Jump to content
benson13

Julian Assange says he was promised a Trump pardon if he would lie about Russia’s DNC hacking

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, NeoConvict said:

Exactly. He wasn't asked to lie, just repeat what he has been saying for four years.

so why would dana go all the way over seas to ask him to repeat what he already said and if he did he would try to talk preznit deadbeat into granting him a pardon. that makes even less sense.

is dana that Bad wording stupid?

I mean who sitting in jail would trust the promise of Donald trump?

Julie isn't that stupid

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, harryramar said:
5 minutes ago, harryramar said:

I smell a rat.

. dana rohrabach is a man male. for an opinionated old fart you don't know many facts.

 

That is the rat hair your made of hairball that you smell. It's your asss!  I don't give a Bad word what the goddamn motherfu(ker is...That is a useless fact...means nothing to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Buffalo said:

That is the rat hair your made of hairball that you smell. It's your asss!  I don't give a Bad word what the goddamn motherfu(ker is...That is a useless fact...means nothing to me.

ok then let's reason it out. we have been told over and over again that Julie already stated on many occasions that Russia had nothing to do with it.'why would a former congressman go over there on his own dime and ask Julie to repeat the same thing over and over again ???

and why dangle a pardon in front of him to say what he is on the record of already saying???

that makes no sense whatsoever.

no wonder pr is considered the smartest of you dopes.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, harryramar said:

so why would dana go all the way over seas to ask him to repeat what he already said and if he did he would try to talk preznit deadbeat into granting him a pardon. that makes even less sense.

is dana that Bad wording stupid?

I mean who sitting in jail would trust the promise of Donald trump?

Julie isn't that stupid

 

Nope, he nailed Hillary in numerous crimes and you crooks tried to throw it under the rug.Time to pay the Bar tab crooks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 123urout said:

Nope, he nailed Hillary in numerous crimes and you crooks tried to throw it under the rug.Time to pay the Bar tab crooks!

so why would anyone ask Julie to repeat what he has said over and over in exchange for the worthless promise of a pardon by deadbeat don?

no one seems to be able to come up with an excuse .

it makes no sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, harryramar said:

so why would anyone ask Julie to repeat what he has said over and over in exchange for the worthless promise of a pardon by deadbeat don?

no one seems to be able to come up with an excuse .

it makes no sense.

If you are stupid it makes no sense.In other words.......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, benson13 said:

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange told a British court on Tuesday that he had been promised a pardon by people close to President Donald Trump.

 

Assange made the remarks while appearing at a pretrial hearing via teleconference.

 

Courtroom reporter James Doleman broke the news on Twitter. According to Doleman, Assange said that the pardon was conditional on him publicly announcing that Russia had nothing to do with the attack on the 2016 election.

 

 

Breaking, at pre-trial hearing for Julian Assange a court has heard that he will be calling a witness who will allege he was offered a pardon by the US government, if he would say Russia was not involved in the leak of DNC documents during the 2006 election.

 
 
 

Julian Assange court appearance today- His lawyer mentioned a statement, that alleges former US Congressman Dana Rohrabacher visited Assange, saying he was there on behalf of the President, offering a pardon if JA would say Russia had nothing to do with DNC leaks. @SBSNews

 
 

 

 

In 2017, a The Wall Street Journal report said that Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) attempted to broker a deal for a pardon or clemency between the White House and Assange.

 

Assange is wanted in the United States on 18 counts of violating espionage laws and conspiring to hack government computers.

You know how I know this is fake news?  Julian Assange has already publicly said Russia had nothing to do with DNC leaks, or at least what wikileaks had.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, rightturnsonly said:

You know how I know this is fake news?  Julian Assange has already publicly said Russia had nothing to do with DNC leaks, or at least what wikileaks had.

 

 

Reverend Hairy gets his news straight from the George Soros propaganda machine.He wont understand truth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, rightturnsonly said:

You know how I know this is fake news?  Julian Assange has already publicly said Russia had nothing to do with DNC leaks, or at least what wikileaks had.

 

 

well derrrrpp! that makes dana's excuse even mre preposterous. why would he spend his own money as a private citizen to ask Julie to say what he has already said so may times

 think for a minute

 you will see it makes no sense and dana is lying

so dana claims he spent his own dough to visit Assange in prison to ask to to say what he has said many times before.

and dana will ask trump to grant a pardon????

that is absurd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, harryramar said:

well derrrrpp! that makes dana's excuse even mre preposterous. why would he spend his own money as a private citizen to ask Julie to say what he has already said so may times

 think for a minute

 you will see it makes no sense and dana is lying

so dana claims he spent his own dough to visit Assange in prison to ask to to say what he has said many times before.

and dana will ask trump to grant a pardon????

that is absurd.

Hairy, seriously, you cant even figure out that killing a baby is wrong.You seriously need to start over in life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, harryramar said:

right like he is gonna squeal on putin and get iced by the Russian thug.

 


Perhaps it was under duress when he said it. He did say it nonetheless. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, neue regel said:


Perhaps it was under duress when he said it. He did say it nonetheless. 

 

Russians hacked DNC emails and accounts. 448 pages of documentation by Mueller.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We know.

 

trump has signaled that he would pardon or evoke EP in order to silence would be detractors &/or informants.

 

There is literally no other plausible explanation.

 

None.  Zero.

 

He is using the powers of the office to protect his own personal/political interests.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, neue regel said:


Perhaps it was under duress when he said it. He did say it nonetheless. 

yes so why would a clown like dana spend all that money to ask him to say what he has said repeatedly. does that make sense?

dana is obviously lying and his story is glaringly absurd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, harryramar said:

yes so why would a clown like dana spend all that money to ask him to say what he has said repeatedly. does that make sense?

dana is obviously lying and his story is glaringly absurd


No, it doesn’t sound quite right. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, CrimeaRiver said:

 

 

Julian's lawyer will say

 

to help Julian

 

That's her job

 

Lawyers are mostly liars - we all know that

Why would Dana offer such a huge bribe if Julie would simply repeat what he has said before

sum ting wong😬

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, harryramar said:

Why would Dana offer such a huge bribe if Julie would simply repeat what he has said before

sum ting wong😬

Yu have head filled wit rice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, harryramar said:

Why would Dana offer such a huge bribe if Julie would simply repeat what he has said before

sum ting wong😬

^^believes lawyers words.....Dupie McDupster:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, harryramar said:

well derrrrpp! that makes dana's excuse even mre preposterous. why would he spend his own money as a private citizen to ask Julie to say what he has already said so may times

 think for a minute

 you will see it makes no sense and dana is lying

so dana claims he spent his own dough to visit Assange in prison to ask to to say what he has said many times before.

and dana will ask trump to grant a pardon????

that is absurd.

Okay, I may have been wrong.  Let's see, Hannity's interview was posted Jan 3, 2017.  I'm assuming you think Dana brokered this deal for Trump before this date.  From this link

https://www.wsj.com/articles/gop-congressman-sought-trump-deal-on-wikileaks-russia-1505509918?tesla=y#comments_sector

 

it starts out

Quote

WASHINGTON—A U.S. congressman contacted the White House

this week trying to broker a deal that would end WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange’s U.S. legal troubles in exchange for what he described as evidence that Russia wasn’t the source of hacked emails published by the antisecrecy website during the 2016 presidential campaign.

under the title it says

Quote

Updated Sept. 15, 2017 6:06 pm ET

 

Now I would argue that Jan 3, 2017 happened BEFORE September 15, 2017 and that the reference to "this week" in the WSJ article implies the event happened in the week surrounding September 15, 2017. 

Now, perhaps the word 'updated' means the article was made some time earlier, but that would leave readers uninformed about the date "this week" is referring to, which would be bad journalism.  So, Assange had publicly commented on this issue.

 

Furthermore, "in exchange for what he described as evidence" from the WSJ isn't the same as Assange saying, "that the pardon was conditional on him publicly announcing that Russia had nothing to do with the attack on the 2016 election".  Assange can publicly say what he wants but that needs to be backed up with evidence.

 

and never forget, that you added the word "lie" to your thread title as if Assange used the word.  I'm sure you learned this tactic from Schiff and his false reading into the record of Trump's phone call with the Ukrainian President.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, CrimeaRiver said:

^^believes lawyers words.....Dupie McDupster:lol:

Noooooo

pay attention ivan

dana said he would ask trump for a pardon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, harryramar said:

Noooooo

pay attention ivan

dana said he would ask trump for a pardon

Gutted McFainty the SeizureWhore?

Image result for hillary seizure gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...