Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Duck615 said:

Sad state of affairs... we have history for a reason... I hope we don't make the same mistake again!!

Libocrats want to rewrite history to their own liking.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 180
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Frankly , I don’t give a damn 

what a dumb knee jerk reaction        HBO Max pulled the Oscar-winning Civil War epic "Gone With the Wind" from its library amid heightened racial tensions following the death of G

They were replaced with "When Billy has two Daddys" and "Fun with Drag Queens".  

Just now, rippy38 said:

Libocrats want to rewrite history to their own liking.

 

 

and that's where making the same mistake again comes in!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, rippy38 said:

So if I end a sentence with "huh?" it's not a question.

 

That was not a question ( notice no question mark at the end).

 

Go ahead and tell me that is a "strawman fallacy" again.

 

 

"A straw man fallacy occurs when someone takes another person's argument or point, distorts it or exaggerates it in some kind of extreme way, and then attacks the extreme distortion, as if that is really the claim the first person is making."

 

Here is your test:  I say - normal people should not be allowed to own AR-15 style assault rifles.

 

And your response is?

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Pengwin said:

 

"A straw man fallacy occurs when someone takes another person's argument or point, distorts it or exaggerates it in some kind of extreme way, and then attacks the extreme distortion, as if that is really the claim the first person is making."

 

 

Thanks for making my point.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6-10-2020

Blogging Platform Bans Writer For Listing Corporations That Defended Rioters

Post classified as “hate speech, disinformation, and targeted harassment.”

 
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Pengwin said:

 

See above, and really cannot understand this, can you?

 

I asked you a question. You really cannot understand this can you?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chongo said:

6-10-2020

Blogging Platform Bans Writer For Listing Corporations That Defended Rioters

Post classified as “hate speech, disinformation, and targeted harassment.”

 

 

Got an issue with Private Property?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, rippy38 said:

I asked you a question. You really cannot understand this can you?

 

No, it wasn't an actual question.

 

Forget it, you will never understand.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, rippy38 said:

Thanks for making my point.

The straw man was when you characterized his statement as "everything is peachy", which he did not say.  He explained this to you.  

 

You're welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Pengwin said:

 

No, it wasn't an actual question.

 

Forget it, you will never understand.

 

It was a question, one that you avoided.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, rippy38 said:

^^^strawman fallacy^^^

 

Ah, no.  That is an actual question.

 

Does he have an issue with free speech being censored on platforms that are Privately Owned, Private Property?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, splunch said:

The straw man was when you characterized his statement as "everything is peachy", which he did not say.  He explained this to you.  

 

You're welcome.

So birdman is a hypocrite then.

 

See post above...

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, splunch said:

The straw man was when you characterized his statement as "everything is peachy", which he did not say.  He explained this to you.  

 

You're welcome.

 

Thanks for trying but he will never understand.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Pengwin said:

 

Got an issue with Private Property?

 

No. Private property should be aggressively defended from attack.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Pengwin said:

 

No, it wasn't a question and I sick and tied so - drop it.

 

By what you and splunch just said, it was a "strawman fallacy".

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Pengwin said:

 

Got an issue with Private Property?

 

 

In Boston last night, someone cut off the head of the Christopher Columbus statue.

 

"If you white......then you ain't right" !!

                                                                        Dem thought.

"All white children must be taught that the white race is evil, racist, and bad.

The white children must be taught to be ashamed of their race.".

                                                                                                                     Dem thought.                  😟

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, rippy38 said:

Maybe he meant the right to free speech?

 

Lol

Private property is private property, right?  I will defend anyone's rights to do what they want with their private property, and do what they will with those who molest or trespass on that private property. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Skans said:

No. Private property should be aggressively defended from attack.

 

Fine.  And do you also agree that the owners of said property have the right to censor any speech they disapprove of even on a public forum but one that they own and control?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...