Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
RichClem

The Wuhan Virus con job

Recommended Posts

I believe Trump acted appropriately before we knew how dangerous this virus was.


But  we're way, way beyond that point and have been for weeks.

 

We might well have sent the country and the world into a depression for no good reason. As strong as Trump is, he could not stand up to a media / fake science onslaught this powerful.

 

Nor will those responsible for this catastrophe ever be held to fair account.

 

Quote

The CDC confirms remarkably low coronavirus death rate. Where is the media?


Daniel Horowitz
Most people are more likely to wind up six feet under because of almost anything else under the sun other than COVID-19.

The CDC just came out with a report that should be earth-shattering to the narrative of the political class, yet it will go into the thick pile of vital data and information about the virus that is not getting out to the public. For the first time, the CDC has attempted to offer a real estimate of the overall death rate for COVID-19, and under its most likely scenario, the number is 0.26%. Officials estimate a 0.4% fatality rate among those who are symptomatic and project a 35% rate of asymptomatic cases among those infected, which drops the overall infection fatality rate (IFR) to just 0.26% — almost exactly where Stanford researchers pegged it a month ago.

....Until now, we have been ridiculed for thinking the death rate was that low, as opposed to the 3.4% estimate of the World Health Organization, which helped drive the panic and the lockdowns. Now the CDC is agreeing to the lower rate in plain ink.

Plus, ultimately we might find out that the IFR is even lower because numerous studies and hard counts of confined populations have shown a much higher percentage of asymptomatic cases. Simply adjusting for a 50% asymptomatic rate would drop their fatality rate to 0.2% – exactly the rate of fatality Dr. John Ionnidis of Stanford University projected.

.
EYdd-PvXQAE72t2?format=jpg&name=small

.....We destroyed our entire country and suspended democracy all for a lie, and these people perpetrated the unscientific degree of panic. Will they ever admit the grave consequences of their error?
https://www.conservativereview.com/news/horowitz-cdc-confirms-remarkably-low-coronavirus-death-rate-media/

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
  • IDIOT! 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This means that the Stanford scientists were right, and they said calimexico should not have been shut down ever.  The science that the politicians were listening to was wrong.  How bout that for science of the libtart lefty nuntwacks that have put our nation near the destruct button.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, slideman said:

Sure a hundred thousand people didn't die.

The survival rate is 98%

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Duck615 said:

The survival rate is 98%

 

27 minutes ago, slideman said:

That is untrue

 

You're correct, troll, but for the wrong reason. The survival rate is approx 99.7%.

 

Why didn't you read my first post?


Because like all trolls, you don't give a rat's ass what the truth is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, RichClem said:

I believe Trump acted appropriately before we knew how dangerous this virus was.

 

 

You run with that.  His approval rating on this is what, 35%?

 

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, RichClem said:

I believe Trump acted appropriately before we knew how dangerous this virus was.


But  we're way, way beyond that point and have been for weeks.

 

We might well have sent the country and the world into a depression for no good reason. As strong as Trump is, he could not stand up to a media / fake science onslaught this powerful.

 

Nor will those responsible for this catastrophe ever be held to fair account.

 

 

And the propaganda war against HQ by the corrupt liberal MSM and others is appalling.

 

If Americans are scared away from this drug on zero basis, many will die.

 

Quote

Dr. Drew Defends President Trump’s Decision To Take Hydroxychloroquine!
By The Scoop

The liberal anti-Trump Fox 11 host tried to get Dr. Drew to attack President Trump for taking hydroxychloroquine, but Dr. Drew did not take the bait.

.

 


https://youtu.be/Kc_vo_MZoT8
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/05/watch-dr-drew-defends-president-trumps-decision-take-hydroxychloroquine/

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, slideman said:

Sure a hundred thousand people didn't die.

We don't have the number data yet.

 

 

There I credible evidence the count may be wrong

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, kfools said:

We don't have the number data yet.

 

 

There I credible evidence the count may be wrong

Yes the epidemiologists are saying it is low

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, slideman said:

Yes the epidemiologists are saying it is low

Some are. Some aren't.

 

The ones who aren't you won't find credible because it doesn't support your narrative of "Trump killed zillions"

 

Michigan isn't under lockdown. Things seem to be getting a bit better. 

 

We just don't know yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, kfools said:

Some are. Some aren't.

 

The ones who aren't you won't find credible because it doesn't support your narrative of "Trump killed zillions"

 

Michigan isn't under lockdown. Things seem to be getting a bit better. 

 

We just don't know yet.

I have not claimed Trump killed zillions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, slideman said:

I have not claimed Trump killed zillions.

But you think somehow he is responsible for the 100,000 deaths so far? Correct?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, kfools said:

But you think somehow he is responsible for the 100,000 deaths so far? Correct?

No I wouldn't say that. I would say he is trying to minimize the severity of the problem and encouraging reopening sooner than might be optimal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, kfools said:

But you think somehow he is responsible for the 100,000 deaths so far? Correct?

 

His watch, his deaths.  That's how it works here.

 

Benghazi, anyone?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Pengwin said:

 

His watch, his deaths.  That's how it works here.

 

Benghazi, anyone?

 

Was Benghazi a naturally occuring event?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, kfools said:

Was Benghazi a naturally occuring event?

 

And why, exactly, would that matter?  His watch, he eats it.

 

No one ever said it was fair.  Lincoln, good guy (bad war).

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Pengwin said:

 

And why, exactly, would that matter?  His watch, he eats it.

That's just rediculous. Reasonable people don't think that way.

8 minutes ago, Pengwin said:

No one ever said it was fair.  Lincoln, good guy (bad war).

 

 

Bloodthirsty monster.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, kfools said:

That's just rediculous. Reasonable people don't think that way.

 

 

You don't think that way, history does.

 

Clinton and Obama didn't get Stevens dead, so why are they the names that come up when Benghazi does?

 

Oh, right, their watch. That's how it works. No one said it was fair.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Pengwin said:

 

And why, exactly, would that matter?  His watch, he eats it.

 

No one ever said it was fair.  Lincoln, good guy (bad war).

 

 

His watch?

People don't think that way...

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, king of the county said:

Them too

Fuckin communist Chinese bastards and Fuckin communist Democrats are working together to influence the 2020 election.

 

Look you blue state bastard Governors, you can only stay closed for so long and then the people are going to riot and throw your ass to the curb.

The voters have figured it out! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, RichClem said:

 

 

You're correct, troll, but for the wrong reason. The survival rate is approx 99.7%.

 

Why didn't you read my first post?


Because like all trolls, you don't give a rat's ass what the truth is.

+1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...