Jump to content
Redoctober

To Slideman: CHOP Held A Public Execution

Recommended Posts

Remember, Slideman continually lied about CHOP, saying it was noting, no guns were they and it was just a street market. Now we know it wasn't true, even though we kept telling him this. We also now know that the Cazistani security guards executed a 16 year old boy in cold blood. That is correct. The autopsy showed he was shot a point blank range in the temple. We now have video of the incident with audio just before the final shot was taken.

 

One of the "guards" said "oh your not dead huh. DO you wanna get pistol whipped?"

 


It gets worse. The Chazistanis scrubbed the crime scene so no investigation could take place. 

 

I hope they catch these devils and execute them all. FU Slideman and FU leftists. You are tearing down this country. This is what happens EVERY DAMN TIME THE LEFT IS IN CONTROL. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ass-douche Socialism.

 

@slideman

 

Lord of the Flies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember when liberals on this forum used to say "at least antifa never killed anyone"? Yeah, look at the country these days. They've killed many people now. 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Redoctober said:

Remember, Slideman continually lied about CHOP, saying it was noting, no guns were they and it was just a street market. Now we know it wasn't true, even though we kept telling him this. We also now know that the Cazistani security guards executed a 16 year old boy in cold blood. That is correct. The autopsy showed he was shot a point blank range in the temple. We now have video of the incident with audio just before the final shot was taken.

 

One of the "guards" said "oh your not dead huh. DO you wanna get pistol whipped?"

 


It gets worse. The Chazistanis scrubbed the crime scene so no investigation could take place. 

 

I hope they catch these devils and execute them all. FU Slideman and FU leftists. You are tearing down this country. This is what happens EVERY DAMN TIME THE LEFT IS IN CONTROL. 

 

1 hour ago, Blue Devil said:

Ass-douche Socialism.

 

@slideman

 

Lord of the Flies.

Where did that asshole @slideman go? 
 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Redoctober said:

He slinked away.

 

 

 I am  glad others  are noticing his cowardly behavior

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Str8tEdge said:

 

Where did that asshole @slideman go? 
 

 

 

Apparently, she is too afraid of the painful truth to respond.

 

@slideman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Blue Devil said:

 

Apparently, she is too afraid of the painful truth to respond.

 

@slideman

Slideman is a woman? I just figured him to be a run of the mill whining lliberal dude that acts like a girl. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Redoctober said:

 

I hope they catch these devils and execute them all. FU Slideman and FU leftists. You are tearing down this country. This is what happens EVERY DAMN TIME THE LEFT IS IN CONTROL

The blm niggers and antifa faggots are out of control and need to be dealt with very harshly anywhere they are rioting.

 

This is slimebag's and other moonbats vision for the future of the US:

 

 

https://seed119.bitchute.com/9WF6N0ecQ55u/aEWjQOnrZRg.mp4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Str8tEdge said:

Ya, he's had a rough week. The NYT bent @slideman, @maineman and @IcebergSlim over with another Russiagate part 2. 🤣

the clown had information about the bounties paid for US heads in a February PDB.  Is ANYONE surprised he didn't read about it?  The PDB is THE MOST IMPORTANT document produced on a daily basis for the PRESIDENT.  It is his DUTY to read it.  Not the clown.... probably because he can't read very well, and Fox and Friends is SO much more interesting to him.  Brick wall is waiting for him... or maybe the gallows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, maineman said:

the clown had information about the bounties paid for US heads in a February PDB.  Is ANYONE surprised he didn't read about it?  The PDB is THE MOST IMPORTANT document produced on a daily basis for the PRESIDENT.  It is his DUTY to read it.  Not the clown.... probably because he can't read very well, and Fox and Friends is SO much more interesting to him.  Brick wall is waiting for him... or maybe the gallows.

 

Since when did the left start caring about soldiers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, maineman said:

the clown had information about the bounties paid for US heads in a February PDB.  Is ANYONE surprised he didn't read about it?  The PDB is THE MOST IMPORTANT document produced on a daily basis for the PRESIDENT.  It is his DUTY to read it.  Not the clown.... probably because he can't read very well, and Fox and Friends is SO much more interesting to him.  Brick wall is waiting for him... or maybe the gallows.

According to? Unnamed sources? 😂 The intelligence community stated the president was never briefed because the intelligence was unverified. 

 

Looks like you fell for Russian Collusion part duex. 😆

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

maineman (COWARD) is faced with a conundrum ...

 

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2020/07/02/susan-rice-accidentally-proved-barack-obama-not-trump-is-guilty-of-dereliction-of-duty-n599450

 

Quote

 

Susan Rice Accidentally Proved Barack Obama (Not Trump) Is Guilty of Dereliction of Duty


by Matt Margolis


Despite the fact that the allegation that Trump ignored intelligence on alleged Russian bounties on U.S. troops has been debunked, the left is still clinging to the story, hoping it will be their next Trump/Russia collusion hoax. Barack Obama’s former national security adviser Susan Rice recently penned an op-ed in the New York Times, essentially disputing the claims that Trump wasn’t aware of the intelligence. “   As a former national security adviser, I find it exceedingly difficult to believe that no one told Mr. Trump about this intelligence,” she claimed.

 

Quote

 

Here’s what should have happened. Had I, as national security adviser, received even “raw” reporting that Russia was paying to kill U.S. service members, I would have walked straight into the Oval Office to brief the president.


Contrary to the spin-masters in the White House today, I would not have waited until we had absolute certainty. I would have said, “Mr. President, I want to make sure you are aware that we have troubling reporting that Russia is paying the Taliban to kill our forces in Afghanistan. I will work with the intelligence community to ensure the information is solid. In the meantime, I will convene the national security team to get you some options for how to respond to this apparent major escalation in Russia’s hostile actions.”


If later the president decided, as Mr. Trump did, that he wanted to talk with President Vladimir Putin of Russia at least six times over the next several weeks and invite him to join the Group of 7 summit over the objections of our allies, I would have thrown a red flag: “Mr. President, I want to remind you that we believe the Russians are killing American soldiers. This is not the time to hand Putin an olive branch. It’s the time to punish him.”


This is what would have happened in any prior administration of either political party.

 


According to Rice, “That it apparently did not is deeply troubling and raises myriad questions.”

 

Quote

If Mr. Trump was told about Russian actions, why did he not respond? If he was not told, why not? Are his top advisers utterly incompetent? Are they too scared to deliver bad news to Mr. Trump, particularly about Russia? Is Mr. Trump running a rogue foreign policy utterly divorced from U.S. national interests? If so, why?


Rice’s argument is belied by the facts. The intelligence wasn’t simply “raw” or “unverified.” An “intelligence official with direct knowledge” told Catherine Herridge of CBS News that intel on alleged Russian bounties only reached “low levels” of the NSC but “did not go further” because it was deemed “uncorroborated” and because of “dissent” within the intelligence community regarding its accuracy. The Department of Defense also said there was no corroborating evidence for the Russian bounties claim. An NSC official also told Herridge that a review of Trump’s Presidential Daily Briefings showed that the intelligence assessment about the Russian bounties was not included in them. If the intelligence was disputed and uncorroborated, it seems very unlikely that anyone would have made a point to inform Trump about this intelligence. If presidents were made aware of every bit of disputed and uncorroborated intelligence there was, one can only imagine how little time there would be for anything else.


Nevertheless, Rice concludes that Trump is guilty of dereliction of duty.

 

Quote

What must we conclude from all this? At best, our commander in chief is utterly derelict in his duties, presiding over a dangerously dysfunctional national security process that is putting our country and those who wear its uniform at great risk. At worst, the White House is being run by liars and wimps catering to a tyrannical president who is actively advancing our arch adversary’s nefarious interests.


What Susan Rice didn’t realize when she wrote this op-ed, is that she just made the most compelling case that Barack Obama, her former boss, is the one who is guilty of dereliction of duty.


Applying the Susan Rice standard to Barack Obama


While the evidence is clear that President Trump didn’t ignore the uncorroborated and disputed intelligence about alleged Russian bounties on U.S. troops, we do know that President Obama was repeatedly briefed about the rise of ISIS, but failed to respond to this intelligence.


Is it possible Obama didn’t see the intel? It’s theoretically possible he missed multiple warnings. According to a former aide in the Obama administration, Obama got all his intelligence briefings in writing. “And it’s well-understood why,” explained the aide. “No one sits and watches him read them, and no one can come back later and tell Congress in a closed session that ‘I told the president this specific thing was likely to happen.'”


There are two possible explanations: (1) Obama saw the intelligence and did nothing, or (2) he never saw the intelligence.


Let’s consider the second option for a moment. While the Russian bounties intel only reached low levels at the NSC because it was disputed and uncorroborated, a former Pentagon official confirmed that detailed and specific intelligence about the rise of ISIS was included in Obama’s Presidential Daily Briefings. The intelligence on the rise of ISIS was also described as “highly accurate” and “actionable.”


According to Rice, any national security advisor in a previous administration would have gone to the president with unverified intel of such a serious nature, and would “not have waited until we had absolute certainty.” It stands to reason that any national security advisor in a previous administration would have gone to the president about “highly accurate” and “actionable” intelligence to make sure the president had been briefed on it. Yet, Obama once claimed that the White House was caught off guard about the rise of ISIS.


To channel Susan Rice: This raises myriad questions. If Obama was informed about intelligence about the rise of ISIS, why did he not respond? If he was not told, why not? Were his top advisors utterly incompetent? Were they too scared to deliver bad news to Obama, particularly about the Middle East? Was Obama running a rogue foreign policy utterly divorced from U.S. national interests? If so, why?


Obama’s national security advisor at the time of the rise of ISIS was Susan Rice’s predecessor, Tom Donilon, who served in that position from October 8, 2010 to July 1, 2013. By Susan Rice’s own explanation, Donilon would have “walked straight into the Oval Office to brief the president” on the intelligence. So, even if Obama failed on numerous occasions to read his PDBs on the rise of ISIS, he had to know about it, because he would have been told directly by his national security advisor.


So, according to Susan Rice, Obama knew about the rise of ISIS and did nothing about it. How many Americans and U.S. troops were killed by ISIS or ISIS-inspired individuals because Obama failed to act? Too many.


By Susan Rice’s own words, Barack Obama is guilty of dereliction of duty.

 


And by COWARD's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


No holds barred chat

  • Hey kfools.. does this help? 


  • By Vegas

    Liberals are going to hell.


  • grgle



  • Where’s at @slideman?


  • Hola


  • I know this one, this new chat thing. I've seen it called the "shoutbox" among other things in my past. Very hard to hide from the chat box. The question is asked, there's no time to go search what other folks think, this is real time. Only seconds should be between chat box replies. This one is made for me. In the chat box one has to be quick on their feet with stuff at the ready. This chat box is the worst nightmare of anyone trying to deal with ol' teach. 


  • By pmurT

    hey @teacher that sounds like too much work for me LOL I need that useless thing called *time* in order to authenticate facts and truths which get posted by deceitful Dems


  • What does the red number refer to? currently, on my screen it says 2

     


  • Where does it say 2?


  • So. In the chat....if you tag a member the text afterwards should be a private message. 


  • How do? I'm teacher. If I'm online and the powers that be can figure out how to make it immediately apparent to me that whatever I've said here has been replied to I'm gonna show up right quick and kick some teeth in. It's the chat box, all this is new and scary. I know this gig. This starts now. 



  • Hey kfools, did you lose your securtiy cert? On my browser it is saying your site is not secure?


  • Mine too. I'm looking into it.


  • Mine too. 


  • I thought it was my location.. 


  • Just gave to renew the security cert. No big deal I'll do it tonight


  • OK thanks

     



  • Happy Anniversary, America... on your Civil Union.


  • All lives matter.


  • Double post deleted.


  • By teacher

    Scroll the other way for a while and you'll see me saying that these days the chat box ain't gonna work as one has to be quick on one's feet. The question is posed, there ain't no stinkin time for ya'll to refer to your betters for the answer, ya'll don't understand these things, this political debate, ya'll don't have the answer at hand, ya'll haven't thought this through, ya'll ain't ready for the next question I'll ask,  ya'll can't handle the pace that a bloke such as I can bring it in the chat box, ya'll can't handle this format.

     

    This one is made for me. 


  • By teacher

    Being offended does not make one correct. 


  • By teacher

    Some few days before the next election Mr. Fools is gonna pin my horse thread. it's gonna be horrible, I shall endevour every day to bring some some fresh. 

     

    I still own this cat box.


  • By teacher

    "I'm coming to you for ask a quick favor."


  • By teacher

    "Anyone that places a color in front of their name is racist." That one is not mine, got it from another member. 


  • Where’s all the hot bitches? 


  • By teacher

    Kidding me? 


  • How do I get rid of this chatroom box?


  • How do I get rid of this chatroom box?


  • Get me out of Chatbox!


  • By jefftec

    The chatbox stays expanded and is a nuisance blocking screen images. What setting is there to control/collapse chatbox?


  • By kfools

    Just click the no holds barred to collapse it.


  • By XavierOnassis

    diddle dee dee


  • By teacher

    Like Jesse Ventura said to all that would not take a chew in the movie "Predator." LF.org is a political debate forum. This chatbox just ups the opportunity to go at it. Ya'll have your political views, seems to me that ya'll should have thought these things out and be ready to battle. 


  • By teacher

    Is real time political debate a thing ya'll hide from? What do you morons do if you happen to run into some one with opposing political views on the street? 


  • By teacher

    I've never ran into anyone, in real life,  that said Obama lied. I run into folks that tell me Trump lies. I'm at work. I didn't bring it up. I don't reply, I'm representing a company. Not my place. 


  • By teacher

    Lookie there, all I have to do is get out and come back. Why is it that liberals, when they have a company man before them decide they that is the time they go off? Why would ya'll put a company man into that position? 


  • By teacher

    Chatbox is mine. 


  • By teacher

    There is no such thing as "reverse discrimination." There is only discrimination. To imply that black on white discrimination is reverse discrimination sort of lends some justification to the idea of so-called "reverse discrimination." Any discrimination is wrong. Original idea supplied to me by a man called Kyle. Credit where credit is due.


  • By teacher

    How do? I'm teacher. I told you unwashed masses long ago in this, the chat box what the rules were.  Told you all that I would rule the chat box. Go check it out. Scroll some. The chat box is supposed to be a place where debate can happen damn near instantaneously. At the onset I said that the chat box wouldn't fly and that is because the chat box demands that all needs to be ready for real time debate. Everybody but I fails.


You don't have permission to chat in this chatroom
×
×
  • Create New...