Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
slideman

Trump's executive order is not an order

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Str8tEdge said:

No. I propose they not fact check some politicians while giving other a free pass. That influences our election process and becomes subject to government intervention. 

So you want to clamp down on free speech?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Redoctober said:

So you want to clamp down on free speech?

I prefer social media not clamp down on free speech , bug if they want to try and influence elections, they’re begging for a good government intervention. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, Str8tEdge said:

I prefer social media not clamp down on free speech , bug if they want to try and influence elections, they’re begging for a good government intervention. 

They are private companies. You don't have to interact with them. Start your own company.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, XavierOnassis said:

Dumbduck is a deep triple secret Communist mole.

 

There are no communists, sir...But I agree that duck is a mole...Moles are quite the vile thing...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Redoctober said:

They are private companies. You don't have to interact with them. Start your own company.

Private companies cannot intentionally influence political elections. They also have very strict rules on political contributions and changing your algorithm to benefit one candidate over another for example would be considered a political contribution. 

 

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Str8tEdge said:

Private companies cannot intentionally influence political elections. They also have very strict rules on political contributions and changing your algorithm to benefit one candidate over another for example would be considered a political contribution. 

 

 

Informing the public that a politician is LYING and directing the conversation to the correct version is a public service. Trump has no chance of willing this in court.

  • MORON! 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Redoctober said:

don't see any difference between what you are saying here and what authoritarian liberals say

 

 

Fake news is the enemy of the people.

 

we are living in strange times, were mega corps are controlling the information..

 

 

its not lke Trump is trying to silence the spread of truth, he is trying to make sure the truth is not silenced.  

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

Informing the public that a politician is LYING and directing the conversation to the correct version is a public service.

 

 

Yes...   they didn’t do it when Obama was lying

 

you said nothing

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Redoctober said:

So you want to clamp down on free speech?

 

Trump wants free speech.

 

the media mega corps are silencing speech.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, EltonJohnson said:

The left is built on lies.  

Come on...don't be an idiot.  The first amendment protects us from interference in free expression by the government, not by private businesses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, IkeBana said:

The first amendment protects us from interference in free expression by the government, not by private businesses.

 

we are in  interesting  times... the  private business have made themselves a  platform for speech and they  are silencing and suppressing an entire ideology

 

Do you deny this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Str8tEdge said:

Private companies cannot intentionally influence political elections. They also have very strict rules on political contributions and changing your algorithm to benefit one candidate over another for example would be considered a political contribution. 

 

 

WOW! I see conservatism has died. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

Trump wants free speech.

 

the media mega corps are silencing speech.  

You can't polish a turd.

 

You trump supporters not conservatives or for small government. You are for big government, as long as it is your type of big government. And following a cult of personality populist like Trump through this show of cracking down on fake news is further proof of that. 

 

Conservatism as died and Trump supporters killed it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Redoctober said:

WOW! I see conservatism has died. 

Conservatism isn't giving tech corps the right to  drastically alter and influence our political landscape. 

Quote

 

https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/5/27/21271157/tech-billionaires-joe-biden-reid-hoffman-laurene-powell-jobs-dustin-moskovitz-eric-schmidt

 

Tech billionaires are plotting sweeping, secret plans to boost Joe Biden

Inside the experiments, data wars, and partisan news sites that Silicon Valley thinks can help Biden catch up to Trump.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/28/2020 at 5:46 PM, slideman said:

In a statement sent to reporters, Kate Ruane, senior legislative counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union, argued that Trump “has no authority to rewrite a congressional statute with an executive order imposing a flawed interpretation of Section 230. Section 230 incentivizes platforms to host all sorts of content without fear of being held liable for it. It enables speech, not censorship.”


Trump may have made a strategic blunder. Twitter knows the law and it will not back down. It recently blocked one of Trump’s idiotic tweets. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Olivaw said:


Trump may have made a strategic blunder. Twitter knows the law and it will not back down. It recently blocked one of Trump’s idiotic tweets. 

Laws are about to change and social media invited government intervention. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Str8tEdge said:

🙄From the idiots supporting illegal spying, entrapment, coerced pleas and prosecution of political opponents based on nothing. Don’t they actually do that in communist countries? 😅

Speaking of arguing from false premises...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

Trump wants free speech.

 

the media mega corps are silencing speech.  


Trump wants his own free speech. 

He doesn’t want Twitter execs to exercise their free speech right to fact check his lies. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, theLion said:

Speaking of arguing from false premises...

Speaking of shut your fucking mouth because you're too stupid to make a valid point. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Str8tEdge said:

Speaking of shut your fucking mouth because you're too stupid to make a valid point. 

Surrender accepted. 

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Str8tEdge said:

Laws are about to change and social media invited government intervention. 

 


Authoritarians  love to intervene in the dissemination of speech. Trump may well have just revealed his true colors. It will not end well for him. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, theLion said:

Surrender accepted. 

 

Quote

 

https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/5/27/21271157/tech-billionaires-joe-biden-reid-hoffman-laurene-powell-jobs-dustin-moskovitz-eric-schmidt

 

Tech billionaires are plotting sweeping, secret plans to boost Joe Biden

Inside the experiments, data wars, and partisan news sites that Silicon Valley thinks can help Biden catch up to Trump.

 

 

 

You're on record as now supporting secret billion dollar programs by private industry to subvert our democratic process. Behind EVERY leftist is a fascist in hiding. 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Olivaw said:


Authoritarians  love to intervene in the dissemination of free speech. Trump showed his true colors. It will not end well for him. 

So intentionally and secretly  changing a search algorithm to benefit one political candidate over another, is free speech?

 

How about twitter selectively fact checking politicians? You call THAT free speech? 😆

 

Remember when the left wanted to ELIMINATE corporate influence in our political process????? Now they support it with a blank check. 😆

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like government is about to get all up in social medias business and they begged for it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Olivaw said:


Trump wants his own free speech. 

He doesn’t want Twitter execs to exercise their free speech right to fact check his lies. 

 

 

So Trump doesn’t have the right to free speech?

 

the fact checking was proven to be wrong, how do rectify that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

No holds barred chat

  • By Imgreatagain

    Hey kfools.. does this help? 


  • By Vegas

    Liberals are going to hell.


  • By deezer shoove

    grgle


  • By rippy38

  • By Str8tEdge

    Where’s at @slideman?


  • By Robot88

    Hola


  • By teacher

    I know this one, this new chat thing. I've seen it called the "shoutbox" among other things in my past. Very hard to hide from the chat box. The question is asked, there's no time to go search what other folks think, this is real time. Only seconds should be between chat box replies. This one is made for me. In the chat box one has to be quick on their feet with stuff at the ready. This chat box is the worst nightmare of anyone trying to deal with ol' teach. 


  • By pmurT

    hey @teacher that sounds like too much work for me LOL I need that useless thing called *time* in order to authenticate facts and truths which get posted by deceitful Dems


  • By impartialobserver

    What does the red number refer to? currently, on my screen it says 2

     


  • By kfools

    Where does it say 2?


  • By kfools

    So. In the chat....if you tag a member the text afterwards should be a private message. 


  • By teacher

    How do? I'm teacher. If I'm online and the powers that be can figure out how to make it immediately apparent to me that whatever I've said here has been replied to I'm gonna show up right quick and kick some teeth in. It's the chat box, all this is new and scary. I know this gig. This starts now. 



  • By Duck615

    Hey kfools, did you lose your securtiy cert? On my browser it is saying your site is not secure?


  • By kfools

    Mine too. I'm looking into it.


  • By Imgreatagain

    Mine too. 


  • By Imgreatagain

    I thought it was my location.. 


  • By kfools

    Just gave to renew the security cert. No big deal I'll do it tonight


  • By Duck615

    OK thanks

     


  • By king of the county

    Test


  • By Blue Devil

    Happy Anniversary, America... on your Civil Union.


You don't have permission to chat in this chatroom
×
×
  • Create New...