Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
roadkill

St Louis Couple

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, roadkill said:

I see where the couple didn't draw their guns until the mob broke their gate.

 

I would have done the same.

 

I would have shot a couple of rounds in the air, say 45 / 50 degrees over their heads and then pointed and waited their next move.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Johnnie said:

 

I don't know ...

 

To me that couple don't look very familiar with holding a firearm ... or shooting one.

Specially the lady, with her toy gun.

 

I wonder if they had started shooting if the situation got worse ?


Her gun is real. A cheaply made one. That is why I think they are first time owners.  A rich person would never buy such a cheap piece of crap unless they didn’t know what they were getting and/or that was all that was left.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, jerra- said:

 

the couple felt threatened and had the right to defend themselves.

 

the mob broke an iron gate.

My posts agree with you... It appears that you have not kept up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Johnnie said:

 

I would have shot a couple of rounds in the air, say 45 / 50 degrees over their heads and then pointed and waited their next move.

WHY would you do THAT?

That sounds INSANE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

My posts agree with you... It appears that you have not kept up.

 

I was agreeing with you.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

ok, fair enough. 

 

I also wanted to emphasize the broken gate gave the couple every reason to defend themselves

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jerra- said:

 

I also wanted to emphasize the broken gate gave the couple every reason to defend themselves

If the protestors had been walking on a public street/sidewalk, then this is a different story. However, that is not the case. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

If the protestors had been walking on a public street/sidewalk, then this is a different story. However, that is not the case. 

 

today on the view all whoopie goldberg could say was how wrong the couple was to 'brandish' their guns.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jerra- said:

 

today on the view all whoopie goldberg could say was how wrong the couple was to 'brandish' their guns.

Yeah... big swing and a miss for her on this one. They were simply defending themselves. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, XavierOnassis said:

WHY would you do THAT?

That sounds INSANE.

 

Talking to you is like debating a wall.

You've  been thoroughly brainwashed.

Probably by professionals.

 

You're not worth comments other than these; with the idle hope they'll knock some sense into that empty skull of yours.

 

I pity you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Deadric said:


Her gun is real. A cheaply made one. That is why I think they are first time owners.  A rich person would never buy such a cheap piece of crap unless they didn’t know what they were getting and/or that was all that was left.

It looked like a Bersa 380 in stainless.

 

Probably all that was left at Academy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, roadkill said:

Sounds logical to me.

Every state needs castle doctrine. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Str8tEdge said:

Every state needs castle doctrine. 

Castle doctrines should apply ONLY to your domicile.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, XavierOnassis said:

Castle doctrines should apply ONLY to your domicile.

In TN it applies to your automobile too.

 

The law treats the front seat of your car just like it was your recliner at home...

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

Castle doctrines should apply ONLY to your domicile.

Yes and EVERY citizen SHOULD have the right to defend their property through lethal force if necessary. 

 

 

  • Thumb up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Str8tEdge said:

Yes and EVERY citizen SHOULD have the right to defend their property through lethal force if necessary. 

Their homes, yes. But if someone is stealing a garden hose from your yard or some WII discs you ordered from EBay, should you be allowed to kill him?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, XavierOnassis said:

 

NO ONE should be trespassing on private property. You don't respect other people's private property, you don't deserve to be in this country. 

 

If they don't drop the hose and immediately leave the yard? Yes. 

 

The left have ZERO RESPECT for other citizens earnings, property or lives. ZERO. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Str8tEdge said:

NO ONE should be trespassing on private property. You don't respect other people's private property, you don't deserve to be in this country. 

 

If they don't drop the hose and immediately leave the yard? Yes. 

 

The left have ZERO RESPECT for other citizens earnings, property or lives. ZERO. 

You would kill a person over a $9.98 garden hose?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, XavierOnassis said:

You would kill a person over a $9.98 garden hose?

I would kill a person for violating my private property and REFUSING to get off it. 

 

YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO VIOLATE OTHER PEOPLE'S PROPERTY.

 

YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO STEAL OTHER PEOPLES' STUFF.

 

SHOW SOME GOD DAMNED RESPECT, BITCH. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

You would kill a person over a $9.98 garden hose?

It's not the hose you fucking moron, it's where it is located. Stay the fuck off private property.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

You would kill a person over a $9.98 garden hose?

They issue is, do you know if they are willing to kill you over a $9.98 garden hose.

 

I don't, and I ain't takin' no chances.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, LaughinAtLefty said:

It's not the hose your fucking moron, it's where it is located. Stay the fuck off private property.

So if I do NOT kill a person over a $9.98 garden hose I am a moron?  I disagree!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, XavierOnassis said:

So if I do NOT kill a person over a $9.98 garden hose I am a moron?  I disagree!

The hose isn't the point idiot, the property is. If private property, stay the fuck off. People have a right to defend themselves and property - end of story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, LaughinAtLefty said:

It's not the hose you fucking moron, it's where it is located. Stay the fuck off private property.

Jesus, these leftists are fucking sick and twisted. NO respect, no morals, no values. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

No holds barred chat

  • Hey kfools.. does this help? 


  • By Vegas

    Liberals are going to hell.


  • grgle



  • Where’s at @slideman?


  • Hola


  • I know this one, this new chat thing. I've seen it called the "shoutbox" among other things in my past. Very hard to hide from the chat box. The question is asked, there's no time to go search what other folks think, this is real time. Only seconds should be between chat box replies. This one is made for me. In the chat box one has to be quick on their feet with stuff at the ready. This chat box is the worst nightmare of anyone trying to deal with ol' teach. 


  • By pmurT

    hey @teacher that sounds like too much work for me LOL I need that useless thing called *time* in order to authenticate facts and truths which get posted by deceitful Dems


  • What does the red number refer to? currently, on my screen it says 2

     


  • Where does it say 2?


  • So. In the chat....if you tag a member the text afterwards should be a private message. 


  • How do? I'm teacher. If I'm online and the powers that be can figure out how to make it immediately apparent to me that whatever I've said here has been replied to I'm gonna show up right quick and kick some teeth in. It's the chat box, all this is new and scary. I know this gig. This starts now. 



  • Hey kfools, did you lose your securtiy cert? On my browser it is saying your site is not secure?


  • Mine too. I'm looking into it.


  • Mine too. 


  • I thought it was my location.. 


  • Just gave to renew the security cert. No big deal I'll do it tonight


  • OK thanks

     



  • Happy Anniversary, America... on your Civil Union.


  • All lives matter.


  • Double post deleted.


  • By teacher

    Scroll the other way for a while and you'll see me saying that these days the chat box ain't gonna work as one has to be quick on one's feet. The question is posed, there ain't no stinkin time for ya'll to refer to your betters for the answer, ya'll don't understand these things, this political debate, ya'll don't have the answer at hand, ya'll haven't thought this through, ya'll ain't ready for the next question I'll ask,  ya'll can't handle the pace that a bloke such as I can bring it in the chat box, ya'll can't handle this format.

     

    This one is made for me. 


  • By teacher

    Being offended does not make one correct. 


  • By teacher

    Some few days before the next election Mr. Fools is gonna pin my horse thread. it's gonna be horrible, I shall endevour every day to bring some some fresh. 

     

    I still own this cat box.


  • By teacher

    "I'm coming to you for ask a quick favor."


  • By teacher

    "Anyone that places a color in front of their name is racist." That one is not mine, got it from another member. 


  • Where’s all the hot bitches? 


  • By teacher

    Kidding me? 


  • How do I get rid of this chatroom box?


  • How do I get rid of this chatroom box?


  • Get me out of Chatbox!


  • By jefftec

    The chatbox stays expanded and is a nuisance blocking screen images. What setting is there to control/collapse chatbox?


  • By kfools

    Just click the no holds barred to collapse it.


  • By XavierOnassis

    diddle dee dee


  • By teacher

    Like Jesse Ventura said to all that would not take a chew in the movie "Predator." LF.org is a political debate forum. This chatbox just ups the opportunity to go at it. Ya'll have your political views, seems to me that ya'll should have thought these things out and be ready to battle. 


  • By teacher

    Is real time political debate a thing ya'll hide from? What do you morons do if you happen to run into some one with opposing political views on the street? 


  • By teacher

    I've never ran into anyone, in real life,  that said Obama lied. I run into folks that tell me Trump lies. I'm at work. I didn't bring it up. I don't reply, I'm representing a company. Not my place. 


  • By teacher

    Lookie there, all I have to do is get out and come back. Why is it that liberals, when they have a company man before them decide they that is the time they go off? Why would ya'll put a company man into that position? 


  • By teacher

    Chatbox is mine. 


You don't have permission to chat in this chatroom
×
×
  • Create New...