Jump to content
Mirabeau

EXCELLENT ARTICLE ABOUT WHY THE THIRD WORLD WAS BETTER WITH EUROPEANS IN CONTROL

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Toldya said:

 

You support a party that denies evolution.

How many Conservatives or Christians deny evolution; or deny science?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, Mirabeau said:

What are the sub-Saharan nations today that are better off (economically, culturally, educationally) than they were under the rule of the white man.

 

Hint:  Don't start with Southern Rhodesia.

 

NAME THEM!

 

(Watch this, folks!)

Fuckistan! S.Africa?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, AnotherJim said:

How many Conservatives or Christians deny evolution; or deny science?

 

Let's start with the current Vice President.

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/shaenamontanari/2016/11/10/vp-elect-mike-pence-does-not-accept-evolution-heres-why-that-matters/

 

And continue onto this survey that says only 43% of RWNJs actually believed it was real in 2013, down from 54% in 2009.

Can't find a current survey but the trend seems to suggest it's moving towards denial.

 

FT_Belief_Trends1.png

 

Surely you've noticed that several RWNJs on this very site have posted anti-evolution threads and that ZERO left wingers have done the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

I do not.    This is a false claim

 

 

however, you deny that human life begins at conception, which is scientific fact.   

 

The fucking secretary of education funds Intelligent Design groups and is using the charter schools agenda to make sure it is taught to as many children as possible. Textbooks now teach children that the fossil record is 'sketchy', undermining the theory of evolution according to her Christian fascist agenda.

 

You're supporting it even if you don't realize you're supporting it.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

 

Only in certain areas, we have plenty of places that are wide open.  

 

It doesn't matter where they are-- more people means more resources are being consumed, more habitats are being destroyed, more living things are going extinct and more pollution is going into the water, the air and the ground.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Toldya said:

You're supporting it even if you don't realize you're supporting it.

 

 

Therefore you’re supporting globalist fascist socialism even if you don’t realize it.

 

there is nothing inherently wrong with teaching a theory of ID,  which I do not believe in.   I do not fear it as you do.  iD and evolution can even work together.

 

 

i subscribe. to much bigger pictures anyway.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

Therefore you’re supporting globalist fascist socialism even if you don’t realize it.

 

there is nothing inherently wrong with teaching a theory of ID,  which I do not believe in.   I do not fear it as you do.  iD and evolution can even work together.

 

i subscribe. to much bigger pictures anyway.  

 

ID and evolution are not scientific equals... not even close.

'Teach the controversy' is how Christian fascists plan to get their foot in the door and turn schools into extensions of their own hateful cult.

Pseudo-science has NO place in the classroom whatsoever, and neither do 'lessons' about how the fossil record is 'sketchy', pretending the theory of evolution is weaker than it actually is.

If you're going to teach lies, then why not teach them that the world is flat, that cigarettes are good for them, that Elvis is alive, or that lizard people control the government? It's the same fucking thing.

And you vote for it while pretending you're so fucking superior.

 

And 'globalist fascist socialism' is just something you made up.

You sound totally ridiculous when you say it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Toldya said:

Pseudo-science has NO place in the classroom whatsoever

 

Ypu seem fine with the pseudo science of Anthropogenic pogenic Global Warming, right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, EltonJohnson said:

 

Ypu seem fine with the pseudo science of Anthrpogenic Global Warming, right?

 

That's not pseudoscience.

The problem is that you personally don't understand it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Toldya said:

you vote for it while pretending you're so fucking superior.

 

 

libertarianism is supiorior to all other ideologies.   Sorry.    I support freedom 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Toldya said:

 

That's not pseudoscience.

The problem is that you personally don't understand it.

 

 

I have two scientific degrees.   I understand it.   I do not believe it, as it has not been proven.   I think on a much bigger scale than the AGW pinheads.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, EltonJohnson said:

 

 

libertarianism is supiorior to all other ideologies.   Sorry.    I support freedom 

 

You want to force kids to learn pseudoscience purely because Christian fascists have political clout.

That's not freedom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Toldya said:

whatsoever, and neither do 'lessons' about how the fossil record is 'sketchy',

 

 

Ever heard of the London Hammer?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Toldya said:

 

You want to force kids to learn pseudoscience purely because Christian fascists have political clout.

That's not freedom.

 

 

What pseudoscience am I forcing them to learn?   

 

ID?

 

that is not scientific, it is philosophy 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Just now, EltonJohnson said:

 

 

What pseudoscience am I forcing them to learn?   

 

ID?

 

that is not scientific, it is philosophy 

 

ID people don't want to debate it, they don't want it to be presented as a religious belief-- they want it to be held as a scientific equal to evolution, and eventually to REPLACE evolution as the dominant theory of how life works.

 

Look at the thread on this board where dumbasses like 123urout 'prove' that evolution is wrong and stupid and the only explanation for anything is God-- THAT is what you are helping to bring to classrooms.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

Ever heard of the London Hammer?

 

A creationist bought it and refuses to let anyone test it to find out what really happened with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Toldya said:

ID people don't want to debate it, they don't want it to be presented as a religious belief-

 

 

So,  they are like liberals with AGW

 

i laugh at both groups. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Toldya said:

 

A creationist bought it and refuses to let anyone test it to find out what really happened with it.

 

 

Yes, but it messes with the fossil record.  

 

 

Do you belive in the great flood?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, EltonJohnson said:

 

 

Yes, but it messes with the fossil record.  

 

 

Do you belive in the great flood?

 

It doesn't mess with the fossil record because it doesn't actually PROVE anything.

But the fact that the owner refuses to let anyone study it is pretty suspicious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Toldya said:

 

It doesn't mess with the fossil record because it doesn't actually PROVE anything.

But the fact that the owner refuses to let anyone study it is pretty suspicious.

 

 

I was more interested in the flood question

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

 

So,  they are like liberals with AGW

 

i laugh at both groups. 

 

You also laugh at a long list of scientific groups and publications that accept AGW.

The largest 31 of which actually approached congress about it.

 

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/top-u-s-science-organizations-hammer-congress-on-climate-change-mdash-again/

 

But even though the ID people have no such support, you vote them into power.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

 

I was more interested in the flood question

 

What do you want me to say?

I believe that floods occur, and that multiple cultures have flood myths.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Toldya said:

 

So you're saying that if Africans could go back in time and prevent colonization and the slave trade, they wouldn't do it?

LOL no.

 

Technologically advanced doesn't mean superior.

The entire PLANET is in a far more precarious situation now than it would have been if a lot of modern technologies had never existed.

Civilization will be lucky to last another 100 years.

 

Perhaps the 'primitive' cultures had the right idea.

So, cease using your computer, your television, your radio, your air conditioning and your vehicle, ALL OF WHICH WERE INVENTED BY EUROPEANS.

 

You get the prize for the stupidest statement of the week!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Toldya said:

 

What do you want me to say?

I believe that floods occur, and that multiple cultures have flood myths.

 

 

How about polar shifts?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Mirabeau said:

So, cease using your computer, your television, your radio, your air conditioning and your vehicle, ALL OF WHICH WERE INVENTED BY EUROPEANS.

 

You get the prize for the stupidest statement of the week!

 

Okay, genius, I admit it... I am dependent on technology.

I guess that means it is good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


No holds barred chat

  • Hey kfools.. does this help? 


  • By Vegas

    Liberals are going to hell.


  • grgle



  • Where’s at @slideman?


  • Hola


  • I know this one, this new chat thing. I've seen it called the "shoutbox" among other things in my past. Very hard to hide from the chat box. The question is asked, there's no time to go search what other folks think, this is real time. Only seconds should be between chat box replies. This one is made for me. In the chat box one has to be quick on their feet with stuff at the ready. This chat box is the worst nightmare of anyone trying to deal with ol' teach. 


  • By pmurT

    hey @teacher that sounds like too much work for me LOL I need that useless thing called *time* in order to authenticate facts and truths which get posted by deceitful Dems


  • What does the red number refer to? currently, on my screen it says 2

     


  • Where does it say 2?


  • So. In the chat....if you tag a member the text afterwards should be a private message. 


  • How do? I'm teacher. If I'm online and the powers that be can figure out how to make it immediately apparent to me that whatever I've said here has been replied to I'm gonna show up right quick and kick some teeth in. It's the chat box, all this is new and scary. I know this gig. This starts now. 



  • Hey kfools, did you lose your securtiy cert? On my browser it is saying your site is not secure?


  • Mine too. I'm looking into it.


  • Mine too. 


  • I thought it was my location.. 


  • Just gave to renew the security cert. No big deal I'll do it tonight


  • OK thanks

     



  • Happy Anniversary, America... on your Civil Union.


  • By teacher

    All lives matter.


  • By teacher

    Double post deleted.


  • By teacher

    Scroll the other way for a while and you'll see me saying that these days the chat box ain't gonna work as one has to be quick on one's feet. The question is posed, there ain't no stinkin time for ya'll to refer to your betters for the answer, ya'll don't understand these things, this political debate, ya'll don't have the answer at hand, ya'll haven't thought this through, ya'll ain't ready for the next question I'll ask,  ya'll can't handle the pace that a bloke such as I can bring it in the chat box, ya'll can't handle this format.

     

    This one is made for me. 


You don't have permission to chat in this chatroom
×
×
  • Create New...