Jump to content
BeAChooser

Is Obama’s Long History of Playing Dirty Finally Catching Up With Him?

Recommended Posts

https://amgreatness.com/2020/05/11/is-obamas-long-history-of-playing-dirty-finally-catching-up-with-him/

 

Quote

 

Is Obama’s Long History of Playing Dirty Finally Catching Up With Him? 


The unraveling of the Michael Flynn case and ongoing investigation into Obama’s Justice Department should put an end to the preposterous claim that his administration was “scandal-free.”


by Julie Kelly


As it became clear Mitt Romney would be the Republican presidential nominee in 2012, the Obama campaign fired up its Chicago-style machine to attack the incumbent president’s election foe. Team Obama identified several Romney donors to smear publicly; one was a wealthy businessman from Idaho.


A former Democratic Senate staffer, according to a 2012 editorial in the Wall Street Journal, contacted an Idaho courthouse seeking the divorce records of Frank VanderSloot, who had donated $1 million to Romney’s campaign. The operative was traced to a professional opposition research shop based in Washington, D.C.


The name of the outfit? Fusion GPS. “Fusion GPS is run by a former Wall Street Journal reporter, Glenn Simpson, who wouldn’t say who is paying him for this high-minded slumming but said in an email that Mr. VanderSloot was a ‘legitimate’ target because of ‘his record on gay issues,’” the Journal wrote.


As we now know, that would not be the last time Obama loyalists would hire Fusion GPS to oversee its dirt-digging operation. Nor was it the first time Obama sought to unseal divorce records to ruin a political opponent.


Obama’s pathway to winning the Illinois U.S. Senate seat in 2004 was cleared after divorce records of his Democratic primary opponent, who had been in the lead, were made public just weeks before the election. After Obama won the primary, the Chicago Tribune sued to get the divorce settlement of Jack Ryan, Obama’s Republican opponent, unsealed. (Many suspect at the behest of Obama advisor and longtime Tribune columnist David Axelrod.) Embarrassing details sank Ryan’s candidacy and he dropped out of the race. Obama won the seat with 70 percent of the vote.


No one wins the presidency without using hardball tactics to get there. Barack Obama is a special case, however, because the media not only covered for him but aided his scorched-earth tactics while he alternated between feigning either innocence or ignorance. This lasted during his two presidential campaigns and eight years in the White House.


The same pattern has been playing out the last four years. In May 2016, the Democrats hired Fusion GPS again to destroy Barack Obama’s rival, Donald Trump. But this time, the artillery would involve the world’s most powerful law enforcement agency, a secret court, and the full complicity of the national news media.


And as the biggest scandal in American political history has unfolded, Obama’s media accomplices have denied, excused, and/or justified his involvement while desperately creating other scandals to serve as diversions. To date, the former president has not faced one question about what he knew and when he knew it. His vice president, safely bunkered in his home studio away from uninvited media scrutiny, is enjoying the same protection despite Joe Biden’s known participation in the Trump-Russia collusion ruse.


Obama’s unmatched political good luck, however, might finally have run out. Fox News Channel’s Ed Henry reported that acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell delivered more secret documents to the Justice Department last week that could prove “Barack Obama knew about a lot of this with Michael Flynn a lot earlier than we know.”


That news jives with recent revelations pointing to Obama’s behind-the-scenes management in the targeting of Flynn, a one-time Obama intelligence official who landed on the president’s unforgiving hit list. According to court documents, Obama himself was the source of the leak about the infamous call between Flynn and Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak.


In her August 2017 interview with Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s lawyers, former acting Attorney General Sally Yates revealed that President Obama notified her about the Flynn-Kislyak call “on January 5, 2017 while in the Oval Office,” the notes detail. That briefing, held for the ostensible purpose of discussing the intelligence community assessment on Russia’s election interference, also included Joe Biden, James Clapper, James Comey, John Brennan, and Susan Rice.


“After the briefing, Obama dismissed the group but asked Yates and Comey to stay behind. Obama started by saying he had ‘learned of the information about Flynn’ and his conversation with Kislyak about sanctions,” Yates told investigators. “At that point, Yates had no idea what the president was talking about.” Turns out, Obama and Comey were setting her up to pursue the bogus Logan Act allegations, which she did.


Yates’s bombshell is just the latest proof to tie “No Drama” Obama to the collusion hoax. During that same briefing, Comey, Clapper, and Obama discussed how to present the so-called “pee tape” claim in the Steele dossier to President-elect Trump the next day. Comey said Obama raised his eyebrows up and down “like a Groucho Marx thing” when his FBI director explained how he would spook the incoming president with the salacious accusation.


Obama’s awareness of Comey’s activities, in fact, can be traced back months before Election Day. The report by Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz confirmed that Comey discussed the counterintelligence probe of the Trump campaign with Obama in the Oval Office sometime in August 2016. (Rice, Clapper, and Brennan also attended that same meeting.)


And of course, we already know, thanks to texts between FBI lovers Peter Strzok and Lisa Page in the summer of 2016, that the “White House is running this,” and the “[president of the United States] wants to know everything we are doing.”


This overwhelming and shocking evidence, however, has been of no interest to marquee media organizations such as CNN and the New York Times while a handful of conservative outlets, including American Greatness, and anonymous Twitter accounts have done the heavy lifting.


But it seems like Obama might be getting a little nervous. Yahoo News reporter Michael Isikoff, the same dutiful Democratic Party scribe that published the first dossier-sourced article about the FBI’s interest in Carter Page, posted a “leaked” tape of the former president complaining about the Flynn case.


“The news over the last 24 hours I think has been somewhat downplayed, about the Justice Department dropping charges against Michael Flynn,” Obama is heard saying. “That’s the kind of stuff where you begin to get worried that basic—not just institutional norms—but our basic understanding of rule of law is at risk. And when you start moving in those directions, it can accelerate pretty quickly as we’ve seen in other places.”


Obama’s attempted damage control could be coming too late for him. Trump spent most of the weekend suggesting on Twitter and in interviews that the wagons are circling around his predecessor. “He got caught, Obamagate!” the president tweeted Sunday. The hashtag #ObamaGate dominated Twitter for most of Sunday into Monday.


But Obama and his cronies have more to worry about than Trump’s mean tweets. U.S. Attorney John Durham is moving “full throttle” on his criminal investigation into Obama Administration officials, according to Fox News. Durham’s inquiry is so far-reaching that other U.S. attorneys now are involved. “They farmed the investigation out because it is too much for Durham and he didn’t want to be distracted,” said one source.


It could be that Obama’s arrogance and sense of political invincibility, bolstered by years of media swooning, finally has caught up with the one-time community organizer. The unraveling of the Flynn case and continued investigation into Obama’s Justice Department will put an end to the preposterous claim that his administration is “scandal-free.” Quite to the contrary, the history books will have to tell the story of the most scandal-ridden presidential administration of all time—and it won’t be Donald Trump’s.

 

 

It's coming folks.   A lot later than I thought but then what happened was far more complex and extensive than anyone at first thought.   But it's coming.   Probably after the reelection of Trump when going after Obama, Hillary and all the others in a court of law won't mobilize the left's stupidest voters.  When there will be four more years to totally destroy everyone ... EVERYONE ... who was involved in this.   But get ready ... it's coming ...

 

ec30b6171c3857df54a28c145a3fd3e9.png

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And the one oversight in the above article?   Hillary and Bill Clinton were up to their necks in this too.   Many of the people named had allegiance to them before Obama came along and still have allegiance to them.   So when IT comes ... make sure to bring them the justice they so rightly deserve too, President Trump.   

 

ec30b6171c3857df54a28c145a3fd3e9.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, BeAChooser said:

https://amgreatness.com/2020/05/11/is-obamas-long-history-of-playing-dirty-finally-catching-up-with-him/

 

 

It's coming folks.   A lot later than I thought but then what happened was far more complex and extensive than anyone at first thought.   But it's coming.   Probably after the reelection of Trump when going after Obama, Hillary and all the others in a court of law won't mobilize the left's stupidest voters.  When there will be four more years to totally destroy everyone ... EVERYONE ... who was involved in this.   But get ready ... it's coming ...

 

ec30b6171c3857df54a28c145a3fd3e9.png

 

Let’s see what happens at the speed this is playing out if Biden wins in November nothing will happen to anyone 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, BeAChooser said:

It's coming folks.   A lot later than I thought but then what happened was far more complex and extensive than anyone at first thought.

 

 

A  big part of  the   Russia  Hoax and  Impeachment was to  delay  for this reason

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, king of the county said:

Let’s see what happens at the speed this is playing out if Biden wins in November nothing will happen to anyone 

 

 

yeah,  they  need to  have this  wrapped up  ASAP...     it will tarnish  everyone, and I am sure  Trump has this timed for a reason

 

Grenell was a chess move.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, king of the county said:

Let’s see what happens at the speed this is playing out if Biden wins in November nothing will happen to anyone 

 

LOL!   You really think Biden has a ghost of a chance of winning.   Have you watched him lately?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BeAChooser said:

You really think Biden has a ghost of a chance of winning.  

 

I am sure they will put someone else in

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

yeah,  they  need to  have this  wrapped up  ASAP...     it will tarnish  everyone, and I am sure  Trump has this timed for a reason

 

Hope you're right.   I'd LOVE to see DOZENS of indictments begin to come down this summer or early fall.

 

2 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

Grenell was a chess move.

 

Yes.   You might appreciate this ...

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/05/11/satchel-contents-identified-grenell-moves-to-unmask-the-unmaskers/

 

Quote

 

Satchel Contents Identified – Grenell Moves to Unmask the Unmaskers…

 

by sundance


Last week it was noted that Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard “Ric” Grenell delivered a satchel of classified documents to AG Bill Barr.  The exact content of the documents was unknown.


Today ABC is reporting that Grenell has requested AG Bill Barr use the declassification authority, granted to him by President Trump in May 2019, to declassify the list of Obama officials who requested unmaskings of Trump campaign and administration officials.


ric-grenell-the-satchel.jpg
 

Quote

 

WASHINGTON – Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell has sought to declassify a list of former Obama administration officials who were allegedly involved in the so-called “unmasking” of former national security adviser Michael Flynn in his conversations with the former Russian ambassador during the presidential transition, a senior U.S. official tells ABC News.


[…] His visit indicates his focus on an issue previously highlighted in 2017 by skeptics of the investigation into the Trump campaign’s contacts with Russia, specifically allegations that former officials improperly unveiled Flynn’s identity from intercepts of his call with former Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak.


[…] Former Obama national security adviser Susan Rice has openly acknowledged unmasking the identities of some senior Trump officials during the presidential transition but has strenuously denied ever leaking any identities and said nothing she did was politically motivated.


[…] In 2017, Rep. Devin Nunes — a longtime critic of the Russia investigation — accused the Obama administration of improper unmasking of Trump transition officials after he secretly met with two national security officials at the White House who he said provided him with documents supporting his assertions. (more)

 


March 27, 2017, then House Intelligence Committee Chairman, Devin Nunes, held a brief press conference and stated he was provided intelligence reports brought to him by unnamed sources including ‘significant information’ about President-Elect Trump and his transition team.


These reports included unmaskings of President Trump campaign officials; and included Donald Trump himself….  You know what that means:

 

Quote

 

1.) …”On numerous occasions the [Obama] intelligence community incidentally collected information about U.S. citizens involved in the Trump transition.”


2.)  “Details about U.S. persons associated with the incoming administration; details with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value were widely disseminated in intelligence community reporting.”


3.) “Third, I have confirmed that additional names of Trump transition members were unmasked.”


4.) “Fourth and finally, I want to be clear; none of this surveillance was related to Russia, or the investigation of Russian activities, or of the Trump team.


“The House Intelligence Committee will thoroughly investigate surveillance and its subsequent dissemination, to determine a few things here that I want to read off:”


    ▪    “Who was aware of it?”
    ▪    “Why it was not disclosed to congress?”
    ▪    “Who requested and authorized the additional unmasking?”
    ▪    “Whether anyone directed the intelligence community to focus on Trump associates?”
    ▪    “And whether any laws, regulations or procedures were violated?”


“I have asked the Directors of the FBI, NSA and CIA to expeditiously comply with my March 15th letter -that you all received a couple of weeks ago- and to provide a full account of these surveillance activities.”

 

 


trump-tweet-spying-1.jpg

 


The next week, April 4, 2017, you already know the routine.  MSNBC is the favorable proprietary venue. Andrea Mitchell plays the role of media-legal-adviser, her client is Susan Rice.  Live interviews are always the greatest risk (see: Evelyn Farkas)  The full interview is below:


susan-rice-4.jpg


There are some interesting aspects to the interview:

 

Quote

Susan Rice @00:51 – …”Let me explain how this works.  I was a National Security Adviser, my job is to protect the American people and the security of our country.  That’s the same as the Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense and CIA Director.; and every morning, to enable us to do that, we receive – from the intelligence community – a compilation of intelligence reports that the IC, the intelligence community, has selected for us –on a daily basis– to give us the best information as to what’s going on around the world.”


[Note, Susan Rice is describing the PDB]

 

Quote

 

“I received those reports, as did other officials, and there were occasions when I would receive a report in which, uh, a ‘U.S Person’ was referred to.  Name, uh, not provided, just ‘U.S. Person’.


And sometimes in that context, in order to understand the importance in the report – and assess it’s significance, it was necessary to find out or request, who that U.S. official was.”

 


OK, so right there, in the very beginning of the forward narrative, Susan Rice is confirming the “unmasking” request(s) which can be pinned upon her, are directly related to her need to understand -on behalf of President Obama- intelligence for the President’s Daily Briefing (the PDB).  This was a previous question now answered.


This is EXPLOSIVE, and here’s why.


Remember, the President’s Daily Brief under President Obama went to almost everyone at top levels in his administration.  Regarding the Obama PDB:

 

Quote

 

[…]  But while through most of its history the document has been marked “For the President’s Eyes Only,” the PDB has never gone to the president alone. The most restricted dissemination was in the early 1970s, when the book went only to President Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger, who was dual-hatted as national security adviser and secretary of state.


In other administrations, the circle of readers has also included the vice president, the secretary of defense and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, along with additional White House staffers.


By 2013, Obama’s PDB was making its way to more than 30 recipients, including the president’s top strategic communications aide and speechwriter, and deputy secretaries of national security departments. (link)

 


Susan Rice is admitting to “unmasking” names within intelligence reports to give her context for how they pertain to the overall briefing material. That briefing material is the PDB. That PDB goes to dozens of political people and political entities.


With dozens of people with access to President Obama’s PDB, Rice’s unmasking of the intelligence report names gave dozens of people direct access to unmasked intelligence – including Obama officials who could, perhaps did, use the PDB for specific and intentional political purposes.


schiff-and-grenell.jpg

 


THIS IS OUTRIGHT SEDITION, FOLKS.   There is no other word for it.   Barr and the DOJ had better prosecute it as such.   No hand slapping and miss no names of those involved in this ... including Barack himself.  

 

Barr’s biggest problem isn’t what we don’t know … it’s what WE THE PEOPLE already know.  

 

If he tries to sweep this under the rug, rather than prosecute these people to the full extent of the law, he may end up behind bars as well.   We’re not accepting excuses this time.    

 

Just saying …

 

ec30b6171c3857df54a28c145a3fd3e9.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

I am sure they will put someone else in

 

No, not going to happen. Take my word for it here. That "talk" is what you get in the back room of a brothel and not much else.

 

Biden is "their guy" and if he wasn't, he would have been LONG AGO "replaced" when there would not be a required "moving of the mountain" to do so.

 

Biden is nothing more than the Demoshit's "sacrificial lamb" and they can blame his "Alzheimer's" for losing.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BeAChooser said:

 

LOL!   You really think Biden has a ghost of a chance of winning.   Have you watched him lately?

Anything is possible 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

 

yeah,  they  need to  have this  wrapped up  ASAP...     it will tarnish  everyone, and I am sure  Trump has this timed for a reason

 

Grenell was a chess move.

Just get the facts out ok?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BeAChooser said:

 

Hope you're right.   I'd LOVE to see DOZENS of indictments begin to come down this summer or early fall.

 

 

Yes.   You might appreciate this ...

 

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/05/11/satchel-contents-identified-grenell-moves-to-unmask-the-unmaskers/

 


THIS IS OUTRIGHT SEDITION, FOLKS.   There is no other word for it.   Barr and the DOJ had better prosecute it as such.   No hand slapping and miss no names of those involved in this ... including Barack himself.  

 

Barr’s biggest problem isn’t what we don’t know … it’s what WE THE PEOPLE already know.  

 

If he tries to sweep this under the rug, rather than prosecute these people to the full extent of the law, he may end up behind bars as well.   We’re not accepting excuses this time.    

 

Just saying …

 

ec30b6171c3857df54a28c145a3fd3e9.png

Wow 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt any of the big names get indicted or prosecuted.  And unfortunatley the MSM media, Obama's PR firm,  will do all it can to ignore it or mention it only to spin it in order to protect Obama's legacy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Huey said:

I doubt any of the big names get indicted or prosecuted.  

 

The only ones who *might* be immune are Obama and Hillary ... but then they could be put on the witness stand and forced to implicate all the rest facing a perjury trap if they didn't.   The problem for them now is not what we don't know but what we do know.   And doing that would effectively destroy their image amongst democRATS.    Truth is that I really don't see a downside to Trump and company going after all of them.   All of them.    Remember ... Trump is NOT part of the deep state.  And this is WAR. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting …


https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/05/12/abc-report-doj-official-we-do-not-intend-to-release-the-unmasking-list/#more-191533

 

Quote

 

ABC Report – DOJ Official: “We Do Not Intend To Release The Unmasking List” – The Documents are a DNI Equity…


by sundance


… snip …


Today ABC is reporting from senior DOJ officials “”we do not intend to release the [unmasking] list” that Grenell brought over to the building last week.”


abc-tweet-doj-unmasking.jpg


Considering the content of the files likely delivered to AG Barr it is worth remaining patient.  No-one is more cynical than me about DOJ hiding stuff; but this ain’t that.


The declassified documents are not a DOJ equity, they are a DNI equity, the DNI can release them.  For the DOJ the declassified documents are evidence.

 

 

Evidence of criminal behavior.
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, fishhead said:

Smoke and mirrors. Trump has 70,000 dead. He's through.

  Make that over 80,000.

 It's all just to divert attention away from his dismal future in his response to the virus.

 There won't be indictment one but he gets these morons riled up with his lies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Squatchman said:

  Make that over 80,000.

 It's all just to divert attention away from his dismal future in his response to the virus.

 There won't be indictment one but he gets these morons riled up with his lies.

Liberals kill more babies each and every year

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, fishhead said:

Smoke and mirrors. Trump has 70,000 dead. He's through.

 

2 million dead without the Pence-CDC Team.

Trump is just the spokesman for the Team.                                                 

No one could do better.                                                     🥃

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Duck615 said:

Liberals kill more babies each and every year

  You kill more buzzards with your breath.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, fishhead said:

Smoke and mirrors. Trump has 70,000 dead. He's through.

 

Yet his poll numbers are looking great.

 

And you do realize, don't you, that the lockdown (which you people want to continue seemingly indefinitely) will kill people too?  

 

For example ...

 

https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/1280195/coronavirus-lockdown-measures-study-research-revealed "Prolonged lockdown measures could kill hundreds of thousands, study reveals"

 

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/company/corporate-trends/lengthy-lockdown-will-kill-more-people-than-covid-murthy/articleshow/75459491.cms?from=mdr "Lengthy lockdown will kill more people than Covid: NR Narayana Murthy"

 

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-cost-special-r/special-report-how-the-covid-19-lockdown-will-take-its-own-toll-on-health-idUSKBN21L20C "Special Report: How the COVID-19 lockdown will take its own toll on health"


https://www.neweurope.eu/article/a-few-of-us-might-die-from-covid-19-but-the-current-worldwide-lockdown-will-kill-many-more-people/ "A few of us might die from COVID-19, but the current worldwide lockdown will kill many more people"

 

And those deaths will be on YOU.

 

Just saying ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, BeAChooser said:

 

Yet his poll numbers are looking great.

 

And you do realize, don't you, that the lockdown (which you people want to continue seemingly indefinitely) will kill people too?  

 

For example ...

 

https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/1280195/coronavirus-lockdown-measures-study-research-revealed "Prolonged lockdown measures could kill hundreds of thousands, study reveals"

 

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/company/corporate-trends/lengthy-lockdown-will-kill-more-people-than-covid-murthy/articleshow/75459491.cms?from=mdr "Lengthy lockdown will kill more people than Covid: NR Narayana Murthy"

 

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-cost-special-r/special-report-how-the-covid-19-lockdown-will-take-its-own-toll-on-health-idUSKBN21L20C "Special Report: How the COVID-19 lockdown will take its own toll on health"


https://www.neweurope.eu/article/a-few-of-us-might-die-from-covid-19-but-the-current-worldwide-lockdown-will-kill-many-more-people/ "A few of us might die from COVID-19, but the current worldwide lockdown will kill many more people"

 

And those deaths will be on YOU.

 

Just saying ...

Trump and you retards own this motherfucker!  Voters will show in droves to get rid of the cocksucker. It's fucking over!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, EltonJohnson said:

 

 

yeah,  they  need to  have this  wrapped up  ASAP...     it will tarnish  everyone, and I am sure  Trump has this timed for a reason

 

Grenell was a chess move.

Yep. We gonna be hearing s out all these revelations and indictments all the way to November. Biden may not last that long...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Squatchman said:

It's all just to divert attention away from his dismal future in his response to the virus.

 

 

What did he do wrong?  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


No holds barred chat

  • Hey kfools.. does this help? 


  • By Vegas

    Liberals are going to hell.


  • grgle



  • Where’s at @slideman?


  • Hola


  • I know this one, this new chat thing. I've seen it called the "shoutbox" among other things in my past. Very hard to hide from the chat box. The question is asked, there's no time to go search what other folks think, this is real time. Only seconds should be between chat box replies. This one is made for me. In the chat box one has to be quick on their feet with stuff at the ready. This chat box is the worst nightmare of anyone trying to deal with ol' teach. 


  • By pmurT

    hey @teacher that sounds like too much work for me LOL I need that useless thing called *time* in order to authenticate facts and truths which get posted by deceitful Dems


  • What does the red number refer to? currently, on my screen it says 2

     


  • Where does it say 2?


  • So. In the chat....if you tag a member the text afterwards should be a private message. 


  • How do? I'm teacher. If I'm online and the powers that be can figure out how to make it immediately apparent to me that whatever I've said here has been replied to I'm gonna show up right quick and kick some teeth in. It's the chat box, all this is new and scary. I know this gig. This starts now. 



  • Hey kfools, did you lose your securtiy cert? On my browser it is saying your site is not secure?


  • Mine too. I'm looking into it.


  • Mine too. 


  • I thought it was my location.. 


  • Just gave to renew the security cert. No big deal I'll do it tonight


  • OK thanks

     



  • Happy Anniversary, America... on your Civil Union.


  • All lives matter.


  • Double post deleted.


  • By teacher

    Scroll the other way for a while and you'll see me saying that these days the chat box ain't gonna work as one has to be quick on one's feet. The question is posed, there ain't no stinkin time for ya'll to refer to your betters for the answer, ya'll don't understand these things, this political debate, ya'll don't have the answer at hand, ya'll haven't thought this through, ya'll ain't ready for the next question I'll ask,  ya'll can't handle the pace that a bloke such as I can bring it in the chat box, ya'll can't handle this format.

     

    This one is made for me. 


  • By teacher

    Being offended does not make one correct. 


  • By teacher

    Some few days before the next election Mr. Fools is gonna pin my horse thread. it's gonna be horrible, I shall endevour every day to bring some some fresh. 

     

    I still own this cat box.


  • By teacher

    "I'm coming to you for ask a quick favor."


  • By teacher

    "Anyone that places a color in front of their name is racist." That one is not mine, got it from another member. 


  • Where’s all the hot bitches? 


  • By teacher

    Kidding me? 


  • How do I get rid of this chatroom box?


  • How do I get rid of this chatroom box?


  • Get me out of Chatbox!


  • By jefftec

    The chatbox stays expanded and is a nuisance blocking screen images. What setting is there to control/collapse chatbox?


  • By kfools

    Just click the no holds barred to collapse it.


  • diddle dee dee


  • By teacher

    Like Jesse Ventura said to all that would not take a chew in the movie "Predator." LF.org is a political debate forum. This chatbox just ups the opportunity to go at it. Ya'll have your political views, seems to me that ya'll should have thought these things out and be ready to battle. 


  • By teacher

    Is real time political debate a thing ya'll hide from? What do you morons do if you happen to run into some one with opposing political views on the street? 


  • By teacher

    I've never ran into anyone, in real life,  that said Obama lied. I run into folks that tell me Trump lies. I'm at work. I didn't bring it up. I don't reply, I'm representing a company. Not my place. 


  • By teacher

    Lookie there, all I have to do is get out and come back. Why is it that liberals, when they have a company man before them decide they that is the time they go off? Why would ya'll put a company man into that position? 


  • By teacher

    Chatbox is mine. 


  • By teacher

    There is no such thing as "reverse discrimination." There is only discrimination. To imply that black on white discrimination is reverse discrimination sort of lends some justification to the idea of so-called "reverse discrimination." Any discrimination is wrong. Original idea supplied to me by a man called Kyle. Credit where credit is due.


  • By teacher

    How do? I'm teacher. I told you unwashed masses long ago in this, the chat box what the rules were.  Told you all that I would rule the chat box. Go check it out. Scroll some. The chat box is supposed to be a place where debate can happen damn near instantaneously. At the onset I said that the chat box wouldn't fly and that is because the chat box demands that all needs to be ready for real time debate. Everybody but I fails.


You don't have permission to chat in this chatroom
×
×
  • Create New...