Jump to content
TBHWT

The Biden–Kavanaugh Double Standard

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, BatteryPowered said:

I think I have stated here before, but just in case it was elsewhere;

 

I give Biden the same benefit of the doubt I gave Kavanaugh and anyone accused of something years/decades after it allegedly happened.  Until corroborating admissible evidence can be presented there is no need for a criminal investigation and (in this case) he is innocent until proven otherwise beyond a reasonable doubt.

 

What "criminal investigation" are you talking about?   I'm talking about the 2020 elections!   We're not a jury.... we're voters.   And voters need to have all the information about the person they decide to elect.    There is much evidence that Kavanaugh is guilty.  Way beyond the statement of his accuser.   Same goes for Trump. 

 

Right now, for Biden we only have the word of his accuser.  Which should not be disregarded.  But it's all we have right now.

 

But "criminal investigation"... That's nonsense!    The statute of limitations has expired for Biden's accuser, for Kavanaugh's, Moore's and for several of Trump's.   So your post is nonsense. 

 

The rest of your post, qualifying the accusers instead of the accused is just plain disgusting..

  • MORON! 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obama published two books about his education and his life. ILLITERATES of course, did not read them as they knew that Obama was "a half breed"  that they would dislike, because they were BIGOTS and IMBECILES.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, RichardFeynmanLives said:

 

What "criminal investigation" are you talking about?   I'm talking about the 2020 elections!   We're not a jury.... we're voters.   And voters need to have all the information about the person they decide to elect.    There is much evidence that Kavanaugh is guilty.  Way beyond the statement of his accuser.   Same goes for Trump. 

 

Right now, for Biden we only have the word of his accuser.  Which should not be disregarded.  But it's all we have right now.

 

But "criminal investigation"... That's nonsense!    The statute of limitations has expired for Biden's accuser, for Kavanaugh's, Moore's and for several of Trump's.   So your post is nonsense. 

 

The rest of your post, qualifying the accusers instead of the accused is just plain disgusting..

 

"All women should be believed".

                                                          The Democrat National Committee.

 

But...……….not white, Christian, GOP, women ????           WTF ???

 

Did the Dems want war with GOP ?

Want one----got one !!!

 

"Never settle with words what you can

accomplish with a flame-thrower".

                                                                   An Old Texas Saying.                           🤠…… 🍺   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Taipan said:

 

"All women should be believed".

                                                          The Democrat National Committee.

 

But...……….not white, Christian, GOP, women ????           WTF ???

 

Did the Dems want war with GOP ?

Want one----got one !!!

 

"Never settle with words what you can

accomplish with a flame-thrower".

                                                                   An Old Texas Saying.                           🤠…… 🍺   

There is no such thing as "The Democrat National Committee".   You have been bamboozled!

 

The source of that quote is... why... No other than Tucker Carlson.   

 

But, regardless of who said it, the statement is idiotic.   The correct statement is that all women should be regarded as credible. in sexual abuse cases.   Not "believed"  It would be immoral to regard their statements as not credible without even investigating.   But that's what Republicans do.  Not Democrats!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, RichardFeynmanLives said:

There is no such thing as "The Democrat National Committee".   You have been bamboozled!

 

The source of that quote is... why... No other than Tucker Carlson.   

 

But, regardless of who said it, the statement is idiotic.   The correct statement is that all women should be regarded as credible. in sexual abuse cases.   Not "believed"  It would be immoral to regard their statements as not credible without even investigating.   But that's what Republicans do.  Not Democrats!

 

Melissa Milano, Susan Sarandon, Stephanie Miller, Rachel Maddow, Joy Behar,

and Rosie O'Donnell...….. all said the exact same thing.  Now,...…….they are all......

back-peddling off the battlefield.

 

What a bunch of goddamn  HYPOCRITES !!      The Dem women are just sickening..... with their hypocrisy.

What a bunch of skanks !!                                      🍺

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Taipan said:

 

Melissa Milano, Susan Sarandon, Stephanie Miller, Rachel Maddow, Joy Behar,

and Rosie O'Donnell...….. all said the exact same thing.  Now,...…….they are all......

back-peddling off the battlefield.

 

Oh my God!   And you think that's the "Democrat National Committee"?

 

BTW, I know you're just pulling  names out of your ass.   But you have no real quotes. 

 

Just so you know you are fooling nobody.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RichardFeynmanLives said:

Oh my God!   And you think that's the "Democrat National Committee"?

 

BTW, I know you just threw in names there off the top of your head.  But you have no real quotes. 

 

Just so you know you are fooling nobody.

 

 

 

Dem thought is very easy to understand.

And yes, Texas men will have sex with Dem whores.

But to be honest, we really don't want marry those dirty sluts.  

What is your mother's name?   Maybe I know her(intimately).

 

This is No Holds Barred.      

"If you can't stand the heat,...…..then stay out of the kitchen".

                                                                                                              President Harry S. Truman.

                                                                                                              1945.                                                                    🍺 

    

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, XavierOnassis said:

Obama published two books about his education and his life. ILLITERATES of course, did not read them as they knew that Obama was "a half breed"  that they would dislike, because they were BIGOTS and IMBECILES.

Illiterates don't read period, that means you are also an imbecile, most the people that voted for him didn't read either. Now why don't you run along and find some punctuation or missed spelled words to correct BIGOT!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, RichardFeynmanLives said:

There is no such thing as "The Democrat National Committee".   You have been bamboozled!

 

The source of that quote is... why... No other than Tucker Carlson.   

 

But, regardless of who said it, the statement is idiotic.   The correct statement is that all women should be regarded as credible. in sexual abuse cases.   Not "believed"  It would be immoral to regard their statements as not credible without even investigating.   But that's what Republicans do.  Not Democrats!

Who is the head of the Democratic National Committee?
Former US Labor Secretary Tom Perez edged Minnesota Rep. Keith Ellison by 35 votes Saturday to become the head of the Democratic National Committee.
What GD leftist sewer did you crawl out of Newbie? I suggest you go back to wherever the hell you came from you lying fuckin leftist agitator!!!
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, TBHWT said:

I agree with most of what you said, but lets not forget the left is desperate they really don't care at this point who get's the nod. We already know that they voted in an obscure half breed that absolutely nobody knew anything about other than he was a great firebrand. Then they went for the scoundrel, so we already know that they're dumb enough to vote for anybody and to cheat in anyway possible to get what they want, they've proven that in the last four years. 

I get all of that.  However, who do  you think makes the strongest ticket with Biden?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Skans said:

I get all of that.  However, who do  you think makes the strongest ticket with Biden?

Probably Pocahontas. she'd reel in all the radicals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, RichardFeynmanLives said:

Bet on what?  That they won't be investigated.   I don't bet.  But it would be a pretty safe bet that Trump's won't be.   Not while he's President, anyway.

Homo butt sex is a gamble.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, Skans said:

I get all of that.  However, who do  you think makes the strongest ticket with Biden?

A newly-launched committee called “Draft Michelle Obama” is pushing for Joe Biden, the apparent Democrat presidential nominee, to select the former first lady as his running mate.

“Joe Biden has said he would choose Michelle Obama as his running mate ‘in a heartbeat.’ The aim of this campaign is to build on the substantial grassroots support for a potential Michelle Obama candidacy and help garner media attention for a vice-presidential nominee who has the power to beat Donald Trump,” the group said in a statement released Monday.

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Taipan said:

 

Dem thought is very easy to understand.

And yes, Texas men will have sex with Dem whores.

But to be honest, we really don't want marry those dirty sluts.  

What is your mother's name?   Maybe I know her(intimately).

 

This is No Holds Barred.      

"If you can't stand the heat,...…..then stay out of the kitchen".

                                                                                                              President Harry S. Truman.

                                                                                                              1945.                                                                    🍺 

    

 

 

 

That's beyond "no hold barred".  That's vulgar.   Seek help!

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, TBHWT said:
Who is the head of the Democratic National Committee?
Former US Labor Secretary Tom Perez edged Minnesota Rep. Keith Ellison by 35 votes Saturday to become the head of the Democratic National Committee.
 

Oh wow!  You know who the Chair of the DNC is. 

 

So?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TBHWT said:

Probably Pocahontas. she'd reel in all the radicals.

And, then blacks would be pissed.  They don't like Lizzy Warren.  Neither do normal women. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Biden and Michelle would easily stomp the poo out of the ignoramus Trump. But I do not think she will win.

I would say that Stacy Abrams is the most likely. She is a good speaker and  Southern Black voter who would get out the Black vote that is needed to flatten Trump.

Personally, I like Warren a bit more because I am more familiar with her and she is VERY good at planning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Skans said:

And, then blacks would be pissed.  They don't like Lizzy Warren.  Neither do normal women. 

You know "normal women"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, TBHWT said:

A newly-launched committee called “Draft Michelle Obama” is pushing for Joe Biden, the apparent Democrat presidential nominee, to select the former first lady as his running mate.

“Joe Biden has said he would choose Michelle Obama as his running mate ‘in a heartbeat.’ The aim of this campaign is to build on the substantial grassroots support for a potential Michelle Obama candidacy and help garner media attention for a vice-presidential nominee who has the power to beat Donald Trump,” the group said in a statement released Monday.

That would at least get the black vote out.  Likely his best choice.  But, Michelle comes off as angry and doesn't have the same ability to rally crowds that Barack had. I think she's just Hillary #2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, XavierOnassis said:

I would say that Stacy Abrams is the most likely.

Choosing her would be a huge mistake.   Michelle would be a much better choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, XavierOnassis said:

You know "normal women"?

A few. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Skans said:

That would at least get the black vote out.  Likely his best choice.  But, Michelle comes off as angry and doesn't have the same ability to rally crowds that Barack had. I think she's just Hillary #2.

I agree, she has also stated no way she wants anything to do again with the white house again. But there's a liar born every minute. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, TBHWT said:

I agree, she has also stated no way she wants anything to do again with the white house again. But there's a liar born every minute. 

Michelle would be his best choice, but she is not nearly good enough to make up for Biden's shortfalls.  I think the Dems who once supported the midget billionaire are trying to get behind the retarded New York governor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, XavierOnassis said:

You know "normal women"?

Of course, he's not like you. Stacey Abrams is normal in your world? She couldn't even accept defeat. Kind of like you here everyday.  You just keep shooting of your big mouth.

 

Image may contain: 1 person, closeup

                  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Skans said:

Michelle would be his best choice, but she is not nearly good enough to make up for Biden's shortfalls.  I think the Dems who once supported the midget billionaire are trying to get behind the retarded New York governor.

Could be, they sure like seeing him everyday on the telly. They haven't even figured out yet that the rest of America isn't NY. And lets not forget that he and DeBlasio were detrimental for the high rate of deaths in NY and telling us how he didn't have enough ventilators or masks which turned out to be false they never even used the thousands they had. I'll say this if democrats win we'll all be screwed. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


No holds barred chat

  • Hey kfools.. does this help? 


  • By Vegas

    Liberals are going to hell.


  • grgle



  • Where’s at @slideman?


  • Hola


  • I know this one, this new chat thing. I've seen it called the "shoutbox" among other things in my past. Very hard to hide from the chat box. The question is asked, there's no time to go search what other folks think, this is real time. Only seconds should be between chat box replies. This one is made for me. In the chat box one has to be quick on their feet with stuff at the ready. This chat box is the worst nightmare of anyone trying to deal with ol' teach. 


  • By pmurT

    hey @teacher that sounds like too much work for me LOL I need that useless thing called *time* in order to authenticate facts and truths which get posted by deceitful Dems


  • What does the red number refer to? currently, on my screen it says 2

     


  • Where does it say 2?


  • So. In the chat....if you tag a member the text afterwards should be a private message. 


  • How do? I'm teacher. If I'm online and the powers that be can figure out how to make it immediately apparent to me that whatever I've said here has been replied to I'm gonna show up right quick and kick some teeth in. It's the chat box, all this is new and scary. I know this gig. This starts now. 



  • Hey kfools, did you lose your securtiy cert? On my browser it is saying your site is not secure?


  • Mine too. I'm looking into it.


  • Mine too. 


  • I thought it was my location.. 


  • Just gave to renew the security cert. No big deal I'll do it tonight


  • OK thanks

     



  • Happy Anniversary, America... on your Civil Union.


  • All lives matter.


  • Double post deleted.


  • By teacher

    Scroll the other way for a while and you'll see me saying that these days the chat box ain't gonna work as one has to be quick on one's feet. The question is posed, there ain't no stinkin time for ya'll to refer to your betters for the answer, ya'll don't understand these things, this political debate, ya'll don't have the answer at hand, ya'll haven't thought this through, ya'll ain't ready for the next question I'll ask,  ya'll can't handle the pace that a bloke such as I can bring it in the chat box, ya'll can't handle this format.

     

    This one is made for me. 


  • By teacher

    Being offended does not make one correct. 


  • By teacher

    Some few days before the next election Mr. Fools is gonna pin my horse thread. it's gonna be horrible, I shall endevour every day to bring some some fresh. 

     

    I still own this cat box.


  • By teacher

    "I'm coming to you for ask a quick favor."


  • By teacher

    "Anyone that places a color in front of their name is racist." That one is not mine, got it from another member. 


  • Where’s all the hot bitches? 


  • By teacher

    Kidding me? 


  • How do I get rid of this chatroom box?


  • How do I get rid of this chatroom box?


  • Get me out of Chatbox!


  • By jefftec

    The chatbox stays expanded and is a nuisance blocking screen images. What setting is there to control/collapse chatbox?


  • By kfools

    Just click the no holds barred to collapse it.


  • diddle dee dee


  • By teacher

    Like Jesse Ventura said to all that would not take a chew in the movie "Predator." LF.org is a political debate forum. This chatbox just ups the opportunity to go at it. Ya'll have your political views, seems to me that ya'll should have thought these things out and be ready to battle. 


  • By teacher

    Is real time political debate a thing ya'll hide from? What do you morons do if you happen to run into some one with opposing political views on the street? 


  • By teacher

    I've never ran into anyone, in real life,  that said Obama lied. I run into folks that tell me Trump lies. I'm at work. I didn't bring it up. I don't reply, I'm representing a company. Not my place. 


  • By teacher

    Lookie there, all I have to do is get out and come back. Why is it that liberals, when they have a company man before them decide they that is the time they go off? Why would ya'll put a company man into that position? 


  • By teacher

    Chatbox is mine. 


  • By teacher

    There is no such thing as "reverse discrimination." There is only discrimination. To imply that black on white discrimination is reverse discrimination sort of lends some justification to the idea of so-called "reverse discrimination." Any discrimination is wrong. Original idea supplied to me by a man called Kyle. Credit where credit is due.


  • By teacher

    How do? I'm teacher. I told you unwashed masses long ago in this, the chat box what the rules were.  Told you all that I would rule the chat box. Go check it out. Scroll some. The chat box is supposed to be a place where debate can happen damn near instantaneously. At the onset I said that the chat box wouldn't fly and that is because the chat box demands that all needs to be ready for real time debate. Everybody but I fails.


You don't have permission to chat in this chatroom
×
×
  • Create New...