Jump to content

Font size, 30-second break, word-count limit...


Font size, 30-second break, word-count limit...  

47 members have voted

  1. 1. Are you in favour of removing or severely restricting the feature that allows changes in font size?

    • Yes, I want it removed.
      17
    • No, I want to be able to change font sizes in my posts
      31
  2. 2. Are you in favour of imposing a 30-second break between posts IN THE SAME THREAD

    • Yes, I think a lot of one-sentence posts could be compiled into a single post to keep conversations coherent.
      28
    • No, I want to post in a rapid-fire style so that my opponents are overwhelmed by my intellectual assault
      19
  3. 3. Are you in favour of imposing a word-count limit per post. It would be roughly 1000 words.

    • Yes, I am in favour of a word-count limit.
      25
    • No, there should be no limit on how long a post is.
      22


Recommended Posts

  • kking pinned this topic
  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

17 minutes ago, Duck615 said:

With this poll, please do not allow willfranklin to use his soks to vote also

+100...or at all!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of the listed?

 

In this sandbox,

Large Font

...can be accepted as infantile yelling.

 

There are times when large(er) font is useful, say up to 24 pt., for titles and the like.

 

16-18 is good for monitors at distance.

 

 

Post when you need to - why regulate that.

 

 

Also think WOT's are infrequent enough not to warrant regulation.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SixShooter said:

Cannot vote options for #1 because they don't match the question. Yes, changing font size should be restricted but not removed.

 

Since the field is required I cannot vote in the poll.

Thats what I was trying to tell him. This should only apply to people like Penis69 who uses it as a default.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Question:

If the owner of the site says he's going to limit the post by size and duration and this is a dictatorship... Why the hell is there even a vote?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, KneeJerk said:

834361b09143f71fbbc0c5a04cec7ada--joe-bi

"24 font makes for good captions."

 

I'd remove the childish text colors.

 

 

kj

 

Don't get me started on Crayons...

 

...again.

 

...some more.

 

Ha!

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, 1AC said:

Question:

If the owner of the site says he's going to limit the post by size and duration and this is a dictatorship... Why the hell is there even a vote?

Because of the word benevolent.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, SixShooter said:

Cannot vote options for #1 because they don't match the question. Yes, changing font size should be restricted but not removed.

 

Since the field is required I cannot vote in the poll.

First option can be read as, "Yes, I want the changes in font size removed or severely restricted."

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, kking said:

This will be up for three days. 

 

4 hours ago, Blue Devil said:

Of the listed?

 

In this sandbox,

Large Font

...can be accepted as infantile yelling.

 

There are times when large(er) font is useful, say up to 24 pt., for titles and the like.

 

16-18 is good for monitors at distance.

 

I can't define pronography BUT I know it when I see it.

 

I think Blue Devil nails in down.

 

Point 2: No

 

Point 3: Yes except for wassik.

 

5 hours ago, leftwinger said:

Easy solution:

 

Put the people you don't want to read on ignore. Even a grade schooler could figure this out. Are right winger this stupid?! Yes. And they're whining sissies.

 

You're a azzhole drone...kk did not ask for your solution; he asked for opinions as a group.

 

Sometimes I read your post...sometimes I don't; no need for a total shun.

 

Once again...you are a azzhole drone.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, kking said:

This will be up for three days. 

 

It might be okay for OTHER FORUMS  like "debate",  Libs Only, etc , where they already have to put up with so many restrictions  .  .  .  

 

.  .  .  BUT ABSOLUTELY NOT FOR THE NHB Forum !

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, leftwinger said:

Easy solution:

 

Put the people you don't want to read on ignore. Even a grade schooler could figure this out. Are right winger this stupid?! Yes. And they're whining sissies.

 

Good Idea.

 

So you are now put where you think you need to be put!! ON IGGY!!!

ROFLMAO!!!

See, that was EASY!!!

 

NO reason to read your one line, imbecilic, moronic and utterly STUPID bullshit any longer!!!

Say goodnight Gracie!!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, leftwinger said:

Easy solution:

 

Put the people you don't want to read on ignore. Even a grade schooler could figure this out. Are right winger this stupid?! Yes. And they're whining sissies.

That doesn't help lurkers.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • kking changed the title to Font size, 30-second break, word-count limit...
  • kking unpinned this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...