hate us White people. Big difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

No holds barred chat

  • Hey kfools.. does this help? 


  • By Vegas

    Liberals are going to hell.


  • grgle



  • Where’s at @slideman?


  • Hola


  • I know this one, this new chat thing. I've seen it called the "shoutbox" among other things in my past. Very hard to hide from the chat box. The question is asked, there's no time to go search what other folks think, this is real time. Only seconds should be between chat box replies. This one is made for me. In the chat box one has to be quick on their feet with stuff at the ready. This chat box is the worst nightmare of anyone trying to deal with ol' teach. 


  • By pmurT

    hey @teacher that sounds like too much work for me LOL I need that useless thing called *time* in order to authenticate facts and truths which get posted by deceitful Dems


  • What does the red number refer to? currently, on my screen it says 2

     


  • Where does it say 2?


  • So. In the chat....if you tag a member the text afterwards should be a private message. 


  • How do? I'm teacher. If I'm online and the powers that be can figure out how to make it immediately apparent to me that whatever I've said here has been replied to I'm gonna show up right quick and kick some teeth in. It's the chat box, all this is new and scary. I know this gig. This starts now. 



  • Hey kfools, did you lose your securtiy cert? On my browser it is saying your site is not secure?


  • Mine too. I'm looking into it.


  • Mine too. 


  • I thought it was my location.. 


  • Just gave to renew the security cert. No big deal I'll do it tonight


  • OK thanks

     



  • Happy Anniversary, America... on your Civil Union.


  • All lives matter.


  • Double post deleted.


  • By teacher

    Scroll the other way for a while and you'll see me saying that these days the chat box ain't gonna work as one has to be quick on one's feet. The question is posed, there ain't no stinkin time for ya'll to refer to your betters for the answer, ya'll don't understand these things, this political debate, ya'll don't have the answer at hand, ya'll haven't thought this through, ya'll ain't ready for the next question I'll ask,  ya'll can't handle the pace that a bloke such as I can bring it in the chat box, ya'll can't handle this format.

     

    This one is made for me. 


  • By teacher

    Being offended does not make one correct. 


  • By teacher

    Some few days before the next election Mr. Fools is gonna pin my horse thread. it's gonna be horrible, I shall endevour every day to bring some some fresh. 

     

    I still own this cat box.


  • By teacher

    "I'm coming to you for ask a quick favor."


  • By teacher

    "Anyone that places a color in front of their name is racist." That one is not mine, got it from another member. 


  • Where’s all the hot bitches? 


  • By teacher

    Kidding me? 


You don't have permission to chat in this chatroom
×
×
  • Create New...